View Full Version : U.S. Issues Hillary Begs China....
petegz28
02-22-2009, 04:42 PM
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sunday urged China to keep buying US debt as she wrapped up her first overseas trip, during which she agreed to work closely with Beijing on the financial crisis.
In Beijing, she called on authorities in Beijing to continue buying US Treasuries, saying it would help jumpstart the flagging US economy and stimulate imports of Chinese goods.
"By continuing to support American Treasury instruments the Chinese are recognising our interconnection. We are truly going to rise or fall together," Clinton said at the US embassy here.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.42a44b0f5d9cf5c9762e80574e79a3d5.831&show_article=1
This is what our country has become.....beggars of the Chinese......Hope Rush and the Globalist Repubs are happy
Saul Good
02-22-2009, 04:45 PM
What is your obsession with Rush Limbaugh, and what does he have to do with Hillary Clinton's visit to China? Get a grip.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 04:47 PM
What is your obsession with Rush Limbaugh, and what does he have to do with Hillary Clinton's visit to China? Get a grip.
Rush champions the selling out of this country to the Chinese in the name of profit. In fact, Friday he was crying that the Obama Admin is "letting" the market crash. When the truth is we sold ourselves out to the Chinese and now that they aren't doing so hot we have to go beg them to keep our country afloat.
Direckshun
02-22-2009, 05:19 PM
Hey, our money for this recovery has to come from somewhere.
Sucks it has to be from China, but better them than Saudi Arabia.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 05:20 PM
Hey, our money for this recovery has to come from somewhere.
Sucks it has to be from China, but better them than Saudi Arabia.
That wasn't my point
Direckshun
02-22-2009, 05:21 PM
That wasn't my point
Wasn't mine, either.
BucEyedPea
02-22-2009, 05:22 PM
We are truly going to rise or fall together," Clinton said at the US embassy here.
STFU
petegz28
02-22-2009, 05:38 PM
STFU
This is what we get for chasing the ultimate profit margin. It wasn't enough to make a $1 when we could sell out to make $1.25.
Now the narrow-minded, greed based decisions on profit now, consequences later has caught up with us.
Simplex3
02-22-2009, 05:42 PM
This is what we get for chasing the ultimate profit margin. It wasn't enough to make a $1 when we could sell out to make $1.25.
Now the narrow-minded, greed based decisions on profit now, consequences later has caught up with us.
...and who exactly was it that was clamoring for the ever-lowering price of goods?
petegz28
02-22-2009, 05:48 PM
...and who exactly was it that was clamoring for the ever-lowering price of goods?
Once again, you want to blame the people for doing what they were told to do. Sorry Simplex, if the Wal-Marts of the world didn't seed the idea of cheaper than cheap at the expense of our jobs then the American people would never of known the difference.
The American people think what they are told to think. You should know that.
Simplex3
02-22-2009, 06:01 PM
Once again, you want to blame the people for doing what they were told to do. Sorry Simplex, if the Wal-Marts of the world didn't seed the idea of cheaper than cheap at the expense of our jobs then the American people would never of known the difference.
The American people think what they are told to think. You should know that.
If your last sentence is accurate then we need to install a dictatorship and get over it.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:03 PM
If your last sentence is accurate then we need to install a dictatorship and get over it.
I thought we had? You truly are naive to think everyone is an economist, an expert on finance and so on and so on. Sure the consumer shoulders some blame. But then again so do the people who started all this.
Comes down to this Mr. Simplex, either the rich can do with a little less and employ mroe Americans and favorable wages, or they can pay out the ass in taxes for the people they put in the unemployment line.
Simplex3
02-22-2009, 06:10 PM
I thought we had? You truly are naive to think everyone is an economist, an expert on finance and so on and so on. Sure the consumer shoulders some blame. But then again so do the people who started all this.
Comes down to this Mr. Simplex, either the rich can do with a little less and employ mroe Americans and favorable wages, or they can pay out the ass in taxes for the people they put in the unemployment line.
Wow. So this whole thing hinges on the people who do the work giving more to those who don't.
Fuck it then. It's over.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:12 PM
Wow. So this whole thing hinges on the people who do the work giving more to those who don't.
