View Full Version : Warfield
keg in kc
10-02-2005, 10:40 PM
Assuming Warfield is either #2 or nickel, with McCleon being the other, Sapp becomes the Dime. No more Woods. No more Washington. Less Bartee.
I wonder how much of a difference it will make?
Halfcan
10-02-2005, 10:50 PM
It would be like the difference between drinking 14 beers through a beer bong and slamming 15 through an I V hooked to your arm. Either way your F#CKED.
RedDread
10-02-2005, 10:53 PM
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but if the Chiefs come out of the bye flatfooted, it won't matter who is on the field.
At least the wake-up call is coming earlier this year. The real question is if the team will respond.
oaklandhater
10-02-2005, 11:07 PM
It would be like the difference between drinking 14 beers through a beer bong and slamming 15 through an I V hooked to your arm. Either way your F#CKED.
Best post ive seen all day
keg in kc
10-02-2005, 11:13 PM
Anybody who quotes that moron should be taken outside and beaten.
Mecca
10-02-2005, 11:16 PM
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but if the Chiefs come out of the bye flatfooted, it won't matter who is on the field.
At least the wake-up call is coming earlier this year. The real question is if the team will respond.
After the last 2 games you actually expect this team to respond? Well ok they'll respond, it's just that response will probably be a team that gives up and goes home. Atleast that's how it looks so far......
KcMizzou
10-02-2005, 11:19 PM
The way I look at it... Warfield's return gives us slight upgrade in each postion of the secondary. (except Surtain's) I don't know how much it will help, but it sure as hell can't hurt.
keg in kc
10-02-2005, 11:26 PM
I wonder at the communications issue. We were clearly confused in our coverage a number of times today, and we'll be re-introducing another guy. I hope the secondary starts to gel soon, so they can play as well as...they can play.
dtebbe
10-02-2005, 11:28 PM
Let's hope he now has football on his mind!
DT
http://tko.cc/pix/warfield2.jpg
I'm hoping that we'll actually start lining our corners up at the line and start bumping WR's. I'm not very convinced we can play a ton of zone and survive, we just kinda seem stuck in the mud out there in zone. We can give up 30 points a game putting our corners on an island and blitzing 7 every time, might as well go down attacking.
Mecca
10-02-2005, 11:32 PM
Do you really think we can play tight man with the pass rush we have? Honestly if you play tight man and give the qb 7 seconds to pass you will get torn up even worse than we are now.
I think we'd do better in man than we have zone. You can't leave McCleon over there on Terrell Owens by himself though, so you can't do it all the time. Plus, that's why you blitz. We can't just sit back in soft zone, we will get murdered unless we get a lot better. Seems like we're a step slow in reacting across the board, plus we don't get a great pass rush from the front 4.
Halfcan
10-02-2005, 11:41 PM
Your right keg, we should have quoted you, "I am so sad and lonely, my life sucks, I have no friends, and the only music I listen to is the theme to Star Wars."
Joking aside I hope things have gotten better for ya. Don't quote me on that though.
vBulletin® v3.8.8, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.