PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Favre to the Chiefs!!!!???


John_Wayne
07-07-2008, 11:01 PM
What would you think if that unlikely scenerio were to happen?

He'd make the Chiefs a better team for a year or two, ala Joe Montana.

As for me....... no thanks. I'm willing to sink or swim with Croyle. After being a Chiefs fan for 18 years, I'm ready for the youth movement.

BWillie
07-07-2008, 11:06 PM
Damn right. I want to go 9-7. Let's do it.

Ari Chi3fs
07-07-2008, 11:07 PM
Farve saw what happened to Trent Green, didn't he?

Why be Willie Mays in the Mets uniform?

If he were to go anywhere, the nearest team to his home area is New Orleans.

DeezNutz
07-07-2008, 11:08 PM
No thanks. Bring on Croyle, whom I don't believe is the answer. Hope I'm wrong, but maybe, just maybe, karma will be on the Chiefs side and another terrible year will allow them to find their own franchise QB.

(I don't want to hear about how there's not a front-line QB in next year's draft. Let us have false hope for a little while.)

88TG88
07-07-2008, 11:10 PM
no

chefsos
07-07-2008, 11:14 PM
...no thanks...

No thanks...

no
This.

Mecca
07-07-2008, 11:15 PM
If we were like Minnesota then I'd be for getting Favre but we aren't remotely close.

beach tribe
07-07-2008, 11:15 PM
What if the Vikes signed him?

dj56dt58
07-07-2008, 11:15 PM
If our Defense is top 5 and our o-line can block this year then yes..otherwise no

That said, if both those are true, we need to see what Brodie can do so..no

so really...i dont know?

DeezNutz
07-07-2008, 11:16 PM
If we were like Minnesota then I'd be for getting Favre but we aren't remotely close.

Isn't Favre's record in the dome terrible? I was thinking about that earlier today when the ESPN folks were kicking the idea around.

blueballs
07-07-2008, 11:16 PM
Like Carl would get him signed in time for training camp

FAX
07-07-2008, 11:20 PM
I'm not sure Fa-Vah-Ra's wacky "throw it up for grabs like a wedding garter" style would work in Herm's system. Within mere weeks, Fa-Vah-Ra would drive Herm completely crazy to the point he would start drooling and barking obscenities for no reason and repeatedly slamming his pecker in locker room doors and wearing a paper sack on his head and dancing like a chicken in front of Arrowhead on game days.

So, I say yes.

FAX

Fish
07-07-2008, 11:20 PM
Randall Cunningham to the Chiefs!!!!???

What would you think if that unlikely scenerio were to happen?

He'd make the Chiefs a better team for a year or two, ala Joe Montana.

As for me....... no thanks.

Killer thread.

Guru
07-07-2008, 11:22 PM
NO. I want our team to struggle and get better through the draft. No more stop gaps for mediocre seasons.

irishjayhawk
07-07-2008, 11:25 PM
I don't want that attention whore anywhere near our team.

Guru
07-07-2008, 11:34 PM
I don't want that attention whore anywhere near our team.

He would make the Montana trade look like small potatoes.

Mecca
07-07-2008, 11:39 PM
I enjoy how everyone is smack talking Favre now when he was basically doing this shit for the last 5 years.

irishjayhawk
07-07-2008, 11:51 PM
I enjoy how everyone is smack talking Favre now when he was basically doing this shit for the last 5 years.

I was talking Farve smack ever since he started and ESPN obliged his start with this shit.


ZOMG BREAKING NEWS BRETT FARVE'S DOG HAS INSIDE INFO!!!!111eleven

Adept Havelock
07-07-2008, 11:54 PM
No.

It would be like Watching Johnny U in a Bolts uniform. A travesty the likes I never want to see again.

little jacob
07-08-2008, 12:06 AM
no... find out what croyle has. if nothing, find another young qb

pr_capone
07-08-2008, 12:08 AM
Sure.... bring on Favre.

Straight up trade - Huard for Favre plus a 7th to GB.

At the very least when Croyle gets his stick body mangled by week 3, we will have someone who can teach Thigpen or next years drafted QB how to play the game.

OF course.... Favre would have to renegotiate his contract.

:D

SNR
07-08-2008, 12:09 AM
Gunther Fan to a disabilities center!!!!???

Make it happen, Carl!

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 12:11 AM
He would make the Montana trade look like small potatoes.

if they traded a 1st rounder for Favre, I'd quit.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 12:12 AM
Gunther Fan to a disabilities center!!!!???

