PDA

View Full Version : Obama Moonbattery 101


The Mad Crapper
06-25-2010, 06:30 PM
People are always coming up to me, they say "Hey Mad Crapper, what's a moonbat?" So I decided to start a thread and break it down for you.

The first sign of a moonbat is, a moonbat always reflexively sides with those who attack their own country.

No homework assignment this week, enjoy the weekend.

LOCOChief
06-25-2010, 06:47 PM
Can't be. If it were so kcnative and orange would be attacking mexico, direckshun, kotter, jenson and dave lane would attack iran. Maybe moonbats will side with those whom attack their own country but they do alot of other underhanded, back biting and stupid shit in general as well.

The Mad Crapper
06-25-2010, 07:00 PM
Can't be. If it were so kcnative and orange would be attacking mexico, direckshun, kotter, jenson and dave lane would attack iran. Maybe moonbats will side with those whom attack their own country but they do alot of other underhanded, back biting and stupid shit in general as well.

I said no homework, but here goes...

kc native, ms (thing) direkshun, orange, jenson, Loon et al

are all US citizens.

And they always side against the USA.

Ergo, vis a vis, concordantly---

they are moonbats.

Velvet_Jones
06-26-2010, 09:01 PM
Moonbat: A person that is so far removed from reality that they actually think they can pick a turd up by its clean end.

Direckshun
06-26-2010, 09:10 PM
It's not hard.

We just hate America, white people, and Jesus.

Stick around. You'll catch on.

HonestChieffan
06-26-2010, 10:02 PM
Moonbats always end up needing non moonbats to carry them

Chiefspants
06-26-2010, 10:42 PM
People are always coming up to me, they say "Hey Mad Crapper, what's a moonbat?" So I decided to start a thread and break it down for you.

The first sign of a moonbat is, a moonbat always reflexively sides with those who attack their own country.

No homework assignment this week, enjoy the weekend.

I see you are no longer posting in DC.

teedubya
06-26-2010, 11:46 PM
I see you are no longer posting in DC.

The Mad Crapper is a man of his word, dammit. He is consistent.

Bowser
06-27-2010, 12:41 AM
Smells like sex in here.

Der Flöprer
06-27-2010, 01:04 AM
Smells like sex in here.

And livestock.

ForeverChiefs58
06-27-2010, 08:18 AM
and Bat guano

The Mad Crapper
07-27-2010, 06:52 AM
"If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be? But in fact God has arranged the parts in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be" (1 Corinthians 12: 17-18, NIV).

Comrade Crapski
03-13-2013, 07:35 PM
It's not hard.

We just hate America, white people, and Jesus.

Stick around. You'll catch on.

Yup.

http://www.whiteprivilegeconference.com/

stonedstooge
03-13-2013, 07:53 PM
Yup.

http://www.whiteprivilegeconference.com/

Are angry old white men allowed to attend?

fan4ever
03-13-2013, 10:51 PM
People are always coming up to me, they say "Hey Mad Crapper, what's a moonbat?" So I decided to start a thread and break it down for you.

The first sign of a moonbat is, a moonbat always reflexively sides with those who attack their own country.

No homework assignment this week, enjoy the weekend.

I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.

Comrade Crapski
03-14-2013, 09:22 AM
I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.

I like that. :thumb:

Prison Bitch
03-14-2013, 10:08 AM
It's not hard.

We just hate America, white people, and Jesus.

Stick around. You'll catch on.

You're joking, but sadly that is closer to reality than it is to satire.

Amnorix
03-14-2013, 01:19 PM
I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.


Don't see that as remotely true.

fan4ever
03-14-2013, 01:35 PM
Don't see that as remotely true.

Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

WhiteWhale
03-14-2013, 01:48 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

I don't consider nationalism a good thing, but I won't argue this point.

I'm not proud or ashamed to be an American. It's the country I was born in. I view it the way I view everything... critically.

Of course as a civil libertarian both parties disgust me.

