PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Chiefs may be interested in Owens per ESPN


EyePod
03-07-2009, 10:07 AM
http://a.espncdn.com/i/nfl/profiles/players/65x90/3664.jpg (http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=1056)Several teams still interested in Owens?

After the initial surprise of Terrell Owens (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=1056)' release had worn off yesterday, many teams began the process of declaring their non-interest in the standout wide receiver. By the end of the day, half of the league's 32 teams had made public statements indicating they would not be interested in signing the star. This leaves the problem of which teams that need help at wide receiver actually do want to roll the dice with Owens. In a text message to ESPN, Owens' agent Drew Rosenhaus indicated "There are several teams that are interested in signing Terrell. I have been in negotiations with these teams. I will not identify these teams at this time. Terrell and I expect to have a deal in place by the end of next week if not sooner." ESPN's Chris Mortensen asked around to his league sources and identified just two teams that are considered a "maybe", those being the Oakland Raiders (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=oak) and San Francisco 49ers (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=sfo).
In addition to the Raiders and the Denver Broncos (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=den), who expressed interest in T.O. during his last brush with free agency, there are four other likely destinations for Owens in the AFC: the Buffalo Bills (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=buf), Cincinnati Bengals (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=cin), Indianapolis Colts (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=ind) and Kansas City Chiefs (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=kan). Buffalo is in need of a complement to Lee Evans (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=5538) and the team has been in talks with Laveranues Coles (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=2209) recently. Although Owens would be a dynamic addition to the team, it's not a great fit for him, given the team's poor quarterback play and the blue collar sensibilities of the fanbase.
The Bengals are left with a hole at wide receiver after they lost out on T.J. Houshmandzadeh (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=2753), and based on their silence regarding Owens there must be some internal conversations going on regarding his potential with the team. With a healthy Carson Palmer (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=4459) returning in 2009, the Bengals would become an instant contender with the addition of T.O., and the weekly touchdown dance oneupmanship between Owens and Chad Ocho Cinco (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=2584) could result in a new record for fines issued to one team for the practice.
Indianapolis has to be considered a bit of a longshot given the current strength of their receiving corps, but the team has not yet stated it won't consider Owens and we'll keep the door open until the team shuts it. That leaves the Chiefs who have been one of the most active teams in free agency so far, and made a tsunami-level splash with the controversial trade for Matt Cassel (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=8644). With Tony Gonzalez (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=1231) chomping at the bit to play on a championship-level team, an Owens signing would certainly send the Chiefs' offense to new heights, thereby acquiescing somewhat to the demands of the Pro Bowl tight end.
In the NFC, the prospects are less enticing. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=tam) are apparently still in the running given their silence on the topic, and with a considerable margin left under the salary cap Owens might be just one of the free agents they'll target in the coming weeks. However, with a shady situation at quarterback it's unlikely T.O. would want to get involved, especially when he'll be competing with franchised wideout Antonio Bryant (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=3591) and tight end Kellen Winslow (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=5531) for passes.
The one division of teams that has remained largely silent on Owens is the NFC North. Two writers for the Chicago Tribune have expressed heated arguments both in favor (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-06-morrissey-bears-terrell-owensmar06,0,5322499.column) of the Bears signing Owens, and against the signing (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-terrell-owens-chicago-bears-david-haugh-090305,0,5901393.column). The Green Bay Packers (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=gnb) have not yet publicly established that they're out of the Owens picture, but a poll on the website of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (http://www.jsonline.com/polls/40827602.html?results=y&oid=1&mr=1&cid=8500544&pid=40827602) seems to be swaying overwhelming against the fans being in favor of that likelihood. With Aaron Rodgers (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=8439) having developed a fine chemistry with Greg Jennings (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=9638) and Co. last season, an addition of Owens is certainly a difficult sell. Lastly, the Detroit Lions (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=det) are still in the running, and while they have indicated that the offense will be built around Calvin Johnson (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=10447) going forward, there is no legitimate second option behind Johnson.
As the oft-mentioned cliche goes, 30 NFL teams might not be interested, but it only takes two to make a market.



http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors

They are really being stupid here. Haley wouldn't coach TO in Dallas, why would he want him here, on a younger, more impressionable team. Haley will want to have complete control of his team, and he won't want disgruntled, immature "veterans" running their mouths. I say no way does this happen.

