PDA

View Full Version : 10-6 or 4-12? Which is more likely for the Chiefs in 2007?


chiefsfan1963
11-18-2007, 06:26 PM
I'm liking what I've seen from Croyle. I'm thinking despite Solari and Herm he could conceivable go 3-3 from here on out. 7-9 looks likely.

I'm not sure where that will but us in the draft. Probably around the high teens low 20's. I'm bummed that we will go another year not getting a chance for a Top 5 or 10 pick. It is a shame given all our picks.

Cochise
11-18-2007, 06:29 PM
We've already got 6 losses. I don't think winning out is too likely. Even if we go 4-2, which seems almost as unlikely, the playoffs are a pipe dream.

I don't think it's unlikely at all that we finish in third place. The team that gets in from the AFC West will be the weakest team in the playoffs, but you can't get there with 8-8.

80% chance of 6-10 or 7-9, I think.

MIAdragon
11-18-2007, 06:30 PM
I see 2-4 in our future

Count Zarth
11-18-2007, 06:31 PM
I'm standing by 8-8.

Hydrae
11-18-2007, 06:33 PM
I started the season expecting 6-10 and have not seen anything to make me think I was wrong.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 06:36 PM
Well..considering our schedule goes something like this...

Nov. 25 - Oakland
Dec. 2 - San Diego
Dec. 9 - @ Denver
Dec. 16 - Tennessee
Dec. 23 - @ Detroit
Dec. 30 - @ New York Jets

I could see us pulling out a miracle and going on a spree, maybe losing one or two along the way. But then again I could see us beating GB and Denver at home. So 8-8 would be mighty nice, but 7-9 is probably more realistic.

9-7 isn't out of the realm of possibility, but I'd say there's about a 75% chance we go 7-9, 15% we go 8-8, 9% we go 9-7 and 1% we go 10-6.

Who knows though, Brodie may be our savior and the guiding light that allows Herm and our coaches to open this offense up a little bit and complement our fierce defense.

NUMBER7
11-18-2007, 06:38 PM
5 - 11...I am sticking with it

jjchieffan
11-18-2007, 08:00 PM
10-6. I will stick with that until we lose, then I will say 9-7. Call me a homer. Our D and Brodie has me stoked.

blueballs
11-18-2007, 08:11 PM
Is a top 5 pick really worth it
all that money on 1 player that could just as easily be a bust
10-15 less money if you get a bust like all teams picking there get

ChiefsCountry
11-18-2007, 08:12 PM
Where is cdcox with all the percents at?

chiefsfan1963
11-18-2007, 08:39 PM
Is a top 5 pick really worth it
all that money on 1 player that could just as easily be a bust
10-15 less money if you get a bust like all teams picking there get

Again folks keep talking about the 1st round. I'm talking about having a Top 5 in the later rounds. That's where being a Top 5 or 10 pick gives you an advantage. Folks on this board don't seem to understand this.

If you are picking in the low 20's in the later rounds a lot of good players are taken.

Thig Lyfe
11-18-2007, 08:42 PM
6-10, winning the AFC West

CoMoChief
11-18-2007, 08:46 PM
I dont know. I say 8-8 because the toughest part of the schedule is past us other than playing in DEN but DEN sucks so who knows.

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 08:47 PM
4-12 but its okay lions are going 6-10

blueballs
11-18-2007, 08:49 PM
Ryan Simms was a 6th
and set this team back in salary cap for years

KCJohnny
11-18-2007, 08:55 PM
10-6.

KC came within a FG of beating the world champs in their own house with a new QB in his first ever start.

It can only get easier. That was far and away the toughest game the Chiefs will have to play this year.

blueballs
11-18-2007, 08:59 PM
@Detriot sounds scary to me

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 09:16 PM
@Detriot sounds scary to me

that will be a sticky situation two teams that arent real

Pablo
11-18-2007, 09:57 PM
I don't care about where we place in the draft. Herm finds a way to get good players in the mid-late first round anyhow. Herm is a better judge of talent than most coaches in this league. That is one thing I can really give him credit for.

The Chiefs just have to go 8-8, which is feasible and they can win the AFC West. Such a sorry, weak division, but we can still win it. I'm all for it. Let Brodie get some experience.

Mecca
11-18-2007, 09:58 PM
6-10, 7-9 is more likely than anything.......