Amnorix
03-14-2013, 01:57 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.


I'm patriotic and love my country, but I've never worn "patriotic apparel". Guess in your book I hate my country.

cosmo20002
03-14-2013, 01:58 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

Wow, that's really all there is to it, isn't it? So what? What if that person is a fucking asshole? Oh, but he's got a flag on his shirt! "Patriotism" means different things to different people, anyway.

Frankly, its a lot like religion--the ones who are the most eager to show everyone how religious they are are the most unbearable to be around.

Amnorix
03-14-2013, 02:09 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

Democrats:

First female 3 star general, Claudia Kennedy.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b6/Claudia_J_Kennedy.jpg/220px-Claudia_J_Kennedy.jpg

1966 West Point valedictorian and 4 star general Wesley Clark.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bf/General_Wesley_Clark_official_photograph%2C_edited.jpg/220px-General_Wesley_Clark_official_photograph%2C_edited.jpg

Dan Inouye, former Senator from Hawaii and Congressional Medal of Honor winner. In this picture you can't see his missing arm -- the one that he lost fighting for the US in WWII.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Daniel_Inouye%2C_official_Senate_photo_portrait%2C_2008.jpg/220px-Daniel_Inouye%2C_official_Senate_photo_portrait%2C_2008.jpg

Henry Shelton, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/General_Henry_Shelton%2C_official_portrait_2.jpg/220px-General_Henry_Shelton%2C_official_portrait_2.jpg

Former SEAL and Congressional Medal of Honor winner Bob Kerrey.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Senator_Bob_Kerrey.jpg

I could keep going, but why bother? Clearly these folks and many more were not likely to be "ashamed of their country".

It's just foolishness. What pisses me off about it, though, is that it paints Democrats as somehow unAmerican, less patriotic, and citizens who aren't as good as Republicans.

Which is complete and utter bullshit.

But when you demonize the enemy, that's when everything grinds to a halt, compromise is impossible, and the perfect becomes the enemy of the good.

KChiefer
03-14-2013, 02:24 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

Or maybe some just understand wearing a red, white, and blue color scheme looks retarded unless you're the Harlem Globetrotters or Miss USA.

Frankie
03-14-2013, 02:25 PM
Has been an absolute constant in my experience.

Try this little experiment; the next time you're in public and see someone wearing patriotic apparel, like a USA lapel-pin or pro USA themed T-shirt, ask them their political affiliation or belief and see how few answer Democrat/liberal.

BTW politicians don't count; even Obama started wearing a flag lapel pin eventually.

Being patriotic is caring about THE PEOPLE of one's country. That's where your little experiment is flawed.

Also not wearing the symbols does not make one unpatriotic much less own-country hater. The second flaw in your experiment.

Frankie
03-14-2013, 02:28 PM
Wow, that's really all there is to it, isn't it? So what? What if that person is a ****ing asshole? Oh, but he's got a flag on his shirt! "Patriotism" means different things to different people, anyway.

Frankly, its a lot like religion--the ones who are the most eager to show everyone how religious they are are the most unbearable to be around.

A truer statement and comparison has never been posted on this forum. :clap:

fan4ever
03-15-2013, 11:34 AM
I think most of you realize what I'm talking about; there are always exceptions, and I never said "hate" their country. For example, in the past few years it's been very accepted of our politicians/representatives to go abroad and speak ill our country/Americans...like Kerry's recent remarks. I don't think that's a "patriotic" thing to do...or even smart.

fan4ever
03-15-2013, 11:35 AM
A truer statement and comparison has never been posted on this forum. :clap:

Nice to have you back Frankie; can't wait for more of your stellar observations. :popcorn:

Comrade Crapski
03-15-2013, 12:05 PM
I'm patriotic and love my country, but I've never worn "patriotic apparel". Guess in your book I hate my country.

He didn't say it's a requirement to wear red, white and blue apparel to be patriotic, he said that people who do will more than likely be conservative/vote r. Which is generally true.

