PDA

View Full Version : Economics Scandal? Documents show Bernanke acted unilaterally in bailing out AIG


Taco John
01-27-2010, 01:47 AM
Is Bernanke Hiding A Smoking Gun?

A Republican senator said Tuesday that documents showing Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernake covered up the fact that his staff recommended he not bailout AIG are being kept from the public. And a House Republican charged that a whistleblower had alerted Congress to specific documents provide "troubling details" of Bernanke's role in the AIG bailout.

Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), a Bernanke critic, said on CNBC that he has seen documents showing that Bernanke overruled such a recommendation. If that's the case, it raises questions about whether bailing out AIG was actually necessary, and what Bernanke's motives were.

A letter Bunning sent Monday to Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) also refers to an "[e]mail exchange regarding restructuring of assistance to AIG, initiated by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner" in March 2009.

Senators will be voting on Bernanke's confirmation for a second term in the coming days. But only senators on the Banking Committee have had access to documents that illuminate just what decisions he made and how he made them. And that access only came after Bunning publicly complained that Dodd and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) were the only members of the committee could see them.

Meanwhile, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who has been investigating the AIG bailout in his role as ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said that a whistleblower has informed him of "troubling details" of Bernanke's role in the bailout.

There may be nothing incriminating in the documents, but without access to them, the Senate will be voting to confirm him in the dark.

Senators from both parties who say they will vote to confirm Bernanke credit him with deft actions that averted a second Great Depression. Those actions, they argue, outweigh what blame he deserves for causing the crisis in the first place.

"He's done a very good job in the last year. And but for his work, we would be in a very different position in this country today," said Dodd Monday. "Now that's hard to prove a negative. But the fact of the matter is, our entire financial system might have collapsed but for his leadership."

On Monday, Bunning sent a letter to Dodd, asking him to subpoena the emails and other documents. Bunning and other committee members have thus far had to view the documents at the Federal Reserve and are bound by confidentiality from revealing their contents. "He thinks that all members of the Senate should have access to the documents he's seen," said Bunning spokesman Mike Reynard.

Issa, in a letter to his committee's chairman, Ed Towns (D-N.Y.), asked for a similar subpoena and even specified exactly which documents he wants: Those tagged electronically as "sb-aig-01000092 to sb-aig-010000125" and "Draft Memo on AIG.pdf."

Towns spokeswoman Jenny Rosenberg said that Towns would decide on a subpoena after Wednesday's hearing on the AIG bailout.

Bunning, in his letter to Dodd, is equally specific, citing nine particular documents that the Senate should review before voting to confirm Bernanke:



1. Agenda and materials for 11/12/2008 meeting of the Board of Directors of AIG (containing minutes of previous board meetings). [AIG_11.12.08_BOD.pdf]

2. Agenda and materials for 1/14/2009 meeting of the Board of Directors of AIG (containing minutes of previous board meetings). [AIG_01.14.09_BOD.pdf]

3. Memo "Issues Related to Possible IPC Lending to American International Group" presented to the Board of Governors for approval of lending to AIG, dated 9/15/2008. [pages sb-aig-01000092 to sb-aig-01000125]

4. Email from Chairman Bernanke including a draft of the memo to be presented to the Board of Governors for approval of lending to AIG, dated 9/15/2008. [Draft Memo on AIG.pdf]

5. Memo "Proposed Securities Lending Facility for American International Group, Inc. ("AIG")" presented to the Board of Governors for approval of the securities lending facility for AIG, dated 10/6/2008. [Board Mtg_10-6-2008_8.35.05_AM.pdf]

6. Memo "Proposed Steps to Stabilize American International Group, Inc." presented to the Board of Governors for approval of restructuring assistance to AIG and creation of Maiden Lane II & III, dated 11/6/2008. [AIG restructuring Board memo Final (Nov. 6, 2008)_11-6-2008_4.55.19_PM.pdf]

7. Spreadsheet describing the assets purchased by Maiden Lane II and Maiden Lane III. [BLK_12.31.08_MLII & III cusip data.xls]

8. Spreadsheet listing derivative transactions and counterparties for Maiden Lane III. [List of Derivative Transactions.pdf]

9. Email exchange regarding restructuring of assistance to AIG, initiated by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, dated 03/01/2009. [AIG Emails, Part3.pdf]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/is-bernanke-hiding-a-smok_n_437509.html

wild1
01-27-2010, 06:45 AM
What has he done to deserve to be re-nominated?

InChiefsHell
01-27-2010, 07:09 AM
What has he done to deserve to be re-nominated?

