PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Trade Deadline 10-20


Cosmos
10-17-2009, 12:54 PM
What's Pioli going to get done??

DJ....Dorsey.....Bowe...?

Short Leash Hootie
10-17-2009, 12:55 PM
nothing. No trades.

OnTheWarpath58
10-17-2009, 01:00 PM
nothing. No trades.

Sadly, I agree. He won't do anything.

Which is sad, because there's no reason not to take whatever you can get for DJ, if you have no intentions of letting him play - which its become very obvious they are not.

Something > nothing. Especially for a rebuilding team.

KC kid
10-17-2009, 01:13 PM
Who would want DJ? he is lazy and stupid

Noss
10-17-2009, 01:13 PM
Clark has told Scott no more spending.

Clark is spending less because of the money he has already tied up in the Arrowhead rebuild.

acesn8s
10-17-2009, 01:17 PM
Clark has told Scott no more spending.

Clark is spending less because of the money he has already tied up in the Arrowhead rebuild.:shake:

DA_T_84
10-17-2009, 01:18 PM
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/17/nothing-concrete-to-bowe-rumors/

DA_T_84
10-17-2009, 01:19 PM
"Nothing concrete" to Bowe rumors
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on October 17, 2009 1:52 PM ET

The trade of Gaines Adams won't do anything to quiet down the trade rumors floating around the NFL, usually on talk radio stations.

One of the more far-fetched ones included the Ravens talking to Kansas City about Dwayne Bowe. We're not sure exactly where the rumors came from -- we saw it here first -- but the rumor included Baltimore sending a second- and fifth-round pick for Bowe.

Old PFT buddy Aaron Wilson confirms there is "nothing concrete" to the rumors.

While Ravens coach John Harbaugh wouldn't rule out a possible deal of some sort Friday, this one seems unlikely for a variety of reasons. Primary among them is that Dwayne Bowe is a relatively low-cost quality player on a Chiefs team that needs more of them. Since some tough love in the preseason, Bowe has responded with 15 catches for 181 yards and three touchdowns in four games.

That doesn't sound like much, but he's clearly the best receiver on the Chiefs. He's cut down on his drops and made a clutch touchdown grab on fourth-and-seven last week to force overtime against the Cowboys.

Bowe is one of the few top-shelf talents on the Chiefs roster; coaching him up seems like a far better option than trading him away.

Marcellus
10-17-2009, 01:26 PM
Funny that the Bowe trade was mentioned by Schefter as something "he" would do and it went from that to a rumor of an actual possibility to now nothing concrete because it makes no sense.

No shit.

DA_T_84
10-17-2009, 01:28 PM
Funny that the Bowe trade was mentioned by Schefter as something "he" would do and it went from that to a rumor of an actual possibility to now nothing concrete because it makes no sense.

No shit.

I know, funny how that works. One guy's thought of what should happen, turned into a "rumor" that the coach won't rule out. And why would he?

CaliforniaChief
10-17-2009, 01:30 PM
"Nothing concrete" to Bowe rumors
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on October 17, 2009 1:52 PM ET

The trade of Gaines Adams won't do anything to quiet down the trade rumors floating around the NFL, usually on talk radio stations.

One of the more far-fetched ones included the Ravens talking to Kansas City about Dwayne Bowe. We're not sure exactly where the rumors came from -- we saw it on Wikipedia first -- but the rumor included Baltimore sending a second- and fifth-round pick for Bowe.

Old PFT buddy Aaron Wilson confirms there is "nothing concrete" to the rumors.

While Ravens coach John Harbaugh wouldn't rule out a possible deal of some sort Friday, this one seems unlikely for a variety of reasons. Primary among them is that Dwayne Bowe is a relatively low-cost quality player on a Chiefs team that needs more of them. Since some tough love in the preseason, Bowe has responded with 15 catches for 181 yards and three touchdowns in four games.

That doesn't sound like much, but he's clearly the best receiver on the Chiefs. He's cut down on his drops and made a clutch touchdown grab on fourth-and-seven last week to force overtime against the Cowboys.

Bowe is one of the few top-shelf talents on the Chiefs roster; coaching him up seems like a far better option than trading him away.

Fixed original article.

bowener
10-17-2009, 01:52 PM
Clark has told Scott no more spending.

Clark is spending less because of the money he has already tied up in the Arrowhead rebuild.

Almost 100% positive that our cap has not one damn thing to do with the renovation budget, nothing at all.

Pretty sure that would be illegal in fact.

