PDA

View Full Version : NSFW! Jennifer Aniston Topless pics


Duck Dog
12-07-2005, 09:24 AM
NOT SAFE FOR WORK. Enter at own risk.

Sorry if a repost, I searched for another thread and didn't see one, so here it is. Jennifer sunbathing topless. Better check it out before they remove it.

http://savemanny.blogspot.com/2005/12/jennifer-aniston-warns-over-topless.html

Pants
12-07-2005, 09:26 AM
NOT SAFE FOR WORK. Enter at own risk.

Sorry if a repost, I searched for another thread and didn't see one, so here it is. Jennifer sunbathing topless. Better check it out before they remove it.

http://savemanny.blogspot.com/2005/12/jennifer-aniston-warns-over-topless.html
sweet

It seems like I've seen them before though.

MOhillbilly
12-07-2005, 09:29 AM
yummy - them are nice.

rep.

vailpass
12-07-2005, 09:29 AM
Meh, so-so.
Where's the beaver shot?

carlos3652
12-07-2005, 09:29 AM
umm I heard that wasnt her...

Mr. Laz
12-07-2005, 09:30 AM
sweet

It seems like I've seen them before though.
they are several years old iirc


i think they are also heavily rumor to be fake (not actually aniston)

MOhillbilly
12-07-2005, 09:33 AM
they are several years old iirc


i think they are also heavily rumor to be fake (not actually aniston)


on entertainment tonight lastnight they ran a spot that said they were real and she was in litigation over the publication of said pics.

Rain Man
12-07-2005, 09:36 AM
Whoever they belong to, they're magnificent.

beavis
12-07-2005, 09:41 AM
they are several years old iirc


i think they are also heavily rumor to be fake (not actually aniston)
Mancow gave out that url this morning.

I also heard she was threatening a lawsuit if they got out.

KcMizzou
12-07-2005, 09:42 AM
I also heard she was threatening a lawsuit if they got out. Yeah, I saw that too. It was on Entertainment Tonight, or something.

Duck Dog
12-07-2005, 09:42 AM
Whoever they belong to, they're magnificent.

I agree. :drool:

MOhillbilly
12-07-2005, 09:43 AM
Yeah, I saw that too. It was on Entertainment Tonight, or something.

its deja vu all over again.....:p

KcMizzou
12-07-2005, 09:43 AM
its deja vu all over again.....:pDoh... yeah, what you said.

shakesthecat
12-07-2005, 09:44 AM
Nummy :clap:

vailpass
12-07-2005, 09:46 AM
TTIWWBS

Duck Dog
12-07-2005, 09:48 AM
I think it's legit.

Actress says paparazzo photographed her from more than a mile away

Now that's a zoom lense.

DECEMBER 5--Lawyers for Jennifer Aniston have warned publications that they will face an invasion of privacy lawsuit if they print topless photos of the actress taken recently while she was apparently sunbathing at her Los Angeles home. In a blistering letter sent to celebrity magazines, attorney John Lavely wrote that the publication of photographs "showing [Aniston] topless or in the act of taking off or putting on her top" would expose those titles to "substantial monetary damages." In his December 3 letter, Lavely wrote that the topless photos were taken by paparazzo Peter Brandt, who allegedly used a "powerful telephoto lens" from a perch more than a mile away from Aniston's home (though the images, TSG has learned, appear to have been snapped from a closer range). Aniston's counsel pounced two days after Brandt e-mailed the topless photos to magazine editors with the request, "PLEASE KEEP THESE PICTURES TO YOUR SELF...THEY MUST NOT FIND THERE WAY TO THE INTERNET!!!!"

jidar
12-07-2005, 09:49 AM
Those are just like I remembered.

in my dreams..

Mr. Laz
12-07-2005, 09:49 AM
on entertainment tonight lastnight they ran a spot that said they were real and she was in litigation over the publication of said pics.
maybe ... but i think there are a different set of topless pics out there too.


these are the old/fake ones


there are new/real ones out there that aniston is sueing over.



just my opinion ... i'm not positive.

Pants
12-07-2005, 09:53 AM
maybe ... but i think there are a different set of topless pics out there too.


these are the old/fake ones


there are new/real ones out there that aniston is sueing over.



just my opinion ... i'm not positive.

I'm 90% sure I've seen those pics before. The new ones must be awesome, it'd be nice if they came out soon. Unless, of course, I'm imagining things.

KcMizzou
12-07-2005, 09:54 AM
"PLEASE KEEP THESE PICTURES TO YOUR SELF...THEY MUST NOT FIND THERE WAY TO THE INTERNET!!!!" Good thing he's a photographer, and not a writer.

Rain Man
12-07-2005, 10:02 AM
maybe ... but i think there are a different set of topless pics out there too.


these are the old/fake ones


there are new/real ones out there that aniston is sueing over.



just my opinion ... i'm not positive.


If people think that this picture is Anniston, I'm guessing that she doesn't want the real ones to come out just because they can't be any better.

RINGLEADER
12-07-2005, 10:04 AM
They're pretty good...but I do have a question. If you're famous person going to lay out in a public place with your shirt off how can you get PO'd when someone snaps a picture of your juggalos?

