PDA

View Full Version : News flash: Carl Peterson is incompetent


Cave Johnson
03-18-2006, 07:14 PM
That is all.

KcMizzou
03-18-2006, 07:20 PM
Well there's something I've never read on the Planet before.

chiefs4me
03-18-2006, 07:45 PM
Thanks for telling us.....:thumb: :rolleyes:

Skip Towne
03-18-2006, 07:49 PM
Ya think?

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 08:03 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.

Coach
03-18-2006, 08:08 PM
In other news, the sun rose from the east.

Sure-Oz
03-18-2006, 08:11 PM
nice thread

Otter
03-18-2006, 08:14 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.

And he has that playoff win 13 years ago to prove it.

milkman
03-18-2006, 08:16 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.

I have no doubt that you are correct.

That doesn't change the fact that he's been the man in charge for 17 years of mediocrity.

That screams incompetence, or apathy.

Actually, I'd vote for apathetic, with emphasis on the "pathetic" part of the word.

beer bacon
03-18-2006, 08:17 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.

That is funny ROFL

mikey23545
03-18-2006, 08:20 PM
17 years of Carl Peterson: 161-110-1, .594 winning percentage;

17 prior years: 93-142-3, .401 winning percentage;

Morons on bulletin boards: 0-0-0, 1,000,000 sandy vaginas.

shaneo69
03-18-2006, 08:26 PM
17 years of Carl Peterson: 161-110-1, .594 winning percentage;

17 prior years: 93-142-3, .401 winning percentage;

Morons on bulletin boards: 0-0-0, 1,000,000 sandy vaginas.

What's his record since 1998?

milkman
03-18-2006, 08:27 PM
17 years of Carl Peterson: 161-110-1, .594 winning percentage;

17 prior years: 93-142-3, .401 winning percentage;

Morons on bulletin boards: 0-0-0, 1,000,000 sandy vaginas.

And just look at all those SB appearances!

mikey23545
03-18-2006, 08:28 PM
What's his record since 1998?

What is it in 1995?

What's yours in 2006?

What's a really stupid ****ing question?

beer bacon
03-18-2006, 08:29 PM
I am glad this thread was started.

shaneo69
03-18-2006, 08:29 PM
17 years of Carl Peterson: 161-110-1, .594 winning percentage

the 20 years prior to Carl Peterson: 20 seasons, 1 Super Bowl victory

milkman
03-18-2006, 08:30 PM
What is it in 1995?

What's yours in 2006?

What's a really stupid ****ing question?

Now that's high quality deflection.

mikey23545
03-18-2006, 08:30 PM
And just look at all those SB appearances!


If only you had been there to guide us! :hail:

Adept Havelock
03-18-2006, 08:31 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.

Yes, he's forgotten more about mediocrity and maintaing a "just-good-enough team to fill the stands" than I've ever known.

As if that's anything for King Carl to be proud of. :rolleyes:

mikey23545
03-18-2006, 08:31 PM
Now that's high quality deflection.

No deflection, just rational thought.

Mr. Laz
03-18-2006, 08:32 PM
17 years of Carl Peterson: ;

17 prior years: 93-142-3, .401 winning percentage;

Morons on bulletin boards: 0-0-0, 1,000,000 sandy vaginas.

17 years since free agency in the NFL: 161-110-1, .594 winning percentage: playoff record since free agency- 3-7, number of super bowl appearances- 0, number of super bowl wins - 0


17 years prior to Free agency: 93-142-3, .401 winning percentage,
playoff record before free agency- 5-2, number of super bowl appearances- 2, number of super bowl wins- 1



number of times mikey19291 has been poked up the butt by Rufus Dawes - 99999999999999

milkman
03-18-2006, 08:34 PM
If only you had been there to guide us! :hail:

Now you're getting it!
:jester:

milkman
03-18-2006, 08:35 PM
number of times mikey19291 has been poked up the butt by Rufus Dawes - 99999999999999

ROFL

shaneo69
03-18-2006, 08:39 PM
No deflection, just rational thought.

Yeah, it's rational to determine Carl's competence by comparing his record to the Jack Steadman/Jim Schaaf regime.

Tribal Warfare
03-18-2006, 08:39 PM
Okay, where is Captain Obivious when you need him

aaaah

News flash: Carl Peterson is incompetent


I guess it's you

chiefs4me
03-18-2006, 08:43 PM
I am glad this thread was started.




I am glad I bumped it..ROFL

mikey23545
03-18-2006, 08:43 PM
number of times mikey19291 has been poked up the butt by Rufus Dawes - 99999999999999

Wow, you really got me there!

The logic you use in your football discussions is just like the logic you use in your political debates!

Mr. Laz
03-18-2006, 08:56 PM
Wow, you really got me there!

The logic you use in your football discussions is just like the logic you use in your political debates!
and i noticed you ignored the real substance of the post, just the way you do in political threads ... that fact that free agency had as much to do with the turnaround of the chiefs as carl peterson did.

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 08:58 PM
And he has that playoff win 13 years ago to prove it.