CupidStunt
03-07-2009, 10:09 AM
Zero chance. ZERO chance.

smittysbar
03-07-2009, 10:11 AM
Didn't Coles already sign somewhere?

milkman
03-07-2009, 10:11 AM
That leaves the Chiefs who have been one of the most active teams in free agency so far

Really?

Did I miss some things?

milkman
03-07-2009, 10:11 AM
Didn't Coles already sign somewhere?

The Natti, I believe.

Robo-Chachi
03-07-2009, 10:11 AM
There is a 100% chance that this had 0% chance of happening.

Bwana
03-07-2009, 10:13 AM
No way in hell.

ArrowheadHawk
03-07-2009, 10:14 AM
Not going to happen.

allen_kcCard
03-07-2009, 10:20 AM
Not going to happen.

Personally, I would be ok with them signing him for 2-3 years, having him come in and do his typically great inital season with a new team, and then looking to trade him while a good season is fresh in peoples minds instead of the 2nd or 3rd season when he always starts to stir the pot and cause trouble.

But I don't see Haley wanting anything to do with him.

Hydrae
03-07-2009, 10:20 AM
Really?

Did I miss some things?

My thought as well.

easymobee
03-07-2009, 10:21 AM
Sign TO to a 1 yr hired assasin deal ( he likely only has 1 impact yr left anyhow) and pair him up w/ Steve Bono vers.2.0. The chiefs need a real good offense to help compensate for the D's likely continued growing pains to have a wild card shot this yr.
Posted via Mobile Device

Baconeater
03-07-2009, 10:21 AM
He'd be the perfect Raider.

noa
03-07-2009, 10:22 AM
Yeah, seeing how much he loved playing along side Jason Witten, I'm sure he would adore having Tony Gonzalez take away his receptions.

Spicy McHaggis
03-07-2009, 10:29 AM
I would say he could help our young WR's out but Bowe already knows how to drop balls.

Ultra Peanut
03-07-2009, 10:30 AM
lol no

Chief Roundup
03-07-2009, 10:30 AM
Yeah, seeing how much he loved playing along side Jason Witten, I'm sure he would adore having Tony Gonzalez take away his receptions.

Yeah cause Tony actually catches the ball especially on 3rd down.

Coogs
03-07-2009, 10:31 AM
You know, the West is kind of there for the taking this year given the schedules all of the West teams face. TO could possibly give the Chiefs a leg up in the race this season.

HOWEVER, Pioli and Haley both said they were more interested in building this thing the right way, and I don't really see how TO fits into that scenario.

SNR
03-07-2009, 10:40 AM
Making.

Shit.

Up.

Does not constitute journalism :banghead: :cuss:

Mr. Kotter
03-07-2009, 10:43 AM
I call B.S. :shake:

Pioli and Haley won't risk that to start their era in KC.

T.O. is a locker room cancer that would only wreak havoc, regardless of his on-field contributions.

chiefforlife
03-07-2009, 10:43 AM
Pioli resurected Moss from Oakland, he could do the same with TO. We have very strong leadership now.
The offensive fortitude he would bring with him, is worth the risk.

Hog Farmer
03-07-2009, 10:44 AM
How do some people even get paid to write ?

ForeverChiefs58
03-07-2009, 10:45 AM
"The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are apparently still in the running... it's unlikely T.O. would want to get involved, especially when he'll be competing with franchised wideout Antonio Bryant and tight end Kellen Winslow for passes."

That could just as easy be KC with wideout Bowe and tight end TG.

Hog Farmer
03-07-2009, 10:45 AM
Pioli resurected Moss from Oakland, he could do the same with TO. We have very strong leadership now.
The offensive fortitude he would bring with him, is worth the risk.


Pioli would not risk a canser like this destroying such a young team, especially Cassel!

DaFace
03-07-2009, 10:47 AM
So...if I'm reading this right, this is pure speculation. Nothing more and nothing less.

Deberg_1990
03-07-2009, 10:50 AM
and people pay good money for insider crap like this?? ROFL

Spicy McHaggis
03-07-2009, 10:51 AM
Pioli resurected Moss from Oakland, he could do the same with TO. We have very strong leadership now.
The offensive fortitude he would bring with him, is worth the risk.

