alnorth
08-31-2008, 02:31 PM
At what point do we stop rebuilding and relocate the whole damn city to higher ground?
Maybe climate change is making hurricanes more frequent, or maybe we've just been lucky the last few decades, but at some point this is going to cost a silly amount of money. Man-made ways to cope with the local geography are only going to do so much since the ground in that area has been sinking little by little every year.
Is there really no feasible way to leave the areas below sea level to nature and relocate most of the infrastructure, or do we need to spend hundreds of billions to rebuild the city 3 or 4 more times first?
Maybe climate change is making hurricanes more frequent, or maybe we've just been lucky the last few decades, but at some point this is going to cost a silly amount of money. Man-made ways to cope with the local geography are only going to do so much since the ground in that area has been sinking little by little every year.
Is there really no feasible way to leave the areas below sea level to nature and relocate most of the infrastructure, or do we need to spend hundreds of billions to rebuild the city 3 or 4 more times first?