PDA

View Full Version : Other Sports Which will happen first?


Buck
04-29-2009, 05:03 PM
In the Major Leagues

All of these have already happened, but which will happen first from now on.

A Pitcher wins 31 Games in a Season (Denny McClain 1968)
A Pitcher has an ERA at or under 1.12 in a season(Bob Gibson 1968)
A Pitcher has 383 or more Strikeouts in a Season (Nolan Ryan 1973)
A Player hits over .400 in a season (Ted Williams .406 1941)
A Player hits 61 or more homers in a season (Roger Maris 1961)
A Player hits in 56 or more Consecutive Games (Joe Dimaggio 1941)
A Player hits for the Triple Crown in one season (Carl Yaztremski 1967)
A Player drives in 191 or more RBIs in one season (Hack Wilson 1930)
A Player steals 130 or more bases in one season (Rickey Henderson 1982)

Jethopper
04-29-2009, 05:09 PM
.400 will never be broken. A 82 MPH fastball is not the norm anymore.

JASONSAUTO
04-29-2009, 05:11 PM
pitcher under 1.12 era, greinke:p

Pestilence
04-29-2009, 05:17 PM
A Player drives in 191 or more RBIs in one season

Buck
04-29-2009, 05:21 PM
pitcher under 1.12 era, greinke:p

You realize for this to happen, he'll have to basically pitch a complete game every game, and only give up 1 run in one out of every 9 innings?

Or he'll have to average 7 innings a game, and only give up 1 run every 11.57 innings, we can make that 2 runs every 23 innings, to make it a nice round number...

So yeah, 2 runs every 23 innings...You think he could do it?

Edit: I meant innings, not games.

RippedmyFlesh
04-29-2009, 05:21 PM
I see someone hitting more than 61 hr's more so then anything else on this list.
I dont think any of the other choices will happen.

ChiefsRoyalsMizzou
04-29-2009, 05:34 PM
more then 61 homers

JASONSAUTO
04-29-2009, 05:37 PM
You realize for this to happen, he'll have to basically pitch a complete game every game, and only give up 1 run in one out of every 9 innings?

Or he'll have to average 7 innings a game, and only give up 1 run every 11.57 innings, we can make that 2 runs every 23 innings, to make it a nice round number...

So yeah, 2 runs every 23 innings...You think he could do it?

Edit: I meant innings, not games.

HELL YEAH HE COULD DO IT HAVE YOU SEEN HIM THIS YEAR???


i keed i keed..... well kinda:D

RJ
04-29-2009, 05:55 PM
Triple Crown seems most likely of the choices, I could see Pujols or Alexei Ramirez- maybe a few others - pulling it off. Just need a good player to have a balanced year in a generally down year offensively.

thurman merman
05-02-2009, 04:39 PM
i gotta think pujols is gonna win the triple crown sooner or later.

1.12 ERA will never even be sniffed by a starting pitcher. not even greinke.

31 wins is pretty much unattainable in this day and age.

i think .400 is possible and 61 HR will happen.

191 RBI is pretty ridiculous.

130 steals probably won't happen. people just don't do that anymore.

thurman merman
05-02-2009, 04:41 PM
Triple Crown seems most likely of the choices, I could see Pujols or Alexei Ramirez- maybe a few others - pulling it off. Just need a good player to have a balanced year in a generally down year offensively.

WTF? are you talking about the same alexei ramirez that is hitting .203 with 1 HR and 9 RBI right now?

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=28952

RippedmyFlesh
05-02-2009, 05:25 PM
WTF? are you talking about the same alexei ramirez that is hitting .203 with 1 HR and 9 RBI right now?

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=28952
wrong ramirez ...manny could go off and get a triple crown .
I think the bet would be pujols against the field.
Chances of triple crown.
Pujols>>>>>>>>arod(younger than manny so more chances)>manny>everyone else.

88TG88
05-02-2009, 07:43 PM
Nobody is ever gonna hit more than 61 homers in a year. Thats just unheard of.

thurman merman
05-03-2009, 07:33 PM
Nobody is ever gonna hit more than 61 homers in a year. Thats just unheard of.

ROFL

Priest31kc
05-03-2009, 07:43 PM
ERA under 1.12. Greinke.

Saul Good
05-03-2009, 08:42 PM
You realize for this to happen, he'll have to basically pitch a complete game every game, and only give up 1 run in one out of every 9 innings?

Or he'll have to average 7 innings a game, and only give up 1 run every 11.57 innings, we can make that 2 runs every 23 innings, to make it a nice round number...

So yeah, 2 runs every 23 innings...You think he could do it?

Edit: I meant innings, not games.

Your math...it's...not good.

1.12 era is slightly worse than 1 run per 9 innings. 1 run every 11.57 innings would be an ERA of 0.78.

Guru
05-03-2009, 08:49 PM
more then 61 homersWhy the hell did he pick 61 anyway. That record was already shattered? I voted as if that option didn't exist.

Buck
07-23-2009, 02:59 PM
Your math...it's...not good.

1.12 era is slightly worse than 1 run per 9 innings. 1 run every 11.57 innings would be an ERA of 0.78.

Yeah, I am retarted.

Why the hell did he pick 61 anyway. That record was already shattered? I voted as if that option didn't exist.

I picked 61 because I never said that the numbers had to be records. Nobody has cleanly hit 61 since 1961, 48 years ago.

Anyhow, unless Pujols has a monster 2nd half, none of these are happening this year.

thurman merman
07-23-2009, 07:47 PM
Anyhow, unless Pujols has a monster 2nd half, none of these are happening this year.

pretty sure pujols will have a monster second half.

OnTheWarpath58
07-23-2009, 07:54 PM
pretty sure pujols will have a monster second half.

Hell, all he has to do is keep the pace he's on, and that gets him to the high 50's.

I wouldn't say he needs a monster 2nd half.