PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Bold prediction: San Diego is our breakout game on offense


Count Alex's Losses
10-18-2009, 11:58 PM
We've put things together in the running game and passing game recently. Not huge successes, but the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the past. Two out of the last three games LJ had 80+ yards by the fourth quarter.

They're making progress. They're gelling. Continuity is being established. The coaches now have a much better idea of what our players can do well and the players themselves are executing at a higher level.

Also, we're healthy on the injury front and should get Albert back next week.

Enter the Chargers and their woeful defense at Arrowhead Stadium, and next week our offense figures to run up and down the field all day. Perhaps we won't gain 500 yards and score 40 points, but I can see maybe 350 yards and 24 points. That qualifies as a breakout game for our sad-sack losers.

Give me a reason it won't happen.

PS - Note the qualifier. Rivers will probably throw for 400 yards.

DeezNutz
10-19-2009, 12:00 AM
We've put together things in the running game and passing game recently. Not huge successes, but the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the pass. Two out of the last three games LJ had 80+ yards by the fourth quarter.

They're making progress. They're gelling. Continuity is being established. The coaches now have a much better idea of what our players can do well and the players themselves are executing at a higher level.

Also, we're healthy on the injury front and should get Albert back next week.

Enter the Chargers and their woeful defense at Arrowhead Stadium, and next week our offense figures to run up and down the field all day. Perhaps we won't gain 500 yards and score 40 points, but I can see maybe 350 yards and 24 points. That qualifies as a breakout game for our sad-sack losers.

Give me a reason it won't happen.

PS - Note the qualifier. Rivers will probably throw for 400 yards.

:hmmm: Almost a witty pun.

And only GoChiefs would see the offensive breakout coming after we fail to score a fucking TD in an entire game. LMAO

Count Alex's Losses
10-19-2009, 12:01 AM
:hmmm: Almost a witty pun.

And only GoChiefs would see the offensive breakout coming after we fail to score a fucking TD in an entire game. LMAO

We were inches away from their red zone the entire day. All we needed was a play or two to turn those field goals into touchdowns.

Next week we're gonna fuk shit up!!! :cuss:

TinyEvel
10-19-2009, 12:02 AM
Possible. though I still have little faith in our O-line.
I do think we can keep it close and win, if we can move the chains and keep Phillip River off the field. Plus, I think today will give our team a much needed confidence boost.
2-5 at the Bye!

DeezNutz
10-19-2009, 12:03 AM
We were inches away from their red zone the entire day. All we needed was a play or two to turn those field goals into touchdowns.

Next week we're gonna fuk shit up!!! :cuss:

We were SO close to the 20 that we could taste it.

jAZ
10-19-2009, 12:04 AM
2-5 at the Bye!

Should (have been) 4-3, damnit!

DeezNutz
10-19-2009, 12:05 AM
Should (have been) 4-3, damnit!

http://www.hatelabs.com/news/bush-duh.jpg

Tribal Warfare
10-19-2009, 12:06 AM
Alright my totally baseless instinct Albert will start to make major progress the next game

pr_capone
10-19-2009, 12:09 AM
I would be ecstatic to be 2-5 at the break.

In fact, I would be beyond giddy if we manage to win 5 games all season.

Win 9 next season.

Win the Super Bowl in the 11-12 season. Then we will be the last team to win a Super Bowl as, of course, the world will end in 2012.

philfree
10-19-2009, 12:10 AM
Alright my totally baseless instinct Albert will start to make major progress the next game

Fearing for his job. You could be right.


PhilFree:arrow:

jAZ
10-19-2009, 12:18 AM
So are we really going to have one of these bold prediction threads every week? Will we at least take the bye week off?

RustShack
10-19-2009, 12:20 AM
So are we really going to have one of these bold prediction threads every week? Will we at least take the bye week off?

Yes. and No.

SLAG
10-19-2009, 12:23 AM
So are we really going to have one of these bold prediction threads every week? Will we at least take the bye week off?

