View Full Version : McGlockton being out meant NOTHING!!

10-22-2000, 03:48 PM
The D-line actually played better without that lazy fatbody out there. The good play of Williams AND Browning is proof that McGlockton's "supporting cast" is anything but, and that not every good D-line play is caused by Glock's so-called "disruption" of the offense.

Maybe these other guys will finally get the credit they deserve.

[This message has been edited by Clint in Wichita (edited 10-22-2000).]

10-22-2000, 03:51 PM
Weren't you guys ripping Dan Williams too? Oh well, I agree the DL had a great day.

10-22-2000, 03:51 PM
Good lord, Bob Dole agrees with Clint.

Circle the mutherfuc@in' wagons...

10-22-2000, 03:53 PM
I've been saying all season that DW is the best DT on the roster, but certainly not deserving of a $30 million contract.

Clint in Wichita
10-22-2000, 04:33 PM
How do we know he wouldn't have played well if he had played in this game? All I heard during the game was how the Rams OL was hurting. Either way, with Hicks probably seriously injured, we're going to need Chet...

10-22-2000, 05:26 PM
Apparently the DL will be just fine without him.

Clint in Wichita
10-22-2000, 06:34 PM
Clint, c'mon. You think Hicks was near the top of the league in sacks because Chet was standing around every game? If anything he is a little too aggressive sometimes which leads to the penalties and the out of position. But without Hicks, we NEED all the help we can get, otherwise the outside pass rush disappears against teams playing with healthy tackles...