PDA

View Full Version : Trading the Royals


rageeumr
03-22-2006, 12:56 PM
This thread or some version of it may have been done before, but I'm curious (and lazy).

Let's say that you have supreme control over KC sports teams. Let's also say that these teams are tradeable just like a player or other commodity.

The hypothetical teams in this scenario share the same positions (28th) in their respective ESPN power rankings. You can trade the Royals for:

1. The Washington Capitals (NHL)
2. The New York Knicks (NBA)

Or, of course, you can keep your beloved Royals.

EDIT: Of course the teams would stay in their respective leagues and play their respective sports. (Thanks for being a smart guy, ENDelt:)) I know this throws divisions off and stuff too, just vote in the damn poll!

ENDelt260
03-22-2006, 12:58 PM
I don't think the Knicks or Capitals have any better shot at winning the AL Central than the Royals do... but, it might be funny to see them try.

Ultra Peanut
03-22-2006, 01:00 PM
The Royals would probably have more success in the Atlantic Division than the Knicks, though.

tk13
03-22-2006, 01:01 PM
Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.

KHinz57
03-22-2006, 01:04 PM
Where are on Chiefs plan-et ... what is this word smart you speak of?

ENDelt260
03-22-2006, 01:04 PM
EDIT: Of course the teams would stay in their respective leagues and play their respective sports. (Thanks for being a smart guy, ENDelt:))

What a bunch of crap. I was all ready to pick the Capitals contingent upon them wearing hockey gear while they played baseball.

jidar
03-22-2006, 01:05 PM
Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.


Yeah because smart organizations know that when it comes to making money, it's better to lose money... ?

SLAG
03-22-2006, 01:05 PM
What a bunch of crap. I was all ready to pick the Capitals contingent upon them wearing hockey gear while they played baseball.

The Ice Skates wouldnt Make it to First base

ENDelt260
03-22-2006, 01:10 PM
The Ice Skates wouldnt Make it to First base
Some of those guys are pretty good on those things. I just wanna see a double-play broken up with a stick.

tk13
03-22-2006, 01:11 PM
Yeah because smart organizations know that when it comes to making money, it's better to lose money... ?
I.. don't... get it....

StcChief
03-22-2006, 01:28 PM
Cards fan's need a good weekend get away series each year that's close by in a beautiful stadium, more than half empty.

beavis
03-22-2006, 01:48 PM
Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.

ChiefsCountry
03-22-2006, 01:58 PM
Keep the Royals. MLB and NFL are the two sports that make you a big league city. NBA and NHL are nice but baseball and football are the biggies.

rageeumr
03-22-2006, 02:01 PM
Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.

Oh ya, well you're ugly :harumph:

58-4ever
03-22-2006, 02:05 PM
:(

SLAG
03-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Whats this Announcement thats going to happen?

Reaper16
03-22-2006, 02:09 PM
Keep the Royals. The Knicks don't have Alex Gordon and Billy Butler.

chiefqueen
03-22-2006, 03:31 PM
What a bunch of crap. I was all ready to pick the Capitals contingent upon them wearing hockey gear while they played baseball.

This would guarantee each first inning supplying more than enough runs to win that day because if the pitcher got close to the plate the gear gets hit (free base) otherwise the balls are way outside. (Pitchers would not throw inside, hockey players know how to fight.)

Old Dog
03-22-2006, 04:19 PM
Bring in an NBA team and we would have two teams in KC with no defense.