PDA

View Full Version : Experimental mock. Thoughts welcome.


Direckshun
03-21-2009, 07:42 PM
1. NT B.J. Raji, Boston College

3. WR Louis Murphy, Florida

4. ILB Daniel Holtzclaw, Eastern Michigan

5. RB Andre Brown, N.C. State

6. C Jon Cooper, Oklahoma

7. CB DeAngelo Willingham, Tennessee

Roster

QB: Cassell, Thigpen, Croyle
RB: Charles, Smith, Brown
FB: Cox

WR: Bowe, Engram, Bradley, Murphy, Webb
TE: Gonzalez, Cottam

LT: Albert, McIntosh
LG: Waters, Smith
C: Cooper, Niswanger
RG: Richardson, Niswanger
RT: Taylor, Richardson

DE: Dorsey, Boone
NT: Raji, Tyler
DE: McBride, Boone

OLB: Hali, Robertson
ILB: Johnson, Beisel
ILB: Holtzclaw, Mays
OLB: Vrabel, Robertson

CB: Flowers, Carr, Leggett, Daniels, Willingham
S: Page, Pollard, Morgan, McGraw

K: Barth
P: Colquitt
KR/PR: Robinson

'Hamas' Jenkins
03-21-2009, 11:10 PM
I really love the idea of having 6 draft picks to work with. :banghead:

BigChiefFan
03-21-2009, 11:24 PM
I actually like it, but think we could get better value out of the 4th round pick.

Also, I like Louis Murphy, but fear he may be too fragile for the league.

DaneMcCloud
03-21-2009, 11:28 PM
:Lin:

How many ****ing times can I say it?

This is the best draft in a ****ing decade for offensive lineman and you take some ****ball from Oklahoma in the 5th?

Are you seriously going to put Matt Cassel out there behind the same ****ing dildos from last season?

If so, TRADE THE ****ER. Because he isn't going to do jackshit behind this ****ing line.

Bottom line: I think your draft is just about the worst collection of players that could I possibly imagine.

A 14 minute old chimp born in the wilds of Africa could have done better.

No offense personally.

DaneMcCloud
03-21-2009, 11:29 PM
Why are there a bunch of fucking asterisks in my post.

WTF?

'Hamas' Jenkins
03-21-2009, 11:35 PM
As long as we don't draft a lineman in the first round, I could care less if we spent 3 picks on OL. I also wouldn't mind offloading our third to Dallas for both of their 4ths plus another pick.

DaneMcCloud
03-21-2009, 11:40 PM
As long as we don't draft a lineman in the first round, I could care less if we spent 3 picks on OL. I also wouldn't mind offloading our third to Dallas for both of their 4ths plus another pick.

Me, too.

I just can't see the Chiefs staying at #3 and picking another fucking DT. They need to trade back and get what they can get.

And as for the rest, I'd take any of the O-lineman before some of the jackoffs that were chosen in this draft.

My ideal draft? The Chiefs trade back a couple of times and grab Heyward-Bey and Unger/Mack with their first two picks in the first round. Continue to build the O-line, add a RB and the BPA at each selection beyond the third round.

'Hamas' Jenkins
03-21-2009, 11:45 PM
Me, too.

I just can't see the Chiefs staying at #3 and picking another fucking DT. They need to trade back and get what they can get.

And as for the rest, I'd take any of the O-lineman before some of the jackoffs that were chosen in this draft.

My ideal draft? The Chiefs trade back a couple of times and grab Heyward-Bey and Unger/Mack with their first two picks in the first round. Continue to build the O-line, add a RB and the BPA at each selection beyond the third round.

Honestly, my ideal draft is to take Stafford, sit him behind Cassel and two-three new linemen, and hope in the middle rounds we can find a tweener to run off the edges for our stupid move to the 3-4.

Halfcan
03-22-2009, 12:11 AM
Why are there a bunch of ****ing asterisks in my post.

