jAZ
10-22-2008, 02:23 PM
In Arizona we use optical paper ballots (think modern #2 pencil style) for our voting.
I'm watching these huge lines already forming (2 hour waits) in early voting along with seperate and unrelated stories of touch-screen voting having problems working properly.... and I realized there is an engineering problem at play.
Touch screen machines are a terrible solution for voting for a a few reasons, but one huge reason.
First they are expensive. Second they are prone to failure (screen slipage). Third they typically don't leave an audit trail.
Those are the typical reasons people talk about, and to one degree or another, those are true.
The big reason I think they make no sense is scalability.
With touch screens, it's far more expensive to add each extra polling station because you must buy an additional computer terminal for each voting booth (plus the table space and privacy barriers... both are relatively cheap).
With the optical scanner system, you just need more paper ballots (crazy cheap), plus the same table space and privacy walls.
There really is no justification for touch screen voting. It's a horrible system all the way around... and with the high costs, and thus fewer polling spaces... the lines are long and fewer people's votes get counted.
Bad system.
I'm watching these huge lines already forming (2 hour waits) in early voting along with seperate and unrelated stories of touch-screen voting having problems working properly.... and I realized there is an engineering problem at play.
Touch screen machines are a terrible solution for voting for a a few reasons, but one huge reason.
First they are expensive. Second they are prone to failure (screen slipage). Third they typically don't leave an audit trail.
Those are the typical reasons people talk about, and to one degree or another, those are true.
The big reason I think they make no sense is scalability.
With touch screens, it's far more expensive to add each extra polling station because you must buy an additional computer terminal for each voting booth (plus the table space and privacy barriers... both are relatively cheap).
With the optical scanner system, you just need more paper ballots (crazy cheap), plus the same table space and privacy walls.
There really is no justification for touch screen voting. It's a horrible system all the way around... and with the high costs, and thus fewer polling spaces... the lines are long and fewer people's votes get counted.
Bad system.