PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Issues **Official Massachusetts Election Results Thread**


Pages : [1] 2 3

petegz28
01-19-2010, 04:35 PM
Polls close in 1 1/2 hours. Brown was up by +5-10 going into the race.

I am calling a Coakley win by %1-%2.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 04:39 PM
Polls close in 1 1/2 hours. Brown was up by +5-10 going into the race.

I am calling a Coakley win by %1-%2.good weather. Dems outnumber republicans 3-1 in the state. Tough hill to climb even with the ticked off voters wanting to throw the bums out.

"Bob" Dobbs
01-19-2010, 04:39 PM
:popcorn:
Heh. I was literally just wondering how long it'd be before we'd see this thread appear.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 04:40 PM
good weather. Dems outnumber republicans 3-1 in the state.

Independants outnumber them both combined.

http://www.moonbattery.com/obamunism_logo.jpg

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 05:05 PM
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html

538 Model Posits Brown as 3:1 Favorite (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html)


by Nate Silver @ 5:26 PM (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html)
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>var addthis_pub="nrsilver";</SCRIPT>http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-plus.gif Share This Content<SCRIPT src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/200/addthis_widget.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>

The FiveThirtyEight Senate Forecasting Model, which correctly predicted the outcome of all 35 Senate races in 2008, now regards Republican Scott Brown as a 74 percent favorite to win the Senate seat in Massachusetts on the basis of new polling from ARG, Research 2000 and InsiderAdvantage which show worsening numbers for Brown's opponent, Martha Coakley. We have traditionally categorized races in which one side has between a 60 and 80 percent chance of winning as "leaning" toward that candidate, and so that is how we categorize this race now: Lean GOP. Nevertheless, there is a higher-than-usual chance of large, correlated errors in the polling, such as were observed in NY-23 and the New Hampshire Democratic primary; the model hedges against this risk partially, but not completely.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:10 PM
Intrade has it at 82.8 - 19

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:21 PM
Oh this is wonderful, Al Franken's recount shyster is Martha Moxley's campaign manager:

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/297187.php

These f'n scumbags.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 05:26 PM
I have a feeling that if Coakley loses, it won't be the end of it. They'll come up with something that will tie up the seat for a bit.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:36 PM
I have a feeling that if Coakley loses, it won't be the end of it. They'll come up with something that will tie up the seat for a bit.

They might try, But that will hurt them as well since that aspect has already been addressed and people are on the lookout for such.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:41 PM
81.8 - 20 on Intrade. Coakley starting to pick up some momentum????

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 05:42 PM
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html

538 Model Posits Brown as 3:1 Favorite (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html)


by Nate Silver @ 5:26 PM (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html)
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>var addthis_pub="nrsilver";</SCRIPT>http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-plus.gifShare This Content<SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/200/addthis_widget.js"></SCRIPT>

The FiveThirtyEight Senate Forecasting Model, which correctly predicted the outcome of all 35 Senate races in 2008, now regards Republican Scott Brown as a 74 percent favorite to win the Senate seat in Massachusetts on the basis of new polling from ARG, Research 2000 and InsiderAdvantage which show worsening numbers for Brown's opponent, Martha Coakley. We have traditionally categorized races in which one side has between a 60 and 80 percent chance of winning as "leaning" toward that candidate, and so that is how we categorize this race now: Lean GOP. Nevertheless, there is a higher-than-usual chance of large, correlated errors in the polling, such as were observed in NY-23 and the New Hampshire Democratic primary; the model hedges against this risk partially, but not completely.
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh10.html#swfp=0" width=1 name=_atssh frameborder="0"></IFRAME>SWEAT

Donger
01-19-2010, 05:43 PM
CNN just reported that Coakley's team is already looking at "irregularities."

Heh.

She's going to lose.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:44 PM
CNN just reported that Coakley's team is already looking at "irregularities."

Heh.

She's going to lose.

Yea, there were a total of 5, FIVE ballots reported that already had Brown on them. 5 out of 2 mil.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:45 PM
Yea, there were a total of 5, FIVE ballots reported that already had Brown on them. 5 out of 2 mil.

And you just know an acornista planted them.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:45 PM
Also from Nate Silver...

Overall, while I would probably take Coakley's side of a 3:1 wager, her situation looks to be increasingly difficult. She is basically relying upon getting solid turnout from a "silent majority" of voters who have done little to make themselves seen and heard. We know that there are a huge number of potential such voters in Massachusetts, which remains a very blue state and which until the past three weeks had not behaved unusually in any obvious way. But the pollsters are no longer seeing and hearing from them.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:46 PM
"Silent majority"

ie dead people.

thecoffeeguy
01-19-2010, 05:47 PM
Read reports where the Dems are going crazy about not getting Coakley enough support, Coakley not being a great candidate, yada yada yada...you only do that when things look grim. :D

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 05:48 PM
Polls close in 1 1/2 hours. Brown was up by +5-10 going into the race.

I am calling a Coakley win by %1-%2.

Boston Globe is calling it for Coakley.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:48 PM
Read reports where the Dems are going crazy about not getting Coakley enough support, Coakley not being a great candidate, yada yada yada...you only do that when things look grim. :D

Oh I agree. She is blaming the D.C. Dems and the D.C. Dems and DNC are blaming her.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:49 PM
Boston Globe is calling it for Coakley.

Link? Or are you referring to my earlier thread on their "mishap"?

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 05:49 PM
CNN just reported that Coakley's team is already looking at "irregularities."

