PDA

View Full Version : Will KC win more than 7 games this year?


OctoberFart
06-07-2007, 08:24 PM
Thoughts?










I don't think so as with no good proven QB(Huard is a proven backup and proven horrible starter) LJ's knee is due to blow with all the carries he will be getting I just don't see it happening.

Mile High Mania
06-07-2007, 08:25 PM
Will Oakland win more than 2?

DMAC
06-07-2007, 08:27 PM
Will any poster pick a gayer name than AutumnWind?

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 08:28 PM
Huard is a proven horrible starter.

Where is the evidence for this statement?

There's way too much talent in KC for a 7-9 season. We're a better football team than we were last year.

OctoberFart
06-07-2007, 08:28 PM
Will any poster pick a gayer name than AutumnWind?
yes DMAC.

Spott
06-07-2007, 08:29 PM
If Croyle is the starter all season, we may win as many as 5.

DMAC
06-07-2007, 08:29 PM
yes DMAC.Gotta love a good comeback.
:rolleyes:

HemiEd
06-07-2007, 08:30 PM
I aint votin' in your ****ing pole until you show respect by changing that name.

But I will tell you this: This Herm Edwards Defense is going to be so strong they may have 7 ****ing shutouts.

DMAC
06-07-2007, 08:31 PM
If Croyle is the starter all season, we may win as many as 5.
It all depends on the play of the line. I don't think it will matter much at the QB position.

KcMizzou
06-07-2007, 08:32 PM
Where is the evidence for this statement?

There's way too much talent in KC for a 7-9 season. We're a better football team than we were last year.I hope you're right. I'm not really sure what to expect this season, but I like what Herm's doing with the roster so far.

It'll be refreshing (in a weird way) to go into a season with no expectations.

DMAC
06-07-2007, 08:34 PM
But I will tell you this: This Herm Edwards Defense is going to be so strong they may have 7 ****ing shutouts.Still worried about the CB position though. That is a big ? for me.

It's weird that we have Surtain and Law back there and I say that.

HemiEd
06-07-2007, 08:38 PM
Still worried about the CB position though. That is a big ? for me.

It's weird that we have Surtain and Law back there and I say that.

I think the line may just bring some pressure this year, from the middle. Something we haven't had in a while.

That should relieve some of the pressure, that is what they tell me anyhow, them guys that know this kind of stuff.

crazycoffey
06-07-2007, 08:41 PM
Of course, D'uh.

Raider fans are so stupid....

Bugeater
06-07-2007, 08:50 PM
Meh. I'd rather we go 4-12 than 7-9 or 8-8. If we're going to suck, we may as well suck bad enough to get better draft positions.

ChiefsCountry
06-07-2007, 08:59 PM
Knowing the Chiefs history at Arrowhead, 7 to 8 wins should be expected.

CHIEF4EVER
06-07-2007, 09:16 PM
Will KC win more than 7 games this year?

I don't know how many games we will win but I know we will win 7 more than the Faders.

Phobia
06-07-2007, 09:26 PM
I don't know if the Chiefs will win 7 games, but they'll win at least 5. Five wins plus the two gifts for showing up against Oakland= 7-9 minimum.

SNR
06-07-2007, 09:46 PM
Let the Fade fan have his fun. He's still in denial about the Raiders wasting the #1 overall pick of the draft on Jamarcus Leaf. They don't have a head coach, either.

The Chiefs WILL win at least 7 games this year, and won't have to worry about being in the AFCW cellar, as Oakland will have that spot locked up by midseason. If Croyle enjoys even the slightest bit of success this year, the Chiefs will be a playoff team.

Logical
06-07-2007, 09:53 PM
No, nope, negative, negatory, nein, well at least I really, really, really don't think so.

Mr. Kotter
06-07-2007, 09:56 PM
Autumnwind?
Blow me....:rolleyes:Worry about your own sorry assed team, will you? Sheesh.

HemiEd
06-07-2007, 09:56 PM
No, nope, negative, negatory, nein, well at least I really, really, really don't think so.

You think Trent Green was that integral to the Chiefs winning?

I for one, feel they have improved virtually everywhere else.

OctoberFart
06-07-2007, 10:00 PM
Chiefs will be in the cellar of the AFC west.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:01 PM
No, nope, negative, negatory, nein, well at least I really, really, really don't think so.