I haven't ever really equated Moss with Owens. Moss seems to be a fairly laid-back guy who is immature at times but he seems to have grown up some (relatively speaking). If you put him in a situation where there is strong leadership he'll be okay.

Owens can destroy a locker room with his insecurities regardless of who is in charge and doesn't seem to have changed an iota over the years.

sparkky
03-07-2009, 10:52 AM
less than zero chance of his signing here, or even being considered. Haley would completely melt down on the sidelines if his relations with Boldin last season is any indication.

nychief
03-07-2009, 10:53 AM
speculation.


HALEY did not take the Cowboys job because he refused to entertain the idea of working with Owens.

Big_Papa_029
03-07-2009, 10:54 AM
This is garbage. There's no chance Haley touches TO, not even with a 10-foot pole. The last thing he needs is the leadership and status of his shiny new QBOTF questioned by an aging, narcissistic, morale killing wide out.

MIAdragon
03-07-2009, 10:55 AM
Pioli resurected Moss from Oakland, he could do the same with TO. We have very strong leadership now.
The offensive fortitude he would bring with him, is worth the risk.

Moss was no where near the problem TO is and Moss can actually play. The proverbial shit storm is never far behind TO. No thanks.

Buzzsaw
03-07-2009, 10:57 AM
I call B.S. :shake:

Pioli and Haley won't risk that to start their era in KC.

T.O. is a locker room cancer that would only wreak havoc, regardless of his on-field contributions.

Exactly. Even if Pioli would roll the dice on a player like that (brought in Moss and Dillon to NE), he wouldn't subject a rookie head coach to having someone like that in the locker room. And TO's on a whole other level of d-bagness.

Buehler445
03-07-2009, 10:58 AM
This is garbage. There's no chance Haley touches TO, not even with a 10-foot pole. The last thing he needs is the leadership and status of his shiny new QBOTF questioned by an aging, narcissistic, morale killing wide out.

Welcome, Captain Lurker..

Big_Papa_029
03-07-2009, 10:59 AM
Welcome, Captain Lurker..

Would you believe it took me seven years to get around to posting?

Mr. Kotter
03-07-2009, 11:01 AM
This is all PR from the Owens camp to create an illusion that his client may have real options, when the reality of it is he won't have options.

Some desperate team, or a team with connections to him in the past that think they can rein him in....Oakland or Minnesota (Childress was OC in Philly during Owens days there) are gonna be about it.

Would you believe it took me seven years to get around to posting?

Actually, 6 years and 10 months. ;)

Welcome.

nychief
03-07-2009, 11:01 AM
I think we are going to add a vet wideout... but it is not going to be TO... no way.

SNR
03-07-2009, 11:04 AM
Would you believe it took me seven years to get around to posting?Weird. I would have thought Carl's resignation would have brought ALL lurkers out from hiding. I guess not, though.

DaneMcCloud
03-07-2009, 11:05 AM
Pioli resurected Moss from Oakland, he could do the same with TO. We have very strong leadership now.
The offensive fortitude he would bring with him, is worth the risk.

When Haley left Dallas after the 2006 season, he went to Jerry Jones and told him this:

"You will not win ANYTHING with Terrel Owens on your football team".

Do you really think Haley wants anything to do with Owens, especially after their behind the scenes and sideline fights?

No way.

Not.

Gonna.

Happen.

Period.

SNR
03-07-2009, 11:07 AM
When Haley left Dallas after the 2006 season, he went to Jerry Jones and told him this:

"You will not win ANYTHING with Terrel Owens on your football team".

Do you really think Haley wants anything to do with Owens, especially after their behind the scenes and sideline fights?

No way.

Not.

Gonna.

Happen.

Period.
Soooo... you're saying the deal is done?

Mr. Krab
03-07-2009, 11:11 AM
I seriously doubt it.

rolstrol
03-07-2009, 11:13 AM
Patriots don't want him

and we're Patriots 2.0

so why would we.

Dave Lane
03-07-2009, 11:16 AM
Actually I could see this happen. Randy Moss was a pariah and he ended up where? And has actually behaved well.

redngold85
03-07-2009, 11:22 AM
Please no......

Smed1065
03-07-2009, 11:23 AM
Yes a winner here.


Can I get a connection cause the shit must be good!

