PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs What number do you want to see Matt Cassel wear


bigkyle76
02-28-2009, 06:32 PM
Since 16 is retired

milkman
02-28-2009, 06:33 PM
No. 16 in Detroit.

You did say "where".






But I bet you mean't "wear".

My bad.

ArrowheadHawk
02-28-2009, 06:33 PM
Do you mean wear?

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 06:34 PM
Ware?

milkman
02-28-2009, 06:34 PM
Ware?

We're.

Saul Good
02-28-2009, 06:35 PM
Where should his number be? He should have one on his chest, one on his back, and he'll probably want one on each sleeve as well.

doomy3
02-28-2009, 06:35 PM
whaire

mikey23545
02-28-2009, 06:36 PM
Aye'm knot shure...

Farzin
02-28-2009, 06:36 PM
LMAO

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 06:38 PM
WAR!!!

unothadeal
02-28-2009, 06:39 PM
12

Adept Havelock
02-28-2009, 06:40 PM
19.

Pablo
02-28-2009, 06:41 PM
666

Vegas_Dave
02-28-2009, 06:41 PM
1

Mr. Flopnuts
02-28-2009, 06:41 PM
0

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 06:42 PM
9/11

rad
02-28-2009, 06:42 PM
Weir?

unothadeal
02-28-2009, 06:43 PM
58

SPATCH
02-28-2009, 06:44 PM
threve

Pablo
02-28-2009, 06:45 PM
420, broseph.

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 06:45 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/2/4/d245777abca64ece2d5d7ca0d19fddb6.png

Pablo
02-28-2009, 06:46 PM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7tyo5knlx8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7tyo5knlx8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

That's for you Sportsracer.

doomy3
02-28-2009, 06:49 PM
eleventy

Crush
02-28-2009, 06:57 PM
I laugh at your non-poll making capabilities.

ILChief
02-28-2009, 06:58 PM
Well, he wore #10 at USC so that's a possibility. I have a Trent Green jersey so I'd need to find a way to change the name on the back.

wild1
02-28-2009, 07:14 PM
19

MIAdragon
02-28-2009, 07:16 PM
hehe 14

Big Chief Homer
02-28-2009, 07:17 PM
4

blueballs
02-28-2009, 07:22 PM
I hope it ain't a teddy

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 07:25 PM
$Texas

talastan
02-28-2009, 07:58 PM
12 So I can keep my jersey and erase the memory of Brokie Croyle.

CHENZ A!
02-28-2009, 08:00 PM
I bet he chooses 7 because 1+6=7 or some bullshit like that. He was #10 in college.

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 08:01 PM
12 So I can keep my jersey and erase the memory of Brokie Croyle.

lol you have a Croyle jersey.

Teeheehee

Thig Lyfe
02-28-2009, 08:02 PM
I bet he chooses 7 because 1+6=7 or some bullshit like that. He was #10 in college.

If he does that, I predict he will become the greatest player to wear #7 in AFC West history.

Dayze
02-28-2009, 09:31 PM
$Texas

ROFL

"...simply stunning.


I submit he should wear the number
"Threeve"

kstater
02-28-2009, 09:33 PM
54

Waters isn't going to need it.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 09:34 PM
54

Waters isn't going to need it.

27 sounds better to me:)

Buzz
02-28-2009, 09:34 PM
I have gas!

That is all.

BryanBusby
02-28-2009, 09:34 PM
( o ) ( o )

Edit: That was suppose to be bewbies, but it could also stand for Reche Caldwell.

CHENZ A!
02-28-2009, 09:34 PM
Maybe a backwards 7. The anti elway.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:35 PM
0

As in the number of playoff games he'll win here?

I think he should demand #4 from Thigpen, just to be a prick.

Tyler should be forced to wear #1, to signify the only win he'll ever get as a starting QB in the NFL.

Count Zarth
02-28-2009, 09:36 PM
2

When has their even been a great quarterback who wore #2?

I want Cassel to come to define #2

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 09:37 PM
As in the number of playoff games he'll win here?

I think he should demand #4 from Thigpen, just to be a prick.

Tyler should be forced to wear #1, to signify the only win he'll ever get as a starting QB in the NFL.

wow

CHENZ A!
02-28-2009, 09:39 PM
2

When has their even been a great quarterback who wore #2?

I want Cassel to come to define #2

Fuck you. Colquitt will beat his ass. :cuss:







:)

The Buddha
02-28-2009, 09:43 PM
2

When has their even been a great quarterback who wore #2?

I want Cassel to come to define #2

That number needs a lot of work here in KC, but perhaps it would rinse the bad taste of Lin Elliot from all of our mouths. It'd be GREAT to be able to remember that number as a GOOD number. Colquitt is doing it justice, but it will take a great QB to not see the number and have memories.

I like 8. Not because of Aikman or Young (though Young was cool, IMO), but because its my lucky number, and its symmetrical both vertically and horizontally.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:44 PM
wow

I know, I know.

In all honesty, the 1st line is a joke. I think he's capable of winning a playoff game for us at some point, though I have no faith that he can put a team on his back in the biggest of all games and win.

The other two lines stand as posted.

SNR
02-28-2009, 09:44 PM
As in the number of playoff games he'll win here?

I think he should demand #4 from Thigpen, just to be a prick.

Tyler should be forced to wear #1, to signify the only win he'll ever get as a starting QB in the NFL.Take some Paxil or something, dude :shake:

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:45 PM
Take some Paxil or something, dude :shake:

Read the above post.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 09:45 PM
I know, I know.

