PDA

View Full Version : LaDainian Tomlinson is a "small" RB?


John_Wayne
12-05-2004, 06:26 PM
I keep hearing that LT is a small RB. I just heard it again on NFL Primetime. They said it is especially surpirsing that he's as productive as he is because he's a small RB. What? He's 5'10" and 221 lbs. Priest is 5'9" and 213 lbs. I rarely, if ever hear Priest described as a small RB. Do you notice this too, or is it just me?

Saulbadguy
12-05-2004, 06:29 PM
He's not big. :shrug:

KingPriest2
12-05-2004, 06:33 PM
What are you talking about? I've heard Priest described as a small RB many times.

HolmeZz
12-05-2004, 06:48 PM
Priest IS a small back.

morphius
12-05-2004, 06:50 PM
Priest was used as a 3rd down back for a long time for a reason.

John_Wayne
12-05-2004, 07:23 PM
My point is that LT is bigger than Priest and I hear that he's a small RB more often than I hear it about Priest. I'd say Priest is a small RB and LT is an average size RB.

David.
12-05-2004, 07:52 PM
seriously...you have like 8 topics on the front page that say absolutely nothing of importance.

Valiant
12-05-2004, 07:56 PM
i think they both are small backs...

hell the average size of a nfl player is prolley around 6'2" or 6'3"..

Ultra Peanut
12-05-2004, 09:07 PM
LT is small, Priest is small, Faulk is small, "I am" Emmitt Smith is small, Barry Sanders was small, Oediportis isn't exactly large...

Rausch
12-05-2004, 09:08 PM
seriously...you have like 8 topics on the front page that say absolutely nothing of importance. :D

FloridaChief
12-05-2004, 09:11 PM
:D

And you brought this back up to the top! :mad:

Oh, shit--so did I..... :cuss: :banghead:

Bob Dole
12-05-2004, 09:12 PM
seriously...you have like 8 topics on the front page that say absolutely nothing of importance.

And you have roughly 4900 posts that meet that same criteria.

What's your point?

David.
12-05-2004, 09:14 PM
And you have roughly 4900 posts that meet that same criteria.

What's your point?

you're just mad because LJ had a good game.