PDA

View Full Version : Obama Obama fires I.G.


Chiefshrink
06-14-2009, 10:51 AM
Chicago thuggery on display!!!! Think we will hear about this in the 'majority communist press????


OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
Obama fires watchdog who barked at his crony
Rush Limbaugh calls action illegal, 'bigger' than Alberto Gonzales fray


Posted: June 13, 2009
7:25 pm Eastern


By Drew Zahn
2009 WorldNetDaily

Gerald Walpin
Former Inspector General Gerald Walpin filed two reports exposing gross misappropriation of federal AmeriCorps funds by a prominent Barack Obama supporter and was shortly thereafter fired by the White House, circumstances he told WND are likely linked and others have called an outright illegal action by the administration.

"I think you have to look at the facts and the circumstances and reach your conclusions," Walpin said in a WND interview. "I will tell you that [my firing] came only after we had issued those two reports to Congress, and I don't think that's a coincidence."

Further, Walpin said, "I am convinced that I and my office are not guilty of any impropriety. In essence, I was fired for doing my job."
Independent, federal inspectors general are supposed to be granted special protection from political interference thanks in part to a law co-sponsored by the then-Senator Barack Obama to ensure that they are free to investigate waste and fraud uninfluenced by political cronyism.

But after Walpin dared to push for action against the St. HOPE Academy program run by Obama supporter and former NBA star Kevin Johnson which had misappropriated hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal AmeriCorps funds, he nonetheless found himself fired by the White House under circumstances that have led some to wonder if Obama has violated his own co-sponsored law in retaliation.

"There are two big questions about the president's actions," writes Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner. "One, why did he decide to fire Walpin? And two, did he abide by the law that he himself co-sponsored?"

Radio talk host Rush Limbaugh fired off an answer to York's questions on his program yesterday:
"Firing an inspector general is a big deal. If you'll remember, Alberto Gonzales as attorney general fired a couple of U.S. attorneys. He took hell for it. This is bigger. Inspectors general are supposed to be completely above politics," Limbaugh commented. "This is big. This is political cronyism, power and so forth. I'm telling you, firing an I.G., because they're not political, it is a much bigger deal than replacing United States attorneys."

Furthermore, Limbaugh stated, the unusual circumstances surrounding the night before Walpin's dismissal constitutes a clear violation of the very law Obama helped to pass as a senator.
"The Obama administration did it overnight," Limbaugh stated. "[It] broke the law firing the AmeriCorps I.G."


According to the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008, co-sponsored by Obama, inspectors general do not serve at the president's pleasure and therefore cannot be fired without 30 days notice and written cause for the decision sent to Congress.

The firing of Walpin, however, took on a very different form.
Walpin confirmed to WND that on Wednesday evening earlier this week, he received a sudden and unexpected ultimatum from White House counsel Norman L. Eisen: Resign with the hour or suffer being fired.
Walpin refused to resign, replying in an email, "It would do a disservice to the independent scheme that Congress has mandated and could potentially raise questions about my own integrity if I were to render what would seem to many a very hasty response to your request."

The next day the administration nonetheless fired Walpin and sent a letter to Congress citing as its only reason for the dismissal, "It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general. That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who also co-sponsored the Inspector General Reform Act, immediately protested the White House's action.

"I was troubled to learn that last night your staff reportedly issued an ultimatum to the AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin that he had one hour to resign or be terminated," Grassley stated in a letter to the president. "Inspectors General were designed to have a dual role reporting to both the President and Congress so that they would be free from undue political pressure. This independence is the hallmark of all inspectors general and is essential so they may operate independently, without political pressure or interference from agencies attempting to keep their failings from public scrutiny."

Grassley's letter reminded Obama of the statute requiring the president to submit 30-days notice to Congress of an inspector general's dismissal and stated, "No such notice was provided to Congress in this instance."
"We cannot afford to have inspector general independence threatened," Grassley concluded. "In light of the massive increases in federal spending of late, it is more critical than ever that we have an inspector general community that is vigorous, independent and active in rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. I urge you to review the Inspector General Reform Act you co-sponsored and to follow the letter of the law should you have cause to remove any inspector general."

