PDA

View Full Version : London Newspaper To Report Saddam Met Osama Bin Laden In Baghdad In 1998


RINGLEADER
10-15-2004, 07:04 PM
According to Saddam's attorney. Reported on the ticker at the bottom of <a href="http://www.memri.org/">this page</a>

Don't know which newspaper it is yet. Will post when I find it.

BroWhippendiddle
10-15-2004, 07:11 PM
According to Saddam's attorney. Reported on the ticker at the bottom of this page (http://www.memri.org/)

Don't know which newspaper it is yet. Will post when I find it.

That can't be true, you see the 9/11 Commission said there were no links between the two. Not to mention all of the libs on this board.

The Pedestrian
10-15-2004, 07:14 PM
To use the libs' own words against them:

BOO-YAH!!!

nychief
10-15-2004, 07:18 PM
That can't be true, you see the 9/11 Commission said there were no links between the two. Not to mention all of the libs on this board.



oh it must be true. come on, the entire intelligence community says there was no connection. Besides, isn't this the Liberal media just trying to sway the election again? :banghead:

the Talking Can
10-15-2004, 07:34 PM
october surprise

I'm shocked....really....I'll be even more shocked when it is retracted right after the election...really....

MadProphetMargin
10-15-2004, 07:49 PM
october surprise

I'm shocked....really....I'll be even more shocked when it is retracted right after the election...really....

I'm not sure the Mirror does retractions. ROFL

Frankie
10-15-2004, 07:52 PM
october surprise

I'm shocked....really....I'll be even more shocked when it is retracted right after the election...really....

:clap:

KCWolfman
10-15-2004, 07:53 PM
october surprise

I'm shocked....really....I'll be even more shocked when it is retracted right after the election...really....
I'm shocked anyone would actually believe an "october surprise" would come from a hardly viewed website.

|Zach|
10-15-2004, 08:03 PM
It will be interesting to see how this pans out. I was under the impression that Bin Laden;s family didn't associate with him.

whoman69
10-15-2004, 09:52 PM
Even if true, it doesn't mean they got along or agreed to anything. Both had too big an ego to cooperate and their goals were 180 degrees apart.

Frankie
10-15-2004, 11:58 PM
It will be interesting to see how this pans out. I was under the impression that Bin Laden;s family didn't associate with him.

No... They associated with the Bush family. Neat, isn't it?

KCWolfman
10-16-2004, 08:06 AM
No... They associated with the Bush family. Neat, isn't it?
And the Clintons, and the Reagans, etc etc etc

Chief Henry
10-16-2004, 08:45 AM
Even if true, it doesn't mean they got along or agreed to anything. Both had too big an ego to cooperate and their goals were 180 degrees apart.


:bong:

Baby Lee
10-16-2004, 08:56 AM
october surprise

I'm shocked....really....I'll be even more shocked when it is retracted right after the election...really....
Kudos to Rove for engineering a 'surprise' across an Ocean in a country with supposedly virulent anti-Bush fellings, especially in the media.

KCWolfman
10-16-2004, 09:16 AM
Even if true, it doesn't mean they got along or agreed to anything. Both had too big an ego to cooperate and their goals were 180 degrees apart.
That is a helluva setup if the story is true. I give it a 3.25 on the CYA scale.

stevieray
10-16-2004, 09:29 AM
No... They associated with the Bush family. Neat, isn't it?

Good of you to put both of those azzholes integrity over our own President. I think I now know why your country and the ME is so screwed up.

Jenson71
10-16-2004, 09:40 AM
We've known this for quite some time.

Here is Saddam making his weekly call to Osama last year...

Frankie
10-16-2004, 11:01 AM
Good of you to put both of those azzholes integrity over our own President. I think I now know why your country and the ME is so screwed up.

Whatever...
:rolleyes: