PDA

View Full Version : Scarlett Johansson posed (somewhat) nude in Vanity Fair


Bootlegged
02-07-2006, 09:26 AM
Johansson, Knightley bare all for magazine

Associated Press
NEW YORK - With award season still under way, Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley are exchanging ballgowns for birthday suits.
Under the artful eye of photographer Annie Leibovitz, the starlets posed nude for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's yearly Hollywood issue, to be released Wednesday.
Fashion superstar Tom Ford also appears on the cover photo, though he stuck with a more traditional suit - one of black fabric.
Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when Rachel McAdams backed out.
"She did want to do it, and then when she was on the set I think she felt uncomfortable, and I didn't want to make anybody feel uncomfortable" Ford said Tuesday on ABC's "Good Morning America."
Other Hollywood stars weren't difficult to persuade, Ford said.
"A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them."
Angelina Jolie also got naked for the Hollywood issue, posing in a bathtub. Another shot depicts a fully clothed George Clooney as a director filming a large cast of women wearing skin-tone underwear.
For the cover photo, Knightly, 20, was photographed sitting sideways, with legs and arms carefully placed. The 21-year-old Johansson, draped over Ford's leg, is somewhat more exposed - readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks

Inspector
02-07-2006, 09:29 AM
I'm not gonna say it. Someone else will need to though....

Pitt Gorilla
02-07-2006, 09:29 AM
Wow, I never thought I'd purchase a vanity fair. It looks like I was wrong.

mnchiefsguy
02-07-2006, 09:33 AM
I will say it....this thread is worthless without pics

Bwana
02-07-2006, 09:33 AM
.

Bootlegged
02-07-2006, 09:34 AM
http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/media.canada.com/cp/entertainment/20060207/e020718a.jpg

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 09:35 AM
Can't wait for tomorrow...Never bought an issue. Looks like its time. I was hoping for full nudity but this will work.

Dartgod
02-07-2006, 09:35 AM
http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/media.canada.com/cp/entertainment/20060207/e020718a.jpg
OK.

This thread is worthless without a bigger picture.

Inspector
02-07-2006, 09:35 AM
I will say it....this thread is worthless without pics

Thanks man.

Somebody needed to say it.

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 09:36 AM
Scarlett was upset when she had to wear a bra in bed during some movie. It wouldn't surprise me if she does playboy some day. Now that is an issue I would buy.

Rain Man
02-07-2006, 09:39 AM
While I appreciate the intent of this thread, why on earth would lattimer go with Scarlett Johansson as the lead story when Keira Knightley is also involved? Johansson is page 12 of the business section, while Knightley is front page news.

Bootlegged
02-07-2006, 09:42 AM
While I appreciate the intent of this thread, why on earth would lattimer go with Scarlett Johansson as the lead story when Keira Knightley is also involved? Johansson is page 12 of the business section, while Knightley is front page news.


To each his own, research boy! The lead story in Lattimer's world is Johansson's bareassed.

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 09:43 AM
While I appreciate the intent of this thread, why on earth would lattimer go with Scarlett Johansson as the lead story when Keira Knightley is also involved? Johansson is page 12 of the business section, while Knightley is front page news.

Knightley is amazing as well. On a side note...so is Milla Jovavich (sp).

KevB
02-07-2006, 09:47 AM
FYI, the third person in the photo wasn't supposed to be the guy you see. It was going to be Rachel McAdams, but when the clothes started to come off, she got cold feet. That would be quite the threesome.

Bootlegged
02-07-2006, 09:48 AM
http://images.ibsys.com/2006/0207/6810322_320X240.jpg



Little larger pic...

KevB
02-07-2006, 09:49 AM
And BTW, gotta' go with Scarlett over Keira. When they are both at their best, Scarlett (see The Island) is above and beyond IMO.

beavis
02-07-2006, 09:53 AM
And BTW, gotta' go with Scarlett over Keira. When they are both at their best, Scarlett (see The Island) is above and beyond IMO.
I wouldn't kick either of them out of bed for eating crackers.

But Keira would still be my first choice.

mcan
02-07-2006, 09:53 AM
See also: Matt's avatar...

I'm a BIG fan of Keira's. Scarlett is also quite the cutie, and in fact, has a fantastic on-screen persona that is very honest and personable.