Mr. Krab
03-07-2009, 11:25 AM
Actually I could see this happen. Randy Moss was a pariah and he ended up where? And has actually behaved well.
In New England they have the leadership to handle Moss, here we don't yet. In New England they have lead wide respect as a winner, here we don't yet.

You lose and Moss/Owens are going to be a problem. Do you really think we are going to win enough next year to keep Owens happy?

philfree
03-07-2009, 11:25 AM
Sign his ass to the league minimum and then just for fun cut his ass. I don't want that socially retarded mo fo near my team.


PhilFree:arrow:

Tuckdaddy
03-07-2009, 11:26 AM
Why would he at 35 go to a 2-12 team? TO will not go to team that is not playoff ready.

rad
03-07-2009, 11:32 AM
I would imagine the Titans could use help at WR.......they're only a couple players away.

DaFace
03-07-2009, 11:33 AM
Why would he at 35 go to a 2-12 team? TO will not go to team that is not playoff ready.

Honestly, I have to wonder if his options will be more limited this time around. He wasn't really all that special in Dallas, and there's no doubting that he's a locker room cancer at this point. Half the teams in the NFL have already says "no fucking way." I just have to wonder if he may not have much of a choice.

Smed1065
03-07-2009, 11:33 AM
Not going to happen.

Personally, I would be ok with them signing him for 2-3 years, having him come in and do his typically great inital season with a new team, and then looking to trade him while a good season is fresh in peoples minds instead of the 2nd or 3rd season when he always starts to stir the pot and cause trouble.

But I don't see Haley wanting anything to do with him.

Fuck him.

He is not a leader or a need this year.


OK at league min but that is a stretch.

Lets see? 34, a dick and a cancer for a young team?


Your motive sucks less (a little) than Wendlers...

KCtotheSB
03-07-2009, 11:35 AM
No. No. NO. FUCK NO!

jAZ
03-07-2009, 11:36 AM
Making.

Shit.

Up.

Does not constitute journalism :banghead: :cuss:

Exactly. Pure, unfounded speculation.

DaFace
03-07-2009, 11:38 AM
Oh, and the Raiders have already said "no" according to a thread on the OM.

sparkky
03-07-2009, 11:58 AM
I would imagine the Titans could use help at WR.......they're only a couple players away.

they didn't go after Housh so I don't see much reason they'd go after a cancer.
Tenn. doesn't pass NEAR enough to keep TO happy and quiet.
but you're right, Tenn. could use a good WR and are a good team.

rtmike
03-07-2009, 11:58 AM
One thing for sure, we'd lead the league with WR's that drop passes. TO & D-Bo would drive Cassel nuts. :D

'Hamas' Jenkins
03-07-2009, 12:02 PM
Actually I could see this happen. Randy Moss was a pariah and he ended up where? And has actually behaved well.

Randy Moss wants to win.
TO wants TO to get attention and the ball on every snap.

The Buddha
03-07-2009, 12:05 PM
Randy Moss wants to win.
TO wants TO to get attention and the ball on every snap.

TO doesn't want that. What TO wants is drama. Even when he gets what he "wants" he'll still complain. No matter what he gets, it will NEVER be enough.

KcMizzou
03-07-2009, 12:06 PM
Haley and T.O. can't stand each other.

jidar
03-07-2009, 12:12 PM
Really?

Did I miss some things?

People who pick that quote out as being inacturate fail the test of objectivity concerning KC Chiefs footbal.

Kerberos
03-07-2009, 12:14 PM
Making.

Shit.

Up.

Does not constitute journalism :banghead: :cuss:

So your saying Nick "Assclown" Athan ISN'T a journalist?......... nebbermind.

Red Beans
03-07-2009, 12:15 PM
Jesus please don't do this...

soundmind
03-07-2009, 12:51 PM
Can we pay for Oakland to have him???

I don't know about Pioli & Co., but I don't want CANCER. This guy is guaranteed to ruin your locker room. The long running stats do not lie, Randy Moss makes you the best passing tandem in the league, TO destroys your team and your team's integrity. Very simple. Do not entertain this beyond Madden.

Black Ball him.

Smed1065
03-07-2009, 12:55 PM
Can we pay for Oakland to have him???

Yes we can but have to take JR as a trade!