Make it happen, Carl!

He'll bust him up after he's dead.

Carl could never seal the deal on time.

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:04 AM
if they traded a 1st rounder for Favre, I'd quit.

No you wouldn't.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:06 AM
No you wouldn't.


oh yes I would

become a fan of the ****ing toledo mudhens or something

RustShack
07-08-2008, 01:08 AM
I would much rather see Croyle or even Thigpen, but I wouldn't be super pissed if we brought him in without giving much away... especially if he took our team somewhere. I also wouldn't mind Croyle learning from him a little, I've heard they throw the ball simular.

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:11 AM
oh yes I would

become a fan of the ****ing toledo mudhens or something

More power to ya if you can. I still think you will be back as soon as Carl is gone though.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:11 AM
I would much rather see Croyle or even Thigpen, but I wouldn't be super pissed if we brought him in without giving much away... especially if he took our team somewhere. I also wouldn't mind Croyle learning from him a little, I've heard they throw the ball simular.


I think if a vet sits croyle down, he's done at this point

it's sink or swim time for brodie

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:13 AM
More power to ya if you can. I still think you will be back as soon as Carl is gone though.

probably so, but it would take a dramatic change

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:14 AM
probably so, but it would take a dramatic change

Doesn't matter. Favre is NOT coming.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:16 AM
Doesn't matter. Favre is NOT coming.


I know this, that's why I can make such a bold statement


kinda like my mccain one

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:17 AM
I know this, that's why I can make such a bold statement


kinda like my mccain one

Thats right, we are renaming you John McCain after the election.:thumb:

Chiefs Pantalones
07-08-2008, 01:17 AM
Where did you find this speculation that Favre would be a Chief?

Otter
07-08-2008, 01:17 AM
It would certainly fit the Chiefs Modus operandi being the unimaginative losers that run the team.

Maybe they'll be little Green Bay instead of little San Fran this time!

Mediocrity thinking at its finest.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:19 AM
Where did you find this speculation that Favre would be a Chief?


we're beating wpi to the punch in making it up

Chiefs Pantalones
07-08-2008, 01:22 AM
we're beating wpi to the punch in making it up

LOL good work

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:23 AM
we're beating wpi to the punch in making it up

Athan will be pissed that he got scooped.

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:24 AM
Athan will be pissed that he got scooped.

nah, he will accuse me of stealing it from his super duper premium section

his lawyers will be in touch with me tomorrow

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:30 AM
nah, he will accuse me of stealing it from his super duper premium section

his lawyers will be in touch with me tomorrow

Nope. It is officially copyrighted as of your original post.

Of course, they will say that was only speculation. ROFL

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:36 AM
Nope. It is officially copyrighted as of your original post.

Of course, they will say that was only speculation. ROFL

I'm trying to get in on some of this action

$10 a month I will happily email anyone my off the wall non fact based predictions

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:39 AM
I'm trying to get in on some of this action

$10 a month I will happily email anyone my off the wall non fact based predictions

Damn!!! $120 per year? The hell with that. LMAO

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:42 AM
Damn!!! $120 per year? The hell with that. LMAO

Guru, I like you so I'll tell you what I'm gonna do, just for you..


first month free, plus I'll steal a whole bunch of footage from nfl films and the networks and "create" a highlight film

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:49 AM
Guru, I like you so I'll tell you what I'm gonna do, just for you..


first month free, plus I'll steal a whole bunch of footage from nfl films and the networks and "create" a highlight film

Oh well hell. With all that lawbreaking, I'm in. :thumb:

J Diddy
07-08-2008, 01:51 AM
Oh well hell. With all that lawbreaking, I'm in. :thumb:

suddenly we sound like beavis and butthead

Guru
07-08-2008, 01:53 AM
suddenly we sound like beavis and butthead

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFG0SPwxF24&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RFG0SPwxF24&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

CoMoChief
07-08-2008, 02:23 AM
Randall Cunningham to the Chiefs!!!!???

What would you think if that unlikely scenerio were to happen?

He'd make the Chiefs a better team for a year or two, ala Joe Montana.

As for me....... no thanks.

Killer thread.

I was thinking Jeff George

Chief Chief
07-08-2008, 07:05 AM
If the Chiefs were to pick up Brett, just think of all the possibilities:

- For the first time in NFL history, league officials would instantly modify the original season schedule so that our team would play in prime time (Sunday/Monday night football) for at least 2 games in 2008.

