PDA

View Full Version : NFL Draft Dallas may trade #22 AND #28 for KC's #5 to get McFadden.


John_Wayne
04-24-2008, 08:51 AM
Another trade scenerio that I heard on ESPN a few days ago. I just thought I'd report yet another trade scenerio for you to ponder.

Fire Me Boy!
04-24-2008, 08:52 AM
HTF would we sign three first round draft picks?

Reerun_KC
04-24-2008, 08:53 AM
HTF would we sign three first round draft picks?
95% of the time we cant sign one until mid season...

LMAO

markk
04-24-2008, 08:53 AM
17, 22, 28... not too shabby.

Mr. Kotter
04-24-2008, 08:54 AM
I have numerous colleagues who are big Cowboys fans....they say that a trade like this just won't happen...

FWIW, they say they simply don't have the cap space to sign a top ten pick, and to keep the guys they are intending to keep.

Molitoth
04-24-2008, 08:56 AM
I would rather have Chris Long.

bsp4444
04-24-2008, 09:23 AM
Too much wheeling and dealing can be a bad thing. I like having a top five pick so we have the option of getting an elite player and also having the 17th that we can move up or down from (or stay) depending on who's left. I feel it's the ideal situation for value amd flexibility.

TEX
04-24-2008, 09:26 AM
Too much wheeling and dealing can be a bad thing. I like having a top five pick so we have the option of getting an elite player and also having the 17th that we can move up or down from (or stay) depending on who's left. I feel it's the ideal situation for value amd flexibility.

Exactly.

Tribal Warfare
04-24-2008, 09:28 AM
Another trade scenerio that I heard on ESPN a few days ago. I just thought I'd report yet another trade scenerio for you to ponder.


Never going to happen

DaKCMan AP
04-24-2008, 09:30 AM
1. I don't want to move down that much such that our first pick is #17. We need to get an elite top-5 (or if a trade, at least a top-10) guy.

2. Dallas would have to give up more than #22 and #28 to move up to #5. Our #5 is worth 1700 pts. #22 (780), #28 (660) and their 2nd rounder #61 (292) is 1732pts.

Sure-Oz
04-24-2008, 09:31 AM
Too much wheeling and dealing can be a bad thing. I like having a top five pick so we have the option of getting an elite player and also having the 17th that we can move up or down from (or stay) depending on who's left. I feel it's the ideal situation for value amd flexibility.

exactly

StcChief
04-24-2008, 09:45 AM
If they want a top #5 pick, have a lousy year, just like everyone else. F Cowgirls.

CoMoChief
04-24-2008, 09:45 AM
exactly

I'm being serious when I say that I saw your avatar last night and had a bad dream about the Joker. Not kidding. He was coming to get me.

siberian khatru
04-24-2008, 09:48 AM
We're already in a great situation -- we have an elite spot and a lot of picks. What's the point of trading that far down out of an elite spot?

Take an elite player at 5 (or at worst, trade down a couple of spots and still get someone like Ellis at 7). Then you can still move one or two 3rds to go up from 17 and get a guy you're targeting, or stay at 17 and still get a good player. We have so many options as is.

Sure-Oz
04-24-2008, 09:49 AM
I'm being serious when I say that I saw your avatar last night and had a bad dream about the Joker. Not kidding. He was coming to get me.

ROFL

it isn't nearly as bad as a dream i had recently where a giant boneless buffalo wing was chasing me down the hwy....talk about ****ed up and i wasn't on anything...

That movie will kick ass though, im very excited

morphius
04-24-2008, 09:57 AM
I don't want to have anything to do with late first round picks, those are a nightmare.

old_geezer
04-24-2008, 10:19 AM
Dallas may trade #22 AND #28 for KC's #5 to get McFadden.

I usually keep quiet on all the draft possibilities but on this I've just got to say not just NO; but HELL NO.
We've already got more draft picks than Carl can shake a pecker at.

Mr. Laz
04-24-2008, 11:58 AM
Too much wheeling and dealing can be a bad thing. I like having a top five pick so we have the option of getting an elite player and also having the 17th that we can move up or down from (or stay) depending on who's left. I feel it's the ideal situation for value amd flexibility.
yep

stlchiefs
04-24-2008, 11:59 AM
95% of the time we cant sign one until mid season...

LMAO

60% of the time it works every time. Sex Panther

blueballs
04-24-2008, 12:11 PM
Jerry Jones has a fiddle of gold
but Peterson has no soul

Short Leash Hootie
04-24-2008, 12:13 PM
I'd do it for 22, 28 and 61...then move up to 11 using our early 3rd...let's make draft day REALLY fun, right?

Short Leash Hootie
04-24-2008, 12:14 PM
95% of the time we cant sign one until mid season...

LMAO

have we ever had a 1st round pick hold out into the season? I understand the hatred for Carl Peterson but some people are just downright STUPID about it...yourself included.

StcChief
04-24-2008, 12:14 PM
F Cowgirls. we have enough picks

chiefqueen
04-24-2008, 12:19 PM
IMO they would also have thrown in next year's #1 to make it even.

Coach
04-24-2008, 12:23 PM
Dallas should stay where they are, since I would imagine that Felix Jones will still be around there. They can trade up another team who is in the 15-20 range for Jones.

CupidStunt
04-24-2008, 12:45 PM
I wasn't completely against this a few weeks ago. Now, I'd f'ing hate it. Not after we got that 17th pick.

Frankie
04-24-2008, 12:58 PM
Let's see:

Our 5 = 1700 points
Their 22 and 28 = 1440 points.