WTF?

potty mouth

dj56dt58
03-22-2009, 03:27 AM
Everette Brown...guys gonna end up the best D player in the draft

BryanBusby
03-22-2009, 05:18 AM
The idea of drafting BJ Raji is a very risky one. If he is everything that's advertised, it'd be a good pick. On the other hand, there are some big red flags on him. Inconsistency and lacking motivation is definitely two things I am not looking for in a top 3 draft choice.

BigChiefFan
03-22-2009, 10:06 AM
Me, too.

I just can't see the Chiefs staying at #3 and picking another ****ing DT. They need to trade back and get what they can get.

And as for the rest, I'd take any of the O-lineman before some of the jackoffs that were chosen in this draft.

My ideal draft? The Chiefs trade back a couple of times and grab Heyward-Bey and Unger/Mack with their first two picks in the first round. Continue to build the O-line, add a RB and the BPA at each selection beyond the third round.
I'd rather have the guy that dominated both of their asses in the Senior Bowl to shore up our defense and give us the road grader we've desperately needed for a decade plus. I understand not wanting to spend another high
1st round pick on one, but technically, we only have one 1st round DT on the roster, so the argument is a moot point in my book.

Direckshun
03-22-2009, 04:50 PM
:Lin:

How many ****ing times can I say it?

This is the best draft in a ****ing decade for offensive lineman and you take some ****ball from Oklahoma in the 5th?

Are you seriously going to put Matt Cassel out there behind the same ****ing dildos from last season?

If so, TRADE THE ****ER. Because he isn't going to do jackshit behind this ****ing line.

Bottom line: I think your draft is just about the worst collection of players that could I possibly imagine.

A 14 minute old chimp born in the wilds of Africa could have done better.

No offense personally.

What does it take to get a couple ideas in your head?

Do I have to crack your ****ing skull? Is that even possible? Is that big-screen you call a forehead made of ****ing granite?

Let me say it to you in a way that you can swallow before I turn to desperate measures and coat your throat in vasoline:

NEED BAD

GOOD PLAYERS GOOD

You're either advocating we abandon every goddamn drafting principle IN EXISTENCE to forego players at skill positions or our new 3-4 defense THAT WE DON'T EVEN HAVE PLAYERS FOR, or you're trying to swat a spider on your keyboard and accidentally entered in this post.

As far as I care you're doing both. Dipshit. I'd rather take draft advice from findthedr and chiefscafan and ****ing WPI than read through another one of your senseless draft excretions that's never offered an idea you hadn't PM'd Mecca for first.

Do yourself a favor and take a bath with a toaster.

Direckshun
03-22-2009, 04:51 PM
What does it take to get a couple ideas in your head?

Do I have to crack your ****ing skull? Is that even possible? Is that big-screen you call a forehead made of ****ing granite?

Let me say it to you in a way that you can swallow before I turn to desperate measures and coat your throat in vasoline:

NEED BAD

GOOD PLAYERS GOOD

You're either advocating we abandon every goddamn drafting principle IN EXISTENCE to forego players at skill positions or our new 3-4 defense THAT WE DON'T EVEN HAVE PLAYERS FOR, or you're trying to swat a spider on your keyboard and accidentally entered in this post.

As far as I care you're doing both. Dipshit. I'd rather take draft advice from findthedr and chiefscafan and ****ing WPI than read through another one of your senseless draft excretions that's never offered an idea you hadn't PM'd Mecca for first.

Do yourself a favor and take a bath with a toaster.

I don't even really believe this, I just wanted to try arguing like Dane for once.

DaneMcCloud
03-22-2009, 04:52 PM
Do yourself a favor and take a bath with a toaster.

Hey Dude, I specifically said "nothing personal".

So why are you making it personal? That's not cool.

Me not liking your draft doesn't mean a god-damned thing.

So why get your panties in a bunch?

keg in kc
03-22-2009, 04:54 PM
I don't even really believe this, I just wanted to try arguing like Dane for once.ROFL

DaneMcCloud
03-22-2009, 04:56 PM
I don't even really believe this, I just wanted to try arguing like Dane for once.

Dammit!

:D

keg in kc
03-22-2009, 04:57 PM
You got got good.