Heh.

She's going to lose.

Both sides have. This idea was already on her site beforehand....sounds like a false flag being created because they're committing the irregularities to make it look like it's the other side.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:49 PM
Boston Globe is calling it for Coakley.

Yeah, since yesterday.

;)

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:54 PM
Both sides have. This idea was already on her site beforehand....sounds like a false flat being created because they're committing the irregularities to make it look like it's the other side.

That's exactly what they are doing.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 05:55 PM
tic toc doc. tic toc

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 05:55 PM
Link? Or are you referring to my earlier thread on their "mishap"?

Wasn't here earlier. I just got home and ate. Seems it was that they called it for her earlier prematurely is what it really said. Saw on another board it wasn't this link. Same article and map though.

http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/st-lawrence-news/54-worldnational-news/10809-boston-globe-calls-election-8-hours-early.html

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 05:56 PM
That's exactly what they are doing.

Oops I meant to type false "flag" operation.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:56 PM
Wasn't here earlier. I just got home and ate. Seems it was that they called it for her earlier prematurely is what it really said. Saw on another board it wasn't this link. Same article and map though.

http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/st-lawrence-news/54-worldnational-news/10809-boston-globe-calls-election-8-hours-early.html

Yeah, they said it was a, uh-hum, mishap.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 05:57 PM
Yeah, they said it was a, uh-hum, mishap.

Yeah, I'm just catching up. I only glanced at it on another board. Whew! Glad I was wrong! * fingers crossed * she loses.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:57 PM
3 mins til close. Intrade moves to 87-13

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 05:58 PM
tic toc doc. tic toc

I'm on drudge, what are you using to get the results?

petegz28
01-19-2010, 05:59 PM
I'm on drudge, what are you using to get the results?

Watching Foxy News of course. I'll switch back and forth from them and MSNBS.

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 05:59 PM
I have a feeling that if Coakley loses, it won't be the end of it. They'll come up with something that will tie up the seat for a bit.

But if Brown loses, the Pubs wouldn't do the same thing?

I know you all hate the Democrats, good for you. The Republicans are every bit as crooked. Every. Last. Bit.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:00 PM
Polls are closed!!!

Guru
01-19-2010, 06:00 PM
so when is the recount?

Guru
01-19-2010, 06:01 PM
But if Brown loses, the Pubs wouldn't do the same thing?

I know you all hate the Democrats, good for you. The Republicans are every bit as crooked. Every. Last. Bit.Well duh!:rolleyes::D

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:01 PM
so when is the recount?

ROFL

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:01 PM
Intrade is getting slammed

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:01 PM
That seat has been held by the Kennedy's for over half a century.

The fact that this race is so close and that it's hinging on their life long mission of universal health care should be all the wake up call that politicians need.

Oh wait. I forgot. NONE of them give a shit about you, I, or what any of us want.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:03 PM
That seat has been held by the Kennedy's for over half a century.

The fact that this race is so close and that it's hinging on their life long mission of universal health care should be all the wake up call that politicians need.

Oh wait. I forgot. NONE of them give a shit about you, I, or what any of us want.

Priority number one is derailing B.O. We'll sort the rest out tomorrow.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:03 PM
Coakley's pollster gave an interview on the internet saying the White House blew it. Not sure if that is the same person who communicated similar or not?

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:03 PM
Priority number one is derailing B.O. We'll sort the rest out tomorrow.

Fair enough.

I voted for Obama.

I'm really sorry.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:03 PM
But if Brown loses, the Pubs wouldn't do the same thing?

I know you all hate the Democrats, good for you. The Republicans are every bit as crooked. Every. Last. Bit.It's time for the river card, not the flop.

Bearcat2005
01-19-2010, 06:04 PM
But if Brown loses, the Pubs wouldn't do the same thing?

I know you all hate the Democrats, good for you. The Republicans are every bit as crooked. Every. Last. Bit.

THIS.

Maybe if Repubs can regain their capitalist soul they will be a worthy option.

I was listening to 980 and a caller stated it perfectly, chosing between dems and reps is like picking what side of the bed to get screwed on. I found that crude but funny.

This all being said I welcome anything (including an election of Brown) to limit this congress.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:04 PM
But if Brown loses, the Pubs wouldn't do the same thing?

I know you all hate the Democrats, good for you. The Republicans are every bit as crooked. Every. Last. Bit.

I'm not saying that I disagree. Not sure why I said that. I think I saw the "already filled out ballots" claim and just made the assumption for one party rather than both - although I tend to lean Rep.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:04 PM
Fair enough.

I voted for Obama.

I'm really sorry.

No need to be. We all make mistakes. He's a damn good con-artist, you were taken in by one of the best.

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:05 PM
No need to be. We all make mistakes. He's a damn good con-artist, you were taken in by one of the best.

Yeah, well I've been cynical about all of these assholes for long enough that I'm ashamed to admit that. But hey, I'm only human.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:05 PM
Coakley's pollster gave an interview on the internet saying the White House blew it. Not sure if that is the same person who communicated similar or not?

So does that comment raise the unemployment rate to 11%?

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:06 PM
That seat has been held by the Kennedy's for over half a century.

The fact that this race is so close and that it's hinging on their life long mission of universal health care should be all the wake up call that politicians need.

Oh wait. I forgot. NONE of them give a shit about you, I, or what any of us want.