The only time I see moonbats with an American flag, it's upside down or it's on fire.

RedNeckRaider
03-15-2013, 07:48 PM
Nice to have you back Frankie; can't wait for more of your stellar observations. :popcorn:

He is the same one trick pony he has always been. He hides his massive IQ well~

Ace Gunner
03-16-2013, 07:05 AM
Dipshit fascist: a person who believes the bullshit from gov't instead of comparing said bullshit with the USC.

theelusiveeightrop
03-16-2013, 11:15 AM
Inhale the stank.

Frankie
03-19-2013, 12:43 AM
Moonbattery 101

http://img0007.popscreencdn.com/104528969_neat-old-vintage-antique-cast-iron-b-co-7-sad-iron-.jpgE

Loneiguana
03-19-2013, 07:31 AM
I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.

More accurate to say that Conservatives love a country that no longer exists.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2123800-1,00.html

By Fareed Zakaria

One perennial prediction about American elections remains likely to hold this November. The winning party will be the one that is more optimistic about America--even in the midst of a struggling economy. "American civilization, from its beginnings," writes historian Daniel Boorstin, "had combined a dogmatic confidence in the future with a naive puzzlement over what the future might bring."

This confidence has not been confined to one party. Both Republican Theodore Roosevelt and Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt had it, as did John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Optimism in this sense is not a philosophy but more of a temperament, a comfort with the country's eternal potential and a faith in its virtues. Reagan was the quintessential American optimist. He was an ardent conservative who wanted to turn sharply away from the liberalism of the 1960s and '70s. But he was also a man who was clearly at home in the America of the '70s--in Hollywood and in California, the diverse, complex, constantly changing state that he governed from 1967 to 1975.

In the '70s and '80s, to many Americans the Democratic Party seemed more concerned with America's shortcomings than its strengths. Many of its leaders criticized the country relentlessly for its behavior at home and abroad, for its inequities and injustices. The Democrats, Jeane Kirkpatrick said at the Republican Convention in 1984, "always blame America first."

Today it is the Republican Party that often seems angry with America. Read the best-selling books by conservatives these days, watch Fox News or attend a Tea Party rally. They are filled with rage, often combined with a powerful nostalgia for an America that has gone away.

Reagan was said to be three parts optimism and one part nostalgia. Recently, that formula has been inverted. In 1996, Bob Dole gave an astonishing convention speech that attacked those who believed the U.S. had improved over the past decades. "I say you're wrong. And I know because I was there. And I have seen it. And I remember," said Dole. So much for progress on civil rights, women's rights or even toward a more open and meritocratic economy and society.

Nostalgia is now commonplace on the right. Michael Savage, a leading radio commentator, recounts in The Savage Nation a time when he received a tasty recipe for meatballs from a fan, which got him thinking that "back when America was still moral and whole, our meatballs were big, soft and tasty. Today, thanks mainly to the Demoncats, the libs and the Commu-Nazis who rule the courts, America's meatballs are small, hard and tasteless." Who knew that even the food was better in the 1950s!

Anger and nostalgia are at the heart of the Tea Party. In their book The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism, two scholars, Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williamson, use polling data, surveys and interviews to explore the roots of the movement. Skocpol and Williamson describe a segment of the electorate that is in general older, white, religious and deeply troubled by America today. "It's so sad the way the country is now," they quote Bonnie Sims of southeastern Virginia, who then adds that values like hard work, thrift and obedience to the law are no longer taught in the U.S. "You have to select English" for daily transactions, Sims explains to the authors.

The Tea Partyers love America, but it's an America that is an abstraction or a memory. The nation of today--with its many immigrants, liberated women, increasingly liberated gays, myriad government programs, open trade and a Spanish-language option on every phone menu--seems to scare them.

