PDA

View Full Version : Defensive Additions


ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:09 PM
I have seen a lot of threads about an assorted number of players we would like to draft or aquire. I am interested in defensive players only for this thread. I was thinking with Williams getting an extension Lamar Arrington might be trying to find a new home. They didn't exactly think he fit into there scheme. Do you think he would fit in well here? And what other defensive players do you think we should get?

nychief
01-03-2006, 07:11 PM
I want Elvis Dumervil from lousiville

CoMoChief
01-03-2006, 07:22 PM
I want Elvis Dumervil from lousiville


If we somehow signed Arrington, or Fox was healthy, and we ran the 3-4 Elvis and Allen would be ran over on the line of scrimmage.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:27 PM
If we somehow signed Arrington, or Fox was healthy, and we ran the 3-4 Elvis and Allen would be ran over on the line of scrimmage.

Is that good or bad?

beer bacon
01-03-2006, 07:27 PM
If we can sign a good defensive free agent for negative 20 million dollars we should totally go for it.

Mecca
01-03-2006, 07:29 PM
The Redskins have to keep Lavar Arrington. He's to early in his contract, it would actually cost them more to cut him than to keep him.

Scorp
01-03-2006, 07:38 PM
If we had unlimited resources I would love to have Arrington! Sadly this isn't the case.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:38 PM
The Redskins have to keep Lavar Arrington. He's to early in his contract, it would actually cost them more to cut him than to keep him.


It cost them more to just pay him and not play him.

Adept Havelock
01-03-2006, 07:39 PM
Don't want Arrington. The reason he was riding the pine in Washington was he wouldn't play within the scheme.

We don't need someone who wants to freelance. This defense needs help in that area as it is.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:43 PM
Don't want Arrington. The reason he was riding the pine in Washington was he wouldn't play within the scheme.

We don't need someone who wants to freelance. This defense needs help in that area as it is.

I don't think he was freelancing. The knock on him was he was only good at killing the QB. Everytime he was in you knew he was basically going to be blitzing. So I think they want him to freelance more. He is a way better option than anything we have at LB besides DJ PERIOD!!!!!! Better than Barber, Mitchell and Griffin.

milkman
01-03-2006, 07:47 PM
I don't think he was freelancing. The knock on him was he was only good at killing the QB. Everytime he was in you knew he was basically going to be blitzing. So I think they want him to freelance more. He is a way better option than anything we have at LB besides DJ PERIOD!!!!!! Better than Barber, Mitchell and Griffin.

No, AH had it right.

Greg(with another g) Williams sat LA because he wouldn't maintain discipline within the scheme.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:48 PM
No, AH had it right.

Greg(with another g) Williams sat LA because he wouldn't maintain discipline within the scheme.

Cool, but he is a decent LB. I don't think he should be a priority but would be worth considering.

beer bacon
01-03-2006, 07:49 PM
I don't think he was freelancing. The knock on him was he was only good at killing the QB. Everytime he was in you knew he was basically going to be blitzing. So I think they want him to freelance more. He is a way better option than anything we have at LB besides DJ PERIOD!!!!!! Better than Barber, Mitchell and Griffin.

Mitchell played better then DJ this year.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:51 PM
Mitchell played better then DJ this year.


But DJ is a rookie. Mitchell didn't play decent until this year. I think he is getting better, but he isn't a Lavar Arrington.

beer bacon
01-03-2006, 07:52 PM
But DJ is a rookie. Mitchell didn't play decent until this year. I think he is getting better, but he isn't a Lavar Arrington.

Yeah. Mitchell is a lot more disciplined then Arrington.

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 07:54 PM
Yeah. Mitchell is a lot more disciplined then Arrington.

You have got to be kidding. Mitchell strikes fear into no one. Arrington is a proven pro bowler who is a good LB. Part of playing LB is having your opponents fear you. No one on our defense strikes that fear into anyone. That is part of our defensive problems, no teams respect us(because we haven't earned any). A good LB would make them respecet us.

Halfcan
01-03-2006, 07:56 PM
How about Reggie Bush-that would be cool. We could have a three-headed monster with LJ, PH and Bush-lol

beer bacon
01-03-2006, 07:58 PM
You have got to be kidding. Mitchell strikes fear into no one. Arrington is a proven pro bowler who is a good LB. Part of playing LB is having your opponents fear you. No one on our defense strikes that fear into anyone. That is part of our defensive problems, no teams respect us(because we haven't earned any). A good LB would make them respecet us.

Kawika Missle strikes fear into everyone!

Halfcan
01-03-2006, 07:59 PM
Kawika Missle strikes fear into everyone!


I get scared just reading his name. STFU STFU STFU

ChiefsfaninPA
01-03-2006, 08:00 PM
Kawika Missle strikes fear into everyone!


Maybe you, but not the people that matters.........the offense of the opposite team.