The White House then clarified two issues, explaining that Walpin was not immediately fired, but suspended for 30 days of paid leave as a countdown to his official release, and that his dismissal, indeed, was related to the Johnson investigation.

In a written response to Sen. Grassley, White House counsel Gregory Craig cited an ethics complaint filed against Walpin by the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento, Lawrence Brown.
Brown had had declined to file criminal charges against Johnson, who was elected in November as mayor of Sacramento, or the St. HOPE Academy, but did reach a settlement requiring the organization to pay back over $400,000 of $850,000 in grants it was given through the AmeriCorps program.
Both Grassley's letter and Walpin, however, pointed out that the inspector general has not been found guilty of any misconduct, and the charges are disputed.

"I have been performing and my office has been performing its work with the highest integrity, in the spirit of an independent office, calling the shots as it sees them," Walpin told WND. "The integrity committee will decide the merits of the complaint, but what troubles me is that the White House is apparently relying on the complaint. At this point, it is before an adjudicatory body, and if the White House felt it couldn't wait for that decision, it should have at least waited for me to come in and provide my factual response, so it could consider it. It did not."

And while Walpin has been guarded in responses to the media, refraining from commenting on his future plans or even accusing the president of firing him for political reasons, he did share with WND that he believes Obama has compromised the independent integrity of the office of inspector general.

"I am sorry for what I believe to be clear interference with the institution of the inspector general," Walpin said. "And I am sorry for the people in my office, who I respect. I took the position because I believed when the president called upon me, it was a great opportunity to give something back to this country. I have done what I believe is right, and I will go on."

orange
06-14-2009, 11:05 AM
Re-repost. How many threads on this subject have to die for lack of support?

banyon
06-14-2009, 11:16 AM
Rush Limbaugh certainly seems upset about this

petegz28
06-14-2009, 01:00 PM
This si the 3rd post about it....

The IG busted Obama's crony and he got fired. Plain and simple.

The Dems and Left will ignore it and pretend it never happened because Obama is Jesus, Mohamed (sp?) and Buddah all rolled into one.

banyon
06-14-2009, 01:17 PM
This si the 3rd post about it....

The IG busted Obama's crony and he got fired. Plain and simple.

The Dems and Left will ignore it and pretend it never happened because Obama is Jesus, Mohamed (sp?) and Buddah all rolled into one.

It took me about five minutes to find the real reasons this clown got fired. I'm sure Rush probably couldn't be bothered to state the real reasons.

In August 2008, Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney's office, which said the watchdog's conclusions seemed overstated and did not accurately reflect all the information gathered in the investigation.

"We also highlighted numerous questions and further investigation they needed to conduct, including the fact that they had not done an audit to establish how much AmeriCorps money was actually misspent," Acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence Brown said in an April 29 letter to the federal counsel of inspectors general.


http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Brown_letter_to_Kenneth_Kaiser.pdf

Read the letter, if you really want to know. The US Atty pretty much puts a clown suit on him.

petegz28
06-14-2009, 01:19 PM
It took me about five minutes to find the real reasons this clown got fired. I'm sure Rush probably couldn't be bothered to state the real reasons.




http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Brown_letter_to_Kenneth_Kaiser.pdf

Read the letter, if you really want to know. The US Atty pretty much puts a clown suit on him.



Why is the NPO giving the money back? BTW, I have not heard what Rush has said in this. I can careless what Rush says on this.

banyon
06-14-2009, 01:25 PM
Why is the NPO giving the money back? BTW, I have not heard what Rush has said in this. I can careless what Rush says on this.

The NPO is giving money back because funds were unaccounted for.

petegz28
06-14-2009, 01:37 PM
The NPO is giving money back because funds were unaccounted for.

And how was that determined?

banyon
06-14-2009, 01:43 PM
And how was that determined?

Through an investigation conducted by the AG in cooperation with the CNCS.

Did you not read the letter?

petegz28
06-14-2009, 01:44 PM
Through an investigation conducted by the AG in cooperation with the CNCS.

