PDA

View Full Version : Hey, That's Me! I'm Fuggin Suing....


CosmicPal
02-03-2005, 11:54 AM
What a crock.....

I'm sorry, but 15 million? The guy did a photo shoot and 16 years later he just happens to see his mug on the coffee jar....whatever.


Model Gets $15.6 Million Award From Nestle

Wed Feb 2, 10:03 AM

By LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - When it comes to coffee, Russell Christoff is more of a fresh-brewed than a freeze-dried kind of guy. So he never scrutinized the Taster's Choice label. When he finally did, he was staring back at himself.

While shopping for Bloody Mary mix at a drug store in 2002, the former actor and model saw a younger version of himself, the one who had once posed for the freeze-dried coffee brand.

True, the label only showed a man's eyes, nose and mouth hovering over a white coffee cup, but they were two eyes, a nose and a mouth Christoff knew exceptionally well.

"I looked at it and said, 'Expletive, that's me!'" Christoff, 58, recalled Tuesday, five days after a jury awarded him $15.6 million for Nestle USA's unauthorized use of his mug.

After two decades as a struggling performer, Christoff says he had all but forgotten the 1986 photo shoot where he spent two hours posing as "The Taster" in a red sweater. He received $250 for the job _ with the understanding that he would be paid $2,000 more if his image was selected to promote Taster's Choice in Canada.

He figured the job hadn't amounted to a hill of beans _ until he stumbled across his likeness in the drug store 16 years later. A legal dispute with Nestle USA ensued, during which Christoff declined the company's $100,000 settlement offer, and Nestle USA turned down his offer to settle for $8.5 million.

Since California has a law barring unauthorized use of a person's image for commercial purposes, Christoff's attorneys, Colin Claxon and Eric Stokel, said they knew they had adequate grounds for a lawsuit.

Last week, a Los Angeles County Superior Court jury ordered Nestle USA to pay Christoff $15.6 million for using his photograph without his permission and profiting from it.

Claxon said a confidentiality agreement prevented him from discussing how the jurors reached that amount, but the award includes 5 percent of the Glendale-based company's profit from Taster's Choice sales from 1997 to 2003, according to the Los Angeles Times.

During that time, Nestle sold eight varieties of the freeze-dried coffee with labels featuring Christoff's face in 18 countries, including the United States, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, Israel and Kuwait.

Nestle's Canadian arm started using the image without Christoff's knowledge in 1986, and Nestle USA imported it while revamping its coffee jars in 1997, Claxon said. The labels have since been changed to feature another model.

Nestle USA attorney Lawrence Heller said the company would appeal the verdict. "The employee that pulled the photo thought they had consent to use the picture," Heller told the Times.

Claxon said that even though the jury estimated that Christoff would probably have earned about $330,000 if Nestle had paid him for his likeness, millions in compensatory damages are fair because Christoff's face became "as much a part of the brand as Taster's Choice" during the six years it appeared on coffee jars, coupons and magazine ads.

Meanwhile, Christoff appeared in corporate training videos, hosted his own public television show about California parks, and had bit parts in the television series "Midnight Caller" and "Nash Bridges."

He said he was overwhelmed by the size of the jury award. But he said he felt gratified that he had taken a stand on behalf of all hardworking actors and models.

"Our image is our product, whether it's our face or our talent, and they took it improperly," he said.

Christoff is now in his second year as a kindergarten teacher in the Bay Area community of Antioch. With the case likely tied up in a protracted appeal, he said he doesn't plan to give up his day job anytime soon.

"I'm still just as poor as I was before," he said.

Brock
02-03-2005, 11:56 AM
Good for him. They deserve to be punished for selling dehydrated pig poop and calling it coffee anyway.

ENDelt260
02-03-2005, 11:57 AM
He's just following Tom Brady's example.

CosmicPal
02-03-2005, 12:00 PM
He's just following Tom Brady's example.

True dat.

But, for Brady's sake- he's famous. This guy is a washed up model/actor.

Rain Man
02-03-2005, 12:02 PM
Claxon said a confidentiality agreement prevented him from discussing how the jurors reached that amount, but the award includes 5 percent of the Glendale-based company's profit from Taster's Choice sales from 1997 to 2003, according to the Los Angeles Times.




It's a good thing the company was profitable. If Delta Airlines had used his image, he would've had to pay them about $50 million.


