PDA

View Full Version : Economics NYT's article , 09/30/08 from 09/30/99, Freddie and Fannie


ROYC75
10-06-2008, 12:34 AM
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Nine years ago today: NYT noted Dems forced Fannie Mae to loan to low incomes & minorities; bailout was anticipated


This article should be framed outside every polling station. It provides confirmation about the root cause of the current housing crisis. The fact that it was written by the New York Times considerably boosts its credibility in liberal eyes.

The NYT tells the story of what was going on in 1999...and provides the WHO and WHY.

After the Republicans took the White House in 2001 they made several attempts to create legislation to introduce oversight, including a bill co-sponsored by McCain in 2005. In 2005 the attempts were blocked by Dems....specifically Barnie Franks who denied there was a crisis. Similar Dem denials are on the record from when Republicans tried in 2003 and in 2007.

Notice who is quoted in the article...Obama's advisor and backer Franklin Raines
Obama's attempt to pin this mess on Senator McCain is a complete perversion of the truth.

The Dems know they're guilty as hell...otherwise we would have had a dozen congressional hearings initiated by now, which is Queen Pelosi's standard response to anything she can blame on her opponents.

H/t Newsbusters

September 30, 1999
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending
By STEVEN A. HOLMES

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

Source NYT Sept 30 1999

KCJohnny
10-06-2008, 01:24 AM
In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.


Bam.

Programmer
10-06-2008, 06:12 AM
Roy, those that are pimping Obama do not want truth, all they are interested in is driving anyone that is conservative out of Washington. They are doing their best to do the same here.

ROYC75
10-06-2008, 07:39 AM
I mean, it's not like any of this stuff had anything to do with the economy , nothing , OK, you see the Dems, Libs and Obots do not believe any of this guys, it's Bush's fault.

He's the debil .........

KCJohnny
10-06-2008, 07:47 AM
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/nGnP6E6Ioik" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="525" height="340" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>

jiveturkey
10-06-2008, 07:50 AM
It was certainly a horrible mistake made by the dems but if you think that all of our financial issues are tied to just Fannie and Freddie you're wrong.

mikey23545
10-06-2008, 07:56 AM
This article should help clarify why Bill O'Reilly was screaming at that lying, cum-swallowing piece of shit Barney Frank.

mikey23545
10-06-2008, 07:57 AM
It was certainly a horrible mistake made by the dems but if you think that all of our financial issues are tied to just Fannie and Freddie you're wrong.

spin spin spin spin...

WilliamTheIrish
10-06-2008, 08:03 AM
I can understand the other three, but Mikey you're much smarter than that. Did F&F make a trillion dollars in loans to low income families?

Do you really believe that?

ROYC75
10-06-2008, 08:06 AM
It was certainly a horrible mistake made by the dems but if you think that all of our financial issues are tied to just Fannie and Freddie you're wrong.

The only thing ? No way, a major part of it , yes, I can name several things, It all started before 911 and escalated after 911.

KCJohnny
10-06-2008, 08:07 AM
I can understand the other three, but Mikey you're much smarter than that. Did F&F make a trillion dollars in loans to low income families?

Do you really believe that?

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together hold or back half of the nation's mortgage debt, and have played an increasingly important role in the real estate market since the credit crisis started in August 2007...

www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/06/business/main4422330.shtml - 94k -

ROYC75
10-06-2008, 09:19 AM
It was certainly a horrible mistake made by the dems but if you think that all of our financial issues are tied to just Fannie and Freddie you're wrong.


The biggest deal was The Gramm Leach Bliley Act deregulated banks. That was bad, Clinton should have vetoed that one. Republican and democrats alike passed that, the house did as well after some changes ......

FTR, McCain didn't vote on it, he didn't like it . BTA, he didn't vote no either , he should have.

But yet Dems and Libs say he wants to deregulate everything and will allow it to happen again ...... Again, I bring up 2005 when Fannie and Freddie was brought up again, McCain was right there saying we have a problem with it.

FTR, I'm glad Phil Gramm is no longer associated with McCain, if so, I wouldn't vote for McCain.

jiveturkey
10-06-2008, 09:29 AM
It goes further than that.

I know that this comes from a liberal source but I found it pretty interesting. It's about 12 minutes and comes back to the greed issue.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4502673n

ROYC75
10-06-2008, 09:44 AM
It goes further than that.

I know that this comes from a liberal source but I found it pretty interesting. It's about 12 minutes and comes back to the greed issue.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4502673n

Jason, there are so many contributing factors, one can not pinpoint just one.

Thing about it is, Osama Bin Laden was a smart man on seeing all the ways America will decline by going after the WTC.

America's stability revolves around it's economy. Every reason we have now for failure has been self inflected by ourselves, all but the WTC attacks. We aligned the dominoes up, Bin Laden knocked them down.

jiveturkey
10-06-2008, 09:51 AM
I'm not pinning them on one thing. Stupidity, greed, dems trying to create a perfect world, repubs trying to create a different type of perfect world.

We all lose and it's because of a huge gamble.