- John Madden's cruiser would always be parked at Arrowhead during the weekdays.

- The Chiefs would be the only club ever to have 2 HOF QBs end their careers on the sidelines injured while enduring a loss in the playoffs.

- Favre and Croyle would have their own line of hunting gear (with the "Brett & Brody" label) which would be exclusively available at Cabela's.

PhillyChiefFan
07-08-2008, 07:06 AM
We are "getting younger" why would Herm sign a great, but old QB??

I respect him, but he should go out with dignity. A lot of people thought he should have retired years ago, and he proved he can still play, why change that?

Not good for a career, when you are the franchise for years and then switch to another team. Let's see...

1. Emmitt Smith
2. Michael Jordan
3. Willie Mays
4. Joe Montana

ChiefsFan4Life
07-08-2008, 07:33 AM
No thanks, we've already get a QB who can throw interceptions AND he's young

luv
07-08-2008, 07:38 AM
"He'd make the Chiefs a better team for a year or two, ala Joe Montana."


Exactly. I'd like to see us get better for the long haul, not two seasons.

Dartgod
07-08-2008, 07:54 AM
Who started this moronic thread?


Oh, Gunther Fan. Check...

StcChief
07-08-2008, 08:12 AM
it won't happen.

blueballs
07-08-2008, 09:58 AM
No thanks, we've already get a QB who can throw interceptions AND he's young

which would come first the sacks or the interceptions
defenses would be in a high pitched drooling fever

Chief Henry
07-08-2008, 10:00 AM
We don't want him.

HughC
07-12-2008, 06:33 PM
Just say no.

Bringing in Favre would be one step forward, two steps backward.

Unless Doc Brown can fix the flux capacitor and start up the deLorean so that the Chiefs get the '96 version of Favre, this would be a bad move for many reasons. In the last three seasons he's only thrown four more touchdowns than picks, and 100 of his passes in the last five years have been caught by guys wearing the other team's jersey; in the playoffs since 2000 he's thrown more interceptions than touchdowns.

Add to that his salary, salary cap implications, and whatever draft picks we would have to give up in order to get him in a trade. Oh yeah, and learning a new playbook and getting a rhythm and timing down with all new team mates in six weeks.


No thank you, I don't want another quick fix that will fall short and set us even further back.

Saleenman607
07-12-2008, 07:01 PM
Skip that joker........is all I can muster. Is it football season yet?

StcChief
07-12-2008, 07:19 PM
he ain't coming here. just forget it

cardken
07-12-2008, 08:00 PM
PRO FOOTBALL; Chiefs and 49ers Come to Terms on Montana Trade


By TOM FRIEND,
Published: April 21, 1993

Joe Montana, who helped the 49ers win four Super Bowls and was urged by fans to run for mayor, is officially leaving San Francisco.

Tonight, the 49ers traded the 36-year-old quarterback -- along with safety David Whitmore and a 1994 third-round draft pick -- to Kansas City for the Chiefs' first-round selection (the 18th over all) in the National Football League draft on Sunday.
Well with three more years on Farve than were on Montana, I say Third pick this year and fourth next. Nothing else.

KcMizzou
07-12-2008, 08:03 PM
We've got a nice start at rebuilding with this last draft, IMO. If Croyle does wash out, we'll pick high again, and have a chance to get one of the best QB's in the draft, along with high picks for other postitions.

Favre would make us better. He'd make us mediocre again, and we all know how that's worked out.

chiefs1111
07-12-2008, 08:08 PM
We've got a nice start at rebuilding with this last draft, IMO. If Croyle does wash out, we'll pick high again, and have a chance to get one of the best QB's in the draft, along with high picks for other postitions.

Favre would make us better. He'd make us mediocre again, and we all know how that's worked out.

Exactly,bringing Brett Farve here isn't going to even make us a playoff team,so it really wouldn't make much sense to.

Der Flöprer
07-12-2008, 08:15 PM
I enjoy how everyone is smack talking Favre now when he was basically doing this shit for the last 5 years.

So Mecca, it's obvious GB isn't going to keep Favre at his salary this year, but they're refusing his outright release. What does this say to free agent veterans about their organization?

Der Flöprer
07-12-2008, 08:15 PM
Something seems amiss:

I think the first thing is that you misspelled his name. It's Favor.