How many times have you been in the playoffs?

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 08:59 PM
That is funny ROFL

Because you know it's true?

banyon
03-18-2006, 09:00 PM
How many times have you been in the playoffs?

Maybe you should try judging Carl Peterson against the average NFL general manager instead of against the average internet poster.

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 09:01 PM
Yes, he's forgotten more about mediocrity and maintaing a "just-good-enough team to fill the stands" than I've ever known.

As if that's anything for King Carl to be proud of. :rolleyes:

Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 09:02 PM
Maybe you should try judging Carl Peterson against the average NFL general manager instead of against the average internet poster.

The average NFL general managers aren't the ones that are calling him out.

You do over estimate your posting abilitiy, you are far from reaching the average of the posters here.

milkman
03-18-2006, 09:03 PM
Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.

Instant gratification? ROFL

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 09:05 PM
Instant gratification? ROFL

I'd explain it to you but I'm sure it's over your head.

milkman
03-18-2006, 09:06 PM
I'd explain it to you but I'm sure it's over your head.

I'm sure you'd explain to me, but you're too busy giving Carl head.

Simplex3
03-18-2006, 09:08 PM
Maybe you should try judging Carl Peterson against the average NFL general manager instead of against the average internet poster.
This is the first intelligent and reasonable post in this thread.

banyon
03-18-2006, 09:09 PM
The average NFL general managers aren't the ones that are calling him out.

You do over estimate your posting abilitiy, you are far from reaching the average of the posters here.


I didn't say anything about my posting ability, just Otter's in a general way. Try reading sometime.

You... on the other hand have that bottom 5% locked up.

Mr. Laz
03-18-2006, 09:11 PM
Quote:
---------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Chiefs Express
Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.
----------------------------------------

yep ... cause 12 years without a playoff win indicates what complete fair weather, instant gratification fans the chiefs have.



per usual Tom, your posts are all mouth and little brain

Simplex3
03-18-2006, 09:13 PM
yep ... cause 12 years without a playoff win indicates what complete fair weather, instant gratification fans the chiefs have.
Going, going.... GONE!

shaneo69
03-18-2006, 09:13 PM
Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.

Yeah, Chiefs fans are just too darn impatient. It's pretty unreasonable of us to expect Carl's organization to win a playoff game when they just won one 13 short years ago.

Sure-Oz
03-18-2006, 09:14 PM
We've wasted a good last few years and priests efforts went for not....

Other teams would've done more than just what was needed to get by....Carl is a mystery....well not really,I would like to think one of my sports franchises will win a championship before im dead.

Mr. Laz
03-18-2006, 09:16 PM
I would like to think one of my sports franchises will win a championship before im dead.
me too :(


your sig is just outstanding btw :clap:

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 09:25 PM
I didn't say anything about my posting ability, just Otter's in a general way. Try reading sometime.

You... on the other hand have that bottom 5% locked up.

Oh gee, now my feelings are hurt!

At least I'm 4% higher than you are.

Logical
03-18-2006, 09:34 PM
I'm sure you'd explain to me, but you're too busy giving Carl head.Don't waste your time on Voldemortom, educating morons is a job best left to psychiatrists.

Adept Havelock
03-18-2006, 09:37 PM
Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.

"Instant Gratification?" Whatever, you scheissekopf. I've been following this team since H. Roe Bartle helped bring them to town. Maybe you are satisfied with a playoff win every 10+ years, and a SB every 40. Some of us have higher expectations.

:rolleyes:

Logical
03-18-2006, 09:39 PM
Instant gratification? ROFLYes those of us who have been following the Chiefs since 1964 and expect more than those two Super Bowl appearances in the very beginning are "instant gratification" fans and we have no right to complain about the general failure of this team to produce Championship quality ever again.

Baby Lee
03-18-2006, 09:48 PM
Another "instant gratification fan" heard from.
Instant, as I said in another thread, there are kids in middle school who were born after the last Chiefs playoff victory.

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 10:05 PM
Don't waste your time on Voldemortom, educating morons is a job best left to psychiatrists.


Another worthwhile comment from Vlad the fag.

Chiefs Express
03-18-2006, 10:07 PM
Yes those of us who have been following the Chiefs since 1964 and expect more than those two Super Bowl appearances in the very beginning are "instant gratification" fans and we have no right to complain about the general failure of this team to produce Championship quality ever again.

Some of us have been following them since 1963 when they played their first game in KC.

The difference being is that many of us know that football is just a game and not every team gets to play in the SB.

If you can't have winners you all seem to become whiners. IT'S A ****ING GAME!!!

Rausch
03-18-2006, 10:42 PM
Soon the tears and bitching will no longer be necessary.

Peterson is in his last contract with KC. Period.

Done.

The question is who do we want to replace him?...

milkman
03-18-2006, 10:44 PM
Some of us have been following them since 1963 when they played their first game in KC.

The difference being is that many of us know that football is just a game and not every team gets to play in the SB.

If you can't have winners you all seem to become whiners. IT'S A ****ING GAME!!!

