PDA

View Full Version : What was the deal with the secondary today?


Rain Man
11-28-2004, 09:05 PM
I was out wandering in southwest Kansas and southeast Colorado this morning, and couldn't find a way to see the first half. I got lucky and found a sports bar right at halftime, and got to see the whole second half.

I couldn't help but notice that our starters were Warfield, McCleon, Pile, and Harts. I know that Woods was hurt, but what was the deal with McCleon and Pile. I saw Bartee out there at times, but I never saw Wesley all day.

Did anything else of interest happen in the first half?

Rausch
11-28-2004, 09:10 PM
Wesley was injured in pregame warmups...seriously.

Rain Man
11-28-2004, 09:14 PM
I was envisioning a Gunther mass-benching. I guess it didn't happen, eh?

FloridaChief
11-28-2004, 09:15 PM
Did McCleon win back the starting CB position from Bartee?

Rain Man
11-28-2004, 09:23 PM
I dunno. It looked like McCleon was starting in the second half, but I could be wrong.

FloridaChief
11-28-2004, 09:27 PM
I dunno. It looked like McCleon was starting in the second half, but I could be wrong.

I thought he started today. I could be wrong, not seeing the game. In any event, I saw on ESPN that Sexy Dexy had a nice hit on one of the Chargers receivers...

Skip Towne
11-28-2004, 09:30 PM
The trainers noticed a brain fart with Bartee in pre-game warmups but it was later determined to be a normal condition with him.

Rain Man
11-28-2004, 09:32 PM
Wesley was injured in pregame warmups...seriously.

He was seriously injured, or Seriously, he was injured?

KcMizzou
11-28-2004, 09:33 PM
He was seriously injured, or Seriously, he was injured?Pulled a hammy...

(Seriously, he was injured.)

HC_Chief
11-28-2004, 09:33 PM
Pulled his hammy during warmups.

FWIW, I thought the safety play was much improved over the previous 10 games.

KcMizzou
11-28-2004, 09:34 PM
FWIW, I thought the safety play was much improved over the previous 10 games. I didn't see the game, but Len and Mitch on 101 seemed to think so.

HC_Chief
11-28-2004, 09:37 PM
Harts can TACKLE. He flat out stopped LT AND Gates on more than one occassion.

Pile did okay, but got beat a couple of times by Gates.

Overall, I thought the safety play was much better. (hard not to be... with Woods diving out of the way of receivers and Wesley missing tackles; attempting to make a highlight reel hit)

Rausch
11-28-2004, 09:38 PM
Harts did get beat, but as a whole he didn't play too bad.

He's a helluva lot better tackler, and a helluva' lot more physical than anyone else we've seen there this year...

morphius
11-28-2004, 09:40 PM
Harts did get beat, but as a whole he didn't play too bad.

He's a helluva lot better tackler, and a helluva' lot more physical than anyone else we've seen there this year...
He also bit huge on the reverse that went for 40 yards as well...

alanm
11-28-2004, 09:41 PM
What was the deal with the secondary today? We have a secondary? :hmmm:

Nelson Muntz
11-28-2004, 09:45 PM
What was the deal with the secondary today?

They sucked a little less than normal?

Sure-Oz
11-28-2004, 10:38 PM
The best play was McCleon laying the wood on Gates.

bricks
11-28-2004, 10:48 PM
We have a secondary? :hmmm:

ROFL ROFL Yeah really. I don't see too many tackles back there. Are they pre-madonnas or football players?

Coach
11-29-2004, 12:20 AM
He also bit huge on the reverse that went for 40 yards as well...

Not if the DE's could at least stayed on their frigging lanes instead of crashing inside. Even a bootleg could spring a 40 yard gain out of that one.

ChiefsFanatik88
11-29-2004, 09:47 AM
He also bit huge on the reverse that went for 40 yards as well...

Do you think if he had played as much as Woods or Wesley, that he would have been beat? I think it's about time {long overdue} to replace Wesley and Woods until they bring make laying the Wood{no pun intended}