This. It's easy looking at this race as a mandate against Obama even if Coakley loses but the real problem still looms that someone, anyone, needs to stand up and speak for what is really going on and not what will keep them employed in politics.

I have no faith republicans will be any better unless their message changes from what it became in the 90's and 2000.

This country needs tough love not a f'ing handout. For me I'm paying more attention to guys like Ron Paul.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:06 PM
Fair enough.

I voted for Obama.

I'm really sorry.

I did as well, but I regret that decision. I feel like I was mislead.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:06 PM
Intrade is down! Can't even get the site to come up now.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:07 PM
Yeah, well I've been cynical about all of these assholes for long enough that I'm ashamed to admit that. But hey, I'm only human.

There is nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, I'm proud of you. And as far as being cynical, how could anybody not be? ;)

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:08 PM
Mr. Flopynuts is good people. Even though he voted for Obama. A lot of people are having buyers remorse on the guy.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:09 PM
I did as well, but I regret that decision. I feel like I was mislead.

You were mislead. You were lied to. You should be pissed off. I know I am. I just want to make every single one of the bastards pay. And it starts tonight.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:09 PM
O'Reilly says as a fact there are still 150,000 dead people in Mass. that are still on the voting rolls.

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:09 PM
I did as well, but I regret that decision. I feel like I was mislead.

The second the cigarette taxes (typically smokers are poor and make well less than 250k a year) went up, I knew he was a fucking liar just like all the rest of them. I was off his boat just a few short weeks after I voted for him.

What completely sealed the deal was his pandering and giving up on a single payer insurance plan. It's pussy shit. If you're not going to do it right, don't waste the fucking time and money.

This country has bigger problems than a half assed attempt to passify voters.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:10 PM
Mr. Flopynuts is good people. Even though he voted for Obama. A lot of people are having buyers remorse on the guy.

No doubt. It takes a big man to admit it instead of pretending otherwise. B.O. is a bad man.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:10 PM
You were mislead. You were lied to. You should be pissed off. I know I am. I just want to make every single one of the bastards pay. And it starts tonight.

I know I was. I honestly thought that he was the best person for the job at the time. Now, I feel like we have John Calipari running the country.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:10 PM
Rasmussen reporting that 22% of Dems voted for Scott Brown!

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:10 PM
There is nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, I'm proud of you. And as far as being cynical, how could anybody not be? ;)

Mr. Flopynuts is good people. Even though he voted for Obama. A lot of people are having buyers remorse on the guy.

I appreciate it fellas. I'm not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat. I'm a fucking American. I wish the rest of the assholes "running" this country were too.

Alright, rant over. It's counterproductive at some point and my blood pressure is going up.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:11 PM
Mass. Sec. of State has DISMISSED "vote problems".

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:11 PM
Nobodys called it yet?

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:11 PM
I appreciate it fellas. I'm not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat. I'm a fucking American. I wish the rest of the assholes "running" this country were too.


Exactly my feelings.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:12 PM
I appreciate it fellas. I'm not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat. I'm a ****ing American. I wish the rest of the assholes "running" this country were too.

Alright, rant over. It's counterproductive at some point and my blood pressure is going up.

I'm with you, man. I love this country.

JD10367
01-19-2010, 06:12 PM
Okay, native Bostonian here chiming in, currently living just south of the People's Republic... er, I mean, Massachusetts--in the state of Rhode Island.

Here's the thing about this election: while finding a Republican in Massachusetts is like finding a redneck at the opera, the Republicans have been eating shit in that state for decades, watching Teddy sitting in his seat. And this election is NOT just about Obama, or health care. People are forgetting that Massachusetts not too long ago elected its first black governor, a dingdong Democrat by the name of Duval Patrick who is not doing a great job. So the backlash is local as well as national.

While I'm techically a liberal, I don't mind if Brown wins because, frankly, I don't think EITHER side should have a filibuster-proof majority. When you rubber-stamp ANY group's wishes, it's just a bad precedent. I'd rather have some checks-and-balances. Let them argue shit out and compromise on stuff. Much better than letting one group push through anything they want. Just my two cents.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:12 PM
Exactly my feelings.

Here, here. I dumped the Repubs as "my party" after the 04 election. Yes, I voted for Bush twice and would again if he ran against the same people, Gore and Kerry. But they disappointed me over the 6 years they were in charge.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:13 PM
Rasmussen reporting that 22% of Dems voted for Scott Brown!

Please please please

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:13 PM
Rasmussen also reported in "their" exit polling Coakley won 47-41

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:13 PM
I know I was. I honestly thought that he was the best person for the job at the time. Now, I feel like we have John Calipari running the country.Would you rather have Palin one 72 year old heartbeat away from the Presidency? Be in a couple of more wars because of McCain doesn't know restraint in foreign policy?

I'm ticked off too. This isn't what I voted for either but McCain would have been a disaster and if he killed over....OMG President Palin? ROFL

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:14 PM
First results in, Brown up by 1500

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:14 PM
Found this Mass. local TV station with results - 9 of 2168 precincts reporting.

Scott Brown (R) 5,940 56%
Martha Coakley (D) 4,508 43%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 90 1%

http://elections.cbslocal.com/cbs/wbz/20100119/

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:15 PM
Rasmussen reports voters who decided in the last few days favored Coakley.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:15 PM
Coakley takes the lead by 100

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:16 PM
Would you rather have Palin one 72 year old heartbeat away from the Presidency? Be in a couple of more wars because of McCain doesn't know restraint in foreign policy?

