PDA

View Full Version : Royals Fun Fact


carlos3652
07-05-2006, 10:50 AM
Losses since 2002:

Royals 453
Devil Rays 438
Tigers 434

:shake: :banghead: :cuss:

hypersensitiveZO6
07-05-2006, 10:51 AM
Does this mean the Royals actually suck?

noa
07-05-2006, 10:55 AM
Well, if there's anything to be optimistic about, its the number of Tigers losses and their performance this year. Still, the Tigers are lucky enough to not be owned by David Glass.

ChiTown
07-05-2006, 10:55 AM
Does this mean the Royals actually suck?

10 outta 10 fans agree. The Royals, as a Franchise over the last 10+ years, have blown chunks.

hypersensitiveZO6
07-05-2006, 10:57 AM
10 outta 10 fans agree. The Royals, as a Franchise over the last 10+ years, have blown chunks.

It can't be! :harumph:

Sully
07-05-2006, 11:01 AM
You are right. That was fun!

Cochise
07-05-2006, 11:06 AM
Thank you for this insigtful take. I thought the Royals were good until just now.

beavis
07-05-2006, 11:10 AM
Still, the Tigers are lucky enough to not be owned by David Glass.
Exactly. Any other owner would be spending $120 million on payroll, and we'd be going to the World Series this year!

VonneMarie
07-05-2006, 11:14 AM
Where's the fun in that? :spock:

carlos3652
07-05-2006, 11:27 AM
There is only one way to go... Up

The Tigers are amazing this year, and 2 years ago they had 119 losses...

I think that the Royals, with a little help next year, can end up closer to the .500 range and in 2-3 years actually compete for a playoff spot...

We need to try to keep our young talent and not send it away...

cookster50
07-05-2006, 11:43 AM
We need to try to keep our young talent and not send it away...


Make this guy the GM now! No other GM in the world has this strategy.

;)

Mr. Laz
07-05-2006, 12:29 PM
that fact doesn't seem particularly fun to me.