Croyle is that bad?

Logical
06-07-2007, 10:01 PM
You think Trent Green was that integral to the Chiefs winning?

I for one, feel they have improved virtually everywhere else.

I first of all think Huard got lucky and got soft teams to get his wins against. Second I am not convinced the D will be any more than marginally better this year. Third I personally believe our o-line willl be worse. 4th I expect LJ to be injured this season the way Herm is using him. Finally I expect Herm to give Croyle at least 8 starts of which he will be lucky to win more than 2 games. By the way that is fine if it results in Croyle being developed.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:02 PM
Second I am not convinced the D will be any more than marginally better this year.

Why is that a negative thing? That would place us just outside the Top 10.

trndobrd
06-07-2007, 10:05 PM
I first of all think Huard got lucky and got soft teams to get his wins against. Second I am not convinced the D will be any more than marginally better this year. Third I personally believe our o-line willl be worse. 4th I expect LJ to be injured this season the way Herm is using him. Finally I expect Herm to give Croyle at least 8 starts of which he will be lucky to win more than 2 games. By the way that is fine if it results in Croyle being developed.


Would you pick "A" or "B"?



.

HemiEd
06-07-2007, 10:14 PM
I first of all think Huard got lucky and got soft teams to get his wins against. .
Very possible, but I don't think any other team in our division swept the NFC west, did they?

Second I am not convinced the D will be any more than marginally better this year. .
I am convinced they are going to shock some people. I don't think Gun can **** this up.

Third I personally believe our o-line willl be worse. .
I look or a lot of improvement there, a lot.

4th I expect LJ to be injured this season the way Herm is using him..
I think that is over, that was a forced defensive posture most of the year IMO.

Finally I expect Herm to give Croyle at least 8 starts of which he will be lucky to win more than 2 games. .
That would really suck.

By the way that is fine if it results in Croyle being developed.
How long is his contract for?

KCBOSS1
06-07-2007, 10:14 PM
I don't think the o-line could be worse than last year. I'm still sick that Green is gone. But somehow, I'm optimistic. I've got a strange feeling that we're going to have a decent year. I don't know.

KCBOSS1
06-07-2007, 10:15 PM
At least we'll stomp the Raiders...eh?

Mecca
06-07-2007, 10:16 PM
Even if the Chiefs overall as a team are better, if Brodie Croyle starts 16 games there's a good chance they'll win 6 games with 10 win talent.......that's what happens when you play a young QB.

I'll be surprised if LJ is the same back this year and avoids injury.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:18 PM
that's what happens when you play a young QB.

.

http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/2111/20584593006qe3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

MadMax
06-07-2007, 10:18 PM
Meh. I'd rather we go 4-12 than 7-9 or 8-8. If we're going to suck, we may as well suck bad enough to get better draft positions.

I agree! :clap:

Mecca
06-07-2007, 10:23 PM
http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/2111/20584593006qe3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

3rd pick....3rd round pick and we don't have comparable talent to the Chargers.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:25 PM
3rd pick....3rd round pick and we don't have comparable talent to the Chargers.

Who cares where he was drafted? He's got all the tools and his arm is better than Rivers.'

Furthermore the Chargers had a weak WR corps last year and no one thought their offensive line was going to be anything special.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:26 PM
3rd pick....3rd round pick.

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6876/joe20montanajpgdn0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

HemiEd
06-07-2007, 10:29 PM
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6876/joe20montanajpgdn0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

It is our turn for something like that to happen.

Mecca
06-07-2007, 10:37 PM
LOL.......that's nice and all but there is a reason the guy was a 3rd round pick and went after guys like Kellen Clemens.

Sure he has talent but he has a tendency to get hurt when people breathe on him......If you think the Chiefs are gonna go out there and be better than last year with a QB in his first year starting.....I think you're gonna be disappointed.

Count Zarth
06-07-2007, 10:38 PM
Croyle took a beating his senior season and didn't get hurt. In fact all of his injuries were non-contact injuries.

OctoberFart
06-07-2007, 10:59 PM
Who cares where he was drafted? He's got all the tools and his arm is better than Rivers.'

