PDA

View Full Version : L. Tynes


el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:41 PM
3 for 3 today, 14 for 17 on the year (82 percent) with a long of 48. Larry, come back. :deevee:

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 06:43 PM
No thanks.

He hasn't exactly been money this year, either. Missed PATs and such. At several points, there's been discussion that he was about to lose his job.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:52 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 06:53 PM
How many XP's has Rayner missed?

ASS11
11-18-2007, 06:55 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

Rayner is now 14 for 20.

**** you, Carl.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 06:57 PM
Maybe we can lure Nick Lowery out of retirement.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:59 PM
How many XP's has Rayner missed?
Zero... of course, we don't get in the endzone much this year.

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 07:00 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

He can go, too. Call me crazy, but I'd like to break the cycle of mediocrity, as it relates to kickers, of course. As a KC sports fan, I've learned to embrace average when it comes to my teams as a whole.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 07:00 PM
Zero... of course, we don't get in the endzone much this year.

true

ASS11
11-18-2007, 07:02 PM
I might actually keep Rayner. His kickoffs are outstanding. He's a young kicker, so he might improve in a few years.

ChiefsCountry
11-18-2007, 07:02 PM
We got a draft pick out the crap that is Tynes. Its a win/win.

kcfan82
11-18-2007, 07:03 PM
I blame the .0000000009 MPH wind in the dome today.

Even Vinatieri was off.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 07:03 PM
Rayner is now 14 for 20.

**** you, Carl.
Really? 70%? That is unforgivable. Does that also mean that Tynes is now 17 for 20 on the year (85%)?

ASS11
11-18-2007, 07:06 PM
Really? 70%? That is unforgivable. Does that also mean that Tynes is now 17 for 20 on the year (85%)?

Yep.

I was happy with Rayner up til this game. Missing a 45-yarder in a dome is inexcusable for a guy with his leg.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 07:10 PM
We got a draft pick out the crap that is Tynes. Its a win/win.
85% with a long of 48 is "crap" in your opinion? What do you think is average for a kicker and who is above average?

Hydrae
11-18-2007, 07:31 PM
He can go, too. Call me crazy, but I'd like to break the cycle of mediocrity, as it relates to kickers, of course. As a KC sports fan, I've learned to embrace average when it comes to my teams as a whole.


Who the hell would you replace him with? Even Vinatieri missed 2 in each of the last 2 games and he is as money as they come. Good luck with that search for the next great place kicker.

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 08:32 PM
Who the hell would you replace him with? Even Vinatieri missed 2 in each of the last 2 games and he is as money as they come. Good luck with that search for the next great place kicker.

No one, this year. Rayner is decent, but I don't think he's the long-term solution, so I'd be heads up in the off season for someone else, at the very least for competition in training camp.

Spott
11-18-2007, 08:36 PM
We would have still lost that game had we made all of the FG's. Indy would have just scored a TD at the end and won 17-16.

Deberg_1990
11-18-2007, 08:38 PM
Still dont want that bum. I dont think him or Rayner are the solution.


Carl whiffed big time on Medlock and should have selected Crosby.

Once again, Carl got fooled by the UCLA connection.

ASS11
11-18-2007, 08:44 PM
Carl whiffed big time on Medlock and should have selected Crosby.


Watch it now. Don't call him out on it or he'll get pissy.