Baby Lee
02-07-2006, 10:18 AM
readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks
The long awaited sequel to the opening scene in Lost in Translation.

jspchief
02-07-2006, 10:23 AM
I'm going to have to go with Kiera, but to be perfectly honest, she doesn't have the tits to be doing nudes.

There has to be a serious tape job or some masterful airbrushing just to get the side of her tit to look that big on that cover shot.

jspchief
02-07-2006, 10:24 AM
The long awaited sequel to the opening scene in Lost in Translation.The new sig is awesome. :thumb:

Great scene.

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 10:26 AM
I'm going to have to go with Kiera, but to be perfectly honest, she doesn't have the tits to be doing nudes.

There has to be a serious tape job or some masterful airbrushing just to get the side of her tit to look that big on that cover shot.


Now Scarlett has a full set. Wouldn't mind seeing them. I saw some movie the other day on our University movie channel about these two people that were clones and I'm not sure it was Scarlett but it sure looked like it. Whoever it was she was scorching hott.

Mecca
02-07-2006, 10:28 AM
While I appreciate the intent of this thread, why on earth would lattimer go with Scarlett Johansson as the lead story when Keira Knightley is also involved? Johansson is page 12 of the business section, while Knightley is front page news.

I don't partically like the female figure when she has a chest that resembles that of a 13 year old boy.........

Sully
02-07-2006, 10:36 AM
If you've seen "The Jacket" with Knightley topless, you'd know why she wasn't the lead story. It's not so much about the size, but the shape of em (and color) is ****ed up.

Baby Lee
02-07-2006, 10:38 AM
Love Keira's accent, but she has Leno saying "Dude! Lookit that chin!!"

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 10:41 AM
Scarlett has a mildly sexy voice as well.

John_Wayne
02-07-2006, 10:43 AM
http://images.ibsys.com/2006/0207/6810322_320X240.jpg



Little larger pic...

Somebody needs to hit the tanning booth! :)

KevB
02-07-2006, 10:47 AM
Now Scarlett has a full set. Wouldn't mind seeing them. I saw some movie the other day on our University movie channel about these two people that were clones and I'm not sure it was Scarlett but it sure looked like it. Whoever it was she was scorching hott.

That's Scarlett in "The Island" (see my reference below). She can look very nice (Lost in Translation), and she can look drop dead gorgeous (The Island).

Dunit35
02-07-2006, 10:49 AM
That's Scarlett in "The Island" (see my reference below). She can look very nice (Lost in Translation), and she can look drop dead gorgeous (The Island).


So that's what that movie was called. She was f'n amazing looking in that movie.

BigOlChiefsfan
02-07-2006, 10:58 AM
I fondly think of Scarlett taking a dive on that roadtrip in 'The Man Who Wasn't There'. Then I say 'WTF was wrong with Billy Bob's character that he didn't just say 'um um good'?'

Simplex3
02-07-2006, 11:08 AM
"A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them."

Allow me to finish this guy's sentence:

"...and who doesn't want to see a bit of them. I mean, it's not like the flaws they have will get past the airbrush. Hell, by the time the photo hits the cover you'll barely recognize them. Their tits will be bigger, their ass more shapely, hell we'll even move their feet to cover their flabby calf. They're perfect and you, the average loser, are not."

Ari Chi3fs
02-07-2006, 11:12 AM
Ari Gold sure is lucky to be there with both of them...

Mr. Laz
02-07-2006, 12:41 PM
crappy quality ... but much bigger


http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/gallery/albums/magazines/vanityfair-march2006/01.jpg

Bootlegged
02-07-2006, 02:06 PM
Is that a nipple?


It's a shadow of a nipple.

No, it's a nipple.

KevB
02-07-2006, 02:12 PM
Allow me to finish this guy's sentence:

"...and who doesn't want to see a bit of them. I mean, it's not like the flaws they have will get past the airbrush. Hell, by the time the photo hits the cover you'll barely recognize them. Their tits will be bigger, their ass more shapely, hell we'll even move their feet to cover their flabby calf. They're perfect and you, the average loser, are not."

I'm fine with that.

beavis
02-07-2006, 02:40 PM
I'm fine with that.
I'm still trying to figure out what his point is.

Fish
02-07-2006, 03:12 PM
Is that a nipple?


It's a shadow of a nipple.

No, it's a nipple.

I believe you are correct my friend..... Check out this version that looks pretty obvious.......

Nippage.... (http://media.egotastic.com/media/pictures/0602/scarlett-johansson-keira-knightley-nude-3.jpg)