PDA

View Full Version : Obama Under fire, President Obama shifts strategy..No Public Option


petegz28
09-02-2009, 07:52 AM
Aides to President Barack Obama are putting the final touches on a new strategy to help Democrats recover from a brutal August recess by specifying what Obama wants to see in a compromise health care deal and directly confronting other trouble spots, West Wing officials tell POLITICO.


Obama is considering detailing his health-care demands in a major speech as soon as next week, when Congress returns from the August recess. And although House leaders have said their members will demand the inclusion of a public insurance option, Obama has no plans to insist on it himself, the officials said.


“We’re entering a new season,” senior adviser David Axelrod said in a telephone interview. “It’s time to synthesize and harmonize these strands and get this done. We’re confident that we can do that. But obviously it is a different phase. We’re going to approach it in a different way. The president is going to be very active.”


Top officials privately concede the past six weeks have taken their toll on Obama's popularity. But the officials also see the new diminished expectations as an opportunity to prove their critics wrong by signing a health care law, showing progress in Afghanistan, and using this month's anniversary of the fall of Lehman Brothers to push for a crackdown on Wall Street.


On health care, Obama’s willingness to forgo the public option is sure to anger his party’s liberal base. But some administration officials welcome a showdown with liberal lawmakers if they argue they would rather have no health care law than an incremental one. The confrontation would allow Obama to show he is willing to stare down his own party to get things done.


“We have been saying all along that the most important part of this debate is not the public option, but rather ensuring choice and competition,” an aide said. “There are lots of different ways to get there.”


The timing, format, venue and content of Obama's presentation are still being debated in the West Wing. Aides have discussed whether to stick to broad principles, or to send specific legislative language to Capitol Hill. Some hybrid is likely, the officials said.


“I’m not going to put a date on any of this,” Axelrod said. “But I think it’s fairly obvious that we’re not in the second inning. We’re not in the fourth inning. We’re in the eighth or ninth inning here, and so there’s not a lot of time to waste.”


Obama's specifics will include many of the principles he has spelled out before, and aides did not want to telegraph make-or-break demands. But Axelrod and others are making plain that Obama will assert himself more aggressively — a clear sign that the president will start dictating terms to Congress.


"His goal is to create the best possible situation for consumers, create competition and choice," Axelrod said. "We want to bring a measure of security to people who have health insurance today. We want to help those who don't have coverage today, because they can't afford it, get insurance they can afford. And we want to do it in a way that reduces the overall cost of the system as a whole."


Also this fall, Obama wants to slap new regulations on Wall Street firms, a goal that is now considered a higher priority than cap-and-trade energy legislation in the West Wing. White House officials think the legislation will show voters, especially wavering independents, that he is serious about making the culprits of the economic crisis pay. It also helps that it doesn't carry a big price tag, like other Obama priorities.

The president also plans to send Congress a report on Afghanistan by Sept. 24 that is designed to build patience after two months in a row of the highest U.S. casualties since the invasion eight years ago. Aides say they recognize they need to show progress over the next 12 to 18 months, or risk losing the support of key Democrats in Congress, who already have balked at funding Obama’s 20,000-troop buildup.


But health care remains front-and-center in Obama’s fall strategy. “I understand the governing wisdom here in town as to where this is right now,” Axelrod said. “I feel good about where it is right now. I understand that there’s been a lot of controversy. I understand that there’s been a lot of politics. But the truth is, we’re a lot closer to achieving something than many thought possible. People look to the president for leadership on this and other issues. He feels passionately about this, and you can look for him to provide that leadership.”


Obama has been criticized for deciding to cede much of the debate to Capitol Hill -- or, as Axelrod put it, “allow Congress to consider the whole range of ideas.”


“History will judge whether this was right or it was wrong,” Axelrod said. “We feel strongly that it was right. As a result of it, we have broad consensus on over 80 percent of this stuff, and a lot of good ideas about how to achieve the other 20. Now, people are looking to the president and the president is eager to help lead that process of harmonizing these different elements and completing this process so that we can solve what is a big problem in the lives of the American people, for our businesses and our economy.”


White House officials say they are looking forward to "a break from the August break" -- a chance to take back control of the debate after a grim month where news coverage of the issue was dominated by vocal, emotional opponents at lawmakers’ town meetings, railing against the cost and complexity of the plans being debated.


So Obama and Democrats will return from vacation wounded, divided and uncertain of the best way to turn things around. Many Democrats, especially in the House, were spooked over break by the rowdy town hall meetings and flurry of polls showing independent voters skeptical of their leadership and spending plans.


