PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Issues With American economy effin up... It looks like this may become reality.


Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 08:33 PM
Collapse of the United States may lead to a North American Union integrating Canada, Mexico, and the US into one Police State

<!-- begin content --> http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/1776


Reposting updated articles for the wrap-up of politics and economics (http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/1771). Originally posted on 2007-12-05 as “Integration of Canada, United States and Mexico confirmed by Province of Manitoba: The North American Union (http://www.chycho.com/?q=North_American_Union)", and on 2008-03-03 as “Did Bush and Harper just commit Treason? Canadian government authorizes American troops to occupy Canada (http://www.chycho.com/?q=harper_treason).”
NAU will be a Multinational Corporate Takeover of North America
In the following video, the senior-most woman in Congress in her thirteenth term in the US House of Representatives, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (http://www.kaptur.house.gov/), who represents Northern Ohio's Ninth Congressional District (http://www.kaptur.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=143&Itemid=27), talks about the North American Union (NAU), which will integrate Canada, the US and Mexico under one centralized government (http://www.chycho.com/?q=fed_war).

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TShPYA-OuPs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
For more than 13 years North America’s SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO) and its members (http://www.nascocorridor.com/) have been working diligently towards creating this centralized government (http://www.chycho.com/?q=fed_war), however, our ‘elected’ leaders continue to deny that such a project even exists.
http://www.chycho.com//images/nasco_thumb.jpg (http://www.chycho.com//images/nasco.jpg)
click to enlarge - source (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50451)
There are three main reasons why our governments (http://www.chycho.com/?q=The_Corporation) are denying the existence of this project: First and foremost, it is treason (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51904) since it is in “total violation of the constitutional rights” of citizens for all three countries. Second, because it will lead to a new North American currency referred to as the ‘Amero’ (http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/369), which will be a Fiat currency (http://www.halexandria.org/dward297.htm) controlled by a monopolized private central bank (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/fr5.htm). And Third, because all discussion of such a union are being conducted behind closed doors, by private corporations and unelected bureaucrats (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965), without consulting the citizens of the three countries.

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6hiPrsc9g98" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
The following video is the Province of Manitoba’s Throne Speech on November 20, 2007 in which the government announces its plans for a new trade corridor running from Mexico, through the heartland of the United States all the way up to Churchill, Manitoba.

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Br31mdP8-Ug" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="300" width="375"></object>
How is it possible that plans for this project have been in the works for the last 13 years but Stephen Harper and George Bush continue to deny its existence? The Security and Prosperity Partnership summit (http://www.psp-spp.com/?q=en/aboutthespp) held in Montebello, Quebec in August 2007 (http://yayacanada.blogspot.com/search?q=montebello) was a meeting between private corporations to expediently implement the plans for a North American Union.
Stop SPP Protest - Union Leader stops provocateurs (Police that start Riots) (http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=6229)


<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/St1-WTc1kow" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
For Canadians (http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_view.asp?code=155076), “the fact that Harper refuses to debate the SPP fuels legitimate speculation that something criminal is going on, and that he is betraying the interests of Canadians. Sue Corcoran of the Council of Canadians rightly points out that the SPP, unlike the North American Free (sic) Trade Agreement, is not being discussed among elected legislators in full view of the public; rather, it’s being negotiated in secret by unelected bureaucrats.
“That is cause enough to warrant an investigation of Harper for sedition on the grounds that he is usurping the role of Parliament and undermining the sovereignty of Canada and the welfare of Canadians.”
In the United States, Lou Dobbs has reported on this issue.