Furthermore the Chargers had a weak WR corps last year and no one thought their offensive line was going to be anything special.


You are about the biggest blind homer I have ever seen.

Mr. Kotter
06-07-2007, 11:16 PM
You are about the biggest blind homer I have ever seen.

And you are the biggest tea-bagging bay city football fan, this side of San Francisco.

You suck shit. You are a used tampon from a sweaty fat hog of a butch bull dyke.

ChiefsCountry
06-07-2007, 11:19 PM
3rd pick....3rd round pick and we don't have comparable talent to the Chargers.

On offense we do at least at the skill positions.

SNR
06-07-2007, 11:48 PM
LOL.......that's nice and all but there is a reason the guy was a 3rd round pick and went after guys like Kellen Clemens.

Sure he has talent but he has a tendency to get hurt when people breathe on him......If you think the Chiefs are gonna go out there and be better than last year with a QB in his first year starting.....I think you're gonna be disappointed.When Trent came back last season and going into the playoffs, he made more bad throws and mental errors than I've ever seen from a Chiefs QB since Elvis Grbac in the 98 season. Brodie can't be much worse, and at least we can all pretty much assume he'll get better as the season progresses. The question is merely how good can he become.

And I see you've taken to new heights with your dumbassed pessimism. Now you believe that draft order is the magical golden rule that tells all never lies. Well, if it means you can continue with your way of using fallacies to prove that the Chiefs are screwed, then yes, I agree that it's automatically written that Croyle will never be better than Cutler, Rivers, OR Russell, and far from that, he'll suck his entire career.

el borracho
06-07-2007, 11:58 PM
I can't answer that until I see the offensive line in at least 2 or 3 preseason games.

blueballs
06-08-2007, 12:32 AM
thoughts?
I think you will steal your Grandmother's SSI check
and blow her heart medication money on skull tats

Mecca
06-08-2007, 12:53 AM
Yes take what I say and completely blow it out of proportion......simply put I think expecting a winning record with a first year starting QB is expecting alot no more no less.

Virtua Chief
06-08-2007, 06:01 AM
KC's O-Line will be better than last year (with more youth and continuity than last year), the WRs should be better than last year, the RB situation will be better than last year, especially if Bennett is healthy

The D-line will be better than last year with two roster spots not being wasted (Hicks Sims) and Tank Tyler being drafted. The LBs and their depth is better. The improved front 7 will help young safties and experienced (slow 24) CBs greatly

I think we can win at least 9, and sweep the NFC north, especially the neutered bears. Rivers and Roethlisberger both had good 1st years recently, why can't Croyle? He has a few beasts on his side. We have to stay healthy.

It will be an more solid and complete team this year with more of Herm's guys and less BS, like is Priest playing, or Roaf retiring, or Lenny Walls. Be optimistic. Its less than 3 months away!

Pushead2
06-08-2007, 06:10 AM
11 - 5

Reerun_KC
06-08-2007, 07:16 AM
9-7

PhillyChiefFan
06-08-2007, 07:17 AM
The QB situation does not dictate the entire season, just LOOK at Grossman. Defense can hold their own and offense will get better and better, this season I dont' know about 11-5 (sorry to disagree Pushead) but I'm thinking a winning season may be in the cards.
Only thing I'm concerned about is the 4 road games at the beginning and tailend of the season. Aren't we the ONLY team in the NFL with that distinction??? WTF???

blueballs
06-08-2007, 07:18 AM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=164213

OnTheWarpath58
06-08-2007, 07:22 AM
LOL.......that's nice and all but there is a reason the guy was a 3rd round pick and went after guys like Kellen Clemens.

Yeah, the same reason that Tom Brady was a 6th Round pick and went after guys like Giovanni Carmazzi, Chris Redman, Tee Martin and Spergon Wynn.....

:rolleyes:

Reerun_KC
06-08-2007, 07:27 AM
Yeah, the same reason that Tom Brady was a 6th Round pick and went after guys like Giovanni Carmazzi, Chris Redman, Tee Martin and Spergon Wynn.....

:rolleyes:


Mecca just got served....

http://www.moviecentral.ca/content3/enews/you_got_served.jpg

Bowser
06-08-2007, 09:38 AM
You are about the biggest blind homer I have ever seen.

