View Full Version : Are we now the youngest team in football?
11-21-2007, 05:22 PM
if we arent then we got to be close, we got a 2nd year qb, rookie rb, and rookie wr
11-21-2007, 05:35 PM
yeah, but all the age on the Oline negates all of that.
I believe we are, 1-60, the youngest. But we need to can the 30-to-35-year-old roster-fillers, which is likely to happen in the offseason. Replace Wiegmann, Welbourn, Dunn, Terry, Turley and Law with a collection of draft picks, younger guys already on board and middling free agents ranging from 25- to 28-years-old and we'll probably be the youngest 1-53 team in the NFL.
Plenty young at WR, RB, QB, DL, LB and S. Just need to freshen up on the OL and at CB. TE has Gonzalez but Wilson, his apparent 'successor', is young.
11-21-2007, 05:38 PM
I suspect KU is younger.
11-21-2007, 05:39 PM
For 53 man rosters I think the Packers are the youngest team.
vBulletin® v3.8.8, Copyright ©2000-2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.