:cuss:

CosmicPal
03-07-2009, 12:58 PM
The way Denver's been picking up free agents like Charlie Sheen picks up whores, I'm surprised T.O.'s hasn't signed with them.

ChiefRon
03-07-2009, 01:00 PM
The way Denver's been picking up free agents like Charlie Sheen picks up whores, I'm surprised T.O.'s hasn't signed with them.

Not over yet. Nobody's talking about it, but I could see it.

KC_Connection
03-07-2009, 01:03 PM
Get 'er done Scott.

kstater
03-07-2009, 01:07 PM
I may be interested in fucking the brains out of Scarlett Johansson.

Bwana
03-07-2009, 01:09 PM
Why would he at 35 go to a 2-12 team? TO will not go to team that is not playoff ready.

TO would go any place that is willing to show him the money. TO is all about TO period. On that note, fuck TO.

SenselessChiefsFan
03-07-2009, 01:25 PM
While I don't think it is probable given the 'money' that TO would want, I would not be surprised at all if it happened.

#1) Consider that Haley and TO were together in Dallas. One week after their huge blowup, TO got three TD's and they were hugging on the sidelines.

#2) TO is a great downfield blocker.

#3) Most WR's are headaches. Seriously, TO is just a little bigger headache than most.

#4) The infamous Drew wouldn't comment on the teams that are interested in him. Hmmm. Anyone smell what Pioli is cookin'? Drew has always tried to play teams off of each other.


Now, I am calling for the Chiefs to sign TO. Frankly, I would prefer that they not sign him. However, I won't be surprised at all if it happens. If Herm were here, I know it wouldn't happen. But, he isn't. The new regime values winning more than 'building'. So, I think it is a possibility.

Oh, and that isn't a shot at Herm or the new regime, just an acknowlegement that there will be differences.

StcChief
03-07-2009, 01:31 PM
He'd be the perfect Raider.This. Greasy Al is likely thinking this too.

Brock
03-07-2009, 01:34 PM
No thanks to the QB killer.

Bwana
03-07-2009, 01:35 PM
#3) Most WR's are headaches. Seriously, TO is just a little bigger headache than most.



ROFL

A little bigger headache? That's like saying Herm had a little problem with winning games last year, or Charles Manson had a little problem with a knife.

Hog Farmer
03-07-2009, 01:39 PM
Oh, and the Raiders have already said "no" according to a thread on the OM.


Wow! If the Raiders turned him down then he may possibly not find a job. If I were TO I think I'd be worried.

ArrowheadHawk
03-07-2009, 01:41 PM
Wow! If the Raiders turned him down then he may possibly not find a job. If I were TO I think I'd be worried.

Somebody will pay him league minimum with no guarantees. :D

Hog Farmer
03-07-2009, 01:41 PM
If Jerry jones is willing to take a 9 million cap hit to dump his ass that should tell you something

DeezNutz
03-07-2009, 01:44 PM
#3) Most WR's are headaches. Seriously, TO is just a little bigger headache than most.


Sometimes I don't think it's possible that you actually believe the positions you represent.

The above is asinine, and Bwana provided apt analogies to explain why.

Sure-Oz
03-07-2009, 01:46 PM
Pure speculation and pure bullshit

KcMizzou
03-07-2009, 01:47 PM
While I don't think it is probable given the 'money' that TO would want, I would not be surprised at all if it happened.

#1) Consider that Haley and TO were together in Dallas. One week after their huge blowup, TO got three TD's and they were hugging on the sidelines.

#2) TO is a great downfield blocker.

#3) Most WR's are headaches. Seriously, TO is just a little bigger headache than most.

#4) The infamous Drew wouldn't comment on the teams that are interested in him. Hmmm. Anyone smell what Pioli is cookin'? Drew has always tried to play teams off of each other.


Now, I am calling for the Chiefs to sign TO. Frankly, I would prefer that they not sign him. However, I won't be surprised at all if it happens. If Herm were here, I know it wouldn't happen. But, he isn't. The new regime values winning more than 'building'. So, I think it is a possibility.

Oh, and that isn't a shot at Herm or the new regime, just an acknowlegement that there will be differences..

Stewie
03-07-2009, 02:04 PM
It's apparent that ESPN is now in the soap opera writing business. It's too bad they have staffers that need to dream up crap like this.