I'm ticked off too. This isn't what I voted for either but McCain would have been a disaster and if he killed over....OMG President Palin? ROFL

Against these morons in congress I'd take Palin over Obama right now in a 72 year old heartbeat.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:17 PM
Found this Mass. local TV station with results - 9 of 2168 precincts reporting.

Scott Brown (R) 5,940 56%
Martha Coakley (D) 4,508 43%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 90 1%

http://elections.cbslocal.com/cbs/wbz/20100119/
<TABLE class=bti_resultstable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR align=left><TD width="100%" colSpan=4>Senate Special Election - Massachusetts</B>
16 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_tableheader width="50%">NAME</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">VOTES</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">Pct.</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=left width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Martha Coakley (D)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">9,037</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">50%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Scott Brown (R)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">8,947</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">49%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Joseph Kennedy (I)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">161</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">1%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- START FOOTER -->

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:17 PM
The second the cigarette taxes (typically smokers are poor and make well less than 250k a year) went up, I knew he was a ****ing liar just like all the rest of them. I was off his boat just a few short weeks after I voted for him.

What completely sealed the deal was his pandering and giving up on a single payer insurance plan. It's pussy shit. If you're not going to do it right, don't waste the ****ing time and money.

This country has bigger problems than a half assed attempt to passify voters.I remember when I jumped off Clinton's train, yeah, I voted for Clinton in 1992. Gheys in the millitary, over and phuquing over for the first 100 or more phreaking days, as if, that was the single number one thing that sobich had to accomplish once elected.

I have never looked back.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:18 PM
Coakley predicts victory. 6:30 pm today
http://wbztv.com/politics/martha.coakley.scott.2.1434640.html

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:19 PM
Coakley predicts victory. 6:30 pm today
http://wbztv.com/politics/martha.coakley.scott.2.1434640.html

There's a shocker!

JD10367
01-19-2010, 06:19 PM
I wouldn't get too hung up on the moment-by-moment numbers. It all depends on where the numbers come in from. There are very blue-collar Republican-oriented areas, and there are very college-professor, Starbucks-loving communist areas.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:20 PM
Intrade still down

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:20 PM
Wow, really going back and forth.

Martha Coakley (D) 9,037 50%
Scott Brown (R) 8,947 49%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 161 1%

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:20 PM
<TABLE class=bti_resultstable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR align=left><TD width="100%" colSpan=4>Senate Special Election - Massachusetts</B>
16 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_tableheader width="50%">NAME</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">VOTES</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">Pct.</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=left width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Martha Coakley (D)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">9,037</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">50%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Scott Brown (R)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">8,947</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">49%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Joseph Kennedy (I)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">161</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">1%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- START FOOTER -->

That's one I saw but it was from the Globe.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:20 PM
Would you rather have Palin one 72 year old heartbeat away from the Presidency? Be in a couple of more wars because of McCain doesn't know restraint in foreign policy?

I'm ticked off too. This isn't what I voted for either but McCain would have been a disaster and if he killed over....OMG President Palin? ROFL


I agree - I originally thought Obama was the lesser of two evils, I'm just not sure I was right.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:21 PM
Latest Rasmussen poll done this morning had Coakley up by 1%

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:21 PM
Jumped again.

Scott Brown (R) 52,219 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 46,406 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 872 1%

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:21 PM
I remember when I jumped off Clinton's train, yeah, I voted for Clinton in 1992. Gheys in the millitary, over and phuquing over for the first 100 or more phreaking days, as if, that was the single number one thing that sobich had to accomplish once elected.

I have never looked back.

Heh, I wasn't old enough to vote in 92 but that's when I wanted 4 more years of Bush. I changed my tune in 2004, but couldn't bring myself to vote for Kerry. So I voted independent. In 08, all my friends told me I was being duped, but I think I was just desperate. Bush completely tanked, the Pubs left their roots of conservatism, and non government intrusion and I just freaked. I bought in, because I wanted it to be so. I should've known better.

Donger
01-19-2010, 06:22 PM
54% Brown
45% Coakley

1% reporting

Per CNN

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:23 PM
I agree - I originally thought Obama was the lesser of two evils, I'm just not sure I was right.

McCain sucked. I didn't vote.

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:23 PM
I'd vote for Monica Crowley for any orifice she ran for.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:23 PM
I wouldn't get too hung up on the moment-by-moment numbers. It all depends on where the numbers come in from. There are very blue-collar Republican-oriented areas, and there are very college-professor, Starbucks-loving communist areas.

Hopefully these are Eastern Mass numbers. If these are WEst... not good for Brown.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:23 PM
We'll see a huge surge for Coakley when then Boston and Cambrige results come in.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:24 PM
I wouldn't get too hung up on the moment-by-moment numbers. It all depends on where the numbers come in from. There are very blue-collar Republican-oriented areas, and there are very college-professor, Starbucks-loving communist areas.yep close race like this it will depend on the district. No one has called it though?

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:25 PM
I'd vote for Monica Crowley for any orifice she ran for.She is pretty hot for a middle aged phd? Dang them conservatives know how to grow them.

Donger
01-19-2010, 06:25 PM
52% Brown
47% Coakley

5% reporting

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:26 PM
I give up on Intrade. That site will not come up for anything.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:26 PM
yep close race like this it will depend on the district. No one has called it though?That's the problem for you homies, this shouldn't even be like this. it should have been commercial, BRAKING NEWS AT 800, COAKLEY WINS, in other news, the Hatians are hacking each other for water.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:27 PM
O'Reilly syas 7% in, 51-48 Brown.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:27 PM
O'Reilly syas 7% in, 51-48 Brown.