StcChief
07-12-2008, 08:17 PM
still not gonna happen. whatever your smoking it must be working

KCChiefsMan
07-12-2008, 08:20 PM
YAAAAYYYY!!!

no

Chiefnj2
07-12-2008, 08:59 PM
Did Favre suffer a loss of oxygen to the brain this past offseason? Unless he did, there is no way in hell he'd want to play for KC. Lets unretire after having a great season and go to a team with weak receivers, an extremely questionable OL and a questionable defense. Plus, Herm doesn't want a gambling gun slinger at QB. Herm couldn't deal with Green, there is now way Favre would fit in.

Ugly Duck
07-12-2008, 10:48 PM
If Croyle does wash out, we'll pick high again

Thats the spirit!

KcMizzou
07-12-2008, 11:12 PM
Thats the spirit!Yeah... you go ahead being excited about Paul friggin' Hackett.

See how that works out for ya.

I don't see how a Raider fan has a leg to stand on when it comes to a discussion about rebuilding a team. Your team has clearly shown the league how NOT to do it.

KCUnited
07-12-2008, 11:21 PM
Dude has won once at Arrowhead, seems like a good fit.

splatbass
07-12-2008, 11:41 PM
Sure.... bring on Favre.

Straight up trade - Huard for Favre plus a 7th to GB.

At the very least when Croyle gets his stick body mangled by week 3, we will have someone who can teach Thigpen or next years drafted QB how to play the game.

OF course.... Favre would have to renegotiate his contract.

:D

I think Favre would be a poor mentor to the young guys. What makes him a great QB are the intangibles - and you can't teach intangibles. He doesn't have great technique, and he tries to force things to happen, which often backfires on him. In short, the things he could teach we don't want our young QBs to do, and the things that make him great can't be taught.

redsurfer11
07-13-2008, 12:15 AM
I saw a milwaukee reporter on ESPN yesterday, said KC was the logical choice for Favre to end up.An AFC team that would not make the Packers look bad for trading Favre.I'd say no. Rather stick with Croyle, Thigpen and maybe Santos. See how it plays out this preseason.

Psyko Tek
07-13-2008, 12:19 AM
I'm not sure Fa-Vah-Ra's wacky "throw it up for grabs like a wedding garter" style would work in Herm's system. Within mere weeks, Fa-Vah-Ra would drive Herm completely crazy to the point he would start drooling and barking obscenities for no reason and repeatedly slamming his pecker in locker room doors and wearing a paper sack on his head and dancing like a chicken in front of Arrowhead on game days.

So, I say yes.

FAX

I was totally against this
until I saw Mr Fax's read on it

Now I want Favre here now

Ugly Duck
07-13-2008, 12:22 AM
I don't see how a Raider fan has a leg to stand on when it comes to a discussion about rebuilding a team. Your team has clearly shown the league how NOT to do it.

Hey... its too early in the season to determine that. Heck - we haven't even played a preseason game yet....

KcMizzou
07-13-2008, 12:24 AM
Hey... its too early in the season to determine that. Heck - we haven't even played a preseason game yet....We've had years to determine that... as far as your team's concerned.

Subterranean Alien
07-13-2008, 08:38 AM
After overhauling the entire team, why would they change the game plan?

ChiliConCarnage
07-13-2008, 09:41 AM
So Mecca, it's obvious GB isn't going to keep Favre at his salary this year, but they're refusing his outright release. What does this say to free agent veterans about their organization?

It says they don't want him signing with the Vikings a rival of the team? At least that's what I assume is happening. They want him to retire and go out a Packer. Worst case scenario is they have to trade him and be the goats but they get to choose where he goes.

Mr. Arrowhead
07-13-2008, 09:44 AM
also wouldnt that be a huge cap hit if they just release him

milkman
07-13-2008, 09:48 AM
also wouldnt that be a huge cap hit if they just release him

I think the cap hit remains the same whether they release him, they trade him, or he remains retired.

blueballs
07-13-2008, 10:04 AM
If Peterson made the trade for his rites
expect another retirement announcement
with in the hour

talastan
07-13-2008, 11:57 AM
Obviously I'm biased, but no....Favre is better off sticking with the team that was built around his talents. Secondly I'd like to say that I'm proud of those on the planet who are voting to stick with the youth movement. It shows that some of the "True" fans are actually waking up.

CoMoChief
07-13-2008, 12:18 PM
If this team had ....

1. A good Oline
2. A good defense
3. only the QB position to fill before being considered the top 2-3 teams in the conference, then I say bring him in.