"TO's brother dated a gal that knew Todd Haley's babysitter..."
"Oh, I'll take that angle because I KNOW he's going to KC... or not. It fills up space though"

DenverDanChiefsFan
03-07-2009, 02:24 PM
People who pick that quote out as being inacturate fail the test of objectivity concerning KC Chiefs footbal.Please explain how the Chiefs have been one of the more active players in free agency?

They TRADED for Cassel and Vrabel (not free agents). And the signed, what, 3 free agents (1 was our own).

I read that line in the article and thought this guy has no clue what he is talking about.

SenselessChiefsFan
03-07-2009, 02:31 PM
Sometimes I don't think it's possible that you actually believe the positions you represent.

The above is asinine, and Bwana provided apt analogies to explain why.

it was 'perhaps' an understatement, but my point is that most WR's are primadonnas anyways.

Again, not in favor of it, just saying I won't be surprised.

DaneMcCloud
03-07-2009, 02:34 PM
it was 'perhaps' an understatement, but my point is that most WR's are primadonnas anyways.

Again, not in favor of it, just saying I won't be surprised.

ROFL

One of the mods really needs to change your username.

ROFL

rad
03-07-2009, 02:38 PM
While I don't think it is probable given the 'money' that TO would want, I would not be surprised at all if it happened.

#1) Consider that Haley and TO were together in Dallas. One week after their huge blowup, TO got three TD's and they were hugging on the sidelines.

#2) TO is a great downfield blocker.

#3) Most WR's are headaches. Seriously, TO is just a little bigger headache than most.

#4) The infamous Drew wouldn't comment on the teams that are interested in him. Hmmm. Anyone smell what Pioli is cookin'? Drew has always tried to play teams off of each other.


Now, I am calling for the Chiefs to sign TO. Frankly, I would prefer that they not sign him. However, I won't be surprised at all if it happens. If Herm were here, I know it wouldn't happen. But, he isn't. The new regime values winning more than 'building'. So, I think it is a possibility.

Oh, and that isn't a shot at Herm or the new regime, just an acknowlegement that there will be differences.

I've never seen a post on CP that was this wrong in my life.

rad
03-07-2009, 02:40 PM
Actually:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fCrqy5S-H_A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fCrqy5S-H_A&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

DeezNutz
03-07-2009, 02:45 PM
it was 'perhaps' an understatement, but my point is that most WR's are primadonnas anyways.

Again, not in favor of it, just saying I won't be surprised.

That motherfucker is nuclear.

Bowe is a bit of a "problem" in a sense. Always in the ear of the head coach, letting him know he needs the ball. I agree with the fact that most of the more talented WR's are "problems" to this degree.

Frankly, I'm sure HC's would be far more worried if they didn't have to deal with these types of issues with their playmakers.

TO, on the other hand, is fucking Chernobyl. No one is safe within a radius of 200 miles.

MIAdragon
03-07-2009, 02:47 PM
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h110/majorcombs/terrell-owens-cartoon.jpg?t=1236458847

BWillie
03-07-2009, 03:00 PM
To is a great player. He keeps good care of his body and he will be productive up to 40. TO is misunderstood. I don't care if guys are assholes. I care if they perform on the field and try their hardest. TO is one of the hardest working guys in the NFL.

Bwana
03-07-2009, 03:12 PM
To is a great player. He keeps good care of his body and he will be productive up to 40. TO is misunderstood. I don't care if guys are assholes. I care if they perform on the field and try their hardest. TO is one of the hardest working guys in the NFL.

:spock:

Misunderstood? "Leon" is a complete headcase, douche bag, team cancer and doesn't give two shits about anyone but himself. Yeah, lets run right out and sign this waste of skin up, great move!

MIAdragon
03-07-2009, 03:12 PM
To is a great player. He keeps good care of his body and he will be productive up to 40. TO is misunderstood. I don't care if guys are assholes. I care if they perform on the field and try their hardest. TO is one of the hardest working guys in the NFL.

http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/watchdog/blog/terrell_owens_crying.jpg

Brock
03-07-2009, 03:42 PM
To is a great player. He keeps good care of his body and he will be productive up to 40. TO is misunderstood. I don't care if guys are assholes. I care if they perform on the field and try their hardest. TO is one of the hardest working guys in the NFL.