**** it then. It's over.
Where you get this is beyond me? You think most of these rich exectuives got rich by doing work? Hardly...most these days get rich on the hard work of others. STFU
BucEyedPea
02-22-2009, 06:27 PM
Where you get this is beyond me? You think most of these rich exectuives got rich by doing work? Hardly...most these days get rich on the hard work of others. STFU
That's what an executive or entrepreneur does. But they got to their positions by having the talent and being able to work, often harder than a worker. Unless they're business is being protected from competition by the govt or some other mercantilist set up.
Saul Good
02-22-2009, 06:30 PM
Where you get this is beyond me? You think most of these rich exectuives got rich by doing work? Hardly...most these days get rich on the hard work of others. STFUHow did they get to be executives, then? You can't really believe the crap that you spew.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:32 PM
How did they get to be executives, then? You can't really believe the crap that you spew.
A lot of them get their positions because of who they know, not what they know. Sorry, but that is the reality in large corporations these days.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:34 PM
That's what an executive or entrepreneur does. But they got to their positions by having the talent and being able to work, often harder than a worker. Unless they're business is being protected from competition by the govt or some other mercantilist set up.
Yea, that is why so many companies are tanking, cause they hard working, super smart executives are so much better than everyone else.
Meanwhile I have a VP in IT that has no IT background. That kind of stuff goes on in several large coporations. It's who you know, not what you know.
Simplex3
02-22-2009, 06:35 PM
Where you get this is beyond me? You think most of these rich exectuives got rich by doing work? Hardly...most these days get rich on the hard work of others. STFU
Holy shit. Those guys took risks that could have put their families in the poor house. More of than not that is the result of starting a business. Most of those guys work 80+ hours a week while their employees skate out at 37 hours.
These evil, limo riding slacker CEOs who never took any risk or put in any effort that you conjure up exist in excruciatingly small numbers. If you shot them all tomorrow nothing would change. However, you are lumping in tons of hard working men and women for punishment because of these few losers.
Simplex3
02-22-2009, 06:37 PM
Yea, that is why so many companies are tanking, cause they hard working, super smart executives are so much better than everyone else.
Meanwhile I have a VP in IT that has no IT background. That kind of stuff goes on in several large coporations. It's who you know, not what you know.
YOU WORK AT SPRINT. It is the poster child for the Corporate Special Olympics. Additionally, without government interference it will either turn it around or all of those moron executives will be looking for work and having tanked Sprint won't look very good on their resumes.
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:37 PM
Holy shit. Those guys took risks that could have put their families in the poor house. More of than not that is the result of starting a business. Most of those guys work 80+ hours a week while their employees skate out at 37 hours.
These evil, limo riding slacker CEOs who never took any risk or put in any effort that you conjure up exist in excruciatingly small numbers. If you shot them all tomorrow nothing would change. However, you are lumping in tons of hard working men and women for punishment because of these few losers.
Yea, they took so much risk they are getting bailed out by the 37 hr a week schmuck. :harumph:
petegz28
02-22-2009, 06:38 PM
YOU WORK AT SPRINT. It is the poster child for the Corporate Special Olympics. Additionally, without government interference it will either turn it around or all of those moron executives will be looking for work and having tanked Sprint won't look very good on their resumes.
You haven't paid much attention then, obviously.
Simplex3
02-23-2009, 08:56 AM
Yea, they took so much risk they are getting bailed out by the 37 hr a week schmuck. :harumph:
A couple of hundred guys did. You're going to apply that punishment to the rest of the hundreds of thousands of them. Great plan.
petegz28
02-23-2009, 09:02 AM
A couple of hundred guys did. You're going to apply that punishment to the rest of the hundreds of thousands of them. Great plan.
You know what they say about a few bad apples.
Simplex3
02-23-2009, 10:30 AM
You know what they say about a few bad apples.
Yeah, they have enablers in the government.
HC_Chief
02-23-2009, 10:31 AM
Yeah, they have enablers in the government.
ZING!
nice :D
petegz28
02-23-2009, 11:26 AM
Yeah, they have enablers in the government.
I know, in your mind everyting is the fault of the government and the consumer. ROFL
Sure seems like millions of the working class are paying the price as well. But I shouldn't have to point that out to you. Well, obviously I do.
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.