The Bushies hiding reports that don't support their foolishness...

[memyselfI]

Dang, two different reports of the Administration hiding reports written by contractors hired by them to support their agenda. Instead, the reports would actually expose their initiatives for the fraud they are....

and look at the liberal entities exposing their dishonesty.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160979,00.html

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45039

[Brock]

We need to come up with some new shills.

[Bwana]

You need to take your nasty old over grown couldn't cut it with a snapper lawn mower "Bushie" and get a life.

Silly Gannon stalking tree hugger.

[the Talking Can]

WASHINGTON — The Labor Department (search) kept secret for more than a year government studies that supported Democratic opponents of the Bush administration's new Central American trade deal, internal documents show.


shouldn't surprise anyone........

[Laz]

shouldn't surprise anyone........

not in the least

[memyselfI]

WASHINGTON — The Labor Department (search) kept secret for more than a year government studies that supported Democratic opponents of the Bush administration's new Central American trade deal, internal documents show.


shouldn't surprise anyone........

Agreed.

The 'surprise' is the establishments reporting these secret reports. Yes, it's because the Administration is lying about causes near and dear to their hearts...

but still, there was a time when they would not have reported these things.

[Reaper16]

Speaking of Fox News, they hired Wes Clark (D-The Man) as a military analyst.
WTF?!?
He was showing up O'Rielly earlier tonight, and apparantly, is now a Fox News employee. Very interseting.

[alanm]

Bleat.. bleat.. bleat.

[go bowe]

Speaking of Fox News, they hired Wes Clark (D-The Man) as a military analyst.
WTF?!?
He was showing up O'Rielly earlier tonight, and apparantly, is now a Fox News employee. Very interseting.the same wes clark who ran for the democrat nomination for president?

didn't he oppose the iraq war while he was running for the nomination?

[go bowe]

Bleat.. bleat.. bleat.ok, now that's too complicated for poor ol' dense tonight... :huh: :huh::huh:

try "ba-a-a... ba-a-a..." :p :p :p

[Reaper16]

the same wes clark who ran for the democrat nomination for president?

didn't he oppose the iraq war while he was running for the nomination?

Yes and yes.

[go bowe]

why the hell would fox news want HIM? :shrug:

[T-post Tom]

Speaking of Fox News, they hired Wes Clark (D-The Man) as a military analyst.
WTF?!?
He was showing up O'Rielly earlier tonight, and apparantly, is now a Fox News employee. Very interseting.

Funny how O'Rielly kept overtalking Clark when Clark outgunned him on the issues.

Lately, O'Rielly has been backtracking on his previous claims regarding Iraq. He now says that the U.S. had no credible evidence of WMD and really had no reason to invade Iraq, but that we should just accept the situation because it's too late to turn back. He asserts that we should forget the false pretenses of the administration, and give them a year before we evaluate the incursion into Iraq. Interesting.

[penchief]

We need to come up with some new shills.

How right you are. Maybe when it comes down to it, Fox is more interested in covering it's own ass. The writing may be on the wall for the current administration. It is possible that Fox News is slowly and carefully trying to cover it's tracks. Maybe things aren't looking to good for this White House. Of course, it is getting more and more difficult to defend the incompetence and dishonesty of this administration even if you're on board with their ideology.

I have noticed a slow and subtle easing up on the rhetoric by Fox. The process of bailing water if you want to stay afloat makes sense if one wants to live to fight another day.

[memyselfI]

How right you are. Maybe when it comes down to it, Fox is more interested in covering it's own ass. The writing may be on the wall for the current administration. It is possible that Fox News is slowly and carefully trying to cover it's tracks. Maybe things aren't looking to good for this White House. Of course, it is getting more and more difficult to defend the incompetence and dishonesty of this administration even if you're on board with their ideology.

I have noticed a slow and subtle easing up on the rhetoric by Fox. The process of bailing water if you want to stay afloat makes sense if one wants to live to fight another day.