Mojo Jojo
10-17-2009, 01:57 PM
Almost 100% positive that our cap has not one damn thing to do with the renovation budget, nothing at all.

Pretty sure that would be illegal in fact.

Cap doesn't have anything to do with renovation budget, but they do both have to do with Clark's wallet. Save player money/pay the NFLPA fine because he has put so much into the stadium.

Clark is a businessman first. Welcome to the "new" Chiefs.

Halfcan
10-17-2009, 02:08 PM
Cap doesn't have anything to do with renovation budget, but they do both have to do with Clark's wallet. Save player money/pay the NFLPA fine because he has put so much into the stadium.

Clark is a businessman first. Welcome to the "new" Chiefs.

Jackson County has put more into that stadium than Clark has. That is no excuse to be such a cheap ass and put a crappy team out there. He has run the team into the ground and should step down.

Mojo Jojo
10-17-2009, 02:10 PM
Jackson County has put more into that stadium than Clark has. That is no excuse to be such a cheap ass and put a crappy team out there. He has run the team into the ground and should step down.

Just curious...who would step up. No one wanted to buy the Royals for $65-70 million. Who is going to pay $500 million for the Chiefs, and if someone did you can bet they won't be in KC.

Param
10-17-2009, 02:15 PM
Just curious...who would step up. No one wanted to buy the Royals for $65-70 million. Who is going to pay $500 million for the Chiefs, and if someone did you can bet they won't be in KC.

Hence why the Rams are a hot commodity. You can move the team in 2014.

Short Leash Hootie
10-17-2009, 02:19 PM
you'd have to pay more than $500M for the Chiefs...probably more like $900M...but why would Clark sell? Morons on this website...

Short Leash Hootie
10-17-2009, 02:21 PM
Forbes has them valued at $1B...

HerculesRockefell
10-17-2009, 02:27 PM
Funny that the Bowe trade was mentioned by Schefter as something "he" would do and it went from that to a rumor of an actual possibility to now nothing concrete because it makes no sense.

No shit.

That's because in the age of the Internetz, people are now incapable of differentiating between a rumor, speculation, or in Schefter's case, just throwing out 5 trades he'd make at the deadline.

Hell, on more than one occasion, he did a mock Bronco offseason the day after the season ended in the Denver Post with all his hypothetical "moves". Didn't make any of it a rumor, it was something the Post had him write because fans wanted to see it.

Halfcan
10-17-2009, 03:00 PM
Just curious...who would step up. No one wanted to buy the Royals for $65-70 million. Who is going to pay $500 million for the Chiefs, and if someone did you can bet they won't be in KC.

Actually the Royals did have several people that wanted them-but the MLB in all their wisdom gave it to cheap ass Glass because they figured he had deep Walmart pockets.

As far as the Cheaps-the win loss record speaks for itself. Hunt has zero business being the decision maker.

Halfcan
10-17-2009, 03:03 PM
you'd have to pay more than $500M for the Chiefs...probably more like $900M...but why would Clark sell? Morons on this website...

CLark won't sell. But the fact remains that the fans will not continue to pay premium prices for a shit product. They were advertising tickets as low as $35. He has run the team into the ground.

Cosmos
10-17-2009, 03:08 PM
I honestly think DJ will be traded by Tuesday.

The staff has given up on him and have no reason to play him the rest of the season.

He is healthy by all accounts.

Pioli has extra LB's on the roster.

He does have some value to a team looking for a 4/3 LB.

milkman
10-17-2009, 03:12 PM
Actually the Royals did have several people that wanted them-but the MLB in all their wisdom gave it to cheap ass Glass because they figured he had deep Walmart pockets.

As far as the Cheaps-the win loss record speaks for itself. Hunt has zero business being the decision maker.

Clark Hunt may, or may not be cheap, but he isn't the one that hired Carl Peterson, and let him hang on for 10 years longer than he should have.

He got behind a plan to rebuild put forward by Herman fucking Edwards after his father died, and when it became apparent to him going into the final quarter of the second season of that plan that Herman fucking Edwards and Carl Peterson weren't getting it done, he made sweeping changes.

He may prove, in time, that he's not the right guy to be making decisions, but until we actually have the time to find this out, you are doing what you usually do, talking out of your ass.

JohninGpt
10-17-2009, 03:15 PM
Forbes has them valued at $1B...

ROFL At a quick glance, that looked like eighteen dollars.