I Boldly Predict the Chiefs a Win on bye week

Mecca
10-19-2009, 01:11 AM
I don't think this team will ever breakout on offense, the players just aren't there.

For the Chiefs to win they are going to need an opponent that basically can't score.

Jethopper
10-19-2009, 01:39 AM
I would be ecstatic to be 2-5 at the break.

In fact, I would be beyond giddy if we manage to win 5 games all season.

Win 9 next season.

Win the Super Bowl in the 11-12 season. Then we will be the last team to win a Super Bowl as, of course, the world will end in 2012.

That will probably be the reason the world ends.

jAZ
10-19-2009, 01:39 AM
I don't think this team will ever breakout on offense, the players just aren't there.

For the Chiefs to win they are going to need an opponent that basically can't score.

Like the Raiders? :banghead:

Thig Lyfe
10-19-2009, 02:05 AM
11-5 BABY!

PornChief
10-19-2009, 02:40 AM
We've put things together in the running game and passing game recently. Not huge successes, but the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the past. Two out of the last three games LJ had 80+ yards by the fourth quarter.

They're making progress. They're gelling. Continuity is being established. The coaches now have a much better idea of what our players can do well and the players themselves are executing at a higher level.

Also, we're healthy on the injury front and should get Albert back next week.

Enter the Chargers and their woeful defense at Arrowhead Stadium, and next week our offense figures to run up and down the field all day. Perhaps we won't gain 500 yards and score 40 points, but I can see maybe 350 yards and 24 points. That qualifies as a breakout game for our sad-sack losers.

Give me a reason it won't happen.

PS - Note the qualifier. Rivers will probably throw for 400 yards.

I sure hope you're right.

Phobia
10-19-2009, 03:04 AM
If the Chiefs didn't break out on offense against the Redskins there is little hope of breaking out on offense against the Chargers. Last I checked Haley was still calling plays and while time in the pocket is improving a little each week, they're still allowing defenders to tee off on MC far too often.

Fruit Ninja
10-19-2009, 03:06 AM
If the Chiefs didn't break out on offense against the Redskins there is little hope of breaking out on offense against the Chargers. Last I checked Haley was still calling plays and while time in the pocket is improving a little each week, they're still allowing defenders to tee off on MC far too often.

skins have the 4th ranked defense. they just have no offense

T-post Tom
10-19-2009, 03:07 AM
I don't know what type of alcoholic beverage(s) you're imbibing Clayton, but pass the bottle. (I hope you're right.) :)

Phobia
10-19-2009, 03:13 AM
skins have the 4th ranked defense. they just have no offense

That's an scheduling anomaly, IMO. They'll be a bottom half D by the end of the season.

kcchiefsus
10-19-2009, 03:13 AM
If the Chiefs didn't break out on offense against the Redskins there is little hope of breaking out on offense against the Chargers. Last I checked Haley was still calling plays and while time in the pocket is improving a little each week, they're still allowing defenders to tee off on MC far too often.

Chargers defense has been shit this year, we have a better chance against them than against Washington.

Micjones
10-19-2009, 03:33 AM
I think the Chiefs could be very productive if Cassel had time to throw.
This team has some offensive talent. Just not on the Line.
They're definitely due for a big game.

Phobia
10-19-2009, 03:59 AM
Chargers defense has been shit this year, we have a better chance against them than against Washington.

Not against crappy teams, they haven't been. There's not enough data out there yet. Four early games doesn't tell the entire story.

kysirsoze
10-19-2009, 04:09 AM
Of course I hope this is true. Sounds a little homerish but I'll go with it since I am drunk on the rarest of liquors, Chiefs Victory. (and margaritas)

SenselessChiefsFan
10-19-2009, 06:13 AM
Very possible.

Chiefs are at home, Chargers have short week. Chargers defense has been very suspect.

So, yeah, I can 'see' it as a possibility.