In all honesty, the 1st line is a joke. I think he's capable of winning a playoff game for us at some point, though I have no faith that he can put a team on his back in the biggest of all games and win.

The other two lines stand as posted.

:D we'll see how strong that back is. and thigpen should at least be respected for making last season bearable at least

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:47 PM
:D we'll see how strong that back is. and thigpen should at least be respected for making last season bearable at least

2-14 is not bearable in any way, shape or form.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 09:48 PM
2-14 is not bearable in any way, shape or form.

well he at least made the games exciting

SNR
02-28-2009, 09:51 PM
Read the above post.I know. Too late. Sorry about that.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:51 PM
well he at least made the games exciting

Really?

What is exciting about 10 losses in 11 starts?

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:52 PM
I know. Too late. Sorry about that.

No big deal.

Like I've said before, I hope like hell he proves me wrong. I'll be first in line for a heaping portion of crow.

The_Doctor10
02-28-2009, 09:55 PM
If he does that, I predict he will become the greatest player to wear #7 in AFC West history.

Really? Best in AFC West history? I dunno man, Doug Flutie was pretty kickass...

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 09:56 PM
Really?

What is exciting about 10 losses in 11 starts?

warpath it doesnt have to be like this, the games were more exciting you cant deny that. stop being so fucking hard headed

Count Zarth
02-28-2009, 09:57 PM
That number needs a lot of work here in KC, but perhaps it would rinse the bad taste of Lin Elliot from all of our mouths. It'd be GREAT to be able to remember that number as a GOOD number. Colquitt is doing it justice, but it will take a great QB to not see the number and have memories.

I like 8. Not because of Aikman or Young (though Young was cool, IMO), but because its my lucky number, and its symmetrical both vertically and horizontally.

Alternatively, these numbers could use some definition:

3 (LaMonica is pretty old school)
11 (Might be a bit scary)
17 (I'm probably missing some obvious great QB who wore this)

The_Doctor10
02-28-2009, 09:58 PM
Really?

What is exciting about 10 losses in 11 starts?

That the games weren't blowouts like they were with Huard/Croyle?

Skip Towne
02-28-2009, 09:59 PM
warpath it doesnt have to be like this, the games were more exciting you cant deny that. stop being so fucking hard headed

I'll bet he's a MUron.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 09:59 PM
warpath it doesnt have to be like this, the games were more exciting you cant deny that. stop being so fucking hard headed

It's not hard headed at all.

Unlike the people that go to games to be seen and have a good time, I go to see the team WIN.

Winning is the goal.

Close is for hand grenades.

I could give two shits about the kid's stat sheet, bottom line, the team didn't win.

If you watch football to feel good about coming close but losing, good for you.

That's not me, it will never be me.

clyde05
02-28-2009, 10:00 PM
5

CHENZ A!
02-28-2009, 10:00 PM
Alternatively, these numbers could use some definition:

3 (LaMonica is pretty old school)
11 (Might be a bit scary)
17 (I'm probably missing some obvious great QB who wore this)

Why can't I think of a great QB that wore 9?

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:00 PM
That the games weren't blowouts like they were with Huard/Croyle?

Last I checked, losing 21-20 and losing 41-3 still counts the same in the standings.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:01 PM
I'll bet he's a MUron.

Negative.

I have no college team.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:01 PM
Why can't I think of a great QB that wore 9?

Jim McMahon?

:D

Might be the only SB winner to wear 9.

Count Zarth
02-28-2009, 10:02 PM
Why can't I think of a great QB that wore 9?

Carson Palmer and Drew Brees have come to define it. Also McNair.

I'd say 6 but Cutler is defining it now.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:04 PM
It's not hard headed at all.

Unlike the people that go to games to be seen and have a good time, I go to see the team WIN.

Winning is the goal.

Close is for hand grenades.

I could give two shits about the kid's stat sheet, bottom line, the team didn't win.

If you watch football to feel good about coming close but losing, good for you.

That's not me, it will never be me.


everyone WANTS to win but last season we didnt have much to watch for and to see this unknown kid play his ass off and make the games respectable was nice. i never felt good after a loss never will but I LOVE the chiefs and anyone that makes me want to keep on watching when all is lost is good by me. he isnt going to be the starter so at least we could show a little respect

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:07 PM
everyone WANTS to win but last season we didnt have much to watch for and to see this unknown kid play his ass off and make the games respectable was nice. i never felt good after a loss never will but I LOVE the chiefs and anyone that makes me want to keep on watching when all is lost is good by me. he isnt going to be the starter so at least we could show a little respect

Respect is earned, and you don't earn respect by playing your worst in the most important parts of the game.

Shitting in your helmet in crucial moments isn't exactly an endearing quality.

If you want to praise him for accomplishing nothing, feel free.

SNR
02-28-2009, 10:08 PM
I'd like to see him wear #15. Fulfill the legacy of teh 0dd t0dd, who never got a chance to display his incredible talent

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:09 PM
Respect is earned, and you don't earn respect by playing your worst in the most important parts of the game.

Shitting in your helmet in crucial moments isn't exactly an endearing quality.

ok man if you cant say he made the games bearable then fine. you have to be right and try to make a point. IMO(and many others) what he did last year was worthy of some respect but it seems as though perfection is all that will make you happy, youre right thigpen cost us those ten wins not the defense or coaching

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:10 PM
.