For many conservatives, the rot set in a while ago. Ron Paul and his supporters argue, for instance, that the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 marked the beginning of the fall. Others see the New Deal as deeply illegitimate. For many, the culprit is the social changes ushered in during the 1960s. But these are shifts that have been with us now for 100 or 75 or 40 years. Those shifts broadened opportunities for women and minorities, gave income support to seniors and helped create stable economic growth that has been the envy of the world. At some point, the changes became part of the fabric of the country. Can you love America and hate so much about it?

The Republican Party has an important and powerful economic message for America today. But to sell it, it needs to convince voters that it understands and appreciates today's America.

Loneiguana
03-19-2013, 07:33 AM
I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkym2h4eeH1qzj7epo1_500.png

dirk digler
03-19-2013, 07:40 AM
I've said this in this forum before; the most basic difference between a liberal and a conservative is this; liberals are ashamed of this country despite it's many benefits while conservatives are proud of this country despite it's many problems.

That is fucking retarded

Comrade Crapski
03-19-2013, 08:20 AM
W have only two political parties to choose from, now:

Communist
Vichy Regime

So for people like me who have no representation, TOSIAR (the only solution is another revolution)

Monday, March 18, 2013
Dances with Confused Elephants

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog 2 Comments

The one question I invariably encounter in a conservative movement that tends toward the gray side is how to engage the youth. And the answer is usually nothing that the questioners want to hear.


Now the Republican Party has laid the corpse of the last election on the slab and come up with the expected answers. Some of them are correct, albeit belated. Many others are the sorts of things that the squishy side of the party has been recommending for a while.

The Republican Party has gone from denying that there is a culture war to conceding defeat in the culture war while denying that it ever existed. Its program now is to push aside the socially conservative material and stop frightening off minorities. And that misses the whole point about everything.

The right has its racist elements like the left, but its weakness with minority groups has nothing to do with what the Republican Party is, but with what the Democratic Party says it is. The GOP is taking on responsibility for the things that it never did. That is a bad idea on the best of occasions, but a terrible idea since it only reinforces the exact same image that has attached to it.

The Republican Party doesn't poll poorly with minorities because its party members wear hoods and jump out of cars in minority neighborhoods while shouting "Boo". It polls poorly with minorities because the Democratic Party has built up an extensive infrastructure in minority communities, backed by a national and local media presence.

George W. Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney were not racists, but if you listen to the media and have no opinion of your own, you might get that impression. And if you're a member of a group that experiences racism and your community leaders and role models tell you that they are racist, then you have excellent odds of believing it.

Clarence Thomas, Herman Cain or Ben Carson are not going to fundamentally change that because the problem is not really in the Republican Party. The problem is that the other side has an extensive investment in depicting Republicans as racist and it controls much of the media and academia. Its figureheads also happen to be highly influential in those communities being targeted.

The only way to counter that is to build up an actual working presence in these communities, focused on their middle class and their small businesses, finding common cause where it's possible, and doing something to build up rival community leaders.

And this isn't only true of minorities. Plenty of white communities are in the same boat. They can occasionally be won over, but they have been structurally indoctrinated and organized into seeing the Republican Party as the enemy. That isn't going to change because the Republican Party goes out of its way to announce that it is now friendly.

A non-retarded Republican Party would have spent the Bush Administration seeing that all that money from Washington D.C. is going to friendly organizations, rather than unfriendly ones. The Democratic Party has spent decades doing just that. But that is very doubtfully the GOP plan.

Instead perhaps there will be a series of LDS-style ads featuring minorities who announce proudly, "I am Black and a Republican." And someone will make a lot of RNC money proposing that idea.

That naturally brings us to the youth. A sizable number of them do believe in gay marriage, abortion and a cradle to the grave nanny state complete with free contraception and abortion for all. But for various reasons the Grand Old Party has decided to bend on gay marriage in the hopes of winning over the kids.

Romney didn't actually lose the white youth vote and going for gay marriage will likely alienate young religious voters while failing to attract nearly enough socially liberal/fiscally conservative voters to make up the difference. Not unless Rand Paul is on the ticket and probably not even then. But the GOP still isn't thinking with its head. And like Rob Portman, it's driven as much by personal concerns as by political ones.