Yep, FOX was there in your face when the 'in' thing was to waive the flag and question one's patriotism when questioning the war...

there is NO WAY a report like this would have been seen on a Fox News 'Fair and Balanced' web site. But they are not idiots and when the flag waiving crowd starts to question the administration's integrity and honesty they should as well lest they not be the 'in' thing any longer.

[mlyonsd]

Yep, FOX was there in your face when the 'in' thing was to waive the flag and question one's patriotism when questioning the war...

there is NO WAY a report like this would have been seen on a Fox News 'Fair and Balanced' web site. But they are not idiots and when the flag waiving crowd starts to question the administration's integrity and honesty they should as well lest they not be the 'in' thing any longer.

That's the funniest thing I've read in here for quite a while.

[Cochise]

Yes, obviously FNC has never reported anything negative for the Bush administration before. They must be after style points.

[whoman69]

Funny how O'Rielly kept overtalking Clark when Clark outgunned him on the issues.

Lately, O'Rielly has been backtracking on his previous claims regarding Iraq. He now says that the U.S. had no credible evidence of WMD and really had no reason to invade Iraq, but that we should just accept the situation because it's too late to turn back. He asserts that we should forget the false pretenses of the administration, and give them a year before we evaluate the incursion into Iraq. Interesting.
His year was up a year ago.

[Brock]

How right you are. Maybe when it comes down to it, Fox is more interested in covering it's own ass. The writing may be on the wall for the current administration. It is possible that Fox News is slowly and carefully trying to cover it's tracks. Maybe things aren't looking to good for this White House. Of course, it is getting more and more difficult to defend the incompetence and dishonesty of this administration even if you're on board with their ideology.

I have noticed a slow and subtle easing up on the rhetoric by Fox. The process of bailing water if you want to stay afloat makes sense if one wants to live to fight another day.

Good God, you aren't very smart, are you? Fox News is number one by any measurement you want to use. Yeah, I'm real sure they're going into "defense mode". ROFL

[penchief]

Good God, you aren't very smart, are you? Fox News is number one by any measurement you want to use. Yeah, I'm real sure they're going into "defense mode". ROFL

Well, they're the only one's in the business of shilling for the White House so I guess those who need comfort and reinforcement will automatically tune in. That's my best guess as to why the WWF/Jerry Springer of network news is number #1.

As far as my point goes (if you're at all interested), I think it is a valid one. Even Fox news runs the risk of losing credibility if it becomes obvious to even the faithful that they possess absolutely no objectivity. Even those who behave self-righteously (as do both the White House and Fox News) can go too far when being unobjective. I don't think anyone would argue that Fox News is a propaganda arm of the Bush White House so that's not the issue.

I'm simply stating that if the Bush White House is exposed for what it really is and they suffer the consequences, Fox News, being attached to the White House's hip as it has been, can suffer a serious loss of credibilty. I have noticed a softening of their hard-line rhetoric. I just wonder why. Exposing Fox News for what they really are would be very bad for their business and very bad for the future of the right-wing agenda.

And by the way, I might not always be very smart but it's still better than being completely blind.

[Cochise]

Defense mode ROFL

Maybe the other networks should be taking notes, what with Fox's lowest rated PT show doing better than CNN's highest.

[Brock]

Even those who behave self-righteously (as do both the White House and Fox News) can go too far when being unobjective.

Ironic beyond words.

[penchief]

Ironic beyond words.

Funny how you ALWAYS resort to that line no matter what you are contending. You recite it as much as Bush plays the 9/11 card. Doesn't matter if it's really relevant. You must think it works well for you as a "gotcha" when you really don't have a substantive reply.

[memyselfI]

Defense mode ROFL

Maybe the other networks should be taking notes, what with Fox's lowest rated PT show doing better than CNN's highest.

Fox and WND are turning on the President...

which goes to show what Baba O'Reilly was saying is true. The RWNJS/Cons do not need to worry about the Libs/Dems or the Independents rather they need to worry about themselves.