Apparently this:

Senators from both parties who say they will vote to confirm Bernanke credit him with deft actions that averted a second Great Depression. Those actions, they argue, outweigh what blame he deserves for causing the crisis in the first place.

That's just hilarious...he deserves blame for causing the crisis, but he fixed his fuck up (no he didn't, by the way) so he should get some kudos and re-nominated...

...Lord, I hope there is a huge overturning of morons on both sides of the aisle this next election...

memyselfI
01-27-2010, 07:37 AM
So Bush covered up for war crimes and now Lite is covering up for financial crimes. Nice.

patteeu
01-27-2010, 09:13 AM
What has he done to deserve to be re-nominated?

Some people claim that he navigated the nation through the most treacherous financial waters of our lifetimes (or at least the lifetimes of most of us), even though it's obviously true that he didn't anticipate those challenges and raise the alarm or take action to mitigate them in advance.

The other factor that I think supports his re-nomination is the specter of Obama choosing a replacement. The devil that we know may not be as bad as that which Obama would set on us as a replacement. I trust Obama less than I trust Bernanke.

I don't know whether Bernanke should be renominated or not, but I don't think he should be a scapegoat for unfocused frustration at the way our economy has performed or the way our government has acted.

BucEyedPea
01-27-2010, 09:15 AM
This is bad. Hope it helps transparency movement in auditing the Fed.
Can we label this Crony Keynesianism?

KC native
01-27-2010, 09:15 AM
So Bush covered up for war crimes and now Lite is covering up for financial crimes. Nice.

JFC, you really are a miserable person looking to blame everything on Obama since Hillary lost. I can see why you catch a lot of the shit you have.

FTR this happened in December of 2008 before Obama even took office.

BucEyedPea
01-27-2010, 09:16 AM
I don't know whether Bernanke should be renominated or not, but I don't think he should be a scapegoat for unfocused frustration at the way our economy has performed or the way our government has acted.

It's not that he's a scapegoat but one of the major players. Of course the other major players would like to have a fall guy when they're part of the problem too.

KC native
01-27-2010, 09:27 AM
Some people claim that he navigated the nation through the most treacherous financial waters of our lifetimes (or at least the lifetimes of most of us), even though it's obviously true that he didn't anticipate those challenges and raise the alarm or take action to mitigate them in advance.

The other factor that I think supports his re-nomination is the specter of Obama choosing a replacement. The devil that we know may not be as bad as that which Obama would set on us as a replacement. I trust Obama less than I trust Bernanke.

I don't know whether Bernanke should be renominated or not, but I don't think he should be a scapegoat for unfocused frustration at the way our economy has performed or the way our government has acted.

Bernanke shouldn't be reconfirmed. While I applaud most of his handling of this crisis, his role in the run up to the crisis should be enough to relegate his ass to the talking heads on TV and the world of economic "consulting".

I feel that Bernanke is going to be too slow to withdraw support because he is kind of like Greenspan in the "I can't see bubbles while they're happening but I can lower rates after the fact to fix the problem" arena.

BucEyedPea
01-27-2010, 09:28 AM
Bubbles are caused by the rates being too low and monetization of govt debt.

KC native
01-27-2010, 09:34 AM
Bubbles are caused by the rates being too low and monetization of govt debt.

Bubbles can be caused by several things. This is why I think your and idiot. Those obviously aren't the only cause of bubbles as bubbles and busts have existed long before the fed ever came into existence.

wild1
01-27-2010, 09:46 AM
The other factor that I think supports his re-nomination is the specter of Obama choosing a replacement. The devil that we know may not be as bad as that which Obama would set on us as a replacement. I trust Obama less than I trust Bernanke.

That's a good point. We'd certainly get someone even worse if Obama did the choosing.

LOCOChief
01-27-2010, 09:52 AM
So Bush covered up for war crimes and now Lite is covering up for financial crimes. Nice.

:spock: War crimes? If they can be considered "criminal" to bad the current admin is committing them.

memyselfI
01-27-2010, 02:24 PM
:spock: War crimes? If they can be considered "criminal" to bad the current admin is committing them.

Agree. Same shit, different dude.

memyselfI
01-27-2010, 02:26 PM
JFC, you really are a miserable person looking to blame everything on Obama since Hillary lost. I can see why you catch a lot of the shit you have.

FTR this happened in December of 2008 before Obama even took office.

Lite has kept Bernanke, Paulson, and Geithner even though they are inept and surrounded by scandal. He's complicit at this point.