KCChiefsFan88
11-18-2007, 09:59 PM
5-11 or 6-10.

Maybe then the Chiefs will overhaul their offensive line, overhaul their offensive coach staff, overhaul their head coach position and overhaul who their GM is

StcChief
11-18-2007, 10:02 PM
7-9 or 8-8

Mecca
11-18-2007, 10:04 PM
Ok honestly for the 8-8 people.....where are 4 wins.....I'll give you Oakland and the Jets, even with their win over the Steelers...who are the other 2?

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:05 PM
Ok honestly for the 8-8 people.....where are 4 wins.....I'll give you Oakland and the Jets, even with their win over the Steelers...who are the other 2?Your beloved Titans and the inconsistent Chargers at home. Maybe Detroit or Denver, but I'm far less optomistic about those two.

Mecca
11-18-2007, 10:07 PM
If they beat the Titans it'll be like 10-7....

All these teams are so up and down who really knows at this point.

OctoberFart
11-18-2007, 10:08 PM
6-9 wins like I have been saying all along.

jjchieffan
11-18-2007, 10:09 PM
We win in Den, beat SD at home. We also shut down Detroit like we did Indy and win that one. I think we can even beat Tenn.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:10 PM
If they beat the Titans it'll be like 10-7....

All these teams are so up and down who really knows at this point.Sure, every team the Chiefs beat will be a 10-7, 14-10 type game. The last six weeks aren't scary or promising. They're a toss-up.

The Chiefs can win at home because they're a bit less conservative at home, and I don't believe any of the remaining teams have the real ability to blow the Chiefs out if our defense plays at a level remotely close to what they did today.

StcChief
11-18-2007, 10:10 PM
6-9 wins like I have been saying all along.
Faiders are in the basement where they belong, that's enough.

jjchieffan
11-18-2007, 10:10 PM
6-9 wins like I have been saying all along.

GO THE F*** AWAY TROLL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:11 PM
6-9 wins like I have been saying all along.
Sure, that's a legitimate range.

Raiders range is somewhere between 3-6.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:14 PM
Even an injured Colt offense should have been able to put up 21-24 on us at home.

But our D held them to 216 yards, and if they can stay in that sort of mode, the Chiefs will be in every game down the stretch.

Who knows, Brodie and Bowe may kick start this sh*t, but they're gonna have to because no RB is going to do anything of any worth this year.

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 10:15 PM
Even an injured Colt offense should have been able to put up 21-24 on us at home.

But our D held them to 216 yards, and if they can stay in that sort of mode, the Chiefs will be in every game down the stretch.

Who knows, Brodie and Bowe may kick start this sh*t, but they're gonna have to because no RB is going to do anything of any worth this year.

nah colts suck but they jus had a bad game...real bad

ChiefsCountry
11-18-2007, 10:15 PM
GO THE F*** AWAY TROLL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nah he can stay, him making fun of GoChiefs is enough for me.

OctoberFart
11-18-2007, 10:16 PM
GO THE F*** AWAY TROLL!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHAAAAA! WWWHHHHHAAAA!!! It's not my fault you can't handle the truth. Truth is not trolling.

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 10:18 PM
the lions will find a way to go 2-14

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:20 PM
nah colts suck but they jus had a bad game...real bad
The Colts didn't just blow this game and slide by..the Chiefs D shut Manning down. They played an even worse game the week before and managed to score 21 points and Manning threw for 328 yards, along with 6 picks. And barely lost that game.

I know everyone wants to say "Indy isn't themselves and this was a hoax", but I'm crediting our defense where credit is due. After Peyton threw that 38 yrd strike down the sideline in their first possession I thought we were done, but our D buckled down and got after him.

The Colts have had a bad stretch, but they've still got all the ingredients to put up 30+ points and shut the other team down any given week, especially at home.

jjchieffan
11-18-2007, 10:22 PM
WHAAAAA! WWWHHHHHAAAA!!! It's not my fault you can't handle the truth. Truth is not trolling.

I can handle the truth just fine. Picking a 4-6 team to win 6 to 9 games isnt going out on much of a limb. I have just had it with your trolling ass on this board. I have never read one constructive statement by you. You just come over here to be a d*ck, just like goatsex does on other boards. You are both trolls. So go back to your own board and talk about your piece of shit team dumb*ss!!

