PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Filling vrable in lb frees up us to get a RT


Demonpenz
02-27-2009, 12:56 PM
I think our focus now at #3 will be a RT

RustShack
02-27-2009, 12:57 PM
ROFL

crazycoffey
02-27-2009, 12:57 PM
burn

keg in kc
02-27-2009, 12:58 PM
Damn right, and if it doesn't work out, he can at least fill it an guard. Gotta get sumpin outta that draft pick.

dirk digler
02-27-2009, 12:58 PM
LMAO

blueballs
02-27-2009, 01:03 PM
right after they convert
Brokie to long snapper

Detoxing
02-27-2009, 01:05 PM
lol

DeezNutz
02-27-2009, 01:05 PM
Curry if all the tackles are off the board.

crazycoffey
02-27-2009, 01:08 PM
LB = Curry - Vrbal - DJ/another - Hali/DJ??
with DL= Turk - Tank - Dorsey

CaliforniaChief
02-27-2009, 01:10 PM
The focus at #3 ought to be getting a franchise QB. Hamas' treatise convinced me. But I gotta wonder if this is part of a bigger deal that involves Cassel? Probably not but it has me wondering.

Bowser
02-27-2009, 01:14 PM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5coJeNNrwLA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5coJeNNrwLA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

speak24
02-27-2009, 01:22 PM
Maybe baby steps to a bigger deal for Cassel or other big FA.

keg in kc
02-27-2009, 01:22 PM
But I gotta wonder if this is part of a bigger deal that involves Cassel?We can only hope not.

Bowser
02-27-2009, 01:23 PM
We can only hope not.

You never know. We may end up with Welker and Moss, which would make the trade a good one.

orange
02-27-2009, 01:33 PM
You never know. We may end up with Welker and Moss, which would make the trade a good one.

... and 50 empty roster spots to fill with no draft picks.


But THINK of the CAP ROOM!

HC_Chief
02-27-2009, 01:35 PM
I think our focus now at #3 will be a RT

Probably Albert if we draft Monroe

Garcia Bronco
02-27-2009, 02:02 PM
WTF would you burn a #3 pick on a RT? Maybe a DT or an LT, but an RT. That's just dumb.

Demonpenz
02-27-2009, 02:06 PM
WTF would you burn a #3 pick on a RT? Maybe a DT or an LT, but an RT. That's just dumb.

We signed vrabel to free up RT which we need because mcintosh is sucks

Brock
02-27-2009, 02:07 PM
:clap:

Demonpenz
02-27-2009, 02:17 PM
:clap:

:clap:

BigRedChief
02-27-2009, 02:18 PM
Take a RT at #3? ROFL

Demonpenz
02-27-2009, 02:45 PM
Probably Albert if we draft Monroe

nail/head

Johnny Vegas
02-27-2009, 02:47 PM
*sigh* franchise RT

Garcia Bronco
02-27-2009, 02:48 PM
We signed vrabel to free up RT which we need because mcintosh is sucks

You still don't take an RT with the 3rd pick

Demonpenz
02-27-2009, 02:50 PM
You still don't take an RT with the 3rd pick

We need a RT because mcintosh sucks though? Who do you suppose plays RT? The Tooth Bunny? :clap:

Johnny Vegas
02-27-2009, 02:52 PM
You still don't take an RT with the 3rd pick

no you take a franchise RT with the 3rd! Hell I'd trade the whole draft and bring back Shields and convert him to RT. All those draft picks will make him young again.

Dave Lane
02-27-2009, 03:32 PM
I think our focus now at #3 will be a RT

Kicker!! Are you a fool!?!

blueballs
02-27-2009, 03:34 PM
Demon makes me wish I did drugs

Basileus777
02-27-2009, 03:36 PM
WTF would you burn a #3 pick on a RT? Maybe a DT or an LT, but an RT. That's just dumb.

You might want to consider upgrading your sarcasm meter, your current one clearly isn't cutting it.

HemiEd
02-27-2009, 03:37 PM
Kicker!! Are you a fool!?!

Tight End, Tony is getting up there in age.

wild1
02-27-2009, 04:16 PM
don't worry, we can still take curry.

suds79
02-27-2009, 04:36 PM
Hey I got it. Lets just spend all our 1st rounders on O-line.

By 2012 we'll be nasty.

You do not spend the 3rd pick in the draft on a RT.

It's LT and then there's a big drop off from there.

We can draft our RT later on.

Shox
02-27-2009, 06:37 PM
You mean all we needed to fix our LB problems was a 33 (soon to be 34) slightly above average NFL LB.

Man no wonder I'm not a NFL GM.

Count Zarth
02-27-2009, 06:39 PM
god bless demon

Pasta Giant Meatball
02-27-2009, 07:13 PM
...and keeps the option of taking Tebow in the 1st next year alive as well for the QB/FB/TE hybrid position we will be employing.

ChiefsCountry
02-27-2009, 07:18 PM
WTF would you burn a #3 pick on a RT? Maybe a DT or an LT, but an RT. That's just dumb.

This is a joke thread but you are right on but alot people will still say take RT with the #3 pick.