PDA

View Full Version : Over/Under on Leinert Stats


Braincase
10-08-2006, 01:19 PM
I'm going to go with 5 sacks, 6 bail-out passes at the sidelines and three interceptions - Law 2, Mitchell 1.

ChiefsfaninPA
10-08-2006, 01:21 PM
Under. On the INTS only though. He will probably just throw a lot away and not try to make something. They have probably drilled this into his head all week. I like the other stat though.

the Talking Can
10-08-2006, 01:22 PM
Law is going to bait the rookie. I know it.

Wa-Z
10-08-2006, 01:24 PM
Who should I start at D...KC or San Diego?

siberian khatru
10-08-2006, 01:24 PM
Law is going to bait the rookie. I know it.

I keep thinking of what Deron Cherry pulled on Marijuanavich in the 1991 playoff gave vs. Oakland.

Leinert's smarter (and more sober) than odd Todd, but I would still like to see the wily vet sucker the rook into some INTs.

ChiefsfaninPA
10-08-2006, 01:26 PM
Who should I start at D...KC or San Diego?


KC, it worked well last week.

Count Alex's Losses
10-08-2006, 01:26 PM
Leinart won't throw for more than 150 yards.

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:32 PM
If the Chiefs get as far ahead as some people think they will he'll get more than that just passing when being behind.......if he has a low yards total it probably means they're winning.

Short Leash Hootie
10-08-2006, 01:34 PM
If the Chiefs get as far ahead as some people think they will he'll get more than that just passing when being behind.......if he has a low yards total it probably means they're winning.
Alex Smith had what, 90 passing yards last week?

I don't think low pssing yards is an indication of anything necessarily.

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:35 PM
Alex Smith had what, 90 passing yards last week?

I don't think low pssing yards is an indication of anything necessarily.

Alex Smith doesn't have 2 pro bowl WR's.......

Count Alex's Losses
10-08-2006, 01:35 PM
Yep. If we get a big lead we'll just run the clock out on offense.

Short Leash Hootie
10-08-2006, 01:38 PM
Alex Smith doesn't have 2 pro bowl WR's.......
Antonio Bryant isn't bad and his line, though not great, isn't nearly as abysmal as Leinart's line.

All I'm saying is, if Leinart ends up with less than 200 yards passing, we win the game. If he ends up with more, there is a chance we'll lose the game, IMO. Edge won't do shit against us. He might end up with 40 yards rushing...maybe.

banyon
10-08-2006, 01:38 PM
Yep. If we get a big lead we'll just run the clock out on offense.

So that's after our first FG right?

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:42 PM
Antonio Bryant isn't bad and his line, though not great, isn't nearly as abysmal as Leinart's line.

All I'm saying is, if Leinart ends up with less than 200 yards passing, we win the game. If he ends up with more, there is a chance we'll lose the game, IMO. Edge won't do shit against us. He might end up with 40 yards rushing...maybe.

Arizona's better than the 49ers are........this games on the road, I doubt the Chiefs blow them out 24-21 is what I'm expecting.

Count Alex's Losses
10-08-2006, 01:43 PM
Arizona's better than the 49ers are........t

Not on offense.

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:45 PM
Not on offense.

Thier skill positions are better.......neither team has a very good line.

Count Alex's Losses
10-08-2006, 01:48 PM
The 49ers line is much better than Arizona's. I don't think there is any comparison.

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:49 PM
Eh if I had a choice I'd still take Arizonas overall offense over the 49ers.

Count Alex's Losses
10-08-2006, 01:51 PM
I've seen both of them play several times. There's no comparison. Arizona has been an absolute mess on offense.

FAX
10-08-2006, 01:51 PM
The Birdie wide outs are a little scary.

I guess you have to get them the ball, though.

FAX

Mecca
10-08-2006, 01:54 PM
I've seen both of them play several times. There's no comparison. Arizona has been an absolute mess on offense.

Well Kurt Warner......Arizona beat the 49ers, so there :)