<object height="30" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/14Li0Wa5rc0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
The most important fact about The North American Union is that it does not mean free trade and prosperity for the citizens of these countries. On the contrary, the security measures involved in implementing this consolidation will restrict movement of private individuals (http://www.chycho.com/?q=anomalies_prisons). The Security and Prosperity Partnership is a project to give absolute freedom to corporations while enslaving citizens.
Additional information on how to stop the integration of Canada, US, and Mexico, and to prevent the Amero (http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/kirby062806.html) from becoming the North American Currency visit the Stop the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America website (Canada) (http://www.stopspp.ca/stopspp/index.php) or Stop the SPP website (USA). (http://stopspp.com/stopspp/)
Additional detailed information on Canada’s future and the North American Union is available through the following discussion panel (59:37).
<embed style="width: 375px; height: 300px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-597658150123962324&hl=en-CA" flashvars=""> The North American Union will be a Police State
The Canadian government has yet again signed an agreement in secret with the United States in an attempt to dismantle Canada (http://www.chycho.com/?q=Dismantling_Canada). This latest agreement allows the US military to occupy Canada in case of an ‘emergency’ (http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=403d90d6-7a61-41ac-8cef-902a1d14879d&k=14984), and vice versa.
What constitutes an emergency you ask? We don’t know, it’s “up to civilian authorities in both countries on whether military assistance is requested or even used.” An emergency could mean that US troops could be used in Canada to protect oil and gas pipelines or even a road, while Canadian troops could be used to subdue American citizens. This agreement also allows the United States government to bypass the Posse Comitatus Act (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act) which is a “United States federal law passed on June 16, 1878” prohibiting federal uniformed services from exercising “police or peace officer powers” to maintain ‘law and order’ on non-federal property.
“Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas.” Why would Canada’s Conservative government not announce this event? Could it be because the “US military does not allow its soldiers to operate under foreign command so there are questions about who controls American forces if they are requested for service in Canada.”
Will Canadians witness American tanks rolling down their streets the same way that Americans witnessed it during the 2004 peace rallies in Los Angeles (http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/118865_comment.php#118868)?
http://www.chycho.com//images/tank.jpg (http://www.chycho.com//images/tank.jpg)
source (http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/118865_comment.php#118868)
Will American soldiers be stationed in Vancouver during the 2010 Olympics (http://www.2010watch.com/)? Or across Alberta to protect the Oil Sands (http://www.tarsandswatch.org/)? Most likely yes, especially if we consider that studies have found a 600 percent rise in terrorism since the US invasion of Iraq (http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/22/the_iraq_effect_new_study_finds).
If “Africans want no part of the American military (http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,536789,00.html)” what makes Stephen Harper (http://mikewatkins.ca/2005/12/04/harper-would-have-sent-canada-to-war-with-iraq/) think that Canadians want any part of it? More importantly however, will Canadians stand in the way of the tanks, as the Chinese did at Tiananmen Square (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989), when they start rolling across the border?

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9-nXT8lSnPQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="300" width="375"></object>
Or will they be ‘accommodating’ like the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic when the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies invaded (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Czechoslovakia) in 1968?

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TtDj99LFgpI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
Maybe Canadians will accept the Americans the way Austrians did in 1938 when Nazi Germany annexed Austria into Greater Germany (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anschluss).

<object height="300" width="375">


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KDQgQTyhFMo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="300" width="375"></object>
Keep in mind that if Canadian soldiers were not occupying Afghanistan, then the government could not use the pretext that we are in need of assistance to implement their plans. So many questions have been left unanswered by Stephen Harper, but that is the trademark of those who commit treason (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason), they are never forthcoming with answers and they always do things in secret.

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 08:50 PM
wow. KC will be a major HUB in this new deal.

http://www.chycho.com//images/nasco.jpg

SNR
07-23-2008, 08:53 PM
What are you, some kind of whacko Ron Paul supporter?

banyon
07-23-2008, 08:53 PM
which will be a Fiat currency controlled by a monopolized private central bank.

Oh, NOES! That would be terrible!


:hmmm:

penguinz
07-23-2008, 08:55 PM
You are a loon.

SNR
07-23-2008, 08:57 PM
Oh, NOES! That would be terrible!


:hmmm:Bernanke would have even MORE power. You're saying this is good?

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 08:58 PM
the reports are coming from some high up officials.

A friend sent this to me, its worth looking into. Lou Dobbs did a pretty interesting report on it.

This shit wouldn't surprise me.

banyon
07-23-2008, 08:59 PM
Bernanke would have even MORE power. You're saying this is good?

I'm saying it's not any different for us (except that the peso is the only thing worse than the dollar), even though the OP tries to make a big deal out of it.

