PDA

View Full Version : Can I have my sig of Carl Peterson back? Thank you.


BWillie
12-19-2006, 08:56 PM
I will make it smaller. Some mod must really hate the mighty King Carl to completely revoke my sig privileges. Would you rather me make it my avatar? Maybe I'll do both..hmmmm ROFL I need to change my avatar anyway. Just too lazy

Mecca
12-19-2006, 08:57 PM
Carl Peterson infests everything he touches with crap...refrain from posting his pics here.

Chief Henry
12-19-2006, 08:58 PM
Carl Peterson infests everything he touches with crap...refrain from posting his pics here.


I love that USC Butt. where did you get that ?

Douche Baggins
12-19-2006, 09:02 PM
The sig police noticed that violation. We stepped back recently in light of tragic events, but this offseason will be scorched earth. NO TRANSGRESSORS. OUR WORD IS LAW.

BWillie
12-19-2006, 09:04 PM
Carl Peterson infests everything he touches with crap...refrain from posting his pics here.

Nope, guess again. One of the best GM's in the game. He deserves to be tributed by at least one chiefs fan. Since I've not encounted anybody on this board who actually likes Carl, I feel it is my duty to stick up for him.

Short Leash Hootie
12-19-2006, 09:04 PM
I HAVE SIGS TURNED OFF BECAUSE I'M BADASS.

BWillie
12-19-2006, 09:05 PM
I HAVE SIGS TURNED OFF BECAUSE I'M BADASS.

I have had my sig privileges revoked because I'm a Bad Ass Mother F***er. A BAMF if you will.
:p

Short Leash Hootie
12-19-2006, 09:06 PM
don't worry I can't post any threads because all of the mods are ashamed of the fact I was so right about the Damon Huard/Trent Green debacle.

greg63
12-19-2006, 09:17 PM
Can I have my sig of Carl Peterson back?


No.


That is all. :p

BWillie
12-19-2006, 09:20 PM
No.


That is all. :p

Lamar would be rolling in his grave right now. Lamar and Carl were like best friends forever.

Douche Baggins
12-19-2006, 09:20 PM
This is going to be my offseason avatar:

http://img326.imageshack.us/img326/6427/judge20dreddvw6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Bill Parcells
12-19-2006, 09:22 PM
This is going to be my offseason avatar:

http://img326.imageshack.us/img326/6427/judge20dreddvw6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Judge dredd??

Mecca
12-19-2006, 09:26 PM
That was about the worst movie ever.

Bill Parcells
12-19-2006, 09:34 PM
That was about the worst movie ever.
I Concur

BWillie
12-19-2006, 09:36 PM
I Concur

Pretty sure Gigli was worse.

noa
12-19-2006, 09:37 PM
Pretty sure Gigli was worse.

I wouldn't want to admit to having seen that. At least Judge Dredd was geared towards men.

Mecca
12-19-2006, 09:38 PM
Pretty sure Gigli was worse.

If you actually watched that...........

Showgirls also ranks in the worst movies I've ever seen category.

BWillie
12-19-2006, 09:41 PM
If you actually watched that...........

Showgirls also ranks in the worst movies I've ever seen category.

Yeah, but at least you could see that chicks tits from Saved by the Bell. That was at least intriguing.

SNR
12-19-2006, 09:57 PM
Nope, guess again. One of the best GM's in the game. He deserves to be tributed by at least one chiefs fan. Since I've not encounted anybody on this board who actually likes Carl, I feel it is my duty to stick up for him.Is there any reason why the hell you think that?

Mecca
12-19-2006, 09:59 PM
Yeah, but at least you could see that chicks tits from Saved by the Bell. That was at least intriguing.

Of couse they had to pick the wrong Saved by the Bell chick....

BWillie
12-19-2006, 10:20 PM
Is there any reason why the hell you think that?

Have you not read my posts? Look at the Chiefs before 1989 and before Carl got here. Ok have you done that? Ok now go look at the Chiefs during the 90's and ever since. Ok have you done that? Ok good.

How can you place blame on a guy that gets you in the position to make the playoffs every year? You can't. I suppose it was his fault we went 10-6 last year and missed the playoffs? Newsflash! 10-6 almost always gets you in the playoffs.

To all of you who say, oh well Carl needs to just start from scratch after a bad year. Here are reasons why it would of been a bad idea to rebuild. Lets look a few of our good seasons shall we?

1990 11-5 ....8-7-1 the year BEFORE
1995 13-3 ....9-7 THE YEAR BEFORE
1997 13-3 .... 9-7 THE YEAR BEFORE
2003 13-3 .....8-8 THE YEAR BEFORE
2005 10-6 .....7-9 THE YEAR BEFORE

What conclusion does this lead to? It would of been a bad idea to rebuild those seasons based on the fact that we had a good season the VERY NEXT SEASON.