Not willing to say it 'will' happen.

Stinger
10-19-2009, 06:18 AM
Give me a reason it won't happen.



Here is one for you .... your predictions are on the Taco John's level of Fail. Yet you still come out with an "I am going to go ahead and call it" thread.

:shake:

LaChapelle
10-19-2009, 07:55 AM
I thought Jason Campbell could scramble. If they had the shitty Thigpen, they would have won. Sunday's win was not as good as some earlier losses to me, but my mood was shitty.

TEX
10-19-2009, 10:26 AM
I would NOT make too much of the victory over the Redskins. They are in total free fall and we are in total rebuild mode. We could very easily look like the team that lost to Oakland when we play the Chargers. It's gonna be a long process filled with steps forward and backwards...

L.A. Chieffan
10-19-2009, 10:30 AM
how many TDs does LJ have this year?

craneref
10-19-2009, 10:46 AM
If we could catch the damn ball we would have won at least two more games this year. One of the two biggest problems our offense has is catching the ball and STUPID offensive penalties. You eliminate those and the opposing defense can't pin its ears back and come after you.

Buck
10-19-2009, 11:06 AM
Good Luck

CaliforniaChief
10-19-2009, 11:10 AM
Yeah I think I'm still probably going to start the Chargers D for my fantasy team next week.

RINGLEADER
10-19-2009, 11:30 AM
We've put things together in the running game and passing game recently. Not huge successes, but the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the past. Two out of the last three games LJ had 80+ yards by the fourth quarter.

They're making progress. They're gelling. Continuity is being established. The coaches now have a much better idea of what our players can do well and the players themselves are executing at a higher level.

Also, we're healthy on the injury front and should get Albert back next week.

Enter the Chargers and their woeful defense at Arrowhead Stadium, and next week our offense figures to run up and down the field all day. Perhaps we won't gain 500 yards and score 40 points, but I can see maybe 350 yards and 24 points. That qualifies as a breakout game for our sad-sack losers.

Give me a reason it won't happen.

PS - Note the qualifier. Rivers will probably throw for 400 yards.


I agree with this. Chiefs usually play the Chargers hard.

Last six games:

KC 21, San Diego 22 (SD +1)
San Diego 20, KC 19 (SD +1)
KC 30, San Diego 16 (KC +14)
San Diego 24, KC 10 (SD +14)
San Diego 27, KC 30 (KC +3)
KC 09, San Diego 20 (SD +11)

Raised On Riots
10-19-2009, 11:39 AM
How in the merry blue fuck could SD's defense be worse than Washington's?

Coach
10-19-2009, 11:59 AM
How in the merry blue fuck could SD's defense be worse than Washington's?

They're soft and bewildered.

Buehler445
10-19-2009, 12:05 PM
How in the merry blue fuck could SD's defense be worse than Washington's?

Washington's D isn't too bad. They have two amazing players in Haynesworth and Landry.

They've spent an assload of money on the D and have some really good players there. Their team is shit, but the Defense is better than average.
Posted via Mobile Device

wild1
10-19-2009, 12:06 PM
This makes no sense. We couldn't put up points against the Raiders. Washington held the offense without a touchdown.

JD10367
10-19-2009, 12:06 PM
Short week for SD + home game for KC + SD's D not being very good = it's possible.

IMO what would help is if SD wins tonight. That will make them soft and happy this week.

Go Chargers!

LaChapelle
10-19-2009, 12:11 PM
If I recall the Raider game for them was a short week and at Arrowhead.

Buehler445
10-19-2009, 12:11 PM
Short week for SD + home game for KC + SD's D not being very good = it's possible.

IMO what would help is if SD wins tonight. That will make them soft and happy this week.

Go Chargers!

You're doing it wrong. It goes like this, " DIE DONKO BITCHES!" :cuss: :bang:

Fucking n00bs. :D
Posted via Mobile Device

Hydrae
10-19-2009, 12:20 PM
I think the Chiefs could be very productive if Cassel had time to throw.
This team has some offensive talent. Just not on the Line.
They're definitely due for a big game.