Pete what districts?

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:28 PM
tic toc doc tic toc

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:29 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
146 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 71,914 51%
Martha Coakley (D) 67,506 48%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 1,243 1%

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:29 PM
Coakley takes the lead by 100

The lead usually narrows later. Shyiat!

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:29 PM
Pete what districts?

No idea.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:30 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
146 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 71,914 51%
Martha Coakley (D) 67,506 48%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 1,243 1%

Only a 146 precints....I can't take the suspense.

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:30 PM
Ok, stupid question here because I haven't been paying attention. Is the Kennedy in the race A Kennedy? Like a real one?

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:30 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 139,806 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 122,732 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 2,434 1%

Chocolate Hog
01-19-2010, 06:31 PM
This is one time where I'd say voting for the liberterian is a wasted vote.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:31 PM
Ok, stupid question here because I haven't been paying attention. Is the Kennedy in the race A Kennedy? Like a real one?

No! Different animal, but spells and sounds the same.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:31 PM
Brown up 53-46

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:32 PM
<TABLE class=bti_resultstable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR align=left><TD width="100%" colSpan=4>Senate Special Election - Massachusetts</B>
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_tableheader width="50%">NAME</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">VOTES</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=right width="20%">Pct.</TD><TD class=bti_tableheader align=left width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Scott Brown (R)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">139,806</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">53%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Martha Coakley (D)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">122,732</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">46%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=bti_resultcell width="50%">Joseph Kennedy (I)</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">2,434</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=right width="20%">1%</TD><TD class=bti_resultcell align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

That has to be the western part of Mass because if it was the east they would have already called it if Coakley is losing this bad in the eastern part of the state.
<!-- START FOOTER -->

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:32 PM
Brown up 53-46

Pulling away...

c'mon baby

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:32 PM
This is one time where I'd say voting for the liberterian is a wasted vote.

Yeah! Me too. In fact if I still lived in Mass I'd vote for Brown in this election.

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:32 PM
No! Different animal, but spells and sounds the same.

Thanks. I was curious if true why he only had 1%.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:33 PM
Brown up 53-46

I love you! ( for now!):redface::o)

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:33 PM
52-47 by latest O'Reilly count

Donger
01-19-2010, 06:33 PM
Brown up 53-46

Holy sh*t.

LMAO

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:33 PM
I really wish Intrade would come up.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:34 PM
Thanks. I was curious if true why he only had 1%.

Well, my rep used to be Joe Kennedy back in Boston. He crashed my Bunker Hill Day party too. Took the mikes from the musicians to talk politics. The creep!

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:35 PM
Disregard last O'Reilly count, that was old

Rain Man
01-19-2010, 06:35 PM
Oh this is wonderful, Al Franken's recount shyster is Martha Moxley's campaign manager:

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/297187.php

These f'n scumbags.


You beat me to the Al Franken reference. It's interesting that the most corrupt national politician in America is a guy who used to make fun of corrupt politicians.

You know that a bunch of "lost" ballot boxes will be found if the Democrat loses this one. It's too much of a bellwether to accept defeat.

Frankly, I'm astounded that it's even close. I would've thought Massachusetts would elect Osama bin Laden if he was the Democrat in the race.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:36 PM
Holy sh*t.

LMAO
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting Don't print em just yet.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:36 PM
CNN's server is going through " a few minutes of maintenance"..lol

Chocolate Hog
01-19-2010, 06:36 PM
Yeah! Me too. In fact if I still lived in Mass I'd vote for Brown in this election.

I forgot how shitty this health care bill was. It's too bad he's not aginst the wars he'd be a nice candidate to vote for in 2012.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:36 PM
CNN's server is going through " a few minutes of maintenance"..lol

ROFL

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:37 PM
D: 0,145,733
R: 0,169,808


Still running 53-46

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 06:37 PM
Well, my rep used to be Joe Kennedy back in Boston. He crashed my Bunker Hill Day party too. Took the mikes from the musicians to talk politics. The creep!

Probably ate some of your cooking and the rest is history. ;)

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 06:37 PM
No one should get overly excited until Boston and Cambridge is counted up.

Donger
01-19-2010, 06:38 PM
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting Don't print em just yet.

I'm not. But, you have to admit, the very fact that he's leading is hilarious.

BTW, where's Direckshun? Didn't he say that the debate about health care reform was "over" or something?

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:38 PM
13% in so far

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:38 PM
Damn, I miss Bernard Shaw. This reminds me of election night 94

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:39 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
280 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 169,808 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 145,733 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 2,922 1%

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:39 PM
13% in so far

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:39 PM
You beat me to the Al Franken reference. It's interesting that the most corrupt national politician in America is a guy who used to make fun of corrupt politicians.

You know that a bunch of "lost" ballot boxes will be found if the Democrat loses this one. It's too much of a bellwether to accept defeat.

Frankly, I'm astounded that it's even close. I would've thought Massachusetts would elect Osama bin Laden if he was the Democrat in the race.

That's what makes me the sickest about the damage that B.O./Pelosi/Reid have already done to this country---

Franken is a fraud, and Arlen Spector was elected as a republican. We shouldn't even have to be sweating this out right now. But these bastards are all gonna pay.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:39 PM
Damn, I miss Bernard Shaw. This reminds me of election night 94

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:43 PM
This man is in the zone, little juke move, can't wrap him up!