Too bad we aren't involved in any of those situations. We have holes ****ing everywhere.

CoMoChief
07-13-2008, 12:21 PM
Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.

I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers.

If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm.

Bwana
07-13-2008, 12:23 PM
If this team had ....

1. A good Oline
2. A good defense
3. only the QB position to fill before being considered the top 2-3 teams in the conference, then I say bring him in.

Too bad we aren't involved in any of those situations. We have holes ****ing everywhere.

QFT

We are a long way from making a run at the big show. The only reason Peterson would bring him is is to help fill the seats, but not even Carl could be that stupid. :hmmm:

CoMoChief
07-13-2008, 12:26 PM
QFT

We are a long way from making a run at the big show.

I never said we were close to being a good team. Hence my post....."We have holes ****ing everywhere."

For instance if the Chiefs were in the same position right now as Minnesota, It would be dumb not to trade for Favre for a 4th-5th rd pick.

milkman
07-13-2008, 12:28 PM
Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.

I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers.

If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm.

Really, what has Favre done for GB.

Won one SB, and lead them to another, and thrown away several other opportunities, like last year when he threw that stupid int. in OT?

CoMoChief
07-13-2008, 01:58 PM
Really, what has Favre done for GB.

Won one SB, and lead them to another, and thrown away several other opportunities, like last year when he threw that stupid int. in OT?

Maybe he just only turned around their entire franchise into a contender just about every year since he's started.

With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB.

What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez????

Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL.

Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough.

It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well.

How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him.

You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on?

StcChief
07-13-2008, 02:00 PM
but what will the "No Favre League" do with out him.

Madden will have to find a new Knob to slobber over.

Bowser
07-13-2008, 02:02 PM
You know Carl Delano has a boner just thinking about the possibilities.

Pasta Giant Meatball
07-13-2008, 02:11 PM
You know Carl Delano has a boner just thinking about the possibilities.

Oh, you know it has got to be killing him with Brodie lined up to be the starter. Heck I still think Carl would rather Huard be the starter again :deevee:

Bowser
07-13-2008, 02:14 PM
Oh, you know it has got to be killing him with Brodie lined up to be the starter. Heck I still think Carl would rather Huard be the starter again :deevee:

Agreed. I'll never forget his smarmy look on Hard Knocks last year when Herm and Dick Curl are just about to go with Brodie as the starter, and Carl chimes in with his "Don't forget about Damon Huard" directive, the douche.

Bwana
07-13-2008, 02:19 PM
I never said we were close to being a good team. Hence my post....."We have holes ****ing everywhere."

For instance if the Chiefs were in the same position right now as Minnesota, It would be dumb not to trade for Favre for a 4th-5th rd pick.


:spock:

Dude, I was agreeing with your take on the state of the team. We are a long way off from filling in one spot and making a run at the AFC title.

Pasta Giant Meatball
07-13-2008, 02:36 PM
Agreed. I'll never forget his smarmy look on Hard Knocks last year when Herm and Dick Curl are just about to go with Brodie as the starter, and Carl chimes in with his "Don't forget about Damon Huard" directive, the douche.

Bout made me sick to my stomach watching that :Lin:

GoHuge
07-13-2008, 02:45 PM
In all honestyl the Chiefs run almost the exact same offense now that the Packers do.

But still....no.

vailpass
07-13-2008, 02:46 PM
Guru, I like you so I'll tell you what I'm gonna do, just for you..


first month free, plus I'll steal a whole bunch of footage from nfl films and the networks and "create" a highlight film

LMAO I"ve been looking into who the proper party within the NFL is to turn in GoChiefs and his plagerism buddies. It would be hilarious if Goodell's Goons came calling for Clayton and his mommy answered the door.

GoHuge
07-13-2008, 02:49 PM
Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.

I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers.

If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm.You know what sucks for the Packers? His contract is up after this year. His entire career he played in one game for millions. I'm sure that adds to the Packs frustration with this whole deal. They still probably aren't 100% in what they have in Rodgers.

KCChiefsFan88
07-13-2008, 04:34 PM
The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

luv
07-13-2008, 04:35 PM
The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

I don't think 0-16 is a real possibility. Even the Dolphins won last year.

KCinNY
07-13-2008, 06:50 PM
I don't think 0-16 is a real possibility. Even the Dolphins won last year.


True, but we do have the team and coaching staff for a legitimate run at perfection.

