PDA

View Full Version : How many interceptions will Brodie Croyle throw tomorrow?


Claynus
11-17-2007, 10:07 PM
Just one interception in 47 attempts for Brodie this year.

How will he fare tomorrow in his first start?

KC_Connection
11-17-2007, 10:07 PM
3.

RustShack
11-17-2007, 10:09 PM
Why isn't none an option?

Claynus
11-17-2007, 10:10 PM
Why isn't none an option?

Just trying to be realistic.

the Talking Can
11-17-2007, 10:12 PM
jinx threads about injury...now ints....

how about we not sit around and try to piss off the gods....jesus

KC Tattoo
11-17-2007, 10:18 PM
jinx threads about injury...now ints....

how about we not sit around and try to piss off the gods....jesus

Exactly :shake:

As if he doesn't have just the Colts defense to deal with. We have to jinx him too. WTF

Reerun_KC
11-17-2007, 10:18 PM
he can throw 10 for all I care, Anything is better than watching an 11 year vet re-invent the fetal position...

beer bacon
11-17-2007, 10:26 PM
Two TDs and two INTs for Crodie Broyle.

Nzoner
11-17-2007, 10:31 PM
I said 2,this is one of the games that's either way it's all good because I have Indy's defense in my big money FF league.

KCJohnny
11-17-2007, 10:31 PM
He'll have a pic, but it will be on a defelection as he has not yet learned the art of the touch pass. His flamers will bounce off the mere human hands of Parker and Webb, and into the hands of Indy's hawkish defenders.

But Brodie will acquit himself well against the defending world champs with overall good decision and accurate throws. His day will literally be defined by how well he hooks up with Tony Gonzales. Gonzales own the Colts.

RustShack
11-18-2007, 02:49 PM
I think I called it, NONE! Suck it Goat!

Fruit Ninja
11-18-2007, 02:51 PM
Rust callled it.

Claynus
11-18-2007, 02:53 PM
Good for Brodie. Real good.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 02:53 PM
I think I called it, NONE! Suck it Goat!

But, but Huard would have... ummm Brodie is a turn offer machine. Remember preseason!!!

dj56dt58
11-18-2007, 03:06 PM
Why isn't none an option?


Just trying to be realistic.

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:17 PM
Once again, time #55,035- GOATSE is wrong.

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:31 PM
Once again, time #55,035- GOATSE is wrong.

I'm not sure where I said he'd throw an interception. You're reaching.

Cochise
11-18-2007, 03:32 PM
still desperately hoping he'll fail I see... If only we'd had downfield damon out there today...

ClevelandBronco
11-18-2007, 03:33 PM
I was off by two.

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:33 PM
still desperately hoping he'll fail I see... If only we'd had downfield damon out there today...

Nope. I want Brodie to go to the Hall of Fame and always have. I'm insulted that you think I'd want a Chiefs player to fail.

Damon Huard debates are pointless.

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:34 PM
I'm not sure where I said he'd throw an interception. You're reaching.

Um, in this thread?



Why isn't none an option?

Just trying to be realistic.

You're not very good with simple logical inferences are you? If you didn't literally say it, then you must not have meant it. I guess it'll always be this bad for you. if only you had been born in the late nineteenth century, you might've had some moderate success peddling "elixir" and "tonics" to the hillbillies on the outskirts of town.

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:35 PM
Um, in this thread?



You're not very good with simple logical inferences are you? If you didn't literally say it, then you must not have meant it. I guess it'll always be this bad for you.

You're reaching. Nowhere did I say he'd throw an interception.

Cochise
11-18-2007, 03:37 PM
Nope. I want Brodie to go to the Hall of Fame and always have. I'm insulted that you think I'd want a Chiefs player to fail.

Damon Huard debates are pointless.

Oh, come on... you had a 2 inch woody all day hoping the would go out there and suck, so you could blame the loss on him and tell everyone Huard is still god and you were right

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:37 PM
You're reaching. Nowhere did I say he'd throw an interception.