If you want to praise him for accomplishing nothing, feel free.

for the record i dont need your permission to feel anyway you can keep that to yourself

The Buddha
02-28-2009, 10:12 PM
Alternatively, these numbers could use some definition:

3 (LaMonica is pretty old school)


Jan Stenerud wore 3 didn't he? I know he's not a QB, but I think he should be able to keep that for himself.

The Bad Guy
02-28-2009, 10:13 PM
I would like to see a #9.

I have to believe he'll be #10 though.

The Bad Guy
02-28-2009, 10:14 PM
I'm with OTW.

I don't watch football for warm fuzzies after a close loss. I watch to win.

I don't give a shit if we lose by 1 point or 100. I feel the same.

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:14 PM
ok man if you cant say he made the games bearable then fine. you have to be right and try to make a point. IMO(and many others) what he did last year was worthy of some respect but it seems as though perfection is all that will make you happy, youre right thigpen cost us those ten wins not the defense or coaching

You fucking idiot. There you go turning it into something it's not, AGAIN.

It's not about being right, it's my OPINION.

I've said it several times now - if you're the type that's content with losers, that's your right.

Perfection wasn't necessary to get more than 1 win.

Some consistency would have done the trick.

Amazing that people will go to any length to defend a guy that won 10% of his games, and who got progressively worse as the game went on. Over a 40 point drop in passer rating between the 1st and 4th quarter.

If that's not shitting the bed in crucial situations, I'm not sure what is.

But please, feel free to praise him. I'm not stopping you, just disagreeing.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:16 PM
You fucking idiot.

It's not about being right, it's my OPINION.

I've said it several times now - if you're the type that's content with losers, that's your right.

Perfection wasn't necessary to get more than 1 win.

Some consistency would have done the trick.

Amazing that people will go to any length to defend a guy that won 10% of his games, and who got progressively worse as the game went on. Over a 40 point drop in passer rating between the 1st and 4th quarter.

If that's not shitting the bed in crucial situations, I'm not sure what is.

But please, feel free to praise him. I'm not stopping you, just disagreeing.

why did you watch the games then? did you think we would win at the end of the season?

The Buddha
02-28-2009, 10:16 PM
I'm with OTW.

I don't watch football for warm fuzzies after a close loss. I watch to win.

I don't give a shit if we lose by 1 point or 100. I feel the same.

Not me. I can at least know that they made it difficult on the other team sometimes. But when we get waxed, its like a perpetual kick to the nuts.

The Bad Guy
02-28-2009, 10:17 PM
why did you watch the games then? did you think we would win at the end of the season?

I have never in my life watched a football game and said I'm watching this to see a loss.

I expect to see wins whether a team is 0-10 or 10-0.

That's my nature.

Accepting losing is for bitches.

The Bad Guy
02-28-2009, 10:17 PM
Not me. I can at least know that they made it difficult on the other team sometimes. But when we get waxed, its like a perpetual kick to the nuts.

Then we are different.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:17 PM
It's not about being right, it's my OPINION.

.

.
if thats the case why argue about it? state your opinion and shut the fuck up

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:18 PM
I have never in my life watched a football game and said I'm watching this to see a loss.

I expect to see wins whether a team is 0-10 or 10-0.

That's my nature.

Accepting losing is for bitches.

i never accepted a loss or anticipated one. thigpen gave us hope that every week we had a chance. not so much before him and the spread. see where i'm coming from

OnTheWarpath58
02-28-2009, 10:20 PM
I have never in my life watched a football game and said I'm watching this to see a loss.

I expect to see wins whether a team is 0-10 or 10-0.

That's my nature.

Accepting losing is for bitches.

Exactly.

Unfortunately, this fan base is chock full of bitches.

DeezNutz
02-28-2009, 10:21 PM
i never accepted a loss or anticipated one. thigpen gave us hope that every week we had a chance. not so much before him and the spread. see where i'm coming from

I honestly never thought this team had a very good chance to win last season, regardless of who was at QB.

Herm was still the coach, and the roster was, generally speaking, depleted of talent.

I watch because this is my team. Always has been. Always will be.

That said, I expect results. That's why I wanted Herm shit canned and the roster carpet bombed.

The Bad Guy
02-28-2009, 10:22 PM
i never accepted a loss or anticipated one. thigpen gave us hope that every week we had a chance. not so much before him and the spread. see where i'm coming from

Thigpen gave me nothing.

If you got hope from Tyler Thigpen, you need to adjust your levels.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:23 PM
Thigpen gave me nothing.

If you got hope from Tyler Thigpen, you need to adjust your levels.

when he played we were in the games NO? before that we couldnt score

blueballs
02-28-2009, 10:36 PM
The big flop with the Browns
was #2 -the 1st overall for the new franchise

The Buddha
02-28-2009, 10:41 PM
when he played we were in the games NO? before that we couldnt score

Thigpen = Derek Anderson IMO.

He's a starter. He should be a starter, but he's no franchise QB. If you think KC needs a franchise QB to be a contender, then you'll be disappointed. But if you're one of those people who feels a QBs most important job is to keep you in the game and let your supporting cast (RB and Defense) win the game for you (MARTYBALL), He's great.

And maybe, just maybe he'll turn into some sort of Rich Gannon-esque player who ends up getting GREAT later in his career. I kinda hope so, cause I think he's a cool guy.

JASONSAUTO
02-28-2009, 10:41 PM
Thigpen = Derek Anderson IMO.

He's a starter. He should be a starter, but he's no franchise QB. If you think KC needs a franchise QB to be a contender, then you'll be disappointed. But if you're one of those people who feels a QBs most important job is to keep you in the game and let your supporting cast (RB and Defense) win the game for you (MARTYBALL), He's great.