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 09:03 PM
When you have all of these international companies buying up our main highways and leasing them for 99 years... seems like something is awry.

http://infowars.net/articles/may2008/200508Turnpike.htm

Chicago turnpike has already been purchased.

So, other countries will own our highways, and we will pay THEM the toll money.

BRILLIANT!!

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 09:05 PM
KC would benefit HUGE from this it looks like. Although it appears a bit clandestine.

THose of you who spout off that Im Looney Tunes, should watch a couple of those videos.

Ignorance is always bliss.

banyon
07-23-2008, 09:11 PM
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 09:17 PM
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression."
-- Thomas Paine

SBK
07-23-2008, 09:18 PM
OMG, George Bush blew up the World Trade Center....!

banyon
07-23-2008, 09:20 PM
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression."
-- Thomas Paine

Yep, I like that quote. That's why I put it in my sig.

FAX
07-23-2008, 09:22 PM
the reports are coming from some high up officials.

A friend sent this to me, its worth looking into. Lou Dobbs did a pretty interesting report on it.

This shit wouldn't surprise me.

The NAU is a vexatious concept, to be sure, Mr. Ari Chi3fs.

As a rule, I am skeptical of stories such as these, but I also attempt to dampen my own natural and somewhat excessive naivete. The fact is that, if the NAU were in the interests of the POWERS THAT BE, we should not doubt for an instant that serious efforts would be made to bring a North American Super State to fruition. When you think about it, such efforts, for example, might well include a manufactured financial crisis very similar to the one in which we currently find ourselves.

FAX

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 09:41 PM
The NAU is a vexatious concept, to be sure, Mr. Ari Chi3fs.

As a rule, I am skeptical of stories such as these, but I also attempt to dampen my own natural and somewhat excessive naivete. The fact is that, if the NAU were in the interests of the POWERS THAT BE, we should not doubt for an instant that serious efforts would be made to bring a North American Super State to fruition. When you think about it, such efforts, for example, might well include a manufactured financial crisis very similar to the one in which we currently find ourselves.

FAX

Ding!

It is certainly going to get worse before it gets better... when the pain is at its worst, they will offer this as the 'solution'

It seems like the classic foreshadowing. It is the Problem-Reaction-Solution

They create the problem, wait for the reaction, then offer their solution.

Which is why, this wouldnt surprise even though it seems a bit far fetched.

THe pieces of the puzzle are connecting though... countries buying our highways, the economy... etc.

We shall see. If true, this is treason at the highest levels.

markk
07-23-2008, 10:19 PM
Well, just to bat around this ball of absurdity for the moment, if we're going to have open borders and basically take on the support of Mexico's lower class anyway through providing jobs and, if some had their way, a full spectrum of government benefits, why not just annex the whole country? We could at least add their GDP, size of the state of Illinois, to ours and get something back.

And Canada has some of the world's largest reserves of natural resources.

(editor's note - not serious)

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 10:52 PM
Yeah everyone, I apologize for this farce. I mean seriously, why would there be a North American Union, its preposterous.

I mean the next thing you know, there will be some European Union, with one currency throughout Europe. A Euro or something.

HAHAHA... preposterous. What a farce.

markk
07-23-2008, 11:05 PM
Yeah everyone, I apologize for this farce. I mean seriously, why would there be a North American Union, its preposterous.

I mean the next thing you know, there will be some European Union, with one currency throughout Europe. A Euro or something.

HAHAHA... preposterous. What a farce.

i bet this has something to do with all the black helicopters following you around

Ari Chi3fs
07-23-2008, 11:54 PM
That's what people in Europe said a few years ago. heh.

***SPRAYER
07-24-2008, 09:09 AM
Wow. That's all I can say.

Nightfyre
07-24-2008, 09:11 AM
Eh, if this came to fruition (which is unlikely,) I could see there being a very violent public response.

BigChiefFan
07-24-2008, 10:01 AM
I find it rather thought-provoking and can see why Ari expressed concern. If you take the time to watch and listen to what was he posted in the thread header, there's some merit to this story. I don't think Lou Dobbs just made this up, do you all?

StcChief
07-24-2008, 12:32 PM
Tin foil we need more for hats