PDA

View Full Version : Shelter forced to kill 1,000 dogs and cats


Redrum_69
02-16-2007, 11:38 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/16/shelter.outbreak.ap/index.html


LAS VEGAS, Nevada (AP) -- An outbreak of contagious diseases at a shelter where officials admit they kept animals for too long without destroying them has forced the killing of about 1,000 dogs and cats, officials said.

Visiting inspectors from The Humane Society of the United States discovered the outbreak of the diseases -- distemper and Parvovirus in dogs and panleukopenia in cats -- Lied Animal Shelter spokesman Mark Fierro said.

"We caused the animals pain, and that is something we are committed will never happen in our shelter again," said Janie Greenspun Gale, board chairwoman for the Animal Foundation, which operates the Lied Animal Shelter, according to KTNV News in Las Vegas. (Watch scenes inside the shelter that became riddled with disease )

During a Thursday news conference, a tearful Greenspun Gale acknowledged that the shelter hadn't followed Humane Society policies, and though the animals were immunized, "we were using the wrong immunizations," KTNV reported.

The shelter staff didn't want to euthanize the animals simply because they'd been there too long or because the shelter needed more space, Greenspun Gale said, but the misguided effort backfired. Humane Society officials said as much when they visited the shelter.

"Instead of congratulating us for trying to save lives, instead of telling us how wonderful we were that we didn't want to put animals down for time and space, they told us we were causing animals to suffer," Greenspun Gale said, according to KTNV.

The mass culling, which began February 9, is believed to be the largest in the city's history and has prompted shelter officials to change their methods of caring for animals.

Animal rights activists said they were outraged by the killings.

"It's unforgivable in light of the fact that it was absolutely preventable," said Holly Stoberski, legal counsel for Heaven Can Wait Sanctuary, a group that has worked with Lied to find homes for impounded animals.

"They were not properly vaccinating the dogs and cats in a timely manner."

Shelter officials vowed to adopt new policies when it reopens Friday, including euthanizing animals after 72 hours at the shelter -- as the Humane Society recommends -- and improving conditions for the animals, including vaccinating them when they arrive.

Not all of the 1,000 animals were infected. Some were put down because they had gone unadopted for more than 120 days and were contributing to overcrowding that Humane Society officials said helped spread the diseases.

Lied Animal Shelter officials have said they did not realize animals were infected until the Humane Society team noticed animals with intestinal and respiratory problems.

The foundation contracts with Clark County and the cities of Las Vegas and North Las Vegas to handle abandoned, neglected and stray animals at Lied. The shelter annually adopts more than 7,000 dogs, cats, rabbits, gerbils, guinea pigs and other animals.

boogblaster
02-16-2007, 11:40 AM
Don't eat at Taco Bell this month ....

BIG_DADDY
02-16-2007, 11:41 AM
What a funny poll. Is this good or bad and the option is yes? LMAO

sd4chiefs
02-16-2007, 11:42 AM
If I vote yes am I voting that it is good or bad? If I vote no am I voting that it is bad or good? I thing I will vote wtf.

BIG_DADDY
02-16-2007, 11:44 AM
HSUS is the new PETA, I can understand why the shelter doesn't like them considering they are really for the complete extermination of all domestic animals. That being said if you have mass parvo in there put them down already and clean up.

BIG_DADDY
02-16-2007, 11:44 AM
If I vote yes am I voting that it is good or bad? If I vote no am I voting that it is bad or good? I thing I will vote wtf.

LMAO

htismaqe
02-16-2007, 11:47 AM
Anybody that's ever seen a dog die of parvo wouldn't have a problem with euthanizing them...

HemiEd
02-16-2007, 11:50 AM
WTF?

crazycoffey
02-16-2007, 11:57 AM
If I vote yes am I voting that it is good or bad? If I vote no am I voting that it is bad or good? I thing I will vote wtf.



ROFL I'm with you on this one. :hmmm:

Redrum_69
02-16-2007, 12:04 PM
What a funny poll. Is this good or bad and the option is yes? LMAO


makes as much sense as signing a bill to not ban pitbulls huh...

HonestChieffan
02-16-2007, 02:47 PM
Would the animal rights folks be happier if:

1) let em all suffer and die a painful death naturally?

2) turn em all out and let them infect the rest of the population?

putting them down was the only option.

Frazod
02-16-2007, 03:10 PM
I'll take "Reasons I Could Never Work At An Animal Shelter" for $1,000, Alex.

Simplex3
02-16-2007, 04:30 PM
I'll take "Reasons I Could Never Work At An Animal Shelter" for $1,000, Alex.
I hear that.

NaptownChief
02-16-2007, 04:40 PM
I'll take "Reasons I Could Never Work At An Animal Shelter" for $1,000, Alex.


My wife wanted to volunteer at a local shelter and I had to put the foot down...We are both very soft when it comes to animals...We already have 3 cats and a 5 month old puppy. If she worked at a shelter we would have about 10 cats and a house full of dogs.

This is a horrible story but when you read that standard Humane Society policy is to euthanize them after 72 hours on a normal bases then you realize killing them all only shortened their lives by 3 days.

Duck Dog
02-16-2007, 04:55 PM
This is what happens when animal welfare freaks take care of animals.

88TG88
02-16-2007, 05:29 PM
take care of em now before the get all wild, diseased and in suffering