And maybe, just maybe he'll turn into some sort of Rich Gannon-esque player who ends up getting GREAT later in his career. I kinda hope so, cause I think he's a cool guy.

thats why i'm actually happy wee did something about the situation

pr_capone
02-28-2009, 11:17 PM
12

THIS

If we are gonna be Patriots West... might as well do it right. :D

Chiefshrink
02-28-2009, 11:21 PM
No.15

keg in kc
02-28-2009, 11:22 PM
I think he should wear the number I don't give a shit.

Chiefshrink
02-28-2009, 11:25 PM
I bet he chooses 7 because 1+6=7 or some bullshit like that. He was #10 in college.

Don't curse with Mike Livingston's old no. Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!


#15 IMO

Ultra Peanut
03-01-2009, 01:21 AM
well he at least made the games excitingSo would a streaker or a bus driving onto the field.

RustShack
03-01-2009, 01:42 AM
Maybe 10 since thats what he wore in college?

Pablo
03-01-2009, 08:05 AM
He should wear Pi.

Go Mizzou & Chiefs
03-01-2009, 09:07 AM
13

Extra Point
03-01-2009, 09:55 AM
6. For Cutler.

HC_Chief
03-01-2009, 10:03 AM
10

The_Doctor10
03-01-2009, 02:04 PM
6. For Cutler.

This

BigChiefFan
03-01-2009, 02:13 PM
Lucky number 7 of course.

Bugeater
03-01-2009, 02:18 PM
3.14159265358979323846

seaofred
03-01-2009, 02:26 PM
What about #8? That would be pretty cool.

BostonTim
03-01-2009, 03:14 PM
Aye'm knot shure...

frayed knot

Cheers, BostonTim

BostonTim
03-01-2009, 03:16 PM
3.14159265358979323846
Why stop thre?


3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989 ...etc

Cheers, BostonTim

soundmind
03-01-2009, 03:29 PM
#favre

Bugeater
03-01-2009, 04:50 PM
Why stop thre?


3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989 ...etc

Cheers, BostonTim
:hmmm: That would require a rather large jersey.

bowener
03-01-2009, 05:36 PM
Something bold, that states, "I am here, and I am ready to conquer your womens." Something like #69, or maybe #33 if he does 'em in the butts. I would like to see him do something original honestly, a QB wearing number 54 would be kind of cool, or maybe 97/99, something like that.

ChiefsCountry
03-01-2009, 05:39 PM
Something bold, that states, "I am here, and I am ready to conquer your womens." Something like #69, or maybe #33 if he does 'em in the butts. I would like to see him do something original honestly, a QB wearing number 54 would be kind of cool, or maybe 97/99, something like that.

Those are all against NFL rules - it has to be 1-19.

Rausch
03-01-2009, 05:39 PM
13

If we're going to shake 40 years of piss poor luck let's just go ahead and donkey punch bad mojo in the face...

Count Zarth
03-01-2009, 05:53 PM
13

If we're going to shake 40 years of piss poor luck let's just go ahead and donkey punch bad mojo in the face...

I think 11 would be more of a punch to bad mojo...

bowener
03-01-2009, 05:53 PM
Those are all against NFL rules - it has to be 1-19.

But that's what would make it so bold!!! Can we not just list him as a LBer on paper, who happens to be terrible at LB, but great at QB? Then he can wear an awesome number!

How about 12? Then he can look like Tom Brady.

Mr. Kotter
03-01-2009, 06:16 PM
I say 6 or 12...to give announcers something to talk about comparing him to Cutler or Brady.

;)

I'm guessin' 9 or 17 though.

Bob Dole
03-02-2009, 02:42 PM
Apparently he'll be wearing ??

http://www.chiefsproshoponline.com/cart.php?m=search_results&search=cassel&utm_source=delivra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cassel_march+3/2/2009+3:54:39+PM

Micjones
03-02-2009, 02:54 PM
why did you watch the games then? did you think we would win at the end of the season?

Excellent point. OTW?
:D

OnTheWarpath58
03-02-2009, 03:09 PM
Excellent point. OTW?
:D

My thoughts were made pretty clear in posts 81/82.

Keep in mind you're talking to a guy that drove 4 hours in each direction and spent $2K a year on season tickets from 2004-2007.

And made that same drive last year to sit in near-zero temps to watch Thigpen's fucking teeth chatter when it mattered most against Miami.

Micjones
03-02-2009, 03:24 PM
My thoughts were made pretty clear in posts 81/82.

Keep in mind you're talking to a guy that drove 4 hours in each direction and spent $2K a year on season tickets from 2004-2007.

And made that same drive last year to sit in near-zero temps to watch Thigpen's fucking teeth chatter when it mattered most against Miami.

I went back and checked and didn't see an answer to his question.

Pablo
03-02-2009, 03:28 PM
Apparently he'll be wearing ??

http://www.chiefsproshoponline.com/cart.php?m=search_results&search=cassel&utm_source=delivra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cassel_march+3/2/2009+3:54:39+PM?? is a pretty sweet number...

And here comes Cassel, wearing number question mark, question mark....

Mr. Krab
03-02-2009, 03:51 PM
Do people really care what number the players wear?

rad
03-02-2009, 03:54 PM
Do people really care what number the players wear?

Yes, obviously.

crazycoffey
03-02-2009, 03:55 PM
15 - ERASE OLD MEMORIES AT THE SAME TIME....

Christofire
03-02-2009, 04:21 PM
2
I want Cassel to come to define #2

Let's hope his QB play doesn't meet the definition of one particular "#2" euphemism that's already out there.

