PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Chiefs Season Win Total from Vegas - 5.5 Games


Jmart
05-06-2009, 05:41 PM
The following is the complete listing of 2009 NFL team regular-season victory totals from the Venetian:

Patriots 12 under -130

Giants 10.5 under -140

Chargers 10.5 under -150

Steelers 11 under -125

Cowboys 9.5 over -120

Colts 10.5 under -140

Packers 8.5 over -120

Eagles 9 under -130

Saints 8.5 under -130

Ravens 8.5 under -120

Falcons 8 under -120

Vikings 8.5 over -135

Cardinals 9 under -125

Titans 8.5 over -130

Bears 8 over -135

Panthers 8.5 over -120

Redskins 8

Dolphins 8 under -150

Texans 8

Jets 8

Bills 7.5 over -120

Seahawks 7.5 under -130

Broncos 7.5 under -130

49ers 7

Jaguars 8 under -140

Chiefs 5.5 over -150

Bengals 5.5 over -140

Browns 6.5 over -140

Buccaneers 6.5

Raiders 5.5 over -125

Rams 5 over -140

Lions 5

milkman
05-06-2009, 05:50 PM
So what do I win if I bet the under?

Jmart
05-06-2009, 05:51 PM
The way these lines go I bet the under is at +120 or something, meaning you would get $120 for every $100 wagered. If you bet the over you would have to bet $150 to win $100.

Cormac
05-06-2009, 06:59 PM
Last year's O/U line was 6! Even then the under was a lock.

This year the over would tempt me.

beavis
05-06-2009, 07:05 PM
I think the line for us is about right.

The 5 for the Lions is screaming at me though.

FD
05-06-2009, 07:15 PM
Sounds about right for us.


"Titans 8.5 over -130"

This is a steal though, does anybody remember how good they were last year?

htismaqe
05-06-2009, 07:20 PM
Last year's O/U line was 6! Even then the under was a lock.

This year the over would tempt me.

Yep.

I see us at 7-9, maybe 6-10.

Otter
05-06-2009, 07:34 PM
Yep.

I see us at 7-9, maybe 6-10.

Tough to get my crystal ball working given I don't have the past incompetence to bank on as a projection factor but I'd say 5 wins is about right.

Kyle DeLexus
05-06-2009, 08:30 PM
I've said 4-5 for us, the boys in vegas seem to have gotten this one pretty much on where it should be.

tboss27
05-06-2009, 08:31 PM
I'd take Bills/Seahawks under at 7.5, and defintely under on the Raiders at 5.5

Frankie
05-06-2009, 08:56 PM
So does this mean at some point we will play against half a team? :hmmm:

MoreLemonPledge
05-06-2009, 08:58 PM
So does this mean at some point we will play against half a team? :hmmm:

The Raiders. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Oh wait. We play them twice. 0.5 + 0.5 = 1

Seriously, though. If you take the under, 5 is a win and 6 is a loss. That way there isn't a tie. But you knew that, right?

StcChief
05-06-2009, 09:01 PM
so the tie is with?

Jmart
05-07-2009, 10:19 AM
Will probably throw down a bit on the over. In this weak division we will be much improved IMO

Buck
05-07-2009, 10:24 AM
Take the Chargers over 10.5 I'm telling you.

All they have to do is win 5 out of their 10 out of division games...you know they are going to sweep the division.

Simply Red
05-07-2009, 11:40 AM
that's great, jmart.

Bowser
05-07-2009, 11:42 AM
I wonder what the over/under for the Dolphins was last year?

Brock
05-07-2009, 11:43 AM
Take the Chargers over 10.5 I'm telling you.

All they have to do is win 5 out of their 10 out of division games...you know they are going to sweep the division.

Norv.

Frankie
05-07-2009, 11:48 AM
Take the Chargers over 10.5 I'm telling you.

All they have to do is win 5 out of their 10 out of division games...you know they are going to sweep the division.

You underestimate the magic touch of one Norv Turner, sir.

Frankie
05-07-2009, 11:51 AM
Norv.

You underestimate the magic touch of one Norv Turner, sir.

OMG!!!.... IS THERE A DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE?... I'M TURNING INTO BROCK!!!:eek:

htismaqe
05-07-2009, 12:13 PM
You underestimate the magic touch of one Norv Turner, sir.

LOL

It's called the "reverse Midas touch".

Everything he touches turns to shit.

Frankie
05-07-2009, 12:16 PM
LOL

It's called the "reverse Midas touch".

Everything he touches turns to shit.

That would be Sadim touch of course. Google it. It's a fascinating study that has not begun yet.

But seriously I think he is a viable OC. Just NOT HC material.

Baby Lee
05-07-2009, 12:26 PM
LOL

It's called the "reverse Midas touch".

Everything he touches turns to shit.

I knew a guy who coined the term
'a fecal twist on the Midas touch.'

Pull that one out every once in a while.

Brock
05-07-2009, 12:40 PM
Certainly they've had more postseason success with Turner than they did with the dude who was there before him. Oddly, Turner is a better coach in the postseason than he is in the regular season, which is why I scoff at the notion of him sweeping the division.

CrazyPhuD
05-07-2009, 01:33 PM
Man I can't believe it was this long...but has to be done!

Print 'Em!