PDA

View Full Version : "Conservatives without Conscience": how conservatives are embracing authoritarianism


jAZ
07-11-2006, 10:32 AM
"Many people believe that neoconservatives and many Republicans appreciate that they are more likely to maintain influence and control of the presidency if the nation remains under ever increasing threats of terrorism, so they have no hesitation in persuing policies that can provoke potential terrorists throughout the world."
-- Nixon-Era Republican John Dean

<embed src=http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Countdown-John-Dean-07-10-06.wmv autostart=false></embed>

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0670037745/002-6535094-1127266?v=glance&n=283155

From Publishers Weekly
In his seventh book, Dean, the former Nixon legal counsel whom the FBI has called the "master manipulator" of the Watergate coverup, weighs in with a rebuke to Christian fundamentalists and other right-wing hard-liners. A self-described Goldwater conservative (indeed, Goldwater had planned to collaborate on this book before his death), he rails against the influence of social conservatives and neoconservatives within his party. Suffused with bitterness stemming from the controversies in which he has been embroiled, Dean's book paints a thin social science veneer over a litany of mostly ad hominem complaints. Purporting to show that social conservatives and neoconservatives are, on the whole, demonstrably authoritarian, bigoted, irrational and amoral, Conservatives Without Conscience offers helpful hints such as "Conservatives without conscience do not have horns and tails," and evinces a telling fascination with politicians' shady book deals. Though there is clearly much to condemn in the policies and tactics Dean deplores, assailing everyone from French political theorist Joseph de Maistre to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to the chairman of Yale University's conservative association as "Double High" social- dominance-oriented authoritarians undermines his journalistic credibility. Dean's lurid accusations may be entertaining, but they add little to the reasoned debate that Washington so sorely lacks today.

jspchief
07-11-2006, 10:40 AM
So he's claiming that they are trying to get us attacked so they will get elected?

ROFLROFL

Iowanian
07-11-2006, 10:41 AM
New and Improved depths of douchebaggary.

patteeu
07-11-2006, 10:44 AM
I'm a McGovern liberal and I think today's liberals are all child molesters who hate freedom and who want to sell out America to the UN and the Islamists. :rolleyes:

Oh, and Paul Wellstone was going to help me write a book, but I scrapped the idea when he died. What a party though!

BIG_DADDY
07-11-2006, 10:45 AM
New and Improved depths of douchebaggary.

Brought to you by the Aljizera Network.

Laz
07-11-2006, 10:49 AM
So he's claiming that they are trying to get us attacked so they will get elected?

ROFLROFL

i doubt that ... but they sure have been working on perfecting government through fear.


quite frankly they don't care what happens as long as they get what they want.


ends justifies the means

jAZ
07-11-2006, 10:54 AM
So he's claiming that they are trying to get us attacked so they will get elected?

ROFLROFL
Did you even watch the interview?

jspchief
07-11-2006, 10:55 AM
Did you even watch the interview?I read the bolded statement at the top of the thread.

I tried to watch the interview, but got bored and clicked back over to the lounge after about 15 seconds.

jAZ
07-11-2006, 10:58 AM
I read the bolded statement at the top of the thread.

I tried to watch the interview, but got bored and clicked back over to the lounge after about 15 seconds.
Did you get bored reading the bolded quote too? He said "they have no hesitation in persuing policies that can provoke potential terrorists". Disregard for negative consequences is not the same thing as "trying to get us attacked".

petegz28
07-11-2006, 11:53 AM
AWWWWW did someone not hug their Haji today?

Adept Havelock
07-11-2006, 04:30 PM
.

Dr. Van Halen
07-11-2006, 06:46 PM
AWWWWW did someone not hug their Haji today?

Is that supposed to be a racist comment? Please explain yourself.

Lurch
07-11-2006, 06:49 PM
" Dean....assailing everyone from French political theorist Joseph de Maistre to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to the chairman of Yale University's conservative association as "Double High" social- dominance-oriented authoritarians undermines his journalistic credibility. Dean's lurid accusations may be entertaining, but they add little to the reasoned debate that Washington so sorely lacks today....Nuff said. Reminds me of the loony Democratic Georgia Senator who spoke at the Republican convention. Same credibility issues.

Rausch
07-12-2006, 04:07 AM
In his seventh book, Dean, the former Nixon legal counsel whom the FBI has called the "master manipulator" of the Watergate coverup,

Well, what reason would there be not to take his word as gospel?... :rolleyes:

Lurch
07-12-2006, 06:41 AM
Well, what reason would there be not to take his word as gospel?... :rolleyes:Yeah, credibility only seems to be important for some when "their" side is being criticized or villified. Yeah, my point seem to have kinda of shut him up.

jAZ
07-12-2006, 10:37 PM
From the DailyShow...
<embed src=http://movies.crooksandliars.com/TDS-John-Dean.wmv autostart=false></embed>

Mr. Kotter
07-12-2006, 10:56 PM
:rolleyes:

This is about one thing:

$


This is about three words:

Dean's Retirement Funds

He's getting while the gettin' is good, and will be laughing all the way to the bank....along with Ann Coulter.:shake:

ChiefFripp
07-13-2006, 12:05 PM
So he's claiming that they are trying to get us attacked so they will get elected?

ROFLROFL
...and you'd be suprised by that?