Dave Lane
03-02-2009, 04:26 PM
A 10 in a diamond cluster on a Superbowl ring...

linebacker58
03-02-2009, 04:28 PM
Im going to say #10, it was his high school & college #....from what I see on the current roster list, it's available and hasnt been worn since Trent Green...

linebacker58
03-04-2009, 04:10 PM
Any news on what # he's decided on? I dont wanna order a jersey and it look ridiculous with a weird # on it..haha...?

djrcmay
03-04-2009, 04:11 PM
#99

Delano
03-04-2009, 04:13 PM
Any news on what # he's decided on? I dont wanna order a jersey and it look ridiculous with a weird # on it..haha...?

No word yet. He is listed as 0 on the roster right now.

StcChief
03-04-2009, 04:15 PM
0 works. it's a number.

CrazyPhuD
03-04-2009, 04:16 PM
666

don't mess with the debbil!

Noss
03-04-2009, 05:06 PM
#7

warrior
03-04-2009, 05:16 PM
#8 or #10

KCrockaholic
03-04-2009, 05:30 PM
I would like to see #15 on Cassel. I dont know why, it just sounds good.

ClevelandBronco
03-04-2009, 05:34 PM
How about #2.

Since he's not a #1.

brandon
03-04-2009, 05:39 PM
I would like to see #15 on Cassel. I dont know why, it just sounds good.

I know why: he's got 15 starts!

KCrockaholic
03-04-2009, 05:41 PM
I know why: he's got 15 starts!

or 10, since thats how many games he won...I count 11 since he basically played the entire game against us

LOCOChief
03-04-2009, 05:48 PM
13

mlyonsd
03-04-2009, 05:58 PM
01 - Just so those that wanted to draft a QB in the first round feel just a little bit better.

Maybe 03 would be better?

StcChief
03-04-2009, 06:23 PM
If #0 is illegal. #1.

anything that has him on SB Winner stage with a Chiefs uniform.

crazycoffey
03-04-2009, 07:00 PM
Pioli says there are no more retired numbers....

milkman
03-04-2009, 07:17 PM
Pioli says there are no more retired numbers....

When did he say that?

DeezNutz
03-04-2009, 07:19 PM
Pioli says there are no more retired numbers....

I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one. We need to believe in Pioli.

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 07:21 PM
No. 16 in Detroit.

You did say "where".






But I bet you mean't "wear".

My bad.

ROFL Beautifully Freudian.

I think Cassel should wear #1 and Thigpen should wear #2, because being a potential warm bucket of piss is hell of a lot better than being a pile of shit. :evil:

Count Zarth
03-04-2009, 07:29 PM
ROFL Beautifully Freudian.

I think Cassel should wear #1 and Thigpen should wear #2, because being a potential warm bucket of piss is hell of a lot better than being a pile of shit. :evil:

Not necessarily. Shit makes a great fertilizer.

crazycoffey
03-04-2009, 07:31 PM
When did he say that?


he didn't, I was just joking....

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 07:33 PM
Not necessarily. Shit makes a great fertilizer.

Yes........"fertilizer". It would be a shame if Tyler Thigpen were to...disappear between now and the draft...:fire:

Count Zarth
03-04-2009, 07:36 PM
And that's why DCS is my hero.

ChiefsCountry
03-04-2009, 07:50 PM
Would rather have seen this.

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 08:02 PM
Would rather have seen this.

As long as it didn't include a side-order of THIS bullshit,
I could live with it.



http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn182/lightbringerrr/no.jpg
(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=85979&stc=1&d=1236221771)

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 08:06 PM
It looks like the fates have spoken; how wonderfully foreboding...

http://www.nflshop.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3509754&cp=2237498&parentPage=family


http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn182/lightbringerrr/cassel.jpg

SNR
03-04-2009, 08:44 PM
Going back to what Mr. Wendler said about picking a number to "make famous"... here's the best list to decide that

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/news/story?id=3218941

It looks like #1 needs some love.

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 08:53 PM
Going back to what Mr. Wendler said about picking a number to "make famous"... here's the best list to decide that

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/news/story?id=3218941

It looks like #1 needs some love.


#11, QB #6 on the list is the most appropriate, for that's exactly what Cassel is and will be to this franchise until the Assassin parks his ass on the bench.

beach tribe
03-04-2009, 09:45 PM
I got $20,000 casino bucks that says Sanchez busts.

beach tribe
03-04-2009, 09:46 PM
Lienart style.

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 09:50 PM
I got $20,000 casino bucks that says Sanchez busts.

I should be able to accumulate 20k by the time he's played a couple of years.

You're on.

beach tribe
03-04-2009, 09:55 PM
I should be able to accumulate 20k by the time he's played a couple of years.

You're on.

Bet ends after the 2010 season.

I I think he may develop in his fourth or fifth season. A bust until then. Not a franchise QB.

chasedude
03-04-2009, 10:00 PM
It looks like the fates have spoken; how wonderfully foreboding...

http://www.nflshop.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3509754&cp=2237498&parentPage=family


http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn182/lightbringerrr/cassel.jpg

Oh Shit, nothing like painting a target on yourself! :doh!:

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 10:02 PM
Bet ends after the 2010 season.

I I think he may develop in his fourth or fifth season. A bust until then. Not a franchise QB.


Two years of first string snaps, buddy! Shouldn't he at least get a "Cutler Window"?!?!?