When your team's worst seasons are followed by your teams BEST SEASONS this is indicative of a great GM. I guess we should of rebuilded all those years we went 13-3 huh?

Lets see more evidence.. o ya. Chiefs are the 3rd most winningiest team in the 90's. Yes, the same era that included the mighty 49ers, Cowboys, and Bills.

I know how you think a GM should go out on the field at playoff time and win games, but I've yet to see any GM do that. A GM's job is to put your team in a position to make the playoffs year in and year out. Carl Peterson has done that.

Lets take a look at the seasons before Carl Peterson shall we?

1988 4-11
1987 4-11
1986 10-6
1985 6-10
1984 8-8
1983 6-10
1982 3-6
1981 9-7
1980 8-8
1979 7-9
1978 4-12
1977 2-12
1976 5-9
1975 5-9
1974 5-9
1973 7-5-2

NOW LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT LIFE AFTER CARL PETERSON

1990 11-5
1991 10-6
1992 10-6
1993 11-5
1994 9-7
1995 13-3
1996 9-7
1997 13-3
1998 7-9
1999 9-7
2000 7-9
2001 6-10
2002 8-8
2003 13-3
2004 7-9
2005 10-6

WOW LOOKS ALOT BETTER DOESN'T IT?
The best record the Chiefs had the 17 years before Carl was 10-6. The 16 years after Carl's hiring we've had over half of those seasons be better than that. Considering we went 10-6 last year, and many of us saw that as a dissapointment says alot that the mentality that Carl has molded the Kansas City Chiefs into.

SNR
12-19-2006, 10:32 PM
Have you not read my posts? Look at the Chiefs before 1989 and before Carl got here. Ok have you done that? Ok now go look at the Chiefs during the 90's and ever since. Ok have you done that? Ok good.

How can you place blame on a guy that gets you in the position to make the playoffs every year? You can't. I suppose it was his fault we went 10-6 last year and missed the playoffs? Newsflash! 10-6 almost always gets you in the playoffs.

To all of you who say, oh well Carl needs to just start from scratch after a bad year. Here are reasons why it would of been a bad idea to rebuild. Lets look a few of our good seasons shall we?

1990 11-5 ....8-7-1 the year BEFORE
1995 13-3 ....9-7 THE YEAR BEFORE
1997 13-3 .... 9-7 THE YEAR BEFORE
2003 13-3 .....8-8 THE YEAR BEFORE
2005 10-6 .....7-9 THE YEAR BEFORE

What conclusion does this lead to? It would of been a bad idea to rebuild those seasons based on the fact that we had a good season the VERY NEXT SEASON.

When your team's worst seasons are followed by your teams BEST SEASONS this is indicative of a great GM. I guess we should of rebuilded all those years we went 13-3 huh?

Lets see more evidence.. o ya. Chiefs are the 3rd most winningiest team in the 90's. Yes, the same era that included the mighty 49ers, Cowboys, and Bills.

I know how you think a GM should go out on the field at playoff time and win games, but I've yet to see any GM do that. A GM's job is to put your team in a position to make the playoffs year in and year out. Carl Peterson has done that.

Lets take a look at the seasons before Carl Peterson shall we?

1988 4-11
1987 4-11
1986 10-6
1985 6-10
1984 8-8
1983 6-10
1982 3-6
1981 9-7
1980 8-8
1979 7-9
1978 4-12
1977 2-12
1976 5-9
1975 5-9
1974 5-9
1973 7-5-2

NOW LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT LIFE AFTER CARL PETERSON

1990 11-5
1991 10-6
1992 10-6
1993 11-5
1994 9-7
1995 13-3
1996 9-7
1997 13-3
1998 7-9
1999 9-7
2000 7-9
2001 6-10
2002 8-8
2003 13-3
2004 7-9
2005 10-6

WOW LOOKS ALOT BETTER DOESN'T IT?
The best record the Chiefs had the 17 years before Carl was 10-6. The 16 years after Carl's hiring we've had over half of those seasons be better than that. Considering we went 10-6 last year, and many of us saw that as a dissapointment says alot that the mentality that Carl has molded the Kansas City Chiefs into.That's nice. But I like glory, not many years of not being shitty.

Two playoff wins. Zero Lamar Hunt Trophies. Zero Super Bowls. Zero playoff wins since 1993. That's personally why I myself don't like Carl Peterson.

BWillie
12-19-2006, 10:34 PM
That's nice. But I like glory, not many years of not being shitty.