KcMizzou
12-07-2005, 10:05 AM
They're pretty good...but I do have a question. If you're famous person going to lay out in a public place with your shirt off how can you get PO'd when someone snaps a picture of your juggalos?
I don't know... but let's not discourage it.

Pants
12-07-2005, 10:06 AM
They're pretty good...but I do have a question. If you're famous person going to lay out in a public place with your shirt off how can you get PO'd when someone snaps a picture of your juggalos?

She was at het place. Supposedly the pic was taken from a mile away.

BigRock
12-07-2005, 11:12 AM
The one at the bottom where you see the back of her head is definitely her, that's the one she sued over when it was printed. You can probably still find that pic on the net in the context of the tabloid it was in, with the headline and everything all around it.

These others... they don't even look like her, IMO.

Bob Dole
12-07-2005, 11:21 AM
Good lord. She really <b>is</b> cold all the time.

Skip Towne
12-07-2005, 11:23 AM
Shit, Hell, Damn.

Simplex3
12-07-2005, 11:32 AM
Good lord. She really <b>is</b> cold all the time.
ROFL

beavis
12-07-2005, 11:43 AM
maybe ... but i think there are a different set of topless pics out there too.


these are the old/fake ones


there are new/real ones out there that aniston is sueing over.



just my opinion ... i'm not positive.
I remember years ago seeing one that had obviously been photoshopped. These don't look as obvious to me.

MOhillbilly
12-07-2005, 11:50 AM
Shit, Hell, Damn.

http://www.viewlondon.co.uk/upload/2513a.gif

BigMeatballDave
12-07-2005, 12:11 PM
OK, where are they? I'm not seeing anything...

Fire Me Boy!
12-07-2005, 12:13 PM
Those are really old... damn.

BigMeatballDave
12-07-2005, 12:14 PM
WTF? WHY CAN'T I SEE THEM?!

Pants
12-07-2005, 12:19 PM
WTF? WHY CAN'T I SEE THEM?!

ROFL

BigMeatballDave
12-07-2005, 12:21 PM
ROFLOh sure, laugh...
:deevee:

Mr. Laz
12-07-2005, 01:29 PM
Oh sure, laugh...
:deevee:
if you ask real nice someone might download/repost them. :p

Mr. Laz
12-07-2005, 01:34 PM
NSFW


http://img283.exs.cx/img283/1489/e3800004660ja023aq.jpg
http://img283.exs.cx/img283/259/69800004659ja013wx.jpg
http://img283.exs.cx/img283/3779/32e00004663ja053zl.jpg
http://img283.exs.cx/img283/8753/2f700004662ja042tw.jpg
http://img283.exs.cx/img283/6355/baa00004661ja035gm.jpg

TheDarkChief
12-07-2005, 01:40 PM
Those pics on the first post here are all old, and have been on the internet for some time now.

Fire Me Boy!
12-07-2005, 01:44 PM
Those pics on the first post here are all old, and have been on the internet for some time now.
Way to catch up. :p

Those are really old... damn.

Fire Me Boy!
12-07-2005, 03:10 PM
They're pretty good...but I do have a question. If you're famous person going to lay out in a public place with your shirt off how can you get PO'd when someone snaps a picture of your juggalos?
She wasn't in public. She was in her back yard. The way privacy laws are written, it's private -- if the photographer could take the picture WITHOUT the aid of a zoom lens it's fair game. However, this guy climbed a tree AND used an enormous zoom.

CoMoChief
12-07-2005, 03:14 PM
They're not that great IMO. I was never a Jennifer Aniston fan.

chiefsfaninNC
12-07-2005, 03:25 PM
They would look better being wrapped by my hands.

Johnson&Johnson
12-07-2005, 04:44 PM
Saweet! Thanks.

Old or not, I have not seen them before.

GoTrav
12-09-2005, 05:34 PM
Saweet! Thanks.

Old or not, I have not seen them before.

me either...but where are the new ones?!@!

Taco John
12-09-2005, 05:38 PM
Could they possibly find more unflattering pictures of her? Maybe taking a dump in a coffee can or something?

seclark
12-09-2005, 05:45 PM
Could they possibly find more unflattering pictures of her? Maybe taking a dump in a coffee can or something?
shit...i'll have to click on the links again to look at her face.
sec

unlurking
12-09-2005, 07:41 PM
Nice. Without ST, I'd be stuck with Den v Balt.

Fire Me Boy!
12-09-2005, 09:18 PM
How has this not been moved to the pix forum yet?

Fire Me Boy!
12-09-2005, 09:20 PM
Could they possibly find more unflattering pictures of her? Maybe taking a dump in a coffee can or something?
I'm guessing those would still find their way to a scat board for people to :whackit: to.

htismaqe
12-09-2005, 09:21 PM
I'm guessing those would still find their way to a scat board for people to :whackit: to.

****ing great, dude.

Now listopencil is gonna be over here wanting you to explain to him what a scat board is...

:D

Fire Me Boy!
12-09-2005, 09:23 PM
****ing great, dude.

Now listopencil is gonna be over here wanting you to explain to him what a scat board is...

:D
ROFL

Fruit Ninja
12-09-2005, 09:33 PM
The ones that she is mad over have not been released to the public. I dont know if they ever will be. THem pics there are old ones. Oh well, maybe someone will get the ones that she is upset over.