Some of this "talent" is indeed offensive.

Buck
10-19-2009, 12:52 PM
By the way, I can easily see GoChiefs prediction coming true.

I don't see how the Chiefs can stop the Chargers Offense though, is the only problem.

Sure-Oz
10-19-2009, 12:57 PM
Rivers, Gates and Jackson are going to have a nice day against us

SenselessChiefsFan
10-19-2009, 12:58 PM
If I recall the Raider game for them was a short week and at Arrowhead.

It was also the first week that Cassel got to play in the new offense. He had been sidelined for close to a month.

vailpass
10-19-2009, 01:04 PM
Some of that depends on what the Bronco D can do to Phyllis Rivers and company tonight. If Phyllis gets manhandled and stifled by Dumvervil et al she may be pms'ing and looking to take it out on someone when she gets to KC.

OctoberFart
10-19-2009, 05:14 PM
Bet the farm on San Diego now. GOQUEER has the most inaccurate prediction posts ever. He is terrible at it.

OnTheWarpath58
10-19-2009, 05:29 PM
From a statistical standpoint, they are the worst scoring defense we will face all year.

Yes, even worse than Cleveland.

So if we can't jump on them, at home, I'm not sure when the fuck we're going to "break out."

chiefzilla1501
10-19-2009, 05:36 PM
I wouldn't use the word breakout, but I think you're right that this is one of the most favorable matchups we've seen so far for our offense. We're getting whacked in the middle game after game after game. And every team we've played, except for Dallas, had a playmaker or two at the DT position.

The Chargers are extremely soft in the middle. Castillo is the only guy that presents a matchup problem, and he's nowhere in the same league as Ngata or Haynesworth. I see Cassel having a lot more of a pocket to work with.

Where it gets dicey is that our WRs are going to get shut the **** down. Cromartie on Bowe. Jammer on Bradley. Eric Weddle to supervise the middle. Expect to see a lot of screens and check downs, and I think Cassel and LJ are going to have some space to run. But I think you'll see Cassel with a lot more time to operate than usual.

OnTheWarpath58
10-19-2009, 05:39 PM
I wouldn't use the word breakout, but I think you're right that this is one of the most favorable matchups we've seen so far for our offense. We're getting whacked in the middle game after game after game. And every team we've played, except for Dallas, had a playmaker or two at the DT position.

The Chargers are extremely soft in the middle. Castillo is the only guy that presents a matchup problem, and he's nowhere in the same league as Ngata or Haynesworth. I see Cassel having a lot more of a pocket to work with.

Where it gets dicey is that our WRs are going to get shut the **** down. Cromartie on Bowe. Jammer on Bradley. Eric Weddle to supervise the middle. Expect to see a lot of screens and check downs, and I think Cassel and LJ are going to have some space to run. But I think you'll see Cassel with a lot more time to operate than usual.

Wha?

The Chargers DB's are seriously overrated.

Christ, TYLER THIGPEN hung over 435 yards and 4 TD's last year.

I'd sure hope to hell that the $63M Qb can at least compare to that.

chiefzilla1501
10-19-2009, 05:55 PM
Wha?

The Chargers DB's are seriously overrated.

Christ, TYLER THIGPEN hung over 435 yards and 4 TD's last year.

I'd sure hope to hell that the $63M Qb can at least compare to that.

That was when the Chiefs had Gonzalez and Bowe. Gonzalez drew primary attention and doubles, and Bowe usually had favorable matchups one-on-one. Gonzalez is a guy who poses an extremely difficult matchup for a secondary. Bowe doesn't have that same affect, especially when he's drawing all the doubles.