So why the hell do you care enough to waste time discussing just a ****ing game on a forum dedicated to a team just playing a ****ing game?

dj56dt58
03-18-2006, 10:52 PM
That's funny, not because I agree but because Carl Peterson has forgotten more about being a General Manager and President of an NFL franchise than any of you have ever known collectively.
But does he ever put that knowledge to use?



:banghead:

jettio
03-18-2006, 11:25 PM
That is all.

Link?

Chiefs Express
03-19-2006, 07:45 AM
So why the hell do you care enough to waste time discussing just a ****ing game on a forum dedicated to a team just playing a ****ing game?

I like the game, but I understand that it is a game and that it does not have an impact on my life. Besides, where else can you see people obsessed with things they have absolutely no control over?

King_Chief_Fan
03-19-2006, 08:22 AM
We've wasted a good last few years and priests efforts went for not....

Other teams would've done more than just what was needed to get by....Carl is a mystery....well not really,I would like to think one of my sports franchises will win a championship before im dead.

Carl is the best there is. Look at what he has done this off season.
Got rid of some bad players and signed the Q. The Q, the only Denver running back to never have made it. I can't believe this may be LJ's back up. YOu think LJ is bad at blocking, you can't believe how bad Q tip is.
but wait, I digress........... Carl is magnificent

Tribal Warfare
03-19-2006, 08:27 AM
The question is who do we want to replace him?...

Casey Printers of course

Simplex3
03-19-2006, 08:58 AM
The question is who do we want to replace him?...
Did someone already hire the drunk monkeys with a dartboard?

jspchief
03-19-2006, 10:08 AM
Carl Peterson incompetent? I don't think so. He's markedly better than the bad GMs of the league.

IMO, his tenure as Chiefs GM is comparable to Vermeil and Schottenheimer's tenures as head coach. Good, but never great. Problem being, unlike Vermeil and Marty, Peterson hasn't been replaced after almost two decades of "good, not great".

He's not a terrible GM. But he's clearly been unable to take numerous teams to the next level. It's time to move on.

mikey23545
03-19-2006, 10:13 AM
Carl Peterson has ruined this team, and we will never recapture the past glory of the Kansas City Chiefs...

Do you realize the Chiefs HAD NEVER EVEN LOST A GAME BEFORE 1960!?!?!?!?

And then that damn Peterson came along....

wolfpack0735
03-19-2006, 10:34 AM
as shi##y as queen carl is to us,which i think he has waisted good players,lamar loves him. He fills the arrowhead and thats all that counts to the hunts.money maker he is to them or it wouldn`t be 30 plus years between super bowls.

gblowfish
03-19-2006, 10:55 AM
Dear Greatest Fans in the NFL:

I am surprised that occasionally I have to remind you why the Hunt family has chosen me, the longest tenured General Manager in professional sports, to chart the direction of the Kansas City Chiefs. Briefly, let me outline the top ten highlights of my impressive, Hall of Fame Quality Resume:

1. President, CEO AND General Manager: I'm three guys in one. That means I have at least three voices in my head at any given time.

2. Consecutive Sellouts: I set the all time record for the franchise. Unstoppable, baby. The real fans know me and love me. Outsiders, not so much.

3. Nachos: Fans will agree, they're cheezier than ever.

4. Bi-State II: OK, it didn't pass, but talk to me after April 4th.

5. Stadium Improvements, Rolling Roof: See point #4 above. And I'll finally bring KC a Super Bowl, like I promised.

6. Profitability: Chiefs make the Hunt family millions and millions every year.

7. Did I mention the Nachos?

8. Arrowhead Pavilion: A tent like no other to house our VIPs... and protect them from the unwashed rabble in the parking lots.

9. Big XII Championship Games, Billy Graham Crusade, MU vs. Arkansas St. KU vs Oklahoma. Pittsburgh St. VS. NWMSU. What can I say? I know quality entertainment when I see it.

10. The players and agents love my kinder, gentler side during contract negotiations.

Now STFD and STFU. Some of you people are worse than Ethan Locke.

You are, and continue to be, the best fans in the NFL. Don't forget to vote "YES" on April 4th, and pay off your 2006 season tickets in full ASAP. We have to buy more airtime and billboards for this damn April 4th thing.

Your Pal,
Carl "Delano" Peterson
LTGMIPS

Cave Johnson
03-19-2006, 10:58 AM
I had no idea this would generate 60 posts. Ok, some idea. I was trying to make fun of the below post in the D.C. section.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=137524

Sorry I wasn't able to explain earlier, but I was out with friends who came in from Nashville, Delaware, Philly, and KC.

Bowser
03-19-2006, 11:13 AM
How many times have you been in the playoffs?

Well **** me running. Tom laying waste to all others with yet another bolt of lightning from the skies.


DUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Bowser
03-19-2006, 11:13 AM
I had no idea this would generate 60 posts. Ok, some idea. I was trying to make fun of the below post in the D.C. section.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=137524

Sorry I wasn't able to explain earlier, but I was out with friends who came in from Nashville, Delaware, Philly, and KC.

Your best thread evah.