Two playoff wins. Zero Lamar Hunt Trophies. Zero Super Bowls. Zero playoff wins since 1993. That's personally why I myself don't like Carl Peterson.

It's not Carl's fault we go 13-3 three times and lose. What is he supposed to do? Is it the Colts GM's fault that they have been losing in the playoffs? What is he supposed to do boot Peyton Manning and draft a new QB? Are you ****ing insane?

Iowanian
12-19-2006, 10:49 PM
You're definitely coming on strong in the last furlong to content for "douche of the year".

Congratulations.

jidar
12-19-2006, 10:51 PM
What's this now?

BWillie
12-19-2006, 10:57 PM
You're definitely coming on strong in the last furlong to content for "douche of the year".

Congratulations.

Well, what is your rebuttal. I have given you strong evidence to show why Carl is a good GM. Would you rather go back to Chiefs football the way it was in the 70's?

BWillie
12-19-2006, 11:01 PM
What's this now?

HAHA rep to you. You have roughly seven seconds until ur sig privileges are deceased.

Mecca
12-19-2006, 11:02 PM
Well, what is your rebuttal. I have given you strong evidence to show why Carl is a good GM. Would you rather go back to Chiefs football the way it was in the 70's?

The rebuttal is the Chiefs rank with teams like Arizona and Detroit when it comes to success.....

jidar
12-19-2006, 11:04 PM
HAHA rep to you. You have roughly seven seconds until ur sig privileges are deceased.

maybe. except I followed the rules with mine.

Bill Parcells
12-19-2006, 11:06 PM
HAHA rep to you. You have roughly seven seconds until ur sig privileges are deceased.
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=137590

BWillie
12-19-2006, 11:08 PM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=137590

I remember someone having a massive massive raider picture on their sig during Raider week. It was 3 times the size of mine. They even got a warning first. I will make it smaller, I just didn't know how until now. Looks like image shack has a little tool deal to help resize images and what not.

I still think it had more to do with the fact that it was Carl Peterson..hmm?

jidar
12-19-2006, 11:09 PM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=137590


although in all fairness, it really ought to say that where you actually edit your sig.

I knew the rule existed but couldn't remember the upper limits nor could I find the rules, so I just looked at one of the mods images and went by that.

Bill Parcells
12-19-2006, 11:13 PM
I remember someone having a massive massive raider picture on their sig during Raider week. It was 3 times the size of mine. They even got a warning first. I will make it smaller, I just didn't know how until now. Looks like image shack has a little tool deal to help resize images and what not.

I still think it had more to do with the fact that it was Carl Peterson..hmm?
I dont know..I do know Senator Dole bumped that thread recently..from what I recall..just figured I would give you the link....I'm not big on sigs..

Bill Parcells
12-19-2006, 11:15 PM
although in all fairness, it really ought to say that where you actually edit your sig.

I knew the rule existed but couldn't remember the upper limits nor could I find the rules, so I just looked at one of the mods images and went by that.
Imageshak has a resizing tool for message boards..I have no idea what the specs are though.so you're right.

milkman
12-19-2006, 11:16 PM
I know how you think a GM should go out on the field at playoff time and win games, but I've yet to see any GM do that. A GM's job is to put your team in a position to make the playoffs year in and year out. Carl Peterson has done that.

No we don't think that the GM should go out onto the field at playoff time and win games.

We think that a GM, at some point in his tenure, should be able to field a team that not only makes the playoffs, but actually advances.

Carl hasn't done that.

Nobody gives a rat's ass about teams that win regular season games.
You are remembered for what you are able to accomplish when the games really mean something.

3 playoff wins in 18 years.
3 ****ing wins.

That is pathetic.

**** Carl.

SNR
12-19-2006, 11:35 PM
The rebuttal is the Chiefs rank with teams like Arizona and Detroit when it comes to success.....But... but... that's the players' fault! You don't see Carl Peterson screwing up during games on the field do you lol!!!11eleven1

greg63
12-20-2006, 07:18 AM
This is going to be my offseason avatar:

http://img326.imageshack.us/img326/6427/judge20dreddvw6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

:shake:

Iowanian
12-20-2006, 08:32 AM
You actually think your opinions on CP are the only reasons I think you're an idiot of the year place finisher? I'm betting another horse to win, but you'll have $10 to show.

Well, what is your rebuttal. I have given you strong evidence to show why Carl is a good GM. Would you rather go back to Chiefs football the way it was in the 70's?

carter08
12-20-2006, 09:45 AM
Pretty sure Gigli was worse.

I would rather watch The History of the Dallas Cowboys tha Gigli