Bowe will be handled for much of the game by Cromartie and with Weddle providing safety help, he'll be blanketed all game long. Jammer can easily handle Bradley. The matchups for us are really bad for us in the secondary. I've said for weeks that Bowe needs help. He's not a guy who's going to fare well against very good corners. The Chiefs need a true #1 and Bowe needs to be bumped down to #2.

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-19-2009, 06:05 PM
That was when the Chiefs had Gonzalez and Bowe. Gonzalez drew primary attention and doubles, and Bowe usually had favorable matchups one-on-one. Gonzalez is a guy who poses an extremely difficult matchup for a secondary. Bowe doesn't have that same affect, especially when he's drawing all the doubles.

Bowe will be handled for much of the game by Cromartie and with Weddle providing safety help, he'll be blanketed all game long. Jammer can easily handle Bradley. The matchups for us are really bad for us in the secondary. I've said for weeks that Bowe needs help. He's not a guy who's going to fare well against very good corners. The Chiefs need a true #1 and Bowe needs to be bumped down to #2.

Give me a break. Cromartie is soooo overrated. That D has been awful this season. Warpath is right, if we can't break out on them it will not happen.

OnTheWarpath58
10-19-2009, 06:05 PM
That was when the Chiefs had Gonzalez and Bowe. Gonzalez drew primary attention and doubles, and Bowe usually had favorable matchups one-on-one. Gonzalez is a guy who poses an extremely difficult matchup for a secondary. Bowe doesn't have that same affect, especially when he's drawing all the doubles.

Bowe will be handled for much of the game by Cromartie and with Weddle providing safety help, he'll be blanketed all game long. Jammer can easily handle Bradley. The matchups for us are really bad for us in the secondary. I've said for weeks that Bowe needs help. He's not a guy who's going to fare well against very good corners. The Chiefs need a true #1 and Bowe needs to be bumped down to #2.

Yeah, Jammer will handle Bradley.

Just like he did last year in SD.

9/81/1

Then again, Bradley will probably still be in Haley's doghouse, which means Jammer gets Wade.

Advantage, Jammer.

chiefzilla1501
10-19-2009, 06:08 PM
Give me a break. Cromartie is soooo overrated. That D has been awful this season. Warpath is right, if we can't break out on them it will not happen.

The D has been awful because they are down 2 guys from their defensive line.

Their defensive line is a lot worse than last year. But they're still playing against the Chiefs. Jammer and Cromartie play fine when the protection is so-so. They struggle when the pass rush doesn't exist, as almost all corners would.

And I doubt the Chiefs will see a non-existent pass rush against the Chiefs. Again, I see the Chiefs running LJ down the Chargers' throat and doing it fairly well. And I see Haley designing a game plan that is going to look more to the RBs/TEs or underneath routes than to Bowe or Bradley.

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-19-2009, 06:12 PM
The D has been awful because they are down 2 guys from their defensive line.

Their defensive line is a lot worse than last year. But they're still playing against the Chiefs. Jammer and Cromartie play fine when the protection is so-so. They struggle when the pass rush doesn't exist, as almost all corners would.

And I doubt the Chiefs will see a non-existent pass rush against the Chiefs. Again, I see the Chiefs running LJ down the Chargers' throat and doing it fairly well. And I see Haley designing a game plan that is going to look more to the RBs/TEs or underneath routes than to Bowe or Bradley.

Thanks for elaborating. Merriman has looked kind of sluggish this year as well coming off injury. That isn't helping them. Losing Jamaal Williams was killer for them.

OnTheWarpath58
10-19-2009, 06:14 PM
The D has been awful because they are down 2 guys from their defensive line.

Which is exactly why I would expect a superior QB to be able to accomplish more against them than the scrub did last year.

DL play and DB play go hand-in-hand. And right now, SD's DL is as bad as it gets, which should make things extremely favorable for Cassel and Co.

chiefzilla1501
10-19-2009, 06:17 PM
Yeah, Jammer will handle Bradley.

Just like he did last year in SD.

