PDA

View Full Version : OFFICIAL [yes, I said OFFICIAL] Chiefs Vs Raiders Game Thread...


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Pitt Gorilla
12-05-2004, 06:12 PM
Its over its over its over, but i wonder if we are still gonna end this game on a sack ...Yeah, but, we would have more won with Scanlon, or something...

Valiant
12-05-2004, 06:12 PM
we dropped from 4thh to 6th im picks..oakland gets 5th for this week...



If we lose out on a stud impact player on D, that could get us a better shot at the championship was it worth it???

AZORChiefFan
12-05-2004, 06:12 PM
How did this game end without a game ending sack!????

Fairplay
12-05-2004, 06:12 PM
[SIZE=7]
Sorry, all you draft position fans, but you just got F*CKED today. THe Kansas City Chiefs Win!!!!




Easy come easy go.

Coach
12-05-2004, 06:12 PM
Congrats to teh Chiefs.
You won, we lost, and BOTH our Defense suck goats nutz

Yup, I agree with that. I wonder if that injury to Curry could had been a deciding factor?

KCJake
12-05-2004, 06:13 PM
Marty's teeth NASTY!!

Straight, No Chaser
12-05-2004, 06:13 PM
GAME OVER BITCHES!!!!!!! SO MUCH FOR OUR TOP 3 DRAFT PICK!!!! HA HA!!! GOOD JOB GUYS!!!

STFU Dumb Ass.

Pants
12-05-2004, 06:13 PM
Fvcking Oakland, can't beat the Chiefs when we need it. Raiders ****ing suck, Raiders fans MAY NOT talk shit EVAR again/!!~!11

David.
12-05-2004, 06:13 PM
Eh, I think that w/these personnel, it could be a lot better.

Granted AS isn't the one who drops balls, etc., but some of his calls have been questionable, to say the least.

really? You think the fact that we still score 30+ in our games without Priest shows how good AS is? perhaps?

KCJake
12-05-2004, 06:14 PM
we dropped from 4thh to 6th im picks..oakland gets 5th for this week...



If we lose out on a stud impact player on D, that could get us a better shot at the championship was it worth it???
I can't believe. IM OUT GOOD JOB CHIEFS :thumb:

Ugly Duck
12-05-2004, 06:14 PM
Raiders fans MAY NOT talk shit EVAR again/!!~!11I hear ya.... beating Denver last week screwed us bad....

Pitt Gorilla
12-05-2004, 06:14 PM
Middle first-rounders are "better" picks anyway; MUCH cheaper and usually just about as good. See Ed Reed, Kearse, et al. I presented a longer argument on this subject several years ago on this board, but it's long gone now.

KCJake
12-05-2004, 06:15 PM
STFU Dumb Ass.
Sorry dude. Some of us are real fans. We want our team to win :)

Straight, No Chaser
12-05-2004, 06:16 PM
TAKING A KNEE IN THE Raiders CRIB: PRICELESS

Straight, No Chaser
12-05-2004, 06:19 PM
Sorry dude. Some of us are real fans. We want our team to win :)

My !!#$%ing bad Jake. It was meant for Valiant... :redface:

Yosef_Malkovitch
12-05-2004, 06:21 PM
really? You think the fact that we still score 30+ in our games without Priest shows how good AS is? perhaps?

Meh. I'm not going to pursue this. I think that AS's playcalling speaks for itself; I think that w/these personnel we could do better.

TheNextStep
12-06-2004, 08:31 AM
Congratulations on the win, guys. I ended up getting sh*t-faced and don't really have many vivid memories of the second half... which is probably a good thing. Today I feel about as good as Derrick Blaylock must...

Anyway, congratulations, fellas. Now I really hope we ruin your Christmas! :)