PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Issues Obama: Government Should “Change Behavior” by Raising Energy Bills


KILLER_CLOWN
11-02-2008, 08:41 PM
Obama: Government Should “Change Behavior” by Raising Energy Bills

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
November 2, 2008


In the video here, taped in 2007, Barack Obama told public television in Iowa “it is undisputable that the climate is getting warmer” and the government should jack up energy bills up through “price signals” in order to force Americans to accept the globalist agenda. “I think it is important for us to send some price signals to change behavior. You know, if electricity goes up, people start becoming more mindful of their electricity bill,” Obama told Associated Press reporter Mike Glover.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gUH4so7HBZ0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gUH4so7HBZ0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Should we expect Obama to revise his contention about global warming now that all four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA’s GISS, UAH, RSS) have released data indicating that over the past year global temperatures have dropped precipitously? Will Obama now admit that solar activity is a much larger driver of climate change than selfish Americans driving SUVs or leaving the lights on?

No, because that does not jive with the austerity and impoverishment agenda of our rulers. “We must address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide,” declared General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, at a secretive Trilateral Commission meeting last year. Guthrie’s use of the word “impose” is not incidental. “We cannot address this crisis as 180 separate nation-states. We must act as a single world state.” In other words, the globalists plan to use the cooked up — or maybe it should be cooled down — climate ruse to usher in a one world government.


Both Obama and McCain are up to speed on the climate change agenda, although the globalists give Sarah Palin a failing grade. “John McCain has shown far more commitment to confronting climate change than Bush has, but his teaming up with Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who doubts that climate change is man-made, should raise worries,” say Michael A. Levi and Scott G. Borgerson of the Council on Foreign Relations. “Palin should immediately and explicitly embrace McCain’s support for a mandatory cap-and-trade system.” A so-called “cap-and-trade system” is shorthand for globalism and world government, as the one-world planners demand a central authority in order to implement carbon trading and carbon taxes for a problem that does not exist.

For the globalists and their minions, climate change is an ideal tool for world government. For instance, Richard Haass, president of the CFR, stated in his article “State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era,” that a system of world government must be forced on the plebs and sovereignty eliminated in order to attack climate change. “Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function,” says Haass. “Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves.”

As Dr. Eric R. Pianka, professor at the University of Texas, has revealed, eugenics and population reduction play right into this scheme. “Because of the negative effects of overpopulation on the earth, Pianka proposed that the Ebola virus be used as a tool of population reduction. Pianka also praised China’s one child policy,” writes Daniel Taylor. “China was able to turn the corner and become the leading world super power because they have a police state and they are able to force people to stop re-producing,” Pianka added.

Obama, with his CFR connected wife, plays right into the concerted effort to impose a global system of domination and control. It begins with driving SUVs and leaving the lights on and ends with United Nations mandated “sustainable development,” a radical reduction in living standards, and eventually depopulation of the sort advocated by Pianka and his supporters.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5704

Guru
11-02-2008, 09:14 PM
Shit, I have been mindful of my energy bills for years. Stick it to us anyway. god I hate this man.

ROYC75
11-02-2008, 09:20 PM
:eek: WOW , force Americans to accept the globalist agenda. :eek:

Guru
11-02-2008, 09:26 PM
Energy bills are high enough already. I guess the rich fuck politicians don't mind that.

banyon
11-02-2008, 09:47 PM
:eek: WOW , force Americans to accept the globalist agenda. :eek:

WOW, you might not want to take everything "infowars" prints without question.

There's nothing even remotely about "globalism" in the video whatsoever.

As for the author's article, to say that the whole thing is a stretch I don't think does it justice. It's really just more of the rampant unaccountable fearmongering escalted to a fever pitch here in the last two months.

This guy needs to stop hyperventilating and realize that Obama didn't say one word about the government raising anyone's energy prices. He just said we needed to do a better job conserving and that our energy prices (likely) will go up. This is pretty obvious to anyone who has looked at available oil reserves and Chinese/Indian demand trends.

He just thinks maybe we shouldn't sit on our hands as our buddies rake in the dough like the prior Administration.

KILLER_CLOWN
11-02-2008, 09:51 PM
WOW, you might not want to take everything "infowars" prints without question.

There's nothing even remotely about "globalism" in the video whatsoever.

As for the author's article, to say that the whole thing is a stretch I don't think does it justice. It's really just more of the rampant unaccountable fearmongering escalted to a fever pitch here in the last two months.

This guy needs to stop hyperventilating and realize that Obama didn't say one word about the government raising anyone's energy prices. He just said we needed to do a better job conserving and that our energy prices (likely) will go up. This is pretty obvious to anyone who has looked at available oil reserves and Chinese/Indian demand trends.

He just thinks maybe we shouldn't sit on our hands as our buddies rake in the dough like the prior Administration.

So how would you define "Price Signals" ?

banyon
11-02-2008, 10:01 PM
So how would you define "Price Signals" ?

Why should we define that term?

Here's a hint: Mr. Kurt Nimmo's applications of quotation marks are apparently for artistic license only. Obama says "indisputable" and doesn't ever utter the phrase "price signals".