Do I look like I fell off the motherfuckin' turnip truck yesterday? :p

beach tribe
03-04-2009, 10:02 PM
"Call me now for ya freee readin."

beach tribe
03-04-2009, 10:04 PM
Two years of first string snaps, buddy! Shouldn't he at least get a "Cutler Window"?!?!?

Do I look like I fell off the mother****in' turnip truck yesterday? :p

That's cool. 2 years of first string snaps. BUT if he becomes the starter, and loses the job, every snap after that counts.

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 10:18 PM
That's cool. 2 years of first string snaps. BUT if he becomes the starter, and loses the job, every snap after that counts.

Done. :thumb:

redngold85
03-04-2009, 10:42 PM
3

Reerun_KC
03-04-2009, 10:45 PM
What number did Scott Mitchell wear in Detriot?

That should be his number... SM v2.0 lives!!!!

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 10:48 PM
Oh Shit, nothing like painting a target on yourself! :doh!:

LMAO

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 10:48 PM
What number did Scott Mitchell wear in Detriot?

That should be his number... SM v2.0 lives!!!!

LMAO

Darth CarlSatan
03-04-2009, 10:57 PM
"Call me now for ya freee readin."

Come on man, admit it; you'd LOVE to see a #6 Sanchez duke it out with a #6 Cutler, and just pound his douchey little ass all up and down the field!!!

Oh yeah; I just felt your soul shiver all the way from Florida to Arizona, boy! You're feelin' it! You're hooked! Don't fight it!LMAO

You thought Thigpen V Favre was something? That's childsplay, baby!

Come on down to the real deal!!!LMAO

Frazod
03-04-2009, 10:58 PM
3

Also retired.

Reerun_KC
03-04-2009, 10:59 PM
#19 it is!

Rock out with your WOK our SM v2.0

http://espn.go.com/i/abcsports/mnf/2001/1005/photo/s_mitchell_i.jpg

Frazod
03-04-2009, 11:03 PM
#19 it is!

Rock out with your WOK our SM v2.0

http://espn.go.com/i/abcsports/mnf/2001/1005/photo/s_mitchell_i.jpg

Montana took 19 because 3 and 16 were retired, so he added them.

I wouldn't mind seeing Cassell take 19. Perhaps it would be lucky.

Reerun_KC
03-04-2009, 11:03 PM
Montana took 19 because 3 and 16 were retired, so he added them.

I wouldn't mind seeing Cassell take 19. Perhaps it would be lucky.

its worth a shot....

Couldnt hurt!

Anyong Bluth
03-05-2009, 03:03 AM
58 since it's the closest to SB. Which = Super Bowl.

royr17
03-05-2009, 03:17 AM
I'd like to see him take # 17

Blick
03-05-2009, 03:52 AM
I don't care.

He's nothing like Scott Mitchell though.

Pioli Zombie
03-05-2009, 05:12 AM
12. Worn by
Namath. Staubach. Bradshaw. Stabler. Brady.

Lots of Lombardi's there
Posted via Mobile Device

el borracho
03-05-2009, 07:12 AM
I'd like him to wear the number 158.3.

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 08:06 AM
He's too massively awesome to be confined to a mere numerical designation; I suggest the following:

http://www.mnhs.org/collections/mplsmusic/web_assets/fullsize_images/mf008456.jpg

CoMoChief
03-05-2009, 08:15 AM
I think a fraction would be kinda cool

CoMoChief
03-05-2009, 08:15 AM
12. Worn by
Namath. Staubach. Bradshaw. Stabler. Brady.

Lots of Lombardi's there
Posted via Mobile Device

And we all know that Jersey numbers directly correlates to Super Bowl wins!!!

TEX
03-05-2009, 08:49 AM
11
No reason. I just like the number.

SNR
03-05-2009, 08:52 AM
11
No reason. I just like the number.Huard and Girlbac's old number. Fantastic!

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 09:05 AM
Huard and Girlbac's old number. Fantastic!

Print'em

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 09:06 AM
I don't care.

He's nothing like Scott Mitchell though.

Yes he is

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 09:11 AM
Yes he is

Hardly.

One started 15 games and won 10 of them.

The other started 7 and lost 4.

One of them was drafted by the same GM that brought him to his new team.

The other wasn't.

If you want to compare Cassel to somebody compare him to Matt Hasslebeck. At least that comparison is valid enough to not be laughable.

Pioli Zombie
03-05-2009, 10:08 AM
And we all know that Jersey numbers directly correlates to Super Bowl wins!!!

Well duuuhhh of course!! ;)
Posted via Mobile Device

rad
03-05-2009, 10:10 AM
Hardly.

One started 15 games and won 10 of them.

The other started 7 and lost 4.

One of them was drafted by the same GM that brought him to his new team.

The other wasn't.

If you want to compare Cassel to somebody compare him to Matt Hasslebeck. At least that comparison is valid enough to not be laughable.

I was gonna say.....Scott Mitchell? WTF?

raybec 4
03-05-2009, 10:12 AM
3.14

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 10:16 AM
Hardly.

One started 15 games and won 10 of them.

The other started 7 and lost 4.

One of them was drafted by the same GM that brought him to his new team.

The other wasn't.

If you want to compare Cassel to somebody compare him to Matt Hasslebeck. At least that comparison is valid enough to not be laughable.

More on the lines of the flavor of the offseason... Mitchell was all that anyone talked about in 1993/1994 (i think)...

I would love to see Cassel pan out and be a prowbowl QB next year and beyond... But as a fan of the NFL, I dont get excited about 7th round draft picks leading their second team to championships...