The mood swing is hitting some top leaders hard: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), for instance, is trailing little-known GOP contenders in his re-election race now. The news swing has been no less brutal. There has been saturation coverage of the town halls and rising casualties in Afghanistan -- the latter leading to a big drop in support for the war.


All of this makes for a tumultuous -- and wildly unpredictable -- fall for Obama and his party.


Axelrod said he isn’t worried. “Part of it is born of long experience,” he said. “In Washington, every day is Election Day. I’d be lying to you if I told you I don’t look at polls -- I do. But I’ve also learned that you have to keep your eye on the horizon here and not get bogged down. I am not Polyannish, but I am also not given to the hysteria that's endemic to this town.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26672_Page2.html

BigRedChief
09-02-2009, 08:05 AM
He needs to get this issue out of Pelosi and Reid's hands and take some friggin ownership. His problem was that he overlearned the lessons from Clinton's failed attempt at health care reform. Your the President, lead.

jAZ
09-02-2009, 08:07 AM
Like I've said all along, if you think that there was ever a chance that nothing would happen you were kidding yourself. This was effectively a choice between massive reform + co-ops opr massive reform + public option.

We'll get one or the other.

petegz28
09-02-2009, 08:09 AM
Like I've said all along, if you think that there was ever a chance that nothing would happen you were kidding yourself. This was effectively a choice between massive reform + co-ops opr massive reform + public option.

We'll get one or the other.

Wow, jAZ...your a reg-a-lar prophet!!! I Think most people want "something" done. Just not what your heros Nancy and Barney want.

memyselfI
09-02-2009, 08:19 AM
ROFLROFLROFL

blaise
09-02-2009, 08:19 AM
Wow, jAZ...your a reg-a-lar prophet!!! I Think most people want "something" done. Just not what your heros Nancy and Barney want.

And either way Obama can run around and claim he won.

memyselfI
09-02-2009, 08:20 AM
And either way Obama can run around and claim he won.

Well the only people who will believe Lite are his sheeple. Everyone else will see he botched the handling of the issue and made it impossible to do what he promised or that he lied when he promised in the first place.

HonestChieffan
09-02-2009, 08:21 AM
This is the political equiv of sending in your third string QB in the third quarter in hopes he can rally from a 2 TD deficit.

The public has lost confidence in anything congress or the president does, thats clear. Now Obama takes his true core (Far Lefty) and tosses them under the buss in an attempt to move center....the center has run to the right on him and they won't back him now either.

He and his entire bunch would look far better taking the issue off the table until it gets the really study and understanding needed then with both sides involved equally, craft a series of bills that each addresses a particular area of needed repair. But that would be too sensible. Clinton knew when to throw in the towel, this boob does not.

The people at this point will not relent and the anger will increase as he forces another bad idea on the people.

Donger
09-02-2009, 08:46 AM
Like I've said all along, if you think that there was ever a chance that nothing would happen you were kidding yourself. This was effectively a choice between massive reform + co-ops opr massive reform + public option.

We'll get one or the other.

I'll bet you that even co-ops are no longer an option.

RINGLEADER
09-02-2009, 10:10 AM
I'll bet you that even co-ops are no longer an option.

Co-ops won't change the dynamic at all. The Dems really screwed this one up.

The only choices I see for them are to:

a) Pass whatever they want by using reconcilliation (which is possible, but doubtful -- enough Dem Senators have expressed an unwillingness to go down this path and it would be political suicide in the short-term);

b) Try to get some incremental bill that doesn't do a whole lot but creates some doors that they can hope to open later;

c) Try for it all and get nothing.

Based on how Obama has boxed himself in (which is very interesting to watch since, as someone else commented, he's tried his hardest to over-compensate from the lessons learned during Hillarycare) between most of America opposed to Obamacare because of the government control and most of the hard-left not willing to support anything less than full Obamacare.

If it can be defeated/postponed this year it is, in all liklihood, dead for good. If (big if) each base stays as energized as they currently are and the GOP rallies around an issue that independents have no problem siding with them on they will pick up seats in both houses and effectively block any attempts at similar power grabs for the rest of Obama's term.

And both sides know that.

SHTSPRAYER
09-02-2009, 01:12 PM
http://www.moonbattery.com/weekendatteddys.jpg

Dave Lane
09-02-2009, 01:16 PM
Cool change that is no change at all...

wild1
09-02-2009, 01:17 PM
"FAIL" across the board on his grade card, so far