2 has left every team he's played on on bad terms. That doesn't mean anything?

jAZ
03-07-2009, 04:01 PM
Actually I could see this happen. Randy Moss was a pariah and he ended up where? And has actually behaved well.

I'd love for it to make sense and then be true. But it's not. No way.

Randy Moss wasn't bipolar and was generally a good guy.

Guru
03-07-2009, 04:02 PM
Just say no.

Mr. Flopnuts
03-07-2009, 04:08 PM
I'd love for it to make sense and then be true. But it's not. No way.

Randy Moss wasn't bipolar and was generally a good guy.

This statement is half accurate and half retarded. Sorry jaZ, nothing personal here, but TO is 10 times the man Randy Moss is. You never see TO step on his opponents. You never see TO squirt water on an official. You never see TO assault a meter cop. And you never see TO tell the media he's gonna shake his dick at a rivals fans.

That said, Randy Moss isn't bipolar, and TO most certainly is.

Darth CarlSatan
03-07-2009, 04:18 PM
I'd laugh.

Darth CarlSatan
03-07-2009, 04:19 PM
ROFL

One of the mods really needs to change your username.

ROFL

Now now Dane, you leave Nonsensical be! :D

Otter
03-07-2009, 04:50 PM
Not going to happen.

Personally, I would be ok with them signing him for 2-3 years, having him come in and do his typically great inital season with a new team, and then looking to trade him while a good season is fresh in peoples minds instead of the 2nd or 3rd season when he always starts to stir the pot and cause trouble.

But I don't see Haley wanting anything to do with him.

To is a great player. He keeps good care of his body and he will be productive up to 40. TO is misunderstood. I don't care if guys are assholes. I care if they perform on the field and try their hardest. TO is one of the hardest working guys in the NFL.

We're gonnna have to ask both of you to go ahead and repeatedly hit yourself in the face with a 2x4 dipped in antfreeze.

K, we'll get back with ya when it's ok to stop.

HolmeZz
03-07-2009, 04:55 PM
Rumor has it TO just signed with the Bills.

EyePod
03-07-2009, 05:59 PM
Rumor has it TO just signed with the Bills.

Yeah, he did. ESPN had the list correct apparently. Makes me kind of scared that he could have been closer to becoming a Chief than I thought... I'm just gonna go back to trusting in Pioli again, because he hasn't done me wrong yet!

DaneMcCloud
03-07-2009, 06:08 PM
Yeah, he did. ESPN had the list correct apparently. Makes me kind of scared that he could have been closer to becoming a Chief than I thought... I'm just gonna go back to trusting in Pioli again, because he hasn't done me wrong yet!

I SERIOUSLY doubt he was ever "close" to becoming a Chief.

The report listed "likely" destinations. No facts.

PURE speculation.

BWillie
03-07-2009, 07:18 PM
2 has left every team he's played on on bad terms. That doesn't mean anything?

True, he's not a great team player, but there is a reason why half of the locker room is usually supporting his ideas. It doesn't look like by most accounts he was disliked by most of his teammates in Dallas, it more so looks like he was questioning the coaches authority and play calling. Just ignore the guy or discipline him. In this case, Wade Phillips doesn't have a pair of balls to do any discipline in that locker room, and it got away from him. That is all you have to do. Either ignore him or discipline him. Either way, TO will be a team player in the first or two years of his contract because he wants to prove people wrong. It's when he's on a team for 2-3 years he starts to become a cancer. Signing him to a one year deal is a good deal for any team.

KcMizzou
03-07-2009, 07:21 PM
True, he's not a great team player, but there is a reason why half of the locker room is usually supporting his ideas. It doesn't look like by most accounts he was disliked by most of his teammates in Dallas, it more so looks like he was questioning the coaches authority and play calling. Just ignore the guy or discipline him. In this case, Wade Phillips doesn't have a pair of balls to do any discipline in that locker room, and it got away from him. That is all you have to do. Either ignore him or discipline him. Either way, TO will be a team player in the first or two years of his contract because he wants to prove people wrong. It's when he's on a team for 2-3 years he starts to become a cancer. Signing him to a one year deal is a good deal for any team.That's exactly what makes him a "team cancer". Hell that's the definition of a team cancer.

Darth CarlSatan
03-07-2009, 07:51 PM
Buffalo, 6 mill, done deal, and good night TO.