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:44 PM
R: 0,254,686
D: 0,224,421

Chocolate Hog
01-19-2010, 06:44 PM
Whats Micheal Savage saying? His takes were hilarious during the primaries.

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:44 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
504 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 280,138 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 248,516 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 4,944 1%

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:45 PM
R: 0,280,138
D: 0,248,516

Bearcat2005
01-19-2010, 06:45 PM
per drudge
Brown: 280,138
Coakley: 248,516
25 percent in

DJ's left nut
01-19-2010, 06:46 PM
Fair enough.

I voted for Obama.

I'm really sorry.

Oh wow, flop.

You could've told me you were sodomized by Rosie O'Donnel and I'd have possibly felt some empathy for you.

But this...

There really should be a support group for it.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:46 PM
Is Aunt Zeituni voting?

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:46 PM
Probably ate some of your cooking and the rest is history. ;)

ROFL I wasn't into French food back then. BTW the party was catered but I did make my Revolution blood-red punch. It was Bunker Hill day and I lived atop Bunker Hill.

But I'll tell ya' one of the raving socialists who marched in the parade that day came right into my basement and piled food on a plate a mile high....then got right back into the parade and continued marching. Such thieves they are eating and running like that. :shake:

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:48 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
618 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 331,843 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 294,090 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 6,044 1%

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:48 PM
No one should get overly excited until Boston and Cambridge is counted up.

Especially Cambridge. JHC they still had commies out in Havahd Square in the late 80s!!!

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:49 PM
Here is a link that has the votes broken down by Town\City

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS

JD10367
01-19-2010, 06:50 PM
Especially Cambridge. JHC they still had commies out in Havahd Square in the late 80s!!!

Get it right. It's the People's Republic of Cambridge.

Tell you what, though. That area is one of the best for restaurants and stores, not to mention artsy-fartsyness (thanks to Harvard and MIT).

Chocolate Hog
01-19-2010, 06:50 PM
I hope those who voted in Cambirdge didn't listen to Obama the same man who accused the police officer doing his job as being a racist.

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 06:50 PM
No one should get overly excited until Boston and Cambridge is counted up.

I'm hearing that Brown's getting about 47% in the Boston precincts that have been counted.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:51 PM
There are 6.3 million people in Massachussetts. You figure less than half can vote, right? Still a long way to go.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:51 PM
Get it right. It's the People's Republic of Cambridge.

Tell you what, though. That area is one of the best for restaurants and stores, not to mention artsy-fartsyness (thanks to Harvard and MIT).

Yes I know. I used to live in Cambridge.

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:51 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
844 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 441,124 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 392,078 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 8,407 1%

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:51 PM
Here is a link that has the votes broken down by Town\City

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICSI'm not familiar with Mass. Are these results from western mass?

wild1
01-19-2010, 06:51 PM
Al Franken's recount shyster is Martha Moxley's campaign manager:


That was the most corrupt s--- nobody ever heard about.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:52 PM
Coakley stands a good shot at winning this....

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:52 PM
No one should get overly excited until Boston and Cambridge is counted, and counted, and counted, and counted, and some more votes are found, then counted also, oh yeah, let's count those dead people too.FYP

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:52 PM
Here is a link that has the votes broken down by Town\City

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS

56-43 in favor of Coakley in Boston

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:52 PM
I'm not familiar with Mass. Are these results from western mass?

It is every town\city across Mass.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:54 PM
That was the most corrupt s--- nobody ever heard about.

Well the Republican didn't put up a legal fight so...

It's sickening. It really is. This is our Constitution they are pissing on.

Mr. Plow
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr class="eln-cty-bodyregular" cellspacing="1"><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="left">Cambridge</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1/33</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1,067
88%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">139
11%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">13
1%</td></tr></tbody></table>

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
875 precints in, 53-46

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
Howie Carr calls it for Brown. Take it for what it's worth.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr class="eln-cty-bodyregular" cellspacing="1"><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="left">Cambridge</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1/33</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1,067
88%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">139
11%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">13
1%</td></tr></tbody></table>

Cambrige and Bostong can be all she needs to put her over the top.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
I'm not familiar with Mass. Are these results from western mass?It's a 5 point lead for Brown with a third of the vote in, it's NOT looking good for Obama.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr class="eln-cty-bodyregular" cellspacing="1"><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="left">Cambridge</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1/33</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">1,067
88%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">139
11%</td><td class="eln-cty-bodyregular" align="right">13
1%</td></tr></tbody></table>

Wow.

Lots of commies in Cambridge.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:55 PM
Howie Carr calls it for Brown. Take it for what it's worth.

Yea, I saw that, what a tard.

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 06:56 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
946 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 488,643 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 442,085 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 9,427 1%

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:56 PM
Cambrige and Bostong can be all she needs to put her over the top.

strike that 59-40

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:56 PM
980 in 52-47

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
Yeah, the demorat machine just sits back, till they know how many votes to count from Cambridge, then they deliver as many as they need. Simple.

Bwana
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
Wow.

Lots of commies in Cambridge.

The sun sets in the west.

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
Wow.

Lots of commies in Cambridge.

I've also heard that the turnout in heavily Coakley areas is much lighter than in Brown's strongholds.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
1300 precints still to report

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
Wow.

Lots of commies in Cambridge.