9/81/1

Then again, Bradley will probably still be in Haley's doghouse, which means Jammer gets Wade.

Advantage, Jammer.

Watch the highlights. The entire defense was smothering Gonzalez all game long. It was maybe his best game of the season. And the Chiefs were still a few games into a gimmick offense that defenses hadn't schemed yet.

The receivers are not going to have a lot of one-on-ones. They have a tight end that scares nobody. Jammer/Cromartie won't have that much trouble covering our receivers, but when they do, they'll have a lot of LB and safety help.

It's not going to go well. I guarantee that the RBs and TEs are going to be the primary targets most of the game. Unless the o-line finds a way to have such good protection that coverages can break down a bit.

chiefzilla1501
10-19-2009, 06:21 PM
Which is exactly why I would expect a superior QB to be able to accomplish more against them than the scrub did last year.

DL play and DB play go hand-in-hand. And right now, SD's DL is as bad as it gets, which should make things extremely favorable for Cassel and Co.

It's as bad of a defensive line as we're going to see, but I have a hard time believing our offensive line will provide consistent protection even against a horrible defensive line. Their defensive line is bad, but it's not nearly as bad as our offensive line.

I don't see their pass rush being so bad that there will be coverage sacks. I think our offensive line protects just well enough to get a read or two in, but I expect our receiver reads to be covered unless there's a coverage breakdown. And again, you keep pretending as if Tony Gonzalez being gone isn't a big deal. He was an absolute coverage nightmare for the Chargers. And he was getting double and often triple teamed all game. Bowe and Bradley don't have that luxury this year.

BigMeatballDave
10-19-2009, 06:41 PM
How in the merry blue **** could SD's defense be worse than Washington's?Its no secret SD D has struggled this season...

Raised On Riots
10-19-2009, 06:43 PM
Its no secret SD D has struggled this season...

You watch, the fuckin' Donks will win again tonight. This board is FAIL.

BigMeatballDave
10-19-2009, 06:43 PM
By the way, I can easily see GoChiefs prediction coming true.

I don't see how the Chiefs can stop the Chargers Offense though, is the only problem.Yep. We might put up 27 vs. your D, but Rivers will put up 40.

BigMeatballDave
10-19-2009, 06:45 PM
You watch, the ****in' Donks will win again tonight. This board is FAIL.If SD can put up some points like they usually do they will win. Denver's O is not a juggernaut...

SenselessChiefsFan
10-20-2009, 01:35 PM
Offensive shootout. Chargers are really banged up on defense.

Can't see the Chiefs stopping the Chargers much either, though.

Buck
10-20-2009, 01:38 PM
Yep. We might put up 27 vs. your D, but Rivers will put up 40.

Rivers was the one guy on our team who I thought gave a fuck but after watching the post game pressers, Norvs attitude has even rubbed off on him.

I'm calling a Chiefs win this week.

20-17

SenselessChiefsFan
10-20-2009, 01:40 PM
Rivers was the one guy on our team who I thought gave a **** but after watching the post game pressers, Norvs attitude has even rubbed off on him.

I'm calling a Chiefs win this week.

20-17


Hey, I hope so, but I imagine you hope so to.... Norv might actually get fired.

Raised On Riots
10-20-2009, 09:44 PM
Offensive shootout. Chargers are really banged up on defense.

Can't see the Chiefs stopping the Chargers much either, though.

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

Thanks Nonsensical; I needed that.

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 03:29 PM
http://i35.tinypic.com/2642sns.gif

L.A. Chieffan
10-25-2009, 03:31 PM
how many TDs does LJ have this year?

.

DaneMcCloud
10-25-2009, 03:31 PM
LMAO

Mecca
10-25-2009, 03:32 PM
I think you meant breakout game for their offense.

Bowser
10-25-2009, 03:32 PM
So close

Raised On Riots
10-25-2009, 03:34 PM
GoChiefs needs to abandon any and ALL prognostication and utterances of "stay down bitch".