Pink Paradise 2010
10-17-2009, 03:31 PM
it would be pretty intresting to actually find out

'Hamas' Jenkins
10-17-2009, 03:34 PM
Forbes has them valued at $1B...

Do you know what liquid assets are?

DA_T_84
10-17-2009, 03:37 PM
Do you know what liquid assets are?

a group of people with swamp ass?

Mojo Jojo
10-17-2009, 03:39 PM
Actually the Royals did have several people that wanted them-but the MLB in all their wisdom gave it to cheap ass Glass because they figured he had deep Walmart pockets.

As far as the Cheaps-the win loss record speaks for itself. Hunt has zero business being the decision maker.

The buyers were...

Rush, George and the founder of Gateway Computers...no numbers announced.

Jerry Greene....he bank rolled WHB and owned Union Bank rumor was the bid was @ $50 million, but he couldn't put up the money without a lot of investors. Not a popular formula for MLB.

Lamar Hunt and the two guys from Westar that went to jail. Bid @ $35 million.

And, David Glass.

There were not many people interested in buying the Royals.

HMc
10-17-2009, 03:42 PM
Do you know what liquid assets are?

Do you read entire threads?

Noss
10-17-2009, 03:44 PM
CLark won't sell. But the fact remains that the fans will not continue to pay premium prices for a shit product. They were advertising tickets as low as $35. He has run the team into the ground.

This

Lumpy68
10-17-2009, 04:33 PM
Clark Hunt may, or may not be cheap, but he isn't the one that hired Carl Peterson, and let him hang on for 10 years longer than he should have.

He got behind a plan to rebuild put forward by Herman ****ing Edwards after his father died, and when it became apparent to him going into the final quarter of the second season of that plan that Herman ****ing Edwards and Carl Peterson weren't getting it done, he made sweeping changes.

He may prove, in time, that he's not the right guy to be making decisions, but until we actually have the time to find this out, you are doing what you usually do, talking out of your ass.

He may not have hired Carl but he sat on his ass and let him trade the best sack man the chiefs have had since The Late GREAT DT. How we have missed Jared .

milkman
10-17-2009, 04:43 PM
He may not have hired Carl but he sat on his ass and let him trade the best sack man the chiefs have had since The Late GREAT DT. How we have missed Jared .

At the time, almost everyone agreed that the trade was good business decision.

Once Carl made public statements thatpissed Allen off, he wasn't going to sign.

Clark Hunt tried to talk to Allen one on one to appease him.

The timing wasn't good.
Clark Hunt had just really taken over.

I'm not going to blame Clark Hunt for that.

He will be given credit, or assigned blame, going forward.

LiL stumppy
10-17-2009, 04:46 PM
Who would want DJ? he is lazy and stupid

How you know that, you watch him in prac. all year? Watched his every play this year on Sundays?


No one knows why he's not playing, not even you. Idiot.

milkman
10-17-2009, 04:49 PM
How you know that, you watch him in prac. all year? Watched his every play this year on Sundays?


No one knows why he's not playing, not even you. Idiot.

It's always entertaining when a clueless little bastard calls someone else an idiot.

Sure-Oz
10-17-2009, 07:03 PM
Derrick Johnson-LB-Chiefs Oct. 17 - 7:38 pm et

Chiefs ILB Derrick Johnson is "available through trade," according to NFL writer Tony Grossi of the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
Johnson has been in and out of the doghouse and lost his starting job to Demorrio Williams. The former No. 15 overall pick in the 2007 draft has battled injuries throughout his career and hasn't come close to his potential. It's pretty clear what Todd Haley and the new regime think of Johnson.
Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer

Deberg_1990
10-17-2009, 07:35 PM
The former No. 15 overall pick in the 2007 draft has battled injuries throughout his career and hasn't come close to his potential.

He really hasnt been injured all that much has he?

Sure-Oz
10-17-2009, 07:51 PM
Not that im aware of, he's pretty much been on the field

Noss
10-17-2009, 09:22 PM
Not that im aware of, he's pretty much been on the field

That 'NFL writer' is saying that so the Browns or whoever can try to get Derrick for a seven round pick, I guess.

salame
10-18-2009, 02:11 AM
not a damn thing
I bet that Gaines Adams trade is the only high profile one

I kind of hoped the Chiefs would get Cribbs though

The Bad Guy
10-18-2009, 07:21 AM
Johnson always has some lingering injury.

As for Clark, it's hard for me to get down on him when he shelled out a shitload of cash to bring in Pioli and try to right this ship.