I think he is a good choice for the next 2-3 years while we are developing a 1st round QBoTF on the bench... Have him ready just in time for this team to move over the hump and go on a 5 year run at a championship...

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 10:17 AM
I was gonna say.....Scott Mitchell? WTF?

But he will always be SM v2.0 to me.... IF some dont like it, sorry, its my opinion not yours...

ClevelandBronco
03-05-2009, 10:18 AM
3.14

Cassel pi?

StcChief
03-05-2009, 10:24 AM
Hardly.

One started 15 games and won 10 of them.

The other started 7 and lost 4.

One of them was drafted by the same GM that brought him to his new team.

The other wasn't.

If you want to compare Cassel to somebody compare him to Matt Hasslebeck. At least that comparison is valid enough to not be laughable.
exactly. Seems the only valid comparison with Coaches/QBs. (in modern football time)

Woodrow Call
03-05-2009, 10:28 AM
But he will always be SM v2.0 to me.... IF some dont like it, sorry, its my opinion not yours...

I'm just glad you've found your new Herm. I'd hate to see you leave your comfort level.

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 10:30 AM
I'm just glad you've found your new Herm. I'd hate to see you leave your comfort level.

Where did I say I hated him? Nice to see your still making shit up as always.... :thumb:

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 10:30 AM
Cassel pi?

Hard Cassel and McCormick?

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 10:35 AM
More on the lines of the flavor of the offseason... Mitchell was all that anyone talked about in 1993/1994 (i think)...

I would love to see Cassel pan out and be a prowbowl QB next year and beyond... But as a fan of the NFL, I dont get excited about 7th round draft picks leading their second team to championships...

I think he is a good choice for the next 2-3 years while we are developing a 1st round QBoTF on the bench... Have him ready just in time for this team to move over the hump and go on a 5 year run at a championship...

I've got bad news for you.

If Cassel is only here 2-3 years, it means we're no closer to a championship run than we are now.

Pioli is going to sink or swim with Cassel. If we go on a "run" it will be with Cassel. If Cassel flames out, we're getting a new GM and HC to go with our new QB.

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 10:37 AM
Where did I say I hated him? Nice to see your still making shit up as always.... :thumb:

I'm happy as hell he's here! It keeps that fucking abortion Pig Pick off of my football field, and on the sidelines where his sub-mediocre ass belongs!

I look forward to seeing if Cassel can play on this team, and do it exceptionally well.
If he can, he'll have a nice 4 to 5 year run. If he's not as good as we're supposed to believe he is, we'd better acquire and be developing an elite talent in the number 2 roster spot.

And by elite, I do NOT mean some bush-whacking scrub like Graham Harrell!

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 10:39 AM
I've got bad news for you.

If Cassel is only here 2-3 years, it means we're no closer to a championship run than we are now.

Pioli is going to sink or swim with Cassel. If we go on a "run" it will be with Cassel. If Cassel flames out, we're getting a new GM and HC to go with our new QB.

You really think Pioli is gonna' pull a Carl, and just ride the mediocre train indefinitely with Cassel come hell or high water?!

You've got some outstanding takes, but this ain't one of 'em.

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 10:40 AM
I've got bad news for you.

If Cassel is only here 2-3 years, it means we're no closer to a championship run than we are now.

Pioli is going to sink or swim with Cassel. If we go on a "run" it will be with Cassel. If Cassel flames out, we're getting a new GM and HC to go with our new QB.

Fair Enough.... I was looking down the road and I hope that they were also. I guess we will see, I know one thing, this is the most excited I have been in 3 years for football.. I cant wait to see the product on the field and see the development of the players and team..

IF Cassel is the man, Great, I am fine with it. IF not, then your right, they will sink with him.

He is still SM v2.0. :thumb:

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 10:41 AM
You really think Pioli is gonna' pull a Carl, and just ride the mediocre train indefinitely with Cassel come hell or high water?!

You've got some outstanding takes, but this ain't one of 'em.

I'm not suggesting that at all. I'm suggesting that Clark isn't Lamar and I wouldn't expect Pioli to get 20 years like Carl did.

We're either going to win with Cassel, or we're going to get a new regime.

Woodrow Call
03-05-2009, 10:49 AM
Where did I say I hated him? Nice to see your still making shit up as always.... :thumb:

First off I never said you hated him just that it's clear to me that he is your new whipping boy. Anyway it's all good, nothing wrong with having an opinion. :thumb:

I would like some examples of me always making stuff up though.

beach tribe
03-05-2009, 10:53 AM
I've got bad news for you.

If Cassel is only here 2-3 years, it means we're no closer to a championship run than we are now.

Pioli is going to sink or swim with Cassel. If we go on a "run" it will be with Cassel. If Cassel flames out, we're getting a new GM and HC to go with our new QB.

I wouldn't bet on it. I would say if Cassel flames Pioli gets a new HC, and QB. JMO.

Brock
03-05-2009, 11:04 AM
We're either going to win with Cassel, or we're going to get a new regime.

Uh...no. They're going to continue drafting/developing QBs regardless of what Cassel does, IMO.

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 11:06 AM
Uh...no. They're going to continue drafting/developing QBs regardless of what Cassel does, IMO.

This. The value of the position has finally come to Arrowhead.

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 11:06 AM
I wouldn't bet on it. I would say if Cassel flames Pioli gets a new HC, and QB. JMO.

If Pioli and Haley don't win it all, or at least get VERY close, in the next 5 years, they'll both be gone. The odds against it are very, very high. What happened with Carl Peterson is beyond rare - it's a 1 in 10,000 occurence in this day and age.