Could you BE a bigger bad luck talisman?

Fritz88
10-25-2009, 03:35 PM
Bold prediction: San Diego is our breakout game on offense

ROFL

chiefs1111
10-25-2009, 03:35 PM
Chiefs offense really broke out today

SenselessChiefsFan
10-25-2009, 03:37 PM
ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

Thanks Nonsensical; I needed that.

I was 50% right.... Chiefs didn't stop them.

Cassel was awful today. I haven't been worried about the trade for him, up until today.

Not willing to say he will be awful just yet.... but that was awful.

I know there was rain, and the receivers dropped a ton of balls and put him in a bad situation... but he overthrew players, and just wasn't good at all.

BigMeatballDave
10-25-2009, 03:37 PM
EPIC THREAD FAIL!

Ari Chi3fs
10-25-2009, 03:43 PM
BOLD PREDICTION FAIL

Kaylore
10-25-2009, 03:44 PM
On the mane, we actually look forward to GoChief's predictions because they are always a guarantee the reverse will happen. I was worried about the MNF San Diego game...until Bob assured us that we were going to lose big. After that I was confident we'd win by double digits.

I've also noticed anytime the Broncos beat a team, GoChiefs immediately thinks the Chiefs will beat them too. He won't say it until after Denver beats them. Then they're a "sure thing."

wild1
10-25-2009, 03:45 PM
Well, I'd say this was a fail.

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 03:45 PM
I was worried about the MNF San Diego game...until Bob assured us that we were going to lose big.

Stop lying. I never said anything about the San Diego game.

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 03:46 PM
BOLD EXCUSE: THE RAIN!

Gadzooks
10-25-2009, 03:49 PM
BOLD EXCUSE: THE RAIN!

That was the difference.

Farzin
10-25-2009, 03:51 PM
The Chargers played in the rain too and did great.

wild1
10-25-2009, 03:52 PM
Predict that Cassel will not make the Hall of Fame please

BigRedChief
10-25-2009, 03:55 PM
BOLD EXCUSE: THE RAIN!
http://www.forumspile.com/Shit-Flag.gif

Raised On Riots
10-25-2009, 04:11 PM
I wonder if Haley has begun to regret taking this job yet?

highBOLTage
10-25-2009, 04:12 PM
http://i35.tinypic.com/2642sns.gif

You still have a chance with this prediction:
the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the past
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6935/cassvy.th.jpg (http://img39.imageshack.us/i/cassvy.jpg/)
Under a 100 from here on?

DeezNutz
10-25-2009, 04:18 PM
I wonder if Haley has begun to regret taking this job yet?

No more so than fans might regret him being offered the job.

Mr. Kotter
10-25-2009, 04:18 PM
Clayton....

Guess not, eh? ;)

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 04:19 PM
Clayton....

Guess not, eh? ;)

I BUMPED THE GOD DAMN THREAD, FOOL.

Raised On Riots
10-25-2009, 04:25 PM
No more so than fans might regret him being offered the job.

True. But still...

Stinger
10-25-2009, 07:29 PM
Chiefs Bold prediction: San Diego is our breakout game on offense

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v250/stinger871/Chief%20Planet/259deut.gif


As I stated earlier in the thread

your predictions are on the Taco John's level of Fail. Yet you still come out with an "I am going to go ahead and call it" thread.

:shake:

Ugly Duck
10-25-2009, 07:36 PM
Bold prediction: San Diego is our breakout game on offense.

With that level of football acumen... you could like be a sportswriter or something!

pr_capone
10-25-2009, 07:38 PM
I BUMPED THE GOD DAMN THREAD, FOOL.

You being the one to bump the thread does not make Kotter a fool. The fool is the original poster whose predictions are on par with those of Miss Cleo.

Wendler... you make posts like your OP and then you wonder why no one takes you, your articles, or WPI seriously.

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 07:44 PM
I meant to say "break our back" game.

