PDA

View Full Version : L. Tynes


el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:41 PM
3 for 3 today, 14 for 17 on the year (82 percent) with a long of 48. Larry, come back. :deevee:

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 06:43 PM
No thanks.

He hasn't exactly been money this year, either. Missed PATs and such. At several points, there's been discussion that he was about to lose his job.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:52 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 06:53 PM
How many XP's has Rayner missed?

Count Alex's Losses
11-18-2007, 06:55 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

Rayner is now 14 for 20.

**** you, Carl.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 06:57 PM
Maybe we can lure Nick Lowery out of retirement.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 06:59 PM
How many XP's has Rayner missed?
Zero... of course, we don't get in the endzone much this year.

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 07:00 PM
Dave Rayner 13 for 17 on the year (76%), long of 49.

He can go, too. Call me crazy, but I'd like to break the cycle of mediocrity, as it relates to kickers, of course. As a KC sports fan, I've learned to embrace average when it comes to my teams as a whole.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 07:00 PM
Zero... of course, we don't get in the endzone much this year.

true

Count Alex's Losses
11-18-2007, 07:02 PM
I might actually keep Rayner. His kickoffs are outstanding. He's a young kicker, so he might improve in a few years.

ChiefsCountry
11-18-2007, 07:02 PM
We got a draft pick out the crap that is Tynes. Its a win/win.

kcfan82
11-18-2007, 07:03 PM
I blame the .0000000009 MPH wind in the dome today.

Even Vinatieri was off.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 07:03 PM
Rayner is now 14 for 20.

**** you, Carl.
Really? 70%? That is unforgivable. Does that also mean that Tynes is now 17 for 20 on the year (85%)?

Count Alex's Losses
11-18-2007, 07:06 PM
Really? 70%? That is unforgivable. Does that also mean that Tynes is now 17 for 20 on the year (85%)?

Yep.

I was happy with Rayner up til this game. Missing a 45-yarder in a dome is inexcusable for a guy with his leg.

el borracho
11-18-2007, 07:10 PM
We got a draft pick out the crap that is Tynes. Its a win/win.
85% with a long of 48 is "crap" in your opinion? What do you think is average for a kicker and who is above average?

Hydrae
11-18-2007, 07:31 PM
He can go, too. Call me crazy, but I'd like to break the cycle of mediocrity, as it relates to kickers, of course. As a KC sports fan, I've learned to embrace average when it comes to my teams as a whole.


Who the hell would you replace him with? Even Vinatieri missed 2 in each of the last 2 games and he is as money as they come. Good luck with that search for the next great place kicker.

DeezNutz
11-18-2007, 08:32 PM
Who the hell would you replace him with? Even Vinatieri missed 2 in each of the last 2 games and he is as money as they come. Good luck with that search for the next great place kicker.

No one, this year. Rayner is decent, but I don't think he's the long-term solution, so I'd be heads up in the off season for someone else, at the very least for competition in training camp.

Spott
11-18-2007, 08:36 PM
We would have still lost that game had we made all of the FG's. Indy would have just scored a TD at the end and won 17-16.

Deberg_1990
11-18-2007, 08:38 PM
Still dont want that bum. I dont think him or Rayner are the solution.


Carl whiffed big time on Medlock and should have selected Crosby.

Once again, Carl got fooled by the UCLA connection.

Count Alex's Losses
11-18-2007, 08:44 PM
Carl whiffed big time on Medlock and should have selected Crosby.


Watch it now. Don't call him out on it or he'll get pissy.