Yeah, we were saying earlier.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:57 PM
40% in, and a 5 point lead for Brown, per Levin

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:58 PM
Yeah, the demorat machine just sits back, till they know how many votes to count from Cambridge, then they deliver as many as they need. Simple.

Yup. No point in wasting fraudelent votes and taking a chance getting caught if you don't have to.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:58 PM
40% in, and a 5 point lead for Brown, per Levin

Not enough. Too many commies in Boston.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:58 PM
Yup. No point in wasting fraudelent votes and taking a chance getting caught if you don't have to.

ROFL

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:58 PM
Mark Levin is calling it for Brown lmao

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
Yeah, we were saying earlier.

The numbers don't lie.

ROFL

petegz28
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
1119 in, 52-47

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
I've seen breakdowns of what Brown needs to get in each area in order to win. He's pulling 3-4% higher than needed in every area I've seen listed. Don't know how good the sample is, though.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
1300 precints still to reportjeeezzz thats alot of votes to be counted yet

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
Yup. No point in wasting fraudelent votes and taking a chance getting caught if you don't have to.Exactly, they need to see our hand before they go into action.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 06:59 PM
Not enough. Too many commies in Boston.

More so Cambridge. Lots of college kids in Boston though including Cambridge. Enough professionals though in Boston too.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
jeeezzz thats alot of votes to be counted yetTic toc doc, tic toc.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
Mark Levin is calling it for Brown lmao

Anyone calling this race right now is a moron. Coakley is getting ready to drop a bomb on the vote count and surge.

JD10367
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
Cambridge is commie-heavy. Boston, though, it not necessarily Coakley Country. Yes, there are urban areas like Roxbury and Dorchester which will vote Democratic, but there are heavy blue-collar areas like Southie that are still full of hard-working Irish guys who are NOT voting for Coakley. Eastie is still half Italian, and that's the half that will probably vote, and they're probably voting Republican as well. I think Boston, if not ending up split, will only be marginally for Coakley.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
I've seen breakdowns of what Brown needs to get in each area in order to win. He's pulling 3-4% higher than needed in every area I've seen listed. Don't know how good the sample is, though.

Thanks for the reassurance Saul.

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
I've seen breakdowns of what Brown needs to get in each area in order to win. He's pulling 3-4% higher than needed in every area I've seen listed. Don't know how good the sample is, though.If thats true why haven't the networks called it?

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
1215 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 638,823 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 563,214 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 12,100 1%

Bearcat2005
01-19-2010, 07:00 PM
50 percent in

R: 0,488,643
D: 0,442,085

Bearcat2005
01-19-2010, 07:01 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
1215 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 638,823 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 563,214 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 12,100 1%

wow my info is off... here I am trying to report :)

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:02 PM
If thats true why haven't the networks called it?

They know better. O'Reilly said "it looks like Brown has it". Fair enough. Hannity said it was too close to call.

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:02 PM
If thats true why haven't the networks called it?

Don't know. Like I said, I don't know the sample size. It's not like he's blowing the numbers away, but he's established a pattern (assuming that the numbers I'm getting are an accurate representation.)

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:03 PM
At 40% in, it's trending a little further towards Brown.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:03 PM
If thats true why haven't the networks called it?They can't believe it.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:03 PM
Brown up by almost 75k votes.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:04 PM
At 40% in, it's trending a little further towards Brown.

40%? Try over 50%. 1234 of 2168 are in.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:04 PM
1298 in, 53-46

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:05 PM
Coakley winning Boston almost 2-1

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:05 PM
40%? Try over 50%. 1234 of 2168 are in.

Might be 40% based on population rather than precincts. (Might be that I got incorrect info.)

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:05 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
1276 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 680,775 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 596,731 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 12,855 1%

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 07:05 PM
FYP

Hey, you completely misrepresented me there. It's Mr. Flopnuts. :p

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:06 PM
wow my info is off... here I am trying to report :)

http://elections.cbslocal.com/cbs/wbz/20100119/#

dirk digler
01-19-2010, 07:07 PM
Anyone calling this race right now is a moron. Coakley is getting ready to drop a bomb on the vote count and surge.

LMAO She isn't going to win so you can relax and have a nice beer pete.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:07 PM
Brown up by 87k votes

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 07:07 PM
Coakley winning Boston almost 2-1I thought they were going to split boston?

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:08 PM
1339 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 705,615 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 621,231 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 13,502 1%

Bwana
01-19-2010, 07:08 PM
Coakley winning Boston almost 2-1

Freaking commies. :shake:

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:08 PM
LMAO She isn't going to win so you can relax and have a nice beer pete.

I will wait until the polls are closer to final. Jean Carnahan pulled it out in the last 30% of votes counted.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:08 PM
Coakley winning Boston almost 2-1

Meh.

Look at all the districts with 0% votes counted. Probably in the suburbs? He'll maintain his lead.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:09 PM
Hey, you completely misrepresented me there. It's Mr. Flopnuts. :pI just want to know one thing: Who is Obama going to throw under the buss for this?

Rahm Emanuel?

alanm
01-19-2010, 07:09 PM
The Doug Flutie Band. :D

JD10367
01-19-2010, 07:09 PM
I thought they were going to split boston?

I thought it would be much more even.

Then again, the yuppies have driven a lot of the blue-collar people out of areas like Charlestown and the North End, which 20 years ago might've voted more Republican in this scenario.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:09 PM
LMAO She isn't going to win so you can relax and have a nice beer pete.

I'm putting a serious dent in a 12 Pak right now.