Raised On Riots
10-25-2009, 08:03 PM
I meant to say "broke-back mountain" game, as we clearly took it up the ass at home again

Fixed!:D

Coach
10-25-2009, 09:38 PM
Claythan,

Please stop making shitty-assed predictions like this. Next time you want to make a prediction, keep the fucking prediction to yourself.

Gadzooks
10-25-2009, 09:44 PM
Claythan,

Please stop making shitty-assed predictions like this. Next time you want to make a prediction, keep the ****ing prediction to yourself.

Yeah, It's beginning to get embarrassing

Coach
10-25-2009, 10:07 PM
Yeah, It's beginning to get embarrassing

No shit.

Count Alex's Losses
10-25-2009, 11:04 PM
Yeah, It's beginning to get entertaining

FYP

Stinger
10-25-2009, 11:34 PM
Yeah, It's beginning to get entertaining

FYP

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v250/stinger871/Chief%20Planet/facepalm.gif

Raised On Riots
10-26-2009, 12:42 AM
FYP

It's almost time to release the Kracken. Not yet, but close...

ChiefsSuckBalls
10-26-2009, 10:44 AM
Ba ha ha!

Buck
10-26-2009, 10:47 AM
Thanks by the way.

Here's these back.

http://www.millennium2000realty.com/images/pix_house_keys1.jpg

Redrum_69
10-26-2009, 10:49 AM
We've put things together in the running game and passing game recently. Not huge successes, but the 100-yard Cassel performances from early in the year are absolutely a thing of the past. Two out of the last three games LJ had 80+ yards by the fourth quarter.

They're making progress. They're gelling. Continuity is being established. The coaches now have a much better idea of what our players can do well and the players themselves are executing at a higher level.

Also, we're healthy on the injury front and should get Albert back next week.

Enter the Chargers and their woeful defense at Arrowhead Stadium, and next week our offense figures to run up and down the field all day. Perhaps we won't gain 500 yards and score 40 points, but I can see maybe 350 yards and 24 points. That qualifies as a breakout game for our sad-sack losers.

Give me a reason it won't happen.

PS - Note the qualifier. Rivers will probably throw for 400 yards.



Where would WPI be without such valuable insight? Why I bet Nick Athan would be the next Brandon Lang, if he had only applied just a little bit more into his writing and guesstimation craft. And you, GoTweet, you could have been so much more of a provider of knowledgable facts rather than a hapless wannabe.

orange
10-26-2009, 11:34 AM
Thanks by the way.

Here's these back.

http://www.millennium2000realty.com/images/pix_house_keys1.jpg

Nice, you cleaned the blood off.

CoMoChief
10-26-2009, 12:16 PM
We sure broke out alright.....this team broke out in Herpes before it was even haltime.

SDChiefs
10-26-2009, 12:23 PM
Wha?

The Chargers DB's are seriously overrated.

Christ, TYLER THIGPEN hung over 435 yards and 4 TD's last year.

I'd sure hope to hell that the $63M Qb can at least compare to that.

Yeah, 10-25 with 97 yds and 3 INTs. Anyone Still believe Cassel is better than Thigpen?

JaFatass Russell > Matt asshole

Stinger
10-26-2009, 01:16 PM
JaFatass Russell > Matt asshole

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v250/stinger871/Chief%20Planet/68u1wz-2.gif

OctoberFart
10-26-2009, 01:56 PM
Bet the farm on San Diego now. GOQUEER has the most inaccurate prediction posts ever. He is terrible at it.

How did the breakout game go?

BoltsWinAgain
10-26-2009, 02:52 PM
ROFL rebuilding season right? haha that was last year.... and the year before.. Queefs Suck!!

SDChiefs
10-26-2009, 05:31 PM
ROFL rebuilding season right? haha that was last year.... and the year before.. Chiefs Suck!!

Yeah, but unlike you, we are still fans of them when they do. Don't you have the 49ers to be rooting for or something.