Keep hope alive Chiefs fans! 0 for 16 can happen in '08!

RedNeckRaider
07-13-2008, 07:14 PM
Maybe he just only turned around their entire franchise into a contender just about every year since he's started.

With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB.

What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez????

Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL.

Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough.

It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well.

How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him.

You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on?

I think his point is with the fact although he has won a Superbowl it was with way more talent than KC has to offer. He is one of the greats but nobody can argue much of what he has done is regular season for the most part. It will be strange to see him in Miami gear next year.

Rausch
07-13-2008, 07:22 PM
The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet.

For you maybe...

Chief Faithful
07-13-2008, 08:09 PM
It was fun watching Harmon Kilibrew in the early 70s on a young Royals team, but they didn't start winning until he was gone. It would be the same with Farve, fun to watch for a year or two then when the team is really ready to make a run it won't have a QB. We saw that act with Schottenhiemer in the 90's, a good team with no QB, so I would rather see a different act this time around.

Develop the young QB while the rest of the team is being rebuilt.

beach tribe
07-13-2008, 08:26 PM
The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

That's a foolish statement.

milkman
07-13-2008, 09:34 PM
Maybe he just only turned around their entire franchise into a contender just about every year since he's started.

With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB.

What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez????

Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL.

Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough.

It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well.

How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him.

You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on?

I think that Ron Wolf is the guy responsible for turning that franchise around, and Favre was a large piece of that puzzle, as was Reggie White.

But the fact is, Favre pissed away opportunities with his gunslinger mentality and boneheaded decisions as much as he contributed to the winning.

Fact is, their one SB win he didn't do anything special in that game or the playoffs.

Desmond Howard, White, and that RB (whose name escapes me) who had a remarkable postseason that year every bit as responsible, if not more than Brett favre.

And I thought my disdain for Peyton Manning was pretty well documented around here.

Deberg_1990
07-13-2008, 09:42 PM
Desmond Howard, White, and that RB (whose name escapes me) who had a remarkable postseason that year every bit as responsible, if not more than Brett favre.




Dorsey Levens. Andre Rison also contributed to the SB win.

StcChief
07-13-2008, 09:50 PM
whatever dope your smokin' send it over.

Pasta Giant Meatball
07-14-2008, 11:34 AM
That's a foolish statement.

Heh pretty standard for that douche.

PastorMikH
09-22-2008, 09:40 PM
Anyone still want him?

From what I'm seeing of tonights game, Thigpen did about as good for us yesterday as Favre is tonight. And Thiggy didn't cost us a high draft pick.

dj56dt58
09-22-2008, 09:41 PM
Anyone still want him?

From what I'm seeing of tonights game, Thigpen did about as good for us yesterday as Favre is tonight. And Thiggy didn't cost us a high draft pick.

speaking of this game and draft picks..Washington is looking pretty good too

ClevelandBronco
09-22-2008, 09:44 PM
May God Himself help you guys.

smittysbar
09-22-2008, 09:50 PM
thiggy isnt on the same lanet as farve. not eveb close. but no he wont be around long so there is no reason to have hm on our roster. it will be a while after herm is gone before we see a good team.
Posted via Mobile Device

ClevelandBronco
09-22-2008, 09:55 PM
I just wanted to chime in...

Posted via mobile device

Posted via stationary device

Der Flöprer
09-22-2008, 09:58 PM
I can't believe this thread got nearly this many responses. I've got a riveting question. If someone left a laptop in a busy cafe then walked outside................

PastorMikH
09-22-2008, 10:03 PM
thiggy isnt on the same lanet as farve. not eveb close. but no he wont be around long so there is no reason to have hm on our roster. it will be a while after herm is gone before we see a good team.
Posted via Mobile Device


No, he isn't on the same planet, but for the first half tonight Thiggy actually looked better (well, maybe Favre looked worse)

ClevelandBronco
09-22-2008, 10:04 PM
I can't believe this thread got nearly this many responses. I've got a riveting question. If someone left a laptop in a busy cafe then walked outside................

The douche who stole it would do your wife and the chick you'd never admit to your wife.

Der Flöprer
09-22-2008, 10:05 PM
The douche who stole it would do your wife and the chick you'd never admit to your wife.

Well, as long as it's not on the handlebars of a motorcycle. I mean, you have to draw a line somewhere.

blueballs
09-23-2008, 11:29 AM
The Jetsifacation of Favre is all but complete
everything the JETS touch goes bad