Over-Head
01-29-2009, 07:08 PM
(sorry if re-post)
On your home page.
Made for a great read, the last paragraph pretty much summed it up.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9149726/Warner-doesn't-need-win-to-join-Namath-in-Canton?CMP=OTC-K9B140813162ATT=5
Warner doesn't need win to join Namath in Canton
..."The last decade of NFL football has been dominated by quarterbacks — Tom Brady, Warner and Roethlisberger — who entered the league with something to prove.
Brady was the 199th pick in the draft.
Roethlisberger played at a midmajor.
Warner bagged groceries and played in the Arena League.
They weren't supposed to be NFL stars.
Brady, Warner and Roethlisberger remind me of Elway, Montana and Kelly, the trio of winning QBs who defined the 1980s and 1990s.
Does Kurt Warner belong in the Hall of Fame? You can't properly explain the last decade without him."
On your home page.
Made for a great read, the last paragraph pretty much summed it up.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9149726/Warner-doesn't-need-win-to-join-Namath-in-Canton?CMP=OTC-K9B140813162ATT=5
Warner doesn't need win to join Namath in Canton
..."The last decade of NFL football has been dominated by quarterbacks — Tom Brady, Warner and Roethlisberger — who entered the league with something to prove.
Brady was the 199th pick in the draft.
Roethlisberger played at a midmajor.
Warner bagged groceries and played in the Arena League.
They weren't supposed to be NFL stars.
Brady, Warner and Roethlisberger remind me of Elway, Montana and Kelly, the trio of winning QBs who defined the 1980s and 1990s.
Does Kurt Warner belong in the Hall of Fame? You can't properly explain the last decade without him."