Did you not read the letter?

I have read a few articles on this. And I come to the conclusion that an Obama crony was busted fudging the books and Barry got mad.

banyon
06-14-2009, 01:46 PM
I have read a few articles on this. And I come to the conclusion that an Obama crony was busted fudging the books and Barry got mad.

I see, your mind is made up regardless of what facts are presented. That's good to know.

petegz28
06-14-2009, 01:56 PM
I see, your mind is made up regardless of what facts are presented. That's good to know.

Its the best impression of a democrat I can do.

banyon
06-14-2009, 02:00 PM
Its the best impression of a democrat I can do.

:lame:

petegz28
06-14-2009, 02:02 PM
:lame:

aww come on...it was spot on and you know it.:)

Nightwish
06-14-2009, 02:17 PM
I have read a few articles on this. And I come to the conclusion that an Obama crony was busted fudging the books and Barry got mad.
You really should learn to be more discerning in your selection of news sources. World Net Daily and the Washington Examiner both have the reputation for right-wing shilling and outright fabrication of stories. They're right there with Newsmax among the worst of the worst. Even Fox News admits there was more to the dismissal than what WND and WE claim (Fox cites the same conclusions that Banyon posted). Furthermore, the dismissal of the IG was strongly endorsed by AmeriCorps vice-chairman, a Republican, according to Fox. I'm also curious how Walpin concluded that there were millions of dollars in misused and misappropriated AmeriCorps funds, when they only received $850K?

blaise
06-14-2009, 04:54 PM
Its the best impression of a democrat I can do.

That's funny.

Nightwish
06-14-2009, 05:06 PM
Its the best impression of a political partisan I can do.
FYP

SBK
06-14-2009, 05:17 PM
My thread title summed this story perfectly, this would be a huge story if Bush was still in office.

bigfoot
06-14-2009, 05:17 PM
It's encouraging to know,"the dismissal of the IG was strongly endorsed by AmeriCorps vice-chairman".

Politics..... pure and simple.

Nightwish
06-14-2009, 05:22 PM
It's encouraging to know,"the dismissal of the IG was strongly endorsed by AmeriCorps vice-chairman".

Politics..... pure and simple.
A) It's a Republican politician.
B) AmeriCorps isn't the organization that was under fire

banyon
06-14-2009, 05:24 PM
My thread title summed this story perfectly, this would be a huge story if Bush was still in office.

Actually, I think it's quite the opposite. The only reason that this is a story is because Bush was in office and his apologists or general political malcontents want to achieve some sort of equivalency no matter what the factual differences are.

bigfoot
06-14-2009, 05:34 PM
A) It's a Republican politician.
B) AmeriCorps isn't the organization that was under fire

The fact the he's Republican matter's little. He works for Americorp and benefits if Walpin is out of Americorp's dealings, looks like to me.



"Grassley said Walpin had identified millions of dollars in AmeriCorps funds that were wasted or misspent and "it appears he has been doing a good job." "
........................Huffington Post...........

memyselfI
06-14-2009, 05:35 PM
Same shit, different dude.

bigfoot
06-14-2009, 05:37 PM
Oh, newsflash.....Walpin was a Bush appointee............we can't have that now can we.

SBK
06-14-2009, 06:10 PM
Actually, I think it's quite the opposite. The only reason that this is a story is because Bush was in office and his apologists or general political malcontents want to achieve some sort of equivalency no matter what the factual differences are.

The coverage of this story reminds me of when those attorneys were fired. ROFL

tiptap
06-15-2009, 09:00 AM
The coverage of this story reminds me of when those attorneys were fired. ROFL

So you are ok with the Bush administration dismissing the lawyer, it being the same in your eyes as this event. I mean are we separating the cause for dismissal or the act of dismissal itself as being questionable or the process as illegitimate?

What I see is making a mountain out of a molehill since this was a specific person and not a survey over the whole department to affect direction in prosecution efforts uniformly. After all in Illinois itself there are strong cases being made against the former Democratic Governor. There are two Democratic Representatives also under the gun.