PDA

View Full Version : '05 draft revisited


Wile_E_Coyote
03-26-2006, 10:50 PM
#15(1) Derrick Johnson

#46(2) traded for Patrick Surtain

#77(3) traded for John Welborne

#99(3) [compensatory pick for Tait] Dustin Colquitt

#116(4) Craphonso Thorpe

#138(5) [part of Surtain trade, move up from #162] Boomer Grigsby

#147(5) [Detroit ?] Alphonso Hodge*

#150(5) traded for Carlos Hall

#187(6) Will Svitek

#199(6) [part of Truluck trade] Khari Long*

#299(7) James Kilian

# (7) [part of Truluck trade] Jeremy Parquet*

*bad info-Truluck was traded for a 5th & 6th. Not sure were the 7th came from

Dunit35
03-26-2006, 11:04 PM
I'll go with a 7.

cdcox
03-26-2006, 11:11 PM
too soon to rate

ct
03-27-2006, 09:30 AM
At this point I'll say an 8. Starting OLB, CB, OT/OG, P.
Depth/situational DLineman, and decent prospects at WR/CB.
Projects at ILB, OT(2).
Already gave up on DE, and QB Kilian ain't gonna cut it, IMO.

I go agree though, it's too early to tell. If Thorpe, Hodge, Boomer, Svitek, Parquet don't pan out, then it defintely falls to a lower grade.

jspchief
03-27-2006, 09:44 AM
too soon to rate

Wile_E_Coyote
04-21-2006, 09:32 AM
up

Iowanian
04-21-2006, 10:34 AM
If I had to say now...I'd say 7*.

* too soon to tell how some of the other draft picks are going to work out. Working with a coach who will play young players improves their chances of finding out what they're made of. My official score won't be available for 2 more seasons.

Gaz
04-21-2006, 10:51 AM
Too soon.

xoxo~
Gaz
Waiting for some data points.

Logical
04-21-2006, 12:08 PM
Gave it a 7 because of DJ, Surtain, Welborne and Colquitt. Not to early to judge those picks. If a couple of the second day picks work out this could someday movee into the 9-10 range, still way too early for that assessment though.

Wile_E_Coyote
04-25-2006, 09:47 AM
the '05 draft is going to be one tough act to follow

jspchief
04-25-2006, 10:09 AM
I still believe it's too soon to rate, but if forced i would probably call it a 9 or 10.

We got 3 immediate starters (DJ, Surtain, Colquitt. 4 if you count Welbourne) which by itself makes it an excellent draft. Then we got 4 players (Hodge, Thorpe, Grigsby, Svitek) that could still become at the very least solid ST contributors and possibly much more.

Overall, I'd call it very successful already, and we've yet to see what quite a few of these guys are capable of.

Lzen
04-25-2006, 03:10 PM
So let me get this straight. In 2004, we traded a future (2005 3rd rd) pick for John Welbourne?

Chiefnj
04-25-2006, 03:13 PM
So let me get this straight. In 2004, we traded a future (2005 3rd rd) pick for John Welbourne?

It was a 5th rounder in 2004 plus a conditional 2005 pick. The conditional pick turned out to be a 3rd rounder in 2005, based in large part on Welbourne's playing time in 2004.

Lzen
04-25-2006, 03:35 PM
It was a 5th rounder in 2004 plus a conditional 2005 pick. The conditional pick turned out to be a 3rd rounder in 2005, based in large part on Welbourne's playing time in 2004.

I see. Thanks. I think Welbourne has turned into a solid contributor and probably worth the picks.

Wile_E_Coyote
05-03-2006, 08:38 PM
'05 draft grades

Dr Z C+

NFL Draft Blitz C+

Yahoo Sports B-

-others needed a subsciption to see

Ultra Peanut
05-04-2006, 09:07 AM
I think it was pretty darn good. DJ, Colquitt, Hodge, Svitek, and to a lesser degree Cro, Grigsby, and Parquet... plus Surtain and -- partially -- Welbourn? Quite a rich haul, on the whole.

The only pick I didn't/don't like is Long.

Demonpenz
05-04-2006, 09:51 AM
wow. not one pro bowler on that draft. We could have had shawn merriman. Pathetic

Reaper16
05-04-2006, 11:07 AM
wow. not one pro bowler on that draft. We could have had shawn merriman. Pathetic
Merriman went 12, we picked at 15.

I still like DJ better, myself.

ChiefsOne
05-04-2006, 11:58 AM
What, everybody knows Carl can't draft.