PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs over/under team sacks


BossChief
06-21-2009, 11:06 AM
25

Scorp
06-21-2009, 11:06 AM
Under

Mr_Tomahawk
06-21-2009, 11:07 AM
ROFL



Under.

Pablo
06-21-2009, 11:10 AM
Haha..I'm gonna take under on this one fo sho.

StcChief
06-21-2009, 11:45 AM
way under

DaneMcCloud
06-21-2009, 11:48 AM
Uh, Under.

EyePod
06-21-2009, 12:01 PM
Over. There were 6 teams that were 25 or below last year, and I don't think we'll be in the bottom 6. These deceptive defensive schemes will help a lot.

Mr. Flopnuts
06-21-2009, 12:07 PM
I don't think we're going to pull out 250% of last year's sack totals. I'll take the under.

whoman69
06-21-2009, 12:10 PM
Its a whole new defense, I'm going over. 25 isn't that much. We don't have Herm overlooking it all. We have a new pass rushing end, an outside lineback who has been doing it for a long time. They will get much more pressure this year.

Mr. Flopnuts
06-21-2009, 12:13 PM
Its a whole new defense, I'm going over. 25 isn't that much. We don't have Herm overlooking it all. We have a new pass rushing end, an outside lineback who has been doing it for a long time. They will get much more pressure this year.

Who is our new pass rushing end? It's one of Jackson's weaknesses.

chiefs1111
06-21-2009, 12:14 PM
under

OnTheWarpath58
06-21-2009, 07:46 PM
Under.

Did I miss an improvement to the pass rush in the offseason?

kstater
06-21-2009, 07:49 PM
Under.

Did I miss an improvement to the pass rush in the offseason?

While I'm taking the under, the 2 biggest hinderances to the defense are now gone. Addition by subtraction.

DaneMcCloud
06-21-2009, 07:50 PM
While I'm taking the under, the 2 biggest hinderances to the defense are now gone. Addition by subtraction.

Yeah, but you're missing the point: Where's the game changing, pass-rushing talent?

Coaches don't sack QB's.

OnTheWarpath58
06-21-2009, 07:51 PM
Yeah, but you're missing the point: Where's the game changing, pass-rushing talent?

Coaches don't sack QB's.

This.

Scheme can mask some small deficiencies, but it's not going to mask a huge lack of talent.

Mr. Krab
06-21-2009, 07:52 PM
getting or giving up?

StcChief
06-21-2009, 07:52 PM
Kinda early but 25 is "really out there" Love to see that kinda change

likely more like 15.

OnTheWarpath58
06-21-2009, 07:53 PM
getting or giving up?

Getting: Under.

Giving up: WAY over.

EyePod
06-21-2009, 07:59 PM
This.

Scheme can mask some small deficiencies, but it's not going to mask a huge lack of talent.

Yet again, I don't think we'll be in the bottom 6 next year, so I think I'll go with over.

EyePod
06-21-2009, 08:02 PM
Oh, and last year was a bad year for sacks. I will eat my hat if we don't have more than 25 sacks. And I wear a nice Captain Morgan hat.

BossChief
06-21-2009, 08:17 PM
Id like to throw into the conversation that Arizonas sack leader had 5 sacks and they ended with 25.

I see something similar playing out in KC

Dayze
06-21-2009, 08:21 PM
Over.

On any given game-day there is a real possibilty of the team having 53 'sacks'.

Which is one more than last year, of 52, now that Hurad is gone.

:D

Jethopper
06-22-2009, 12:59 AM
I would say over but Duane Clemons and Eric Hicks aren't around anymore. However, I do think Shawn Barber will have 15 by himself..... under.....

Shaid
06-22-2009, 01:09 AM
Over

BossChief
06-22-2009, 06:16 AM
getting or giving up?

sacks by the defense

StcChief
06-22-2009, 06:21 AM
sacks by the defenseunder

Consistent1
06-22-2009, 07:50 AM
Id like to throw into the conversation that Arizonas sack leader had 5 sacks and they ended with 25.

I see something similar playing out in KC

This is a pretty fair point. I think they will be able to "scheme" out a few more here and there. I would say just about a push in the 25 area without much real possibility of going over. Maybe we will get surprised in a nice way.

BarrySPAMAID
06-22-2009, 09:43 AM
OVER!!!! Just just barely though.....

Ask Bernard Pollard. He says 25 too.......just a thought.

KCtotheSB
06-22-2009, 10:51 AM
Under.
Joke topic.

cmh6476
06-22-2009, 10:54 AM
did we let Brian Johnston get away?

DaneMcCloud
06-22-2009, 01:20 PM
did we let Brian Johnston get away?

The Chiefs didn't let him "get away".

They cut him.

BossChief
11-23-2009, 03:57 AM
just an update

after 10 games we have 15 sacks

that is on pace for 24