There's no other inference to make from the quoted material.

What does being realistic + not including zero as a poll option mean if not >= 1 INT?

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:38 PM
you had a 2 inch woody all day hoping the would go out there and suck,

Nothing could be further from the truth. I wanted Brodie to throw eighteen TDs.

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:39 PM
Nothing could be further from the truth. I wanted Brodie to throw eighteen TDs.

Sure sounds like it. All of your pro-Brodie posts have just cluttered the place...or not.

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:40 PM
Sure sounds like it. All of your pro-Brodie posts have just cluttered the place...or not.

I love Brodie Croyle. I want him to succeed.

BigMeatballDave
11-18-2007, 03:41 PM
I'm not sure where I said he'd throw an interception. You're reaching.BS. You said many times during this season that Brodie would throw more ints than Huard.

ClevelandBronco
11-18-2007, 03:42 PM
BS. You said many times during this season that Brodie would throw more ints than Huard.

Wouldn't that normally be expected from a youngster such as Croyle?

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:44 PM
Wouldn't that normally be expected from a youngster such as Croyle?

Assuming you weren't comparing him with the NFL INT leader, yes.

RustShack
11-18-2007, 03:45 PM
Are you still in pre school goatass?

Claynus
11-18-2007, 03:46 PM
Are you still in pre school goatass?

Watch your mouth, n00b. I was spamming this board when you were just logging on to AOL.

BigMeatballDave
11-18-2007, 03:46 PM
Wouldn't that normally be expected from a youngster such as Croyle?Yeah, honestly, I expected 2. He played better than I thought he would in his 1st career start.

ClevelandBronco
11-18-2007, 03:46 PM
Assuming you weren't comparing him with the NFL INT leader, yes.

That's not a fair characterization of Huard based on his performance last year.

banyon
11-18-2007, 03:51 PM
That's not a fair characterization of Huard based on his performance last year.

Why would I base the comparison on last year and not this year?

Even if I did, I would be hard pressed not to point out that Huard's decent #'s last year came against the worst passing defenses in the NFL.

Huard 2006

Vs. NFCW

KC 4-0 QB Rating 123.2

71/101 956 YDS 7 TD 0 INT

Vs. Everyone else

KC 0-4 (1/2 game v. CIN) QB Rating 66.7

60/117 636 YDS 1 TD 1 INT
______________________

Also perhaps worth mentioning that Huard's top numbers were compiled against these defenses in passing efficiency:

17 STL
24 ARI
26 SEA
28 SF

ILChief
11-18-2007, 03:52 PM
Where's the ZERO option? This looks more like a Huard poll

RustShack
11-18-2007, 03:54 PM
Oh no, the little kid pulled out the n00b word. I'm shaking in my little space boots.

ClevelandBronco
11-18-2007, 03:54 PM
Why would I base the comparison on last year and not this year?...

Because you were making a point about what GOATSE has been posting throughout this season. I'm assuming that some of what he posted at the beginning of the season at least was based on Huard's past performance.

The stats you posted help to flesh out your point.

the Talking Can
11-18-2007, 04:46 PM
Croyle would throw 5-6 ints if he played...everyone knows that.

Cochise
11-18-2007, 05:22 PM
Croyle would throw 5-6 ints if he played...everyone knows that.

We have to play Huard, his mistake-free game management will give us the best chance to win.

the Talking Can
11-18-2007, 05:30 PM
We have to play Huard, his mistake-free game management will give us the best chance to win.

Huard has the same completion percentage on 3rd and 3 as Peyton Manning.

Cochise
08-10-2013, 11:06 AM
Huard has the same completion percentage on 3rd and 3 as Peyton Manning.

I remember that!

Setsuna
08-10-2013, 11:09 AM
Quadruple banned

Big Smoke
08-10-2013, 12:04 PM
Quadruple banned

ROFL