PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs So, are you a Pioli Pimp or a Pioli Pooper?


Douche Baggins
01-13-2009, 05:49 PM
We drew a line in the sand when Herm was hired. Some of us stepped over the line once or twice, others remained steadfast, etc.

Now we have a new GM for the first time in 20 years. It's time to draw another line. Where do you stand?

Are a Pioli Pimp (for Pioli) or a Pioli Pooper? (against)

Proclaim your allegiance.

the Talking Can
01-13-2009, 05:49 PM
jesus christ

can we not have this gay shit this time.....go back to wpi

Deberg_1990
01-13-2009, 05:50 PM
Dear Gaythan

Stop posting on my message board.

Thanks.

DaFace
01-13-2009, 05:51 PM
I'll be very surprised if there more than a handful of people who are upset with the hire. While some may have preferred someone else, I can't imagine anyone being pissed that we hired Pioli.

Mr. Flopnuts
01-13-2009, 05:53 PM
I'm curious if anyone happy about this hire will have the balls to say so. Let the floggings begin....................

http://www.holycrime.com/Images/flogging1.gif


You don't want to know what that says.

BigRedChief
01-13-2009, 05:54 PM
I have started threads on here dating back to 2004 saying we should fire King Carl and hire Scott Pioli.

Sully
01-13-2009, 05:56 PM
I'm
A) Excited (ecstatic) about the hire.
B) Ready to give Pioli several years of a "free pass" type of situation.
and
C) Reserving the right to bitch the second he begins to consistently make moves that I think are idiotic.

Dayze
01-13-2009, 05:58 PM
Dear Gaythan

Stop posting on my message board.

Thanks.

ROFL

All that is missing from that is a picture of Bill Lumberg

"Yeeeeah.....I'm gonna have to go ahead and ask to you stop posting. Thanks a bunch"!

Ari Chi3fs
01-13-2009, 05:59 PM
I have started threads on here dating back to 2004 saying we should fire King Carl and hire Scott Pioli.

I have 100% agreed with you the whole time.

Bearcat
01-13-2009, 06:01 PM
Once or twice, this year LMAO

SNR
01-13-2009, 06:01 PM
I'm sure a great deal of people were excited about Carl Peterson when he was hired, too.

It's just... 20 years can REALLY wear on a fanbase. Especially if they produce nothing in those 20 years.

People are excited for a new direction, especially a direction taken by a guy who's already built the incredible dynasty of this decade.

It's going to be a loooong time before people even consider being anti-Scott

StcChief
01-13-2009, 06:11 PM
Pioli resume and results speak volumes. Carl's not so much.

Dr. Facebook Fever
01-13-2009, 06:13 PM
I'm already sick of this place post Pioli hire

DaFace
01-13-2009, 06:14 PM
I'm sure a great deal of people were excited about Carl Peterson when he was hired, too.

It's just... 20 years can REALLY wear on a fanbase. Especially if they produce nothing in those 20 years.

People are excited for a new direction, especially a direction taken by a guy who's already built the incredible dynasty of this decade.

It's going to be a loooong time before people even consider being anti-Scott

I agree, especially with the first part. I'd bet that Carl Peterson would have a much more positive legacy in KC if he'd just left 10 years ago. He was never a truly BAD GM in my opinion - he just didn't know when to give up.

Big Chief Homer
01-13-2009, 06:27 PM
...