The answer that I give when asked about the youth, that no one really wants to hear, is that in many cases they aren't 'gettable'. That doesn't mean that they are permanently off-limits, but that with delayed employment opportunities and delayed maturity, it will take time until they actually share conservative economic and social concerns. That's not true across the board, but it is true of the very voters that the Grand Old Party wants to get its hands on.

Shifting on gay marriage will not make a difference. It will only reinforce the image of the GOP as a dated party that lags behind the Democratic Party's initiatives. And gay marriage does not exist as an individual cause. It is part of a constellation of social causes representing progressive social mores. The idea that gay marriage is a stopping point is laughable. There is no stopping point. That is the whole point.


The left is not interested in gay marriage because it believes in marriage, but because it believes in destroying all existing social institutions. A Republican Party that fails to grasp that has no clue where it is or what it's fighting. It might as well be sent blindfolded into the ring with Muhammad Ali. And that is indeed what has been largely going on. The Republican Party has capitalized on populist backlashes to the left's culture war without really understanding them or believing in them.

The Republican Party can go fiscally conservative and socially liberal and the joke will be on it, because a socially liberal society of broken families and absent values is naturally dependent on the Nanny State. Trying to be fiscal conservatives in a socially liberal society makes as much sense as trying to sell burnt Korans to Mecca.

A socially conservative society can be naturally fiscally conservative, but a socially liberal society is going to reserve its patches of fiscal conservatism for the upper classes. A socially liberal and fiscally conservative party will revisit the old broken Eastern Establishment GOP with a veneer of radicalism that will quickly rub off once the Democratic Party takes its proposals and runs with them.

That brings us back to the youth. If we are to believe the brilliant rebranders of the GOP, then the youth have naturally socially "advanced" on gay marriage. That is of course utter nonsense. The advance has been carefully engineered by the left for its own reasons using popular entertainment and the education system, among other methods. The same process that branded the Republican Party racist led to this amazing social revolution in believing what you see on television to be true.

Gay marriage exists as part of a set of progressive social values. To accept it, you have to accept everything that comes with it... or a year from now you'll be right where you were before you accepted it. And the people moving the agenda forward are not your friends. The places that they are moving the agenda are meant to stagger you and bewilder you. To make you feel like you are losing your own country.

The natural advance theory is a myth. And trying to keep pace with these 'advances' is hopeless because they are managed culture war strikes, not some external process naturally progressing at its own pace.

The same problem exists with the youth vote as with the minority vote. We are not up against a cultural or social misunderstanding, but a deliberate program that has been developing for over a century and that is backed by heavy investment in role models, in entertainment and in ideas. We have not alienated them. They have been alienated from us. The distinction is an important one because it means that we are not in control of the process.

Trying to win by evolving is a lost cause. Trying to repackage conservatism as socially liberal ignores the most basic elements of human psychology and the entire process of youthful rebellion that feeds radicalism. All that's left is to get rid of conservatism, rename the Republican Party the Freedom Party that now stands for everything the Democratic Party stands for except higher taxes and big government and wait for the laughter.

The Republican Party isn't competing with issues. It's competing with schools and comedians. It's competing with the entire messaging apparatus of the left which is extensive, elaborate and pervasive. Imagining that the conservative position will get equal time with their professors and Family Guy because of a shift on gay marriage is the most deluded idea ever. The problem isn't gay marriage, it's the apparatus that's the problem.

Imagine a Republican candidate trying to adopt his liberal opponent's positions in a debate with a one-hour delay. That is how ridiculous the GOP is being. And its leaders should not doubt that even a crowd of voters which gets sizable chunks of its politics from its entertainment will only sneer at them for their hopelessly uncool efforts at trying to fit in.

The GOP leadership wants a quick fix solution. How to Get Minority Voters and Young Voters in 4 Easy Steps. There is no such solution.