OctoberFart
11-18-2007, 10:22 PM
Sure, that's a legitimate range.

Raiders range is somewhere between 3-6.

That is pretty accurate although you are very optimistic for 6 wins. I was thinking 4 wins after seeing this team play past couple weeks.

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:24 PM
That is pretty accurate although you are very optimistic for 6 wins. I was thinking 4 wins after seeing this team play past couple weeks.Yeah, but I just pity the Raiders so much I thought I'd give them the benefit of the doubt and they might pull 4 wins off. Not next week, but maybe the following 5 games, they'll go 4-1. I doubt it, but anything is possible.

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 10:24 PM
The Colts didn't just blow this game and slide by..the Chiefs D shut Manning down. They played an even worse game the weak before and managed to score 21 points and Manning threw for 328 yards, along with 6 picks. And barely lost that game.

I know everyone wants to say "Indy isn't themselves and this was a hoax", but I'm crediting our defense where credit is due. After Peyton threw that 38 yrd strike down the sideline in their first possession I thought we were done, but our D buckled down and got after him.

i heard a stat earlier im kinda inebriated but it was something like 70 touchdowns patriots to 11 chiefs ....but i do like allen mullets are cool

Pablo
11-18-2007, 10:26 PM
i heard a stat earlier im kinda inebriated but it was something like 70 touchdowns patriots to 11 chiefs ....but i do like allen mullets are coolYeah..the Pats have 56 touchdowns already, I'm sure 11 is a fairly accurate estimate for the Chiefs.

But I bet we got those bastards beat in FG's!!! A-ha, we're better than them at something. But probably not.

blueballs
11-18-2007, 10:27 PM
They got Dallas Clark back also

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 10:29 PM
Yeah..the Pats have 56 touchdowns already, I'm sure 11 is a fairly accurate estimate for the Chiefs.

But I bet we got those bastards beat in FG's!!! A-ha, we're better than them at something. But probably not.

im gonna walk on as the patriots punter ----5foot 6 23 years old ---how hard could it be

barry_smilez20
11-18-2007, 10:29 PM
i just wish tony danza would kick for the lions

chiefsfan1963
11-19-2007, 10:51 AM
The Colts didn't just blow this game and slide by..the Chiefs D shut Manning down. They played an even worse game the week before and managed to score 21 points and Manning threw for 328 yards, along with 6 picks. And barely lost that game.

I know everyone wants to say "Indy isn't themselves and this was a hoax", but I'm crediting our defense where credit is due. After Peyton threw that 38 yrd strike down the sideline in their first possession I thought we were done, but our D buckled down and got after him.

The Colts have had a bad stretch, but they've still got all the ingredients to put up 30+ points and shut the other team down any given week, especially at home.

Our D did what it needed to do to win, our O as usual laid an egg! We are the mirror image of DV's Chiefs.

Croyle would have won that game despite Solari and Herm if that was his 10th regular game start.

chiefsfan1963
11-19-2007, 10:56 AM
i heard a stat earlier im kinda inebriated but it was something like 70 touchdowns patriots to 11 chiefs ....but i do like allen mullets are cool

Chief's are ranked 30th in O production. I remember after DV left I predicted that our O ranking would drop like a stone, most did not agree with me. :shake:

KCJohnny
11-19-2007, 11:00 AM
Chief's are ranked 30th in O production. I remember after DV left I predicted that our O ranking would drop like a stone, most did not agree with me. :shake:

I feel your pain, 63.
I said the same about the D when DV brought players and coaches west on I-70 in 2001.

I think we are better off needing a bit more punch on offense than trying to rebuild an entire defense. This defense has the potential to be great. That was a butt whuppin' KC laid on the Colts O yesterday. I think with Croyle, LJ, a real FB and 2-3 new OLmen, we have the chance to score 22 ppg (arena football league).

chiefsfan1963
11-19-2007, 02:20 PM
I feel your pain, 63.
I said the same about the D when DV brought players and coaches west on I-70 in 2001.

I think we are better off needing a bit more punch on offense than trying to rebuild an entire defense. This defense has the potential to be great. That was a butt whuppin' KC laid on the Colts O yesterday. I think with Croyle, LJ, a real FB and 2-3 new OLmen, we have the chance to score 22 ppg (arena football league).

I may agree with you, but you would have to replace Herm for at worst your buddy Marty to guarantee the result.