This coming from the guy that thinks the Raiders are anything other than a 4-12 team. LMAO

penguinz
06-08-2007, 09:48 AM
Mecca just got served....

http://www.moviecentral.ca/content3/enews/you_got_served.jpg
Mecca has proven time after time he he knows as much about football as Emanuel Lewis knows about being tall.

Pushead2
06-08-2007, 09:51 AM
Super Bowl Champions this year going 6-10 and squeaking into the playoffs. I retract my 11-5 bid.

Lzen
06-08-2007, 12:13 PM
I refuse to vote in a dumb shit poll that refers to my team as Queefs. Loser.

CupidStunt
06-08-2007, 12:22 PM
Twice as many wins as the Raiders, I'd say.

So probably 8-8.

OctoberFart
11-25-2007, 10:29 PM
Where is the evidence for this statement?

There's way too much talent in KC for a 7-9 season. We're a better football team than we were last year.

Look at this beauty. I would think you would be skinny from not being able to eat since you stick your foot in your mouth so often.

Count Zarth
11-25-2007, 10:31 PM
Losing Larry Johnson was a huge blow. Do you really think this team would be 4-7 with Johnson, AutumnFart? I don't.

Mecca
11-25-2007, 10:34 PM
Boy this thread is kinda funny......

I got SERVED though apparently...

Mr. Kotter
11-25-2007, 10:34 PM
And you are the biggest tea-bagging bay city football fan, this side of San Francisco.

You suck shit. You are a used tampon from a sweaty fat hog of a butch bull dyke.

You may, in the end be right....but damn...that sure put your silly ass, Autumn, in its place... ROFL

OctoberFart
11-25-2007, 10:35 PM
Losing Larry Johnson was a huge blow. Do you really think this team would be 4-7 with Johnson, AutumnFart? I don't.
He wouldn't of made a difference against Denver. Indy? Probably not as they played down to their talent. Today? Well wasn't 150 and 2TD's enough. Diaper Boy has looked like crap this year so yes they would still be 4-7. He got paid so all he worries about is getting laid.

luv
11-25-2007, 10:35 PM
Losing Larry Johnson was a huge blow. Do you really think this team would be 4-7 with Johnson, AutumnFart? I don't.
I don't think we'd be that much better off.

Mecca
11-25-2007, 10:38 PM
Notice how I said he'd get injured months in advance...

OctoberFart
11-25-2007, 10:40 PM
Knowing the Chiefs history at Arrowhead, 7 to 8 wins should be expected.

Best they can do is .500 at home. When was the last time KC had a losing record at home?

Mr. Flopnuts
11-25-2007, 11:10 PM
Best they can do is .500 at home. When was the last time KC had a losing record at home?

Nice win for you guys today. Don't get used to it.

Mr. Flopnuts
11-25-2007, 11:11 PM
Best they can do is .500 at home. When was the last time KC had a losing record at home?



We probably won't win another game this year. I honestly believe that.

luv
11-25-2007, 11:14 PM
We probably won't win another game this year. I honestly believe that.
C'mon....the Jets?

OctoberFart
11-25-2007, 11:18 PM
Nice win for you guys today. Don't get used to it.
I know because Oakland isn't that good. It's comforting to know that neither is the rest of the AFCW especially the chiefs.

Fruit Ninja
11-25-2007, 11:20 PM
Where is the evidence for this statement?

There's way too much talent in KC for a 7-9 season. We're a better football team than we were last year.
lol, just had to quote that. I dont blame ya though Clayton. I would have agreed with that before TC. Its one of them things. On paper we supposedly upgraded. Paper doesnt mean shit though.

Fruit Ninja
11-25-2007, 11:21 PM
I know because Oakland isn't that good. It's comforting to know that neither is the rest of the AFCW especially the chiefs.
Even if the Chiefs would have won, you could have been comfortable with the Chiefs being horrible.

Ugly Duck
11-25-2007, 11:32 PM
Originally Posted by GOATSE: There's way too much talent in KC for a 7-9 season. We're a better football team than we were last year.

lol, just had to quote that.

Ha! Here's a few of his predictions for today's game:

"I think it will be a blow-out.... Chiefs 24, Raiders 3"

"Raiders will be eviscerated at Arrowhead."