Carl is not that stupid.

keg in kc
04-24-2008, 01:04 PM
IMO they would also have thrown in next year's #1 to make it even.If they threw in a first next year, I'd be all for it.

As much as I like the idea of drafting at 5, I'm not convinced there's anyone so elite in this draft that it will utterly kill us to draft at 17, 22 and 28.

And in fact, we could always swing multiple trades, and trade back up, and still be ahead another 1st in '09.

(But I don't think this happens, either way).

beavis
04-24-2008, 01:39 PM
I actually like the idea of picking up as many picks as possible. If you through enough darts at the board, you are bound to hit something. Consider who is making the decisions.

Brock
04-24-2008, 01:40 PM
I'd rather move up from 17 than down from 5.

Mile High Mania
04-24-2008, 01:45 PM
The last time Dallas traded 2 R1 picks... Joey Galloway bit them in the ass. There is no way I believe this has any life.

Frankie
04-24-2008, 02:48 PM
I'd rather move up from 17 than down from 5.

I agree, actually.

KCChiefsMan
04-24-2008, 02:51 PM
we haven't had a top 5 pick in ages. We need to draft an elite player at #5 so I would not like this trade at all.

siberian khatru
04-24-2008, 02:52 PM
I'd rather move up from 17 than down from 5.

I think that's a very real possibility.

SBK
04-24-2008, 02:52 PM
The ONLY way I would even get past the 'hello' part of the phone call is if this involved 3 first round picks. Both this year, and next years.

And even then it wouldn't be enough. Take the elite player at 5 and give the finger to people wanting our spot.

BigRock
04-24-2008, 04:03 PM
It won't happen but I'd rather trade them #17 (maybe throwing in a 3rd rounder to make it more even) and then Dallas could further package #17 with our 3rd and their own picks to move up farther into the top 10.

But from our perspective, we'd still have 6 picks in the first 3 rounds, but we'd have 3 first rounders instead of 3 third rounders.

OnTheWarpath58
04-24-2008, 04:13 PM
It won't happen but I'd rather trade them #17 (maybe throwing in a 3rd rounder to make it more even) and then Dallas could further package #17 with our 3rd and their own picks to move up farther into the top 10.

But from our perspective, we'd still have 6 picks in the first 3 rounds, but we'd have 3 first rounders instead of 3 third rounders.

You're right, it won't happen, but I actually kinda like that. The only reason they might move up is if Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie was to fall and they wanted to jump ahead of Philly and Tampa.

Cherilus at 22 and James Hardy at 28?

Sam Baker, Antoine Cason, Lawrence Jackson or Quentin Groves at 35?

Chiefmanwillcatch
04-24-2008, 04:22 PM
I want Chris Long too.

You have to consider the players that are available down there.

You math nerds think all this shit is linear with the draft and quality.

Bob Dole
04-24-2008, 04:36 PM
Let's see:

Our 5 = 1700 points
Their 22 and 28 = 1440 points.

Carl is not that stupid.

The same Carl that just traded his franchise tag player for less than the standard 2 firsts?

Um...ok.

Ultra Peanut
04-24-2008, 05:18 PM
No.

LiL stumppy
04-24-2008, 05:57 PM
LOL I wouldn't mind at all, but it would be hard to sign 3 first rounders.

Micjones
04-24-2008, 06:08 PM
That's tempting considering how many holes this team has, but I think we should be wheeling and dealing with the second of our two picks... Not the #5 overall pick.

Rain Man
04-24-2008, 06:32 PM
No. No.


No.

VonneMarie
04-24-2008, 06:35 PM
No, no and no.

AJKCFAN
04-24-2008, 06:47 PM
I'd only trade that far down if the deal was too good to pass up (and also factor in the Chiefs really not being thrilled with the available choices @ #5).

Something like if Ryan were still on the board, then to deal the 5 to the Falcons (who supposedly have a raging hard-on for him) for all 3 of the 2's, their better 3 AND next year's 1.

Falcons would end up with potentially Dorsey AND Ryan. They'd start Ryan in all likelihood from Week 1 and a rookie QB likely would mean a 6-10 season at best for them, giving the Chiefs two 1st round picks in the Top 12.

As for the Chiefs, besides the 2 1's for next year, they'd still have a 1 for this year @ #17 and have four second round picks and four 3rd rounds picks to start off things for Sunday. They won't necessarily get a high-imapct player anymore, but they'd have NINE Top 100 picks this weekend + 2 premier first round picks in '09. That could mean having a tremendous back-to-back draft years to really build up a collection of young talent.

Pestilence
04-24-2008, 06:52 PM
I'd only trade that far down if the deal was too good to pass up (and also factor in the Chiefs really not being thrilled with the available choices @ #5).

Something like if Ryan were still on the board, then to deal the 5 to the Falcons (who supposedly have a raging hard-on for him) for all 3 of the 2's, their better 3 AND next year's 1.

Falcons would end up with potentially Dorsey AND Ryan. They'd start Ryan in all likelihood from Week 1 and a rookie QB likely would mean a 6-10 season at best for them, giving the Chiefs two 1st round picks in the Top 12.

As for the Chiefs, besides the 2 1's for next year, they'd still have a 1 for this year @ #17 and have four second round picks and four 3rd rounds picks to start off things for Sunday. They won't necessarily get a high-imapct player anymore, but they'd have NINE Top 100 picks this weekend + 2 premier first round picks in '09. That could mean having a tremendous back-to-back draft years to really build up a collection of young talent.

****ing retarded.