He deserved to get paid his $2,000 plus interest, plus some sort of punitive damage, but no way does he deserve $15+ million.

Amnorix
02-03-2005, 12:05 PM
$15+M is absurd, and I hope it's reduced on appeal.

Bearcat
02-03-2005, 12:06 PM
Model Gets $15.6 Million Award From Nestle

_ with the understanding that he would be paid $2,000 more if his image was selected to promote Taster's Choice in Canada.



So.... $2,000 turning into $15.6 million in 16 years.... that's quite a bit of interest.

ENDelt260
02-03-2005, 12:07 PM
He deserved to get paid his $2,000 plus interest, plus some sort of punitive damage, but no way does he deserve $15+ million.

He probably should've taken the 100 G's and run.

journeyscarab
02-03-2005, 12:13 PM
I can't believe he said 'Expletive, that's me!' Never use the word Expletive for an expletive.

InChiefsHell
02-03-2005, 12:23 PM
He probably should've taken the 100 G's and run.

Exactly. WHat a dumbass...of course, if this actually pans out then I guess he was "smart" for taking it to court. How the hell does Nestle do something so freakin stupid?

But no matter how stupid, it ain't worth 15 mil. He should have doubled their origional offer to 200,000, they prolly would have given it to him. Now, most of his award will go to some slimy bastard attorney... :shake:

Baby Lee
02-03-2005, 12:39 PM
But no matter how stupid, it ain't worth 15 mil.
A jury of his [and your] peers disagree, and they had the benefit of actually reviewing all the relevant evidence. I'll take their judgment over yours, thanks for weighing in though.

Alec R
02-03-2005, 12:41 PM
More power to him. Get in where you fit in and since they DID break the law, they should pay. If you can get 15 million from the bastards, get it. If you cant, get what you can.

Washed up? Probably, but hey, he hit his lick in time.

yunghungwell
02-03-2005, 12:43 PM
He said he was overwhelmed by the size of the jury award. But he said he felt gratified that he had taken a stand on behalf of all hardworking actors and models.

ROFL

LTownChief
02-03-2005, 01:14 PM
I think I'm going to rob a rich guys house and injure myself badly in the process and collect some damages!

R&GHomer
02-03-2005, 01:33 PM
15 million is crazy. If I were him, Id go back with an offer to the company for half the award. Look what happened to that lady with McDonalds. If I remember correctly she was originally awarded some 6 million and after all the appeals and what not, she ended up with 600k.

Baby Lee
02-03-2005, 02:46 PM
I think I'm going to rob a rich guys house and injure myself badly in the process and collect some damages!
Luck with that. That is absolutely NOT a retarded idea.

Rain Man
02-03-2005, 02:50 PM
ROFL

You've obviously never waited tables before. It's hard work.

picasso
02-03-2005, 03:02 PM
God you guys are negative about this story.
I think it's great! And if it was you who was on a store item package you would want your money to. I would. Think about the money made from that product over 16 years with your face on the cover. And if it was recently then they should have been found guilty for not getting the authority to use it. That's fair. People do have rights ya know.

Calcountry
02-03-2005, 04:06 PM
He's just following Tom Brady's example.ROFL

Calcountry
02-03-2005, 04:07 PM
He probably should've taken the 100 G's and run.A pig gets fat, and a hog gets stuck.

Iowanian
02-03-2005, 04:14 PM
15mil is ludicrus.........They surely could have found a similar no-name face on a package, determined the monetary gains that person had, multiplied it by time, added lawyer fees and a small "attaboy" and called it good.

This is exactly the type of lawsuit that should be limited.

Rain Man
02-03-2005, 04:17 PM
God you guys are negative about this story.
I think it's great! And if it was you who was on a store item package you would want your money to. I would. Think about the money made from that product over 16 years with your face on the cover. And if it was recently then they should have been found guilty for not getting the authority to use it. That's fair. People do have rights ya know.

So you think the guy's time is worth $7,800,125 per hour? That's what he's getting paid, by his own account.

Baby Lee
02-03-2005, 04:56 PM
So you think the guy's time is worth $7,800,125 per hour? That's what he's getting paid, by his own account.
It's not about his time. It's the commercial value of his image.

LTownChief
02-03-2005, 05:09 PM
You've obviously never waited tables before. It's hard work.


I waited tables for about a year while I was in college, that sucked. The work wasn't that hard though.