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:10 PM
The Doug Flutie Band. :D

ROFL

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:10 PM
1357 in, 53-46

Mr. Flopnuts
01-19-2010, 07:10 PM
I just want to know one thing: Who is Obama going to throw under the buss for this?

Rahm Emanuel?

The dumbest thing he could do is chuck ANYONE under the bus. If he doesn't recognize this as the American people demanding REAL change, then he's a fool that will bury his own party in much the same way people said the Pubs were less than a year ago. History says the Dems won't recover as fast as the Pubs do.

JD10367
01-19-2010, 07:10 PM
I just want to know one thing: Who is Obama going to throw under the buss for this?

Rahm Emanuel?

No one to blame but Coakley herself. The Dems thought they had this one in the bag, so they didn't try very hard. Brown snuck up on them and, by then, it was too late. Coakley sealed her fate by going on the radio and thinking Curt Schilling was a Yankees fan, LOL.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:10 PM
Brown up 85k votes

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:11 PM
I just want to know one thing: Who is Obama going to throw under the buss for this?

Rahm Emanuel?

Aunt Zeituni.

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:11 PM
1419 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 750,616 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 661,351 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 14,323 1%

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:11 PM
You just have to love them teabagging rednecks up there, hey, in the home of the original tea party. Wow.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
Over half the Boston precincts have reported. Still only 1 of 33 in Cambrige, ironically.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
I'm putting a serious dent in a 12 Pak right now.Phug an A. Today is the day, America stepped back from the brink.

dirk digler
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
I will wait until the polls are closer to final. Jean Carnahan pulled it out in the last 30% of votes counted.

If she somehow wins I will buy you a 12-pack of your favorite beer. That is how confidant I am that she is toast.

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
No major outlets have called it yet, but their tones are all starting to turn towards one of inevitability.

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:12 PM
Over half the Boston precincts have reported. Still only 1 of 33 in Cambrige, ironically.They have to know how many votes to come up with dude.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:13 PM
Intrade still down.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 07:13 PM
I thought it would be much more even.

Then again, the yuppies have driven a lot of the blue-collar people out of areas like Charlestown and the North End, which 20 years ago might've voted more Republican in this scenario.

That's true. I lived in Charilestown.....but I was a yuppie not a townie.
Lot of Dems but not hard lefty Dems.

AustinChief
01-19-2010, 07:13 PM
At about 1000 votes coming in per precint and Brown with about a 85k lead... and with 800 precints left to report.... that leaves 800k votes in the wild...

If Brown can hold onto an 80k lead with 200 precints left... then we can talk....

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:13 PM
No major outlets have called it yet, but their tones are all starting to turn towards one of inevitability.HOPE, and CHANGE>

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:13 PM
Phug an A. Today is the day, America stepped back from the brink.

What if B.O. hands Brown a suitcase with 300 million dollars cash?

:eek:

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:14 PM
Brown up 90k votes.

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 07:14 PM
What if B.O. hands Brown a suitcase with 300 million dollars cash?

:eek:

ROFL

BigRedChief
01-19-2010, 07:14 PM
Over half the Boston precincts have reported. Still only 1 of 33 in Cambrige, ironically.Isn't that where the commies live? Isn't that a high density population? Whats the population for Cambridge?

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:14 PM
2/3 of the precincts in, Brown by 7 points, per ABC news' Aaron Katurski(sp)

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
1435 in, 53-46

BucEyedPea
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
Isn't that where the commies live? Isn't that a high density population? Whats the population for Cambridge?

Yes that is where the commies live.

dirk digler
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
What if B.O. hands Brown a suitcase with 300 million dollars cash?

:eek:

:tinfoil:

Calcountry
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
What if B.O. hands Brown a suitcase with 300 million dollars cash?

:eek:We will find out, if he is on the side of the American people or not, won't we?

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
Isn't that where the commies live? Isn't that a high density population? Whats the population for Cambridge?

They have 33 precints, which seems to be one of the higher areas.

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 07:15 PM
If she somehow wins I will buy you a 12-pack of your favorite beer. That is how confidant I am that she is toast.

A whole 12 pack? Wow. :)

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:16 PM
I just want to know one thing: Who is Obama going to throw under the buss for this?

Rahm Emanuel?

Yep. If this holds, Rahm's in deep shit.

TrebMaxx
01-19-2010, 07:16 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
1461 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 769,239 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 682,784 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 14,798 1%

Saul Good
01-19-2010, 07:16 PM
At about 1000 votes coming in per precint and Brown with about a 85k lead... and with 800 precints left to report.... that leaves 800k votes in the wild...

If Brown can hold onto an 80k lead with 200 precints left... then we can talk....

Precincts aren't all even in size. Dem precincts tend to have more people.

AustinChief
01-19-2010, 07:17 PM
Isn't that where the commies live? Isn't that a high density population? Whats the population for Cambridge?

about 100k

mlyonsd
01-19-2010, 07:17 PM
Yep. If this holds, Rahm's in deep shit.

The best thing for the country is if Rahm Foster'd himself. And I'm dead serious about that.

petegz28
01-19-2010, 07:17 PM
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
1461 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 769,239 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 682,784 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 14,798 1%

Here comes the Coakley surge

dirk digler
01-19-2010, 07:17 PM
A whole 12 pack? Wow. :)

4321



:D

The Mad Crapper
01-19-2010, 07:18 PM
The best thing for the country is if Rahm Foster'd himself. And I'm dead serious about that.

ROFL