PDA

View Full Version : UN to the rescue! Morgan Freeman wins cybersquatting appeal through UN arbitrators


Taco John
05-11-2005, 04:49 AM
I had no idea the UN had this kind of power already... No sir. I don't like it.


Freeman Wins Rights to Name in Cyberspace

Tue May 10,12:08 PM ET



GENEVA - Academy Award-winning actor Morgan Freeman won control of the Internet domain name www.morganfreeman.com in a ruling issued Thursday by a United Nations panel.

Arbitrators for the World Intellectual Property Organization ordered the transfer of the domain name to the American actor, who had complained that it was being used in bad faith to divert Internet traffic to a commercial search engine.

The ruling upheld Freeman's complaint against the company that registered the name: Mighty LLC, of Charlestown, Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Arbitrator Peter Nitter noted that he had no response from Mighty LLC, but said that the company "is using the domain name for its commercial benefit to lure Internet users to its Web site."

Nitter said the use of a Morgan Freeman web address creates a "likelihood of confusion" and suggests Freeman may be authorizing or sponsoring the web site.

Freeman, who won the best supporting actor Oscar in February for his performance in "Million Dollar Baby," registered his name in 1964 with the Screen Actors Guild and applied last year to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to trademark his name. The trademark application is still pending.

A number of celebrities have already won the Internet version of their names back through U.N. arbitration, including Julia Roberts, Madonna, Nicole Kidman, Pamela Anderson, Pierce Brosnan and Carmen Electra.

Anyone can register a domain name for a few dollars, which has led so-called "cybersquatters." The U.N. arbitration system, which started in 1999, allows those who think they have the right to a domain to get it back without having to fight a costly legal battle or paying large sums of money.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050510/ap_en_mo/morgan_freeman

Nightfyre
05-11-2005, 05:04 AM
lol, UN? What power? The UN is a joke, and should be dealt with accordingly.

trndobrd
05-11-2005, 06:17 AM
Whew! I know I'll sleep a lot better tonight.

HC_Chief
05-11-2005, 09:02 AM
Hell, I could make the same ruling and it would be just as irrelevant as the UN's. ;)

jAZ
05-11-2005, 09:37 AM
Any thoughts on who should handle such disputes?

HC_Chief
05-11-2005, 09:46 AM
Any thoughts on who should handle such disputes?

The company legally obtained the domain. Freeman should buy it from them if it's such a hassle.

As long as they are not portraying the site as his and are not using his likeness, he has no recourse, other than forking over the dough, in the matter.

Taco John
05-11-2005, 01:24 PM
The company legally obtained the domain. Freeman should buy it from them if it's such a hassle.

As long as they are not portraying the site as his and are not using his likeness, he has no recourse, other than forking over the dough, in the matter.




I totally disagree with that. Morgan Freeman is a trademark as much as it's a name. They might have registered it, but they don't own it. Morgan Freeman certainly shouldn't pay them a dime for their cybersquatting practices.

HC_Chief
05-11-2005, 03:04 PM
I totally disagree with that. Morgan Freeman is a trademark as much as it's a name. They might have registered it, but they don't own it. Morgan Freeman certainly shouldn't pay them a dime for their cybersquatting practices.

He's not the only Morgan Freeman in the world... he does not have the market cornered on the name; nor does he have copyright ownership of it. Again, if they do not portray the domain as affiliated with Morgan Freeman, actor, and they legally registered it, tough titties for him. He doesn't <i>have</i> to pay for anything. If, however, he wants that domain, he must buy it from them. It is legally theirs.

jAZ
05-11-2005, 04:32 PM
I totally disagree with that. Morgan Freeman is a trademark as much as it's a name. They might have registered it, but they don't own it. Morgan Freeman certainly shouldn't pay them a dime for their cybersquatting practices.
Given your feelings on both matters (UN & trademark), who do you think should judge such international domain disputes?

Baby Lee
05-11-2005, 05:08 PM
I totally disagree with that. Morgan Freeman is a trademark as much as it's a name. They might have registered it, but they don't own it. Morgan Freeman certainly shouldn't pay them a dime for their cybersquatting practices.
Did you have the same stance when moneyed interests were putting the strong arm to actual squatters in the territories?

If so, a certain Al Swearingen has a 'corksoaker' or two to throw your way. :p

EDIT: F*ck this place if Al can't speak his mind.

Logical
05-11-2005, 10:11 PM
I totally disagree with that. Morgan Freeman is a trademark as much as it's a name. They might have registered it, but they don't own it. Morgan Freeman certainly shouldn't pay them a dime for their cybersquatting practices.

Dammit someone has infringed on my trade mark.

http://www.james-reynolds.com/

KCWolfman
05-11-2005, 10:12 PM
He probably gave them a sh*tload of oil to buy the decision.

Taco John
05-12-2005, 12:53 AM
He's not the only Morgan Freeman in the world...



He's the only Morgan Freeman in the world who people can make money off his name. HIS name.

Nightfyre
05-12-2005, 04:19 AM
Im curious when the UN decided it had jurisdiction over the internet...

Taco John
05-12-2005, 04:20 PM
More than that, I'm curious about their ability to enforce their judgements...

Logical
05-12-2005, 04:26 PM
More than that, I'm curious about their ability to enforce their judgements...
I would think that they would not be able to, much like the World Court. A decision making body with no enforcement arm that relies on the cooperation of the defendent/plaintiff to have any resolution capability.

BigOlChiefsfan
05-12-2005, 06:30 PM
</ Dave Chappell > "I'm Kofi Annan, Bitch"