PDA

View Full Version : Legal Lawsuit filed over Atlanta airport barring guns


Adept Havelock
07-01-2008, 02:15 PM
Any bets on how long before someone files a suit to carry on an aircraft?

Lawsuit filed over Atlanta airport barring guns

By SHANNON McCAFFREY, Associated Press Writer2 hours, 45 minutes ago

The nation's busiest airport dueled with gun rights advocates Tuesday over whether a new Georgia state law allows visitors to carry firearms at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

City officials in charge of the airport declared it a "gun-free zone" when a law allowing people to carry guns on public transit and other places took effect Tuesday. Gun rights supporters, including a state legislator who helped pass the law, quickly filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the designation.

"My message is simple: Leave your firearms at home," airport general manager Ben DeCosta told reporters at a news conference.

Atlanta officials said anyone carrying a gun at the airport could be arrested and charged with a misdemeanor.

The new state law allows people with a concealed weapons permit to carry guns into restaurants, state parks and on public transportation.

John Monroe, an attorney for the gun rights backers who filed the lawsuit, argued the Atlanta airport qualifies as public transportation. There are also restaurants in the terminal, which Monroe said should be accessible to gun-toting visitors under the new law.

Rep. Tim Bearden, a Republican from Villa Rica and a former police officer, is a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Bearden sponsored the state law.

He had told a newspaper he would carry a concealed weapon to the airport Tuesday when he picked up his family. But he told The Associated Press by telephone Tuesday morning, "There will be no reason for any confrontation at the airport."

The gun group argues that weapons should be allowed in the terminal up to the point where passengers pass through security to board their flights. The parking lot is off limits under the state law, but it allows travelers to carry a gun on MARTA trains and buses, which run directly to the airport.

Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin said citizens can't bring guns into the terminal and argued that airports remain attractive targets for terrorism.

Allowing citizens to carry firearms "would create an environment that would endanger millions of people," she said.

Franklin said she will lobby Congress to withhold federal funds from facilities that allow firearms on their premises.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080701/ap_on_re_us/airport_guns&printer=1;_ylt=AhzLDyiKYiBuNySmxeiBKjRH2ocA

Radar Chief
07-01-2008, 02:23 PM
Don’t think they’re going to win this one.
But I didn’t know that about “public transportation”. :hmmm:

SBK
07-01-2008, 02:25 PM
This law that went into effect today only deals with 3% of the GA population. The ones that have gone through the multiple background checks and have successfully applied for an received a license to carry. It's not a law that lets any swinging dick carry a concealed weapon around.

We all know gun free zones are the safest places on planet earth. Just ask the students at Virginia Tech.

Vegas_Dave
07-01-2008, 02:30 PM
We all know gun free zones are the safest places on planet earth. Just ask the students at Virginia Tech.

Well put. I hate the idea of "if guns are illegal, then we are all safer"...

The sad fact of the matter is that when law abiding citizes are forbidden by law to be able to protect themselves, criminals have easier pickings because we know that they will not abide by the "no gun" law.

I am glad that Nevada is a gun friendly state. Any citizen who legally can own a handgun can actually open carry it in public. When I am out, I have my Glock 19 on my hip in plain site.

little jacob
07-01-2008, 02:32 PM
Allowing citizens to carry firearms "would create an environment that would endanger millions of people," she said.

The data from concealed carry locales opposes this hysterical conclusion.

I support concealed carry vigorously and think there are relatively few places where it should be prohibited, but due to the unique dangers associated with an airport, i think it might be best if CCW was allowed on the grounds but not into the secure area.

As far as on the planes is concerned, I appreciate the point that CCW would likely have prevented 911, but instead I'd rather we step up the number of air marshals in service if we are concerned. A discharge on a plane has a different chain of consequences than does one elsewhere so different rules apply. In a potentially catastrophic situation like an airplane in flight we should know that no one but the marshal has an accessible weapon.

I also doubt that a few people would be able to pull off a 911 style incident again. I doubt after what happened that passengers today would allow it to happen again

Amnorix
07-01-2008, 02:45 PM
I also doubt that a few people would be able to pull off a 911 style incident again. I doubt after what happened that passengers today would allow it to happen again

Yeah. To be perfectly blunt and non-PC about it, Achmed with a boxcutter is going to get his s**t caved in. Someone might get sliced, but he'll be all done...