It's the nature of professional sports today. Win or be gone.

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 11:08 AM
Uh...no. They're going to continue drafting/developing QBs regardless of what Cassel does, IMO.

I'm sure that's their plan. But it's not the way it works.

Do you think BB and Pioli would have still been in New England if Tom Brady hadn't broke out in 2001? Ask Pete Carroll about that.

Cassel is the QB for the next 3-4 years at least. They'll draft 2 or 3 late round projects during that time. And if Cassel fails, the next regime will get to decide what to do with them.

The ONLY way it doesn't happen with Cassel is if we draft somebody this year or next, Cassel gets hurt, and that draftee lights it up right away - aka the Brady scenario.

Brock
03-05-2009, 11:19 AM
I'm sure that's their plan. But it's not the way it works.

Do you think BB and Pioli would have still been in New England if Tom Brady hadn't broke out in 2001? Ask Pete Carroll about that.

Cassel is the QB for the next 3-4 years at least. They'll draft 2 or 3 late round projects during that time. And if Cassel fails, the next regime will get to decide what to do with them.

The ONLY way it doesn't happen with Cassel is if we draft somebody this year or next, Cassel gets hurt, and that draftee lights it up right away - aka the Brady scenario.

If the Patriots hadn't won any super bowls over the past decade, then sure, maybe Belichick and Pioli wouldn't still be there. That doesn't mean anything to the Chiefs situation.

The idea that Pioli would be fired because a QB he traded a second round pick didn't work out is pretty silly, IMO, as is the idea that they've married themselves to Cassel regardless of how he plays.

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 11:22 AM
If the Patriots hadn't won any super bowls over the past decade, then sure, maybe Belichick and Pioli wouldn't still be there. That doesn't mean anything to the Chiefs situation.

The idea that Pioli would be fired because a QB he traded a second round pick didn't work out is pretty silly, IMO, as is the idea that they've married themselves to Cassel regardless of how he plays.

He's married to Cassel solely because of time. I'm not suggesting Pioli would be fired solely because Cassel failed. I'm saying that, short of Cassel going down with an injury in the next 18 months and somebody else emerging (ala Brady in New England) they will be here over the same period of time.

If Cassel flames out, probability says Pioli simply won't have enough time to try it with someone else. Now if Clark turns out to be more like his dad in that respect, then that changes the argument a bit. Pioli will probably get another chance to try it with someone else, but then Haley probably won't.

Reerun_KC
03-05-2009, 11:45 AM
First off I never said you hated him just that it's clear to me that he is your new whipping boy. Anyway it's all good, nothing wrong with having an opinion. :thumb:

I would like some examples of me always making stuff up though.

I got nothing about you making stuff up.... :thumb: Was just throwing that out there...

And no Cassel isnt my new whipping boy... I will wait until if we draft Curry, then I will ride him like no other.... Drafting an OLB that high, he better be pro bowl or bust the first year...

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 11:55 AM
I got nothing about you making stuff up.... :thumb: Was just throwing that out there...

And no Cassel isnt my new whipping boy... I will wait until if we draft Curry, then I will ride him like no other.... Drafting an OLB that high, he better be pro bowl or bust the first year...

Fuckin' A Right!

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 12:02 PM
I got nothing about you making stuff up.... :thumb: Was just throwing that out there...

And no Cassel isnt my new whipping boy... I will wait until if we draft Curry, then I will ride him like no other.... Drafting an OLB that high, he better be pro bowl or bust the first year...

He probably won't even play OLB, which makes it all the more important that he be special right away.

beach tribe
03-05-2009, 12:04 PM
I'm a firm believer that Pioli, and Hunt are gonna be married for a LOOONG time.

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 12:05 PM
I'm a firm believer that Pioli, and Hunt are gonna be married for a LOOONG time.

If Clark is a chip off of the Lamar block, it's not out of the question.

We just need to realize that what we just got done with is so far from the norm that we should probably not expect to happen in the NFL again in our lifetime.

Chocolate Hog
03-05-2009, 12:06 PM
This. The value of the position has finally come to Arrowhead.

What? You mean there will be 144145235326 threads about QB's? Kinda like 05' People probably debated if Kilian would take Trent Greens job?

beach tribe
03-05-2009, 12:10 PM
If Clark is a chip off of the Lamar block, it's not out of the question.

We just need to realize that what we just got done with is so far from the norm that we should probably not expect to happen in the NFL again in our lifetime.

Same age, basically the same philosophy. They are going to agree on a lot of things, and I believe Clark will feel as though he has shared in any failures that might come Pioli's way. If Cassel doesn't work out, they will try again, I'm almost certain of it.

htismaqe
03-05-2009, 12:13 PM
Same age, basically the same philosophy. They are going to agree on a lot of things, and I believe Clark will feel as though he has shared in any failures that might come Pioli's way. If Cassel doesn't work out, they will try again, I'm almost certain of it.

Fair enough.

That would be a fairly large departure from the NFL norm, but in the end, I hope you're right.

Darth CarlSatan
03-05-2009, 01:21 PM
What? You mean there will be 144145235326 threads about QB's? Kinda like 05' People probably debated if Kilian would take Trent Greens job?

Chiefs Planet much?

Skip Towne
03-05-2009, 02:06 PM
5. It worked for George Brett.

Blick
03-05-2009, 02:54 PM
Yes he is

Mitchell never had a completion % over 60. Cassel's completion % was 63.4 in his first year starting. I don't think they'll be going down the same path.