The left did not get to where it is with quick fix solutions. It thought in the long term and it acted in the long term. And while we may lack the time and the committed manpower to replicate its tactics, it's absurdly silly to think that its cultural advantages, which include, among other things, control of the education system and your television set, can be negated by turning on a few positions.

This is a war of values. Whatever your beliefs about marriage or any other subject may be, every political struggle is about what we believe about society at large. It is about what we believe other people should believe. The man who believes in the least amount of government imaginable still needs a society that agrees with him and is willing to implement that kind of system or it all comes to nothing.

We are in the middle of a culture war. That doesn't mean our leaders should go around shouting that to the skies, but they should understand what it means. This is not really a struggle over ObamaCare or gay marriage or whether money should be pumped into green energy, agricultural subsidies or foreign aid to Pakistan. It's a battle over what kind of society we should have and what its people should believe and not believe.

You don't win a culture war by opting out. You don't win it by surrendering on most of the points. And you don't win it by pretending it isn't there. If you fail to make an argument, then you lose by default. And then when the polls catch up with you, you chalk up that failure to changing mores and count yourself clever for catching up to the bandwagon of your enemies and then fighting a last stand on the next issue of the day for as long as the polls say that you should.

This is not simply about government. This is about the kind of society that we want to have and the kind of people that we want to be. This isn't about enforcing morality, but it is about recognizing that if we don't have a system of values that we put forward, then we will automatically lose to those who do. And their system of values will have very little room for freedom of speech or any other kind of freedom.

Some people vote for parties, swapping them out like yesterday's laundry. These are the independent voters. Others vote their values and that is as true in Portland as it is in Salt Lake City. Most vote their culture. That tribal sense of where they belong. It is why Jewish support for the Democratic Party is so hard to shake. It is why social conservatives keep voting Republican even when they see little out of it.


If the Republican Party ever starts understanding where its voters are coming from and where the people who aren't its voters are coming, and the entire process that has been tearing apart the country for generations then it might have a shot. But that's not a quick fix. It's not an easy answer. It can't be solved with an online ad campaign full of videos meant to go viral, but not in the way that the people making them think that they will.

The GOP used to understand the culture war, now it doesn't. It would like a unilateral detente. It would like to opt out and just focus on economic reform. And that plan has as good a chance of succeeding as interrupting an exchange of shelling in WW1 to ask if this whole thing can't be settled with a spirited debate. It doesn't work that way.

The real problem is not just that the Republican Party is still shell-shocked from its defeat, but that it has learned very little from that defeat. Despite being beaten by a coalition, it has no real plan for assembling its own coalition. It doesn't really understand its base or the other side's base and it is thinking in urban liberal terms about the future of a conservative party.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2013/03/dances-with-confused-elephants.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews+%28from+NY+to+Israel+Sultan+ Reveals+The+Stories+Behind+the+News%29&utm_content=FaceBook

Comrade Crapski
09-05-2013, 07:52 PM
http://www.cbc.ca/thisisthat/blog/2013/09/03/to-ensure-every-child-wins-ontario-athletic-association-removes-ball-from-soccer/

LiveSteam
09-05-2013, 08:12 PM
lol.

Baby Lee
10-11-2013, 05:52 AM
It's just foolishness. What pisses me off about it, though, is that it paints Democrats as somehow unAmerican, less patriotic, and citizens who aren't as good as Republicans.

Which is complete and utter bullshit.

But when you demonize the enemy, that's when everything grinds to a halt, compromise is impossible, and the perfect becomes the enemy of the good.

When we pledge allegiance to the United States we bind ourselves to that system of government. Anyone who seeks to overthrow or undermine that system is deemed a traitor.

And that's exactly what some Tea Partiers have began sounding like -- traitors to the system, radicals for whom the end they seek justifies whatever means they think necessary to achieve it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/tea-party-republicans-government_b_4080832.html

Amnorix
10